Bioreactor scale-up on rhamnolipid production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa RS6 based on constant impeller tip speed

Abstract

Rhamnolipids (RL) are glycolipid biosurfactants produced by microbes, commonly used in oil recovery and bioremediation. This study investigates the scale-up of RL production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa RS6 using biodiesel side stream waste glycerol as substrate, transitioning from a 1.5 to a 5 L bioreactor under a controlled constant impeller tip speed (V_tip) of 0.882 m s⁻¹. Enhanced gas–liquid mass transfer was achieved in the 5 L system, reflected by a higher volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$k_{L} a$$\end{document}) of 0.032 ± 0.00067 s⁻¹ compared to 0.025 ± 0.00087 s⁻¹ in the 1.5 L bioreactor. Correspondingly, the oxygen transfer rate (OTR) increased from 98.8 to 127.35 mmol L⁻¹ h⁻¹. Both RL yield and productivity increased by approximately 22% and 45%, reaching a final RL concentration of 16.48 ± 0.02 g L⁻¹ and productivity of 0.22 ± 0.11 g L⁻¹ h⁻¹, respectively, in the 5 L bioreactor. Biomass of P. aeruginosa RS6 concentrations remained satisfactory across scales, indicating that shear forces did not compromise cell integrity. An opposite trend was observed in the oxygen uptake rate (OUR), suggesting prolonged oxygen availability and sustained microbial respiration in the 5 L bioreactor, likely driven by effective hydrodynamic control. Notably, produced RL maintained its high quality across both scales, exhibiting emulsification activity, EI₂₄% of 62.38 ± 0.53 and 60.10 ± 0.34 on hydrophobic liquid kerosene and palm cooking oil, respectively. These findings validate constant V_tip as a robust scale-up strategy for RL production, effectively enhancing yield while maintaining microbial cell viability and physiological performance. By demonstrating consistent process behavior between bioreactor scales, this study provides experimental evidence that addresses common scale-up limitations, specifically poor scalability and reproducibility in RL biosurfactant production.

Graphical abstract

Improved gas-liquid mass transfer (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$ k_{L} a$$\end{document}) during scale-up of rhamnolipid production by P. aeruginosa RS6 in a bioreactor system under a constant impeller tip speed.

Keywords

Rhamnolipid / Bioreactor / Scale-up / Volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient / Oxygen transfer rate / Impeller tip speed

References

[1] Tiso T, Thies S, Müller M, et al.. Lee SY, et al.. Rhamnolipids: Production, performance, and application. Consequences of microbial interactions with hydrocarbons, oils and lipids: Production of fuels and chemicals, 2017, Berlin Heidelberg, Springer587622

[2] Clarke KG. Bioprocess scale up. Bioprocess engineering: an introductory engineering and life science approach, 2013Woodhead Publishing171188

[3] Bumphenkiattikul P, Limtrakul S, Vatanatham T, et al.. Heat transfer effect in scaling-up a fluidized bed reactor for propylene polymerization. RSC Adv, 2018, 8: 28293-28312

[4] Chompupun T, Limtrakul S, Vatanatham T, et al.. Experiments, modeling and scaling-up of membrane reactors for hydrogen production via steam methane reforming. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif, 2018, 134: 124-140

[5] Zhou Y, Han L, He H, et al.. Effects of agitation, aeration and temperature on Streptomyces kanasenisi ZX01 and scale-up based on volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient. Mol: J Synth Chem Nat Prod Chem, 2018, 23: 125

[6] Shin WS, Lee D, Kim S, et al.. Application of scale-up criterion of constant oxygen mass transfer coefficient (k_La) for production of itaconic acid in a 50 L pilot-scale fermentor by fungal cells of Aspergillus terreus. J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2013, 23: 1445-1453

[7] Bernemann V, Fitschen J, Leupold M, et al.. Characterization data for the establishment of scale-up and process transfer strategies between stainless steel and single-use bioreactors. Fluids, 2024, 9: 115

[8] Schmidt FR. Optimization and scale up of industrial fermentation processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2005, 68: 425-435

[9] Pérez ER, Suárez JG, Diaz EN, et al.. Scaling-up fermentation of Escherichia coli for production of recombinant P64k protein from Neisseria meningitidis. Electron J Biotechnol, 2018, 33: 29-35

[10] Giavasis I, Harvey LM, McNeil B. The effect of agitation and aeration on the synthesis and molecular weight of gellan in batch cultures of Sphingomonas paucimobilis. Enzyme Microb Technol, 2006, 38: 101-108

[11] Amani H. Application of a dynamic method for the volumetric mass transfer coefficient determination in the scale-up of rhamnolipid biosurfactant production. J Surfactant Deterg, 2018, 21: 827-833

[12] Srivastava VC, Mishra IM, Suresh S. Murray MY. Oxygen mass transfer in bioreactors. Comprehensive Biotechnology, 20112London, Elsevier947956

[13] Zhong JJ, Fujiyama K, Seki T, Yoshida T. A quantitative analysis of shear effects on cell suspension and cell culture of perilla frutescens in bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1994, 44: 649-654

[14] Stephenie W, Kabeir BM, Shuhaimi M, et al.. Influence of pH and impeller tip speed on the cultivation of Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum G4 in a milk-based medium. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng, 2007, 12: 475-483

[15] Li B, Becken U, Sha M. Tackling the challenge of scalability: Fermentation systems for bioprocess scale-up from small to pilot/production. Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News, 2016

[16] Zambry NS, Ayoib A, Md Noh NA, Yahya ARM. Production and partial characterization of biosurfactant produced by Streptomyces sp. R1. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 2017, 40: 1007-1016

[17] López-Giraldo LJ, Amaya H, Alvarez JA, et al.. Ethanol production from soursop leachate: Nitrogen sources and scale-up. Chem Eng Trans, 2024, 110: 115-120

[18] Nordin N, Zakaria MR, Halmi MIE, et al.. Isolation and screening of high efficiency biosurfactant-producing bacteria Pseudomonas sp. Journal of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 1: 25-31

[19] Mahamad SS, Mohamed MS, Radzuan MN, et al.. Optimizing rhamnolipid bio-surfactant production in a bioreactor using waste glycerol. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 2025

[20] Baskaran SM, Mohd Rafein Z, Ahmad Syafiq MAS, et al.. Valorization of biodiesel side stream waste glycerol for rhamnolipids production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa RS6. Environ Pollut, 2021, 276: 116742

[21] Zhang X, Xu D, Zhu C, et al.. Isolation and identification of biosurfactant producing and crude oil degrading Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Chem Eng J, 2012, 209: 138-146

[22] Lawal N, Hair-Bejo M, Arshad SS, et al.. Propagation and molecular characterization of bioreactor adapted very virulent infectious bursal disease virus isolates of Malaysia. J Pathog, 2018, 2018: 1-11

[23] Nur Asshifa MN, Zambry NS, Salwa MS, Yahya ARM. The influence of agitation on oil substrate dispersion and oxygen transfer in Pseudomonas aeruginosa USM-AR2 fermentation producing rhamnolipid in a stirred tank bioreactor. 3 Biotech, 2017, 7: 189

[24] Sabra W, Kim EJ, Zeng AP. Physiological responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 to oxidative stress in controlled microaerobic and aerobic cultures. Microbiology, 2002, 148: 3195-3202

[25] Garcia-Ochoa F, Gomez E. Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: an overview. Biotechnol Adv, 2009, 27: 153-176

[26] Cheng T, Liang J, He J, et al.. A novel rhamnolipid-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa ZS1 isolate derived from petroleum sludge suitable for bioremediation. AMB Express, 2017, 7: 1-14

[27] Benincasa M, Contiero J, Manresa MA, Moraes IO. Rhamnolipid production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa LBI growing on soapstock as the sole carbon source. J Food Eng, 2002, 54: 283-288

[28] Silva FCBB, Rufino RD, et al.. Glycerol as substrate for the production of biosurfactant by Pseudomonas aeruginosa UCP0992. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2010, 79: 174-183

[29] Mouafo TH, Mbawala A, Ndjouenkeu R. Effect of different carbon sources on biosurfactants’ production by three strains of Lactobacillus spp. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 1: 1-15

[30] Garcia-Ochoa F, Gomez E. Flickinger MC. Oxygen transfer rate determination: Chemical, physical and biological methods. Encyclopedia of industrial biotechnology: Bioprocess, Bioseparation, and Cell Technology, 2010, London, Wiley121

[31] Al-Masry WA. Effects of antifoam and scale-up on operation of bioreactors. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif, 1999, 38: 197-201

[32] Liu K, Phillips JR, Sun X, et al.. Investigation and modeling of gas-liquid mass transfer in a sparged and non-sparged continuous stirred tank reactor with potential application in syngas fermentation. Fermentation, 2019, 5: 75

[33] Ali H, Zhu S, Solsvik J. Effects of geometric parameters on volumetric mass transfer coefficient of non-Newtonian fluids in stirred tanks. Int J Chem React Eng, 2022, 20: 697-711

[34] Jamshidzadeh M, Griesz AU, Jensen JW, et al.. CFD-guided scaling of Pseudomonas putida fermentation. Biochem Eng J, 2025, 213: 109549

[35] Stoker EB (2011) Comparative studies on scale-up methods of single-use bioreactors. Utah State University, DigitalCommons@USU.

[36] Uyar B, Ali MD, Uyar GEO. Design parameters comparison of bubble column, airlift and stirred tank photobioreactors for microalgae production. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 2024, 47: 195-209

[37] Wang Z, Guo K, Liu H, et al.. Effects of bubble size on the gas-liquid mass transfer of bubble swarms with Sauter mean diameters of 0.38-4.88 mm in a co-current upflow bubble column. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 2020, 95: 2853-2867

[38] Rodríguez-Torres M, Romo-Buchelly J, Orozco-Sánchez F. Effects of oxygen transfer rate on the L (+) lactic acid production by Rhizopus oryzae NRRL 395 in stirred tank bioreactor. Biochem Eng J, 2022, 187: 108665

[39] Abdella A, Segato F, Wilkins MR. Optimization of process parameters and fermentation strategy for xylanase production in a stirred tank reactor using a mutant Aspergillus nidulans strain. Biotechnol Rep, 2020, 26: e00457

[40] Alvarez-Ortega C, Harwood CS. Responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to low oxygen indicate that growth in the cystic fibrosis lung is by aerobic respiration. Mol Microbiol, 2007, 65: 153-165

[41] Hadjiev D, Sabiri NE, Zanati A. Mixing time in bioreactors under aerated conditions. Biochem Eng J, 2006, 27: 323-330

[42] Kreitmayer D, Gopireddy SR, Aki Y, et al.. Scale-up analysis of geometrically dissimilar single-use bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2023, 120: 3381-3395

[43] Botlagunta M, Rewaria V, Mathi P. Oxygen mass transfer coefficient and power consumption in a conventional stirred-tank bioreactor using different impellers in a non-newtonian fluid: an experimental approach. Iran J Chem Chem Eng, 2022, 41: 533-543

[44] Garcia-Ochoa F, Gomez E, Santos VE, Merchuk JC. Oxygen uptake rate in microbial processes: an overview. Biochem Eng J, 2010, 49: 289-307

[45] Desai JD, Banat IM. Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 1997, 61: 47-64

[46] Zhao F, Shi R, Ma F, et al.. Oxygen effects on rhamnolipids production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microb Cell Fact, 2018, 17: 39

[47] Chatzifragkou A, Papanikolaou S. Effect of impurities in biodiesel-derived waste glycerol on the performance and feasibility of biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2012, 95: 13-27

[48] Haryati T, Haryono NY, Nugraheni D, et al.. Extracellular lipase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa SB-37: production by solid state fermentation, immobilization, and characterization. Bull Chem React Eng Catal, 2024, 19: 710-721

[49] Junker BH. Scale-up methodologies for Escherichia coli and yeast fermentation processes. J Biosci Bioeng, 2004, 97: 347-364

[50] Nienow AW. The impact of fluid dynamic stress in stirred bioreactors – the scale of the biological entity: a personal view. Chem Ing Tech, 2021, 93: 17-30

[51] Arulrajah P, Lievonen AE, Subaşı D, et al.. Scale-down bioreactors-comparative analysis of configurations. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng, 2025, 48: 1619-1635

[52] Ebrahimi M, Tamer M, Villegas RM, et al.. Application of CFD to analyze the hydrodynamic behaviour of a bioreactor with a double impeller. Processes, 2019, 7: 694

[53] Guerra-Santos LH, Käppeli O, Fiechter A. Dependence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa continuous culture biosurfactant production on nutritional and environmental factors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 1986, 24: 443-448

[54] García-Contreras R, Loarca D, Pérez-González C, et al.. Rhamnolipids stabilize quorum sensing mediated cooperation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2020, 367(10fnaa080

[55] Kim J, Agbojo O, Jung S, Croughan M. Measurement of oxygen transfer rate and specific oxygen uptake rate of h-iPSC aggregates in vertical wheel bioreactors to predict maximum cell density before oxygen limitation. Bioengineering, 2025, 12: 332

[56] Delvigne F, Zune Q, Lara AR, et al.. Metabolic variability in bioprocessing: implications of microbial phenotypic heterogeneity. Trends Biotechnol, 2014, 32: 608-616

[57] De Plano LM, Caratozzolo M, Conoci S, et al.. Impact of nutrient starvation on biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an analysis of growth, adhesion, and spatial distribution. Antibiotics, 2024, 13: 987

[58] Hung YHR, Sauvageau D, Bressler DC. An adaptive, continuous substrate feeding strategy based on evolved gas to improve fed-batch ethanol fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2025, 109: 1-11

[59] Fitzpatrick JJ, O’Leary F, Hill A, et al.. Influence of substrate concentrations on the performance of fed-batch and perfusion bioreactors: insights from mathematical modelling. ChemEngineering, 2025, 9: 48

[60] Singh VK, del Jiménez Val I, Glassey J, Kavousi F. Integration approaches to model bioreactor hydrodynamics and cellular kinetics for advancing bioprocess optimisation. Bioengineering, 2024, 11: 546

[61] Lin X, Li K, Wu C, et al.. Advances in modeling analysis for multi-parameter bioreactor process control. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng, 2025, 30: 235-261

[62] Bosch MP, Robert M, Mercade ME, et al.. Surface active compounds on microbial cultures. Tenside, Surfactants, Deterg, 1988, 25: 208-211

[63] Ferreira A, Vecino X, Ferreira D, et al.. Novel cosmetic formulations containing a biosurfactant from Lactobacillus paracasei. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2017, 155: 522-529

[64] Zhou J, Xue R, Liu S, et al.. High di-rhamnolipid production using Pseudomonas aeruginosa KT1115, separation of mono/di-rhamnolipids, and evaluation of their properties. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2019, 7: 245

[65] Ali F, Das S, Hossain TJ, et al.. Production optimization, stability and oil emulsifying potential of biosurfactants from selected bacteria isolated from oil-contaminated sites. R Soc Open Sci, 2021, 8(10211003

[66] Wongsirichot P, Winterburn J. Recent fermentation developments for improved rhamnolipid production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2025, 109: 1-18

Funding

Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi(IF1019E1159)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Jiangnan University