Screening and fermentation optimization of Methylophilus sp. HN238 for efficient microbial protein production using methanol

Aijia Shi , Menghan Chi , Zhen Zhu , Wenqin Bai , Jinling Cai , Limei Chen , Demao Li

Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) : 1050 -1066.

PDF
Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) : 1050 -1066. DOI: 10.1007/s43393-025-00373-0
Original Article
research-article

Screening and fermentation optimization of Methylophilus sp. HN238 for efficient microbial protein production using methanol

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The global demand for large-scale and cost-effective production of high-quality protein has become increasingly urgent, with microbial protein derived from methanol being recognized as a promising solution. Among 50 methylotrophic strains, Methylophilus sp. HN238 was selected for its capability to utilize methanol as the sole carbon. Through optimization of the medium composition, a 387.30% increase in protein yield was achieved during shake-flask fermentation. Subsequent scale-up to a 5 L bioreactor resulted in a protein content of 57.30%. Amino acid composition analysis revealed that 18 amino acids were quantitatively detectable in the protein, with essential amino acids accounting for 44.10% of the total composition, thereby demonstrating compliance with the World Health Organization (WHO) standards for high-quality protein. Transcriptomic differential analysis was conducted to investigate the metabolic response of Methylophilus sp. HN238 to methanol concentrations (10 g/L vs. 50 g/L). It was observed that high methanol concentrations promoted the upregulation of methanol dehydrogenase (MDH) encoded by the maxI gene, while formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FLD) and cytochrome c (cyt c) were downregulated. This regulatory imbalance was associated with intracellular formaldehyde accumulation, impaired electron transport chain efficiency, oxidative stress, and subsequent inhibition of cellular growth. The study not only validated the potential of Methylophilus sp. HN238 for protein production with high methanol concentrations but also provided critical insights into metabolic engineering strategies to enhance methanol-to-biomass conversion efficiency.

Keywords

Methanol / Methylophilus sp. / Microbial protein / Amino acids / Fermentation optimization

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Aijia Shi, Menghan Chi, Zhen Zhu, Wenqin Bai, Jinling Cai, Limei Chen, Demao Li. Screening and fermentation optimization of Methylophilus sp. HN238 for efficient microbial protein production using methanol. Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing, 2025, 5(3): 1050-1066 DOI:10.1007/s43393-025-00373-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

HumpenöderF, PoppA, SchleussnerC-F, OrlovA, WindischMG, MenkeI, PongratzJ, HavermannF, ThieryW, LuoF. Overcoming global inequality is critical for land-based mitigation in line with the paris agreement. Nat Commun, 2022, 137453.

[2]

BolandMJ, RaeAN, VereijkenJM, MeuwissenMPM, FischerARH, Van BoekelMAJS, RutherfurdSM, GruppenH, MoughanPJ, HendriksWH. The future supply of animal-derived protein for human consumption. Trends Food Sci Technol, 2013, 29: 62-73.

[3]

BajićB, VučurovićD, VasićĐ, Jevtić-MučibabićR, DodićS. Biotechnological production of sustainable microbial proteins from agro-industrial residues and by-products. Foods, 2022, 12107.

[4]

SobhiM, ZakariaE, ZhuF, LiuW, AboagyeD, HuX, CuiY, HuoS. Advanced microbial protein technologies are promising for supporting global food-feed supply chains with positive environmental impacts. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 894. 165044

[5]

ZhangW, ZhangT, WuS, WuM, XinF, DongW, MaJ, ZhangM, JiangMJRA. Guidance for engineering of synthetic methylotrophy based on methanol metabolism in methylotrophy. RSC Adv, 2017, 7: 4083-4091.

[6]

DuXL, JiangZ, SuDS, WangJQ. Research progress on the indirect hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to methanol. Chemsuschem, 2016, 9: 322-332.

[7]

SchraderJ, SchillingM, HoltmannD, SellD, FilhoMV, MarxA, VorholtJA. Methanol-based industrial biotechnology: current status and future perspectives of methylotrophic bacteria. Trends Biotechnol, 2009, 27: 107-115.

[8]

TuyishimeP, SinumvayoJP. Novel outlook in engineering synthetic methylotrophs and formatotrophs: a course for advancing C1-based chemicals production. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2020, 36118.

[9]

AntoniewiczMR. Synthetic methylotrophy: strategies to assimilate methanol for growth and chemicals production. COBIOT, 2019, 59: 165-174.

[10]

TlustyM, RhyneA, SzczebakJT, BourqueB, BowenJL, BurrG, MarxCJ, FeinbergL. A transdisciplinary approach to the initial validation of a single-cell protein as an alternative protein source for use in aquafeeds. PeerJ, 2017, 5. e3170

[11]

TibbettsSM, PierceyMJ, PatelakisSJJ, StrattonB. Single-cell protein (SCP) meals from methylovorus menthalis as feed ingredients for freshwater atlantic salmon (SalmoSalar L.): digestibility, growth performance, nutrient utilization, and fish health. Aquaculture, 2025, 598. 741874

[12]

WindassJ, WorseyM, PioliE, PioliD, BarthP, AthertonK, DartE, ByromD, PowellK, SeniorPJN. Improved conversion of methanol to single-cell protein by Methylophilus Methylotrophus. Nat, 1980, 287: 396-401.

[13]

GundupalliMP, AnsariS, da VitalJP, QiuF, AndersonJ, LuckertM, BresslerDC. Bacterial single cell protein (BSCP): a sustainable protein source from methylobacterium species. Trends Food Sci Technol, 2024, 147. 104426

[14]

SarwarA, LeeEY. methanol-based biomanufacturing of fuels and chemicals using native and synthetic methylotrophs. Synth Syst Biotechnol, 2023, 8: 396-415.

[15]

TangC-Y, WangJ, LiuX, ChenJ-B, LiangJ, WangT, SimpsonWR, LiY-L, LiX-Z. Medium optimization for high mycelial soluble protein content of Ophiocordyceps Sinensis using response surface methodology. Front Microbiol, 2022, 131055055.

[16]

ShaoY, LiS, WangY, QiaoP, ZhongW. Transcriptomic data reveals an auxiliary detoxification mechanism that alleviates formaldehyde stress in Methylobacterium sp. Xjlw BMC Genomics, 2024, 251008.

[17]

IshikawaK, Toda-MurakoshiY, OhnishiF, KondoK, OsumiT, AsanoK. Medium composition suitable for L-lysine production by Methylophilus Methylotrophus in fed-batch cultivation. J Biosci Bioeng, 2008, 106: 574-579.

[18]

MadhaiyanM, KimB-Y, PoonguzhaliS, KwonS-W, SongM-H, RyuJ-H, GoS-J, KooB-S, SaT-M. MethylobacteriumOryzae Sp. Nov., an aerobic, pink-pigmented, facultatively methylotrophic, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase-producing bacterium isolated from rice. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 2007, 57: 326-331.

[19]

LiY, ChenL, ChenW, ZhuJ, ChenY, LiD. Transcriptomic analysis of the metabolic regulatory mechanism of Schizochytrium Limacinum B4D1 using sodium acetate to produce DHA. Biochem Eng J, 2023, 197. 108963

[20]

ZhuX, MengC, DuH, ChenL, SunF, ChenW, WeiZ, RenJ, GaoZ, LiD. Enhancement of Astaxanthin production in Schizochytrium Limacinum B4D1 under ethanol induction. Algal Res, 2022, 61. 102537

[21]

TongS, ChenW, HongR, ChaiM, SunY, WangQ, LiD. Efficient mycoprotein production with low CO2 emissions through metabolic engineering and fermentation optimization of Fusarium Venenatum. J Agric Food Chem, 2023, 72: 604-612.

[22]

National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China. National Food Safety Standard: determination of amino acids in foods: GB 5009.124-2016[S]. 2016.

[23]

Ozturk UrekR, IlginS. Production and partial characterization of the exopolysaccharide from Pleurotus Sajor Caju. Ann Microbiol, 2019, 69: 1201-1210.

[24]

JiaFH, ZhouW, YuX, TaoG, YuanY. Determination of crude polysaccharide content in a polysaccharide-rich oral liquid by phenol-sulfuric acid method. Chem Pharma Eng, 2015, 36: 23-25

[25]

GuadalupeZ, Martínez-PinillaO, GarridoÁ, CarrilloJD, AyestaránB. Quantitative determination of wine polysaccharides by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and size exclusion chromatography (Sec). Food Chem, 2012, 131: 367-374.

[26]

SimõesACP, FernandesRP, BarretoMS, da CostaGBM, de GodoyMG, FreireDMG, PereiraNJ. Growth of Methylobacterium Organophilum in methanol for the simultaneous production of single-cell protein and metabolites of Interest. Food Technol Biotechnol, 2022, 60: 338-349.

[27]

YangX, XuM, ZouR, AngelidakiI, ZhangYJ. Microbial protein production from CO2, H2, and recycled nitrogen: focusing on ammonia toxicity and nitrogen sources. J Cleaner Prod, 2021, 291. 125921

[28]

YiH, ZhengT, JiaZ, SuT, WangCJ. Study on the influencing factors and mechanism of calcium carbonate precipitation induced by urease bacteria. J Cryst Growth, 2021, 654. 126113

[29]

DehinwalR, GopinathT, SmithRD, ErnstRK, SchifferliDM, WaldorMK, MarassiFM. A pH-sensitive motif in an outer membrane protein activates bacterial membrane vesicle production. Nat Commun, 2024, 156958.

[30]

BanatIM, Al-AwadhiN, HamdanIY. Physiological characteristics of four methylotrophic bacteria and their potential use in single-cell protein production. MIRCEN J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 1989, 5: 149-159.

[31]

BilliniM, HoffmannT, KühnJ, BremerE, ThanbichlerM. The cytoplasmic phosphate level has a central regulatory role in the phosphate starvation response of Caulobacter Crescentus. Commun Biol, 2024, 7772.

[32]

SunY, CuiS, TangX, MaoB, ZhaoJ, ChenJ. Analysis of growth-limiting factors and optimization of high-density cultivation process for Lactobacillus fermentum. Food Ferment Ind, 2021, 47: 1-10.

[33]

LiR, JinM, DuJ, LiM, ChenS, YangS. The magnesium concentration in yeast extracts is a major determinant affecting ethanol fermentation performance of Zymomonas Mobilis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020, 8957.

[34]

NguyenHN, HuynhU, ZastrowML. Fluorescent protein-based Zn2+ sensors reveal distinct responses of aerobic and anaerobic Escherichia Coli cultures to excess Zn2+. J Biol Chem, 2024, 300107840.

[35]

ChandrangsuP, HelmannJD. Intracellular Zn (II) intoxication leads to dysregulation of the perr regulon resulting in heme toxicity in Bacillus Subtilis. PLoS Genet, 2016, 12. e1006515

[36]

LeT-K, LeeY-J, HanGH, YeomS-J. Methanol dehydrogenases as a key biocatalysts for synthetic methylotrophy. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2021, 92021.

[37]

ZhaoY, WangG, CaoZ, WangY, ChengH, ZhouHM. Effects of Ca2+ on the activity and stability of methanol dehydrogenase. J Protein Chem, 2000, 19: 469-473.

[38]

SunZ, ChengZ, WangJ, KennesC, ChenD, YuJ, ChenJ. Fe (II)/Fe (III) regulated adaptive biofilm responses and microbial metabolic mechanisms for enhanced cycloalkane biodegradation. Chem Eng J, 2024, 500. 157388

[39]

DingX, LiuY, ZhengL, ChangQ, ChenX, XiC. Effect of different iron ratios on interaction and thermodynamic stability of bound whey protein isolate. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad, 2024, 182. 114198

[40]

ØverlandM, TausonA-H, ShearerK, SkredeA. Evaluation of methane-utilising bacteria products as feed ingredients for monogastric animals. Arch Anim Nutr, 2010, 64: 171-189.

[41]

KiesslingA, AskbrandtS. Nutritive value of two bacterial strains of single-cell protein for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss). Aquaculture, 1993, 109: 119-130.

[42]

JonesSW, KarpolA, FriedmanS, MaruBT, TracyBP. Recent advances in single-cell protein use as a feed ingredient in aquaculture. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2020, 61: 189-197.

[43]

BiswasA, TakakuwaF, YamadaS, MatsudaA, SavilleRM, LeBlancA, SilvermanJA, SatoN, TanakaH. Methanotroph (Methylococcus Capsulatus, Bath) bacteria meal as an alternative protein source for Japanese yellowtail. Seriola Quinqueradiata Aquaculture, 2020, 529. 735700

[44]

HeY, QinH, WenJ, WangL, CaoW, FanS, LuW, LiJ, LiC. Characterization of amino acid composition, nutritional value, and taste of fruits from different Actinidia arguta resources. J Food Qual, 2024, 20241005194.

[45]

ChumpolS, KantachoteD, NitodaT, KanzakiH. Administration of purple nonsulfur bacteria as single-cell protein by mixing with shrimp feed to enhance growth, immune response and survival in white shrimp (Litopenaeus Vannamei) cultivation. Aquaculture, 2018, 489: 85-95.

[46]

BraudeR, RhodesDN. Pruteen, a new source of protein for growing pigs. II. Feeding trial: growth rate, feed utilization and carcass and meat quality. Livest Prod Sci, 1977, 4: 91-100.

[47]

WangC, PengY, ZhangY, XuJ, JiangS, WangL, YinY. The biological functions and metabolic pathways of valine in swine. J Anim Sci Biotechnol, 2023, 14135.

[48]

SouthgateG, GoodwinPM. The regulation of exopolysaccharide production and of enzymes involved in C1 assimilation in Methylophilus Methylotrophus. J Gen Microbiol, 1989, 135: 2859-2867.

[49]

LintonJD, WattsPD, NiekusGH. The energetics and kinetics of extracellular polysaccharide production from methanol by micro-organisms possessing different pathways of C1 assimilation. Microbiology, 1986, 132: 779-788.

[50]

LiuQ, HeZ, CaiM. Transcriptome analysis reveals methanol metabolism variations for the growth damage caused by overexpression of chimeric transactivators in Pichia Pastoris. Synth Syst Biotechnol, 2025, 10: 133-139.

[51]

KeltjensJT, PolA, ReimannJ, den CampHJM. PQQ-dependent methanol dehydrogenases: rare-earth elements make a difference. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2014, 98: 6163-6183.

[52]

WuML, WesselsHCT, PolA, CampHJMO, JettenMSM, Van NiftrikL, KeltjensJT. XoxF-type methanol dehydrogenase from the anaerobic methanotroph “Candidatus Methylomirabilis Oxyfera”. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2014, 81: 1442-1451.

[53]

AnthonyC, WilliamsP. The structure and mechanism of methanol dehydrogenase. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2003, 1647: 18-23.

[54]

AnthonyC, GhoshM, BlakeCCF. The structure and function of methanol dehydrogenase and related quinoproteins containing pyrrolo-quinoline quinone. Biochem J, 1994, 304: 665-674.

[55]

AnthonyC, GhoshM. The structure and function of the PQQ-containing quinoprotein dehydrogenases. Prog Biophys Mol Biol, 1998, 69(1): 1-21.

[56]

HüttemannM, PecinaP, RainboltM, SandersonTH, KaganVE, SamavatiL, DoanJW, LeeI. The multiple functions of cytochrome C and their regulation in life and death decisions of the mammalian cell: from respiration to apoptosis. Mitochondrion, 2011, 11: 369-381.

[57]

WakayamaK, YamaguchiS, AkihitoT, TasukuM, OzawaS, TomizukaN, HayakawaT, NakagawaT. Regulation of intracellular formaldehyde toxicity during methanol metabolism of the methylotrophic yeast Pichia Methanolica. J Biosci Bioeng, 2016, 122: 545-549.

[58]

MoonJ, DönigJ, KramerS, PoehleinA, DanielR, MüllerV. Formate metabolism in the acetogenic bacterium acetobacterium woodii. Environ Microbiol, 2021, 23: 4214-4227.

[59]

ChenNH, DjokoKY, McewanAG. Formaldehyde stress responses in bacterial pathogens. Front Microbiol, 2016, 7257.

[60]

KatoN, YurimotoH, ThauerRK. The physiological role of the ribulose monophosphate pathway in bacteria and archaea. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2014, 70: 10-21.

[61]

AttwoodPV. The structure and the mechanism of action of pyruvate carboxylase. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 1995, 27: 231-249.

[62]

ShiL, WangJ, WangX, ZhangY, SongZ, CaiM, ZhouJ. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses reveal global behaviour of a genetically engineered methanol-independent Pichia Pastoris strain. Process Biochem, 2019, 76: 46-54.

[63]

KawanishiM, MatsudaT, YagiT. Genotoxicity of formaldehyde: molecular basis of DNA damage and mutation. Front Environ Sci, 2014, 236.

[64]

SmithDP, ThrashJC, NicoraCD, LiptonMS, Burnum-JohnsonKE, CariniP, SmithRD, GiovannoniSJ. Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of “Candidatus Pelagibacter Ubique” describe the first Pii-independent response to nitrogen limitation in a free-living alphaproteobacterium. MBio, 2013, 4: e00133-e212.

[65]

PietzkeM, Burgos-BarraganG, WitN, Tait-MulderJ, SumptonD, MackayGM, PatelKJ, VazquezA. Amino acid dependent formaldehyde metabolism in mammals. Commun Chem, 2020, 378.

[66]

DharavathS, KumariK, KumarS, GourinathS. Structural and functional studies of serine acetyltransferase isoform from Entamoeba Histolytica reveals novel role of the C-terminal tail in loss of regulation from feedback inhibition. Int J Biol Macromol, 2022, 217: 689-700.

[67]

YuY, YangJ, ZhaoF, LinY, HanS. Comparative transcriptome and metabolome analyses reveal the methanol dissimilation pathway of Pichia Pastoris. BMC Genomics, 2022, 23366.

[68]

WilsonDF. Oxidative phosphorylation: regulation and role in cellular and tissue metabolism. J Physiol, 2017, 595: 7023-7038.

[69]

SchraderM, FahimiHD. Peroxisomes and oxidative stress. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2006, 1763: 1755-1766.

[70]

SeixasAF, QuenderaAP, SousaJP, SilvaAFQ, ArraianoC, AndradeJM. Bacterial response to oxidative stress and RNA oxidation. Front Genet, 2022, 122021.

[71]

DongW, ZouY, ZhaoC, HuangT, JiangW, LiF, WuS. Glutathione-S-transferase regulates oxidative stress in Megalurothrips Usitatus in response to environmental stress. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2025, 208. 106299

[72]

ZhangH, JiaH, XiongP, YaoG, HeM. Transcriptome and enzyme activity analyses of tolerance mechanisms in pearl oyster (Pinctada Fucata) under high-temperature stress. Aquaculture, 2022, 550. 737888

[73]

RahmanMS, RahmanMS. Effects of elevated temperature on prooxidant-antioxidant homeostasis and redox status in the American oyster: signaling pathways of cellular apoptosis during heat stress. Environ Res, 2021, 196. 110428

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Jiangnan University

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

377

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/