PDF
Abstract
Fruit wine is a widely accepted alcoholic beverage, which is favored by consumers because of its unique taste and rich nutrition. Acidity is a key determinant of fruit wine quality, which is closely related to the type and concentration of organic acids present in fruit wine. The optimum level of acidity effectively harmonizes the taste of the fruit wine and prevents deterioration; however, excessive acidity adversely affect the flavor profile. Understanding the common organic acids and deacidification methods in fruit wine has important guiding significance for wine making process. This paper reviews the main organic acids in fruit wine, including tartaric, citric, malic, and lactic acids, and discusses their influence on the sensory properties of fruit wine. Additionally, the traditional deacidification method and biotechnology deacidification method were described in detail, and the advantages and disadvantages of these methods and their practical application in the field of deacidification of fruit wine were evaluated, aiming at providing reference and guidance for the production of high quality fruit wine.
Keywords
Fruit wine
/
Acidity
/
Organic acids
/
Deacidification
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Qingbo Zeng, Shuo Ha, Ming Chen, Chunzhi Zhang, Hua Yang.
Common organic acids in fruit wine and the deacidification strategies.
Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing, 2025, 5(2): 489-499 DOI:10.1007/s43393-025-00333-8
| [1] |
A.OnettoC, CostelloJ, Radka.KolouchovaP, JordansC, Jane.McCarthyA, AtackM. Analysis of Transcriptomic Response to SO2 by Oenococcus oeni growing in continuous culture. Microbiol Spectr, 2021, 92e01154-21.
|
| [2] |
AilingH, LiF, YiQ, YuyangS, YanlinL. Studies on selection and fermentation characteristics of citric acid-degradation yeast. J Chin Inst Food Sci Technol, 2018, 181172-80
|
| [3] |
AsiyeA, EdaÖ, ErdalA, BurcuDK, FilizUT. Changes in quality parameters of orange juice deacidified by ion exchange resins. Food Chem, 2022, 375: 131837.
|
| [4] |
AugagneurY, RittJ-F, LinaresDM, RemizeF, Tourdot-MaréchalR, GarmynD, GuzzoJ. Dual effect of organic acids as a function of external pH in Oenococcus oeni. Arch Microbiol, 2007, 1882147-57.
|
| [5] |
BenitoÁ, CalderónF, BenitoS. The influence of Non-saccharomyces species on Wine Fermentation Quality parameters. Fermentation, 2019, 5354-72.
|
| [6] |
BenitoÁ, CalderónF, PalomeroF, BenitoS. Combine Use of selected Schizosaccharomyces Pombe and Lachancea thermotolerans yeast strains as an alternative to theTraditional Malolactic Fermentation in Red Wine production. Molecules, 2015, 2069510-23.
|
| [7] |
BenitoS. The impacts of Schizosaccharomyces on winemaking. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2019, 103114291-312.
|
| [8] |
BergentallMK, NiimiJ, PerssonI, CalmetE, AsD, PlovieA, MalafronteL, MelinP. Malolactic fermentation in lingonberry juice and its use as a preservative. Food Microbiol, 2024, 121: 104500.
|
| [9] |
BetteridgeA, GrbinP, JiranekV. Improving Oenococcus oeni to overcome challenges of wine malolactic fermentation. Trends Biotechnol, 2015, 339547-53.
|
| [10] |
BlankLM, SauerU. TCA cycle activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a function of the environmentally determined specific growth and glucose uptake rates. Microbiology, 2004, 15041085-93.
|
| [11] |
BidartBM, CamarasaF. Metabolic analysis of S. Cerevisiae strains engineered for malolactic fermentation. FEBS Lett, 1997, 410: 452-6.
|
| [12] |
BoroskiM, CruPiP, TaMBorraP, AnTonacciD, TociAT. Influence of winemaking techniques with low sulphur dioxide on wine varieties Chardonnay, Pinot and Montepulciano. J Food Nutr Res, 2017, 564326-34
|
| [13] |
CapozziV, TufarielloM, SimoneND, MariagiovannaF, GriecoF. Biodiversity of Oenological Lactic acid Bacteria: species- and strain-dependent Plus/Minus effects on Wine Quality and Safety. Fermentation, 2021, 7124-41.
|
| [14] |
ChenJ, KremerB. The Effect of Wine Deacidification with different methods. Sino-Overseas Grapevine Wine, 2001, 3317-20
|
| [15] |
CianiM, ComitiniF. Non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts have a promising role in biotechnological approaches to winemaking. Ann Microbiol, 2010, 61125-32.
|
| [16] |
CianiM, ComitiniF, MannazzuI, DomizioP. Controlled mixed culture fermentation: a new perspective on the use of non-saccharomyces yeasts in winemaking. FEMS Yeast Res, 2010, 102123-33.
|
| [17] |
Cioch-SkonecznyM, GrabowskiM, SatoraP, SkonecznyS, KlimczakK. The use of yeast mixed cultures for deacidification and improvement of the composition of cold climate grape wines. Molecules, 2021, 2692628-45.
|
| [18] |
CostantiniA, RantsiouK, MajumderA, JacobsenS, PessioneE, SvenssonB, Garcia-MorunoE, CocolinL. Complementing DIGE proteomics and DNA subarray analyses to shed light on Oenococcus oeni adaptation to ethanol in wine-simulated conditions. J Proteom, 2015, 123: 114-27.
|
| [19] |
DanilewiczJC. Role of tartaric and malic acids in wine oxidation. J Agric Food Chem, 2014, 62225149-55.
|
| [20] |
Drumonde-NevesJ, FernandesT, LimaT, PaisC, Franco-DuarteR. Learning from 80 years of studies: a comprehensive catalogue of non-saccharomycesyeasts associated with viticulture and winemaking. FEMS Yeast Res, 2021, 213foab017.
|
| [21] |
GardoniE, BenitoS, ScansaniS, BrezinaS. Biological deacidification strategies for white wines. S Afr J Enol Vitic, 2021, 422114-22
|
| [22] |
GaoM, ZengX, ChenY. Selecting of resins for deacidification of Plum Wine by Ion Exchange. food Ferment Industries, 2009, 3566-9
|
| [23] |
GengK, LinY, ZhengX, LiC, ChenS, LingH, YangJ, ZhuX, LiangS. Enhanced expression of Alcohol dehydrogenase I in Pichia pastoris reduces the content of Acetaldehyde in wines. Microorganisms, 2023, 12138-54.
|
| [24] |
GuiseR, Filipe-RibeiroL, NascimentoD, BessaO, NunesFM, CosmeF. Comparison between different types of carboxylmethylcellulose and other oenological additives used for white wine tartaric stabilization. Food Chem, 2014, 156: 250-7.
|
| [25] |
HongSK, LeeHJ, ParkHJ, HongYA, RheeIK, LeeWH, ChoiSW, LeeOS, ParkHD. Degradation of malic acid in wine by immobilized Issatchenkia orientalis cells with oriental oak charcoal and alginate. Lett Appl Microbiol, 2010, 505522-9.
|
| [26] |
JiangY, LuoT, TangY, ChenS, NiH, ChenQ, SongX, BaoY, DengZ, WangJ. Isolation of a novel characterized Issatchenkia terricola from red raspberry fruits on the degradation of citric acid and enrichment of flavonoid and volatile profiles in fermented red raspberry juice. Food Sci Hum Wellness, 2022, 1141018-27.
|
| [27] |
JingfeiG, RupasingheHPV, NancyLP. Characterisation of malolactic conversion by Oenococcus oeni to reduce the acidity of apple juice. Int J Food Sci Technol, 2013, 4851018-27.
|
| [28] |
KimC, JeonJ, KangJ, ChoiH, YeoS, JeongS. Characteristics of Gaeryangmerou Wine deacidified by Calcium Carbonate. J East Asian Soc Diet Life, 2016, 266559-64.
|
| [29] |
KongC, LiA, SuJ, WangX, ChenC, TaoY. Flavor modification of dry red wine from Chinese spine grape by mixed fermentation with Pichia fermentans and S. Cerevisiae. LWT - Food Sci Technol, 2019, 109: 83-92.
|
| [30] |
KossevaMR, KennedyJF. Encapsulated lactic acid Bacteria for Control of Malolactic Fermentation in wine. Artif Cells Blood Substit Biotechnol, 2009, 32155-65.
|
| [31] |
LabarreC, DivieC, GuzzoJ. Genetic organization of the mle locus and identification of a mler-like gene from Leuconostoc oenos. Applled Environ Microbiol, 1994, 62124493-8.
|
| [32] |
Li J, Zhang C, Liu H, Liu J, Jiao Z. (2020). Profiles of Sugar and Organic Acid of Fruit Juices: A Comparative Study and Implication for Authentication. Journal of Food Quality. 2020(1): 1–11.
|
| [33] |
LiL, XiaoyunM, QiurongW, XutongL, YanK, LinjunJ, AnjunC. Effect of different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains on the quality of Prunus salicina Lindl.c.v.Cuihongli wine. Food Ferment Industries, 2020, 4620127-34
|
| [34] |
LiM, SuJ, YangH, FengL, WangM, XuG, ShaoJ, MaC. Grape Tartaric Acid: Chemistry, function, metabolism, and Regulation. Horticulturae, 2023, 9111173-92.
|
| [35] |
LiN, WeiY, LiX, WangJ, ZhouJ, WangJ. Optimization of deacidification for concentrated grape juice. Food Sci Nutr, 2019, 762050-8.
|
| [36] |
LiuH, WuB, FanP, XuH, LiS. Inheritance of sugars and acids in berries of grape (Vitis vinifera L). Euphytica, 2006, 153: 99-107.
|
| [37] |
Liu W, Fan M, Sun S, Li H. (2020). Effect of mixed fermentation by Torulaspora delbrueckii, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Lactobacillus plantarum on the sensory quality of black raspberry wines. European Food Research and Technology. 246(8): 1573–1581.
|
| [38] |
LiuY, DengL, TaoR. Screening and identification of yeast degrading malic acid. Food Scinece Technol, 2020, 4538-12
|
| [39] |
LytraG, MiotSertierC, MoineV, CoulonJ, BarbeJ. Influence of must yeast-assimilable nitrogen content on fruity aroma variation during malolactic fermentation in red wine. Food Res Int, 2020, 135: 109294.
|
| [40] |
MatoI, Suárez-LuqueS, HuidobroJF. A review of the analytical methods to determine organic acids in grape juices and wines. Food Res Int, 2005, 38101175-88.
|
| [41] |
MazzuccoMB, RodríguezME, Catalina CaballeroA, Ariel LopesC. Differential consumption of malic acid and fructose in apple musts by Pichia kudriavzevii strains. J Appl Microbiol, 2024, 1352lxae019.
|
| [42] |
NikhanjP, KocherGS. Optimization of malolactic fermentation parameters with isolated and characterized lactic acid bacteria associated with grape berries. J Food Process Preserv, 2020, 4412e14905.
|
| [43] |
OlguínN, Champomier-VergèsM, AngladeP, BaraigeF, Cordero-OteroR, BordonsA, ZagorecM, ReguantC. Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of Oenococcus oeni PSU-1 response to ethanol shock. Food Microbiol, 2015, 51: 87-95.
|
| [44] |
ParamithiotisS, StasinouV, TzamouraniA, KotseridisY, DimopoulouM. Malolactic fermentation—theoretical advances and practical considerations. Fermentation, 2022, 810521-42.
|
| [45] |
Pedro.MIC, García-RomeroE, Heras MansoJM, Fernández-GonzálezM. Influence of sequential inoculation of Wickerhamomyces Anomalus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the quality of red wines. Eur Food Res Technol, 2014, 2392279-86.
|
| [46] |
PelletierS, SerreÉ, MikhaylinS, BazinetL. Optimization of cranberry juice deacidification by electrodialysis with bipolar membrane: impact of pulsed electric field conditions. Sep Purif Technol, 2017, 186: 106-16.
|
| [47] |
PortaroL, MaioliF, CanutiV, PicchiM, LencioniL, MannazzuI, DomizioP. Schizosaccharomyces japonicus/Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed starter cultnews: New perspectives for the improvemesangioveseiovese aroma, taste, and color stability. Lwt, 2022, 156: 113009-18.
|
| [48] |
QiuS, ChenK, LiuC, WangY, ChenT, YanG, LiJ. Non-Saccharomyces yeasts highly contribute to characterisation of flavour profiles in greengage fermentation. Food Res Int, 2022, 157: 111391-402.
|
| [49] |
RozoyE, BoudesocqueL, BazinetL. Deacidification of Cranberry Juice by Electrodialysis with bipolar membranes. J Agric Food Chem, 2015, 632642-51.
|
| [50] |
SamarasekaraD, HillC, MlsnaD. Analysis and identification of major Organic acids in wine and Fruit juices by Paper Chromatography. J Chem Educ, 2018, 9591621-5.
|
| [51] |
ShangY, ZengY, ZhuP, ZhongQ. Acetate metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeat different temperatures during lychee wine fermentation. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip, 2016, 303512-20.
|
| [52] |
SuD, YingZ, JingZ, WeiZ, YingY, JingxiG, LixiaP, WeiL. Enhanced deacidification activity in Schizosaccharomyces Pombe by genome shuffling. Yeast, 2014, 322317-25
|
| [53] |
TofaloR, BattistelliN, PerpetuiniG, ValbonettiL, RossettiAP, PerlaC, ZulliC, ArfelliG. Oenococcus oeni Lifemodulatesulates Wine Volatilome and Malolactic Fermentation Outcome. Front Microbiol, 2021, 12: 736789.
|
| [54] |
ToitMd, EngelbrechtL, LermE, Krieger-WeberS. Lactobacillus: the next generation of malolactic fermentation starter cultures—an overview. Food Bioprocess Technol, 2010, 46876-906.
|
| [55] |
TsegayZT. Total titratable acidity and organic acids of wines produced from cactus pear (Opuntia-ficus‐indica) fruit and Lantana camara (L. Camara) fruit blended fermentation process employed response surface optimization. Food Sci Nutr, 2020, 884449-62.
|
| [56] |
Ferreira V, Campo AEE, Cacho J. (2007). Flavour of wines towards an understanding by reconstitution experiments and an analysis of ethanol’s effect on odour activity of key compounds. Thirteenth Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference.
|
| [57] |
VeraE, RualesJ, DornierM, SandeauxJ, PersinF, PourcellyG, VaillantF, ReynesM. Comparison of different methods for deacidification of clarified passion fruit juice. J Food Eng, 2003, 594361-7.
|
| [58] |
VeraE, SandeauxJ, PersinF, PourcellyG, DornierM, RualesJ. Deacidification of passion fruit juice by electrodialysis with bipolar membrane after different pretreatments. J Food Eng, 2009, 90167-73.
|
| [59] |
VilelaA. Use of Nonconventional yeasts for modulating wine acidity. Fermentation, 2019, 5127-42.
|
| [60] |
VilelaA, SchullerD, Mendes-FaiaA, Côrte-RealM. Reduction of volatile acidity of acidic wines by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2013, 97114991-5000.
|
| [61] |
VirdisC, SumbyK, BartowskyE, JiranekV. Lactic acid Bacteria in wine: Technological advances and evaluation of their functional role. Front Microbiol, 2021, 11: 612118.
|
| [62] |
VolschenkH, van VuurenHJJ, Viljoen–BloomM. Malo-ethanolic fermentation in Saccharomyces and Schizosaccharomyces. Curr Genet, 2003, 436379-91.
|
| [63] |
VolschenkH, Viljoen-BloomM, SubdenRE, van VuurenHJJ. Malo‐ethanolic fermentation in grape must by recombinant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast, 2001, 1810963-70.
|
| [64] |
WangH, PengM, YangS, CaiG, LuJ, YangH. Study on breeding and fermentation characteristics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Malus Asiatica wine. Eur Food Res Technol, 2024, 25051389-400.
|
| [65] |
WangX, LiuX, LongJ, ShenK, QiuS, WangY, HuangY. Isolation, screening, and application of aroma-producing yeast for red dragon fruit wine. Food Bioscience, 2024, 59: 103878.
|
| [66] |
YıldırımHK, AltındışliA. Changes of phenolic acids during aging of Organic wines. Int J Food Prop, 2015, 1851038-45.
|
| [67] |
YingW, JianzhongZ. Analysis the influence factors and optimization the deacidification conditions of the L-malic acid degradation capability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Food Sci Biotechnol, 2018, 37101673-89
|
| [68] |
ZhangF, PuB, LiuX. Study on the deacidification of Kiwi wine. Sci Technol Food Ind, 2014, 3518207-10
|
| [69] |
ZhangZ, LiJ, FanL, DuanZ. Effect of organic acid on cyanidin-3-O-glucoside oxidation mediated by iron in model Chinese bayberry wine. Food Chem, 2020, 310: 125980.
|
| [70] |
ZhaoQ, GuorongD, ShengnanW, PengtaoZ, XiaomengC, ChenyaqiongC, HuiL, YawenX, XiaoyuW. Investigating the role of tartaric acid in wine astringency. Food Chem, 2023, 403: 134385.
|
| [71] |
ZhongW, ChenT, YangH, LiE. Isolation and selection of Non-saccharomyces yeasts being capable of degrading citric acid and evaluation its Effect on Kiwifruit Wine Fermentation. Fermentation, 2020, 6125-40.
|
| [72] |
ZhongW, LiX, YangH, LiE. A novel, effective, and feasible method for deacidifying kiwifruit wine by weakly basic ion exchange resins. J Food Process Eng, 2018, 422e12969.
|
| [73] |
ZhugeQ, GuilanS, GuangaoZ, YongzhengZ, PubingG. Study on two different acid lowering methods for kiwifruit wine. Liquor-Making Sci Technol, 2005, 129: 61-4
|
Funding
Liaoning Provincial University Basic Scientific Research Fund Project (LJ212410152025)
Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province(2024-MS-171)
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Jiangnan University