Cellulase production using a combination of carrot peel and corn husk (tusa) residues under solid-state fermentation
Vanny Mora-Villalobos, Marcy González-Vargas, Carolina Cortés-Herrera, Carmela Velázquez-Carrillo, María E. Koschny, Natalia Barboza
Cellulase production using a combination of carrot peel and corn husk (tusa) residues under solid-state fermentation
Agricultural wastes are characterized by bioactive compounds that can be used to produce different byproducts, including enzymes, which are obtained through solid state fermentation (SSF). The goal of this study was to evaluate the initial pH and moisture conditions of a substrate composed of carrot peels and corn husk residues (tusa) by SSF to obtain cellulase enzymes. Carrot and corn wastes were characterized to determine their physicochemical properties, confirming their suitability for the fermentation process. It was found that endoglucanase enzyme activity increased with time and was favored at a humidity of 75% and a pH of 5.2, reaching values above 300 U/mg protein. However, no significant trends were observed in exocellulase activity related to the study´s factors. Although the use of agro-industrial wastes to obtain high-value molecules has been widely studied, combining carrot and corn wastes as a substrate for cellulase production using Cladosporium sp. _V3 (GenBank No. PP931187) isolated from pineapple wastes has been poorly characterized.
[1.] |
|
[2.] |
Biswal D, Mandavgane SA. Biomass waste: a potential feedstock for cellulase production. Curr Status Future Scope Microb Cellulases. 2021;347–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821882-2.00017-X.
|
[3.] |
|
[4.] |
Chilakamarry CR, Mimi Sakinah AM, Zularisam AW, Sirohi R, Khilji IA, Ahmad N, et al. Advances in solid-state fermentation for bioconversion of agricultural wastes to value-added products: opportunities and challenges. Bioresour Technol. 2022;343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126065.
|
[5.] |
|
[6.] |
|
[7.] |
|
[8.] |
|
[9.] |
Sharma A, Tewari R, Rana SS, Soni R, Soni SK, Cellulases. Classification, Methods of Determination and Industrial Applications. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2016 179:8 2016;179:1346–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12010-016-2070-3
|
[10.] |
|
[11.] |
Santos GB, De Sousa A, Filho F, Rêgo J, Rodrigues S, Rodrigues De Souza R. Cellulase production by Aspergillus Niger using urban lignocellulosic waste as substrate: evaluation of different cultivation strategies. J Environ Manage. 2022;305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114431.
|
[12.] |
|
[13.] |
|
[14.] |
Singhania RR, Adsul M, Pandey A, Patel AK. Cellulases. Current developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering: production, isolation and purification of Industrial products. Elsevier; 2017. pp. 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63662-1.00004-X.
|
[15.] |
|
[16.] |
|
[17.] |
|
[18.] |
|
[19.] |
|
[20.] |
|
[21.] |
Srivastava N, Manikanta · A, Mishra · PK, Upadhyay · SN, Srivastava M, Ramteke PW et al. Fungal Cellulases Prod Biodegradation Agric Waste 2018:75–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7146-1_4
|
[22.] |
|
[23.] |
Florencio C, Couri S, Farinas CS. Correlation between agar plate screening and solid-state fermentation for the prediction of cellulase production by Trichoderma strains. Enzyme Res. 2012;2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/793708
|
[24.] |
Mongeau R, Brassard R. Determination of Neutral Deteigent Fiber in Breakfast cereals: Pentose, Hemicellulose, Cellulose and Lignin Content. J Food Sci 1982;47.
|
[25.] |
|
[26.] |
|
[27.] |
Kanwal Malik S, Mukhtar H, Farooqi AA, And I-U-H. Optimization of process parameters for the biosynthesis of cellulases by Trichoderma Viride. Pak J Bot. 2010;42:4243–51.
|
[28.] |
Macarron R. Purificación y caracterización de endoglucanasa III de Trichoderma reesei QM9414. 1992.
|
[29.] |
|
[30.] |
Suesca Adriana. Producción De Enzimas celulolíticas a partir de cultivos de Trichoderma sp. con biomasa lignocelulósica. Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2012.
|
[31.] |
|
[32.] |
|
[33.] |
|
[34.] |
Zhai R, Hu J, Saddler JN. What are the Major Components in Steam Pretreated Lignocellulosic Biomass that inhibit the efficacy of Cellulase Enzyme Mixtures? 2016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00481
|
[35.] |
Frisvad JC. Taxonomy, chemodiversity and chemoconsistency of aspergillus, penicillium and talaromyces species. Front Microbiol. 2014;5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00773.
|
[36.] |
Ghosh S, Godoy L, Yongabi Anchang K, Achilonu CC, Gryzenhout M. Fungal cellulases: Current Research and Future challenges. In: Ahmed M, Abdel-Azeem AN, Yadav N, Minaxi Y Sharma, editors. Industrially important Fungi for Sustainable Development. Springer Nature; 2021.
|
[37.] |
|
[38.] |
|
[39.] |
|
[40.] |
|
[41.] |
|
[42.] |
|
[43.] |
|
[44.] |
Šelo G, Planinić M, Tišma M, Tomas S, Koceva Komlenić D, Bucić-Kojić A. A comprehensive review on valorization of agro-food industrial residues by solid-state fermentation. Foods. 2021;10. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10050927.
|
[45.] |
|
[46.] |
|
[47.] |
|
[48.] |
|
[49.] |
Vandenberghe LPS, Pandey · Ashok, Carvalho JC, Luiz ·, Letti AJ, Woiciechowski AL et al. Solid-state fermentation technology and innovation for the production of agricultural and animal feed bioproducts 2021;1:142–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43393-020-00015-7
|
[50.] |
Marzo C, Belén Díaz A, Caro I, Blandino A. Conversion of exhausted Sugar Beet Pulp into Fermentable sugars from a Biorefinery Approach. Foods. 2020;9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101351.
|
[51.] |
|
[52.] |
Grzyb A, Wolna-Maruwka A, Niewiadomska A. The significance of microbial transformation of nitrogen compounds in the light of integrated crop management. Agronomy. 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071415.
|
[53.] |
|
[54.] |
|
[55.] |
|
[56.] |
Zeng R, Yin X-Y, Ruan T, Hu Q, Hou Y-L, Zuo Z-Y, et al. A Novel Cellulase produced by a newly isolated Trichoderma virens. Bioengineering. 2016;3. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering3020013.
|
[57.] |
|
[58.] |
|
[59.] |
|
[60.] |
|
[61.] |
|
[62.] |
|
[63.] |
|
[64.] |
|
[65.] |
Yuan Y, Jiang B, Chen H, Wu W, Wu S, Jin Y, et al. Recent advances in understanding the effects of lignin structural characteristics on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-02054-1.
|
[66.] |
|
[67.] |
|
[68.] |
Sanjay SS, Shukla AK. Mechanism of antioxidant activity. Potential therapeutic applications of Nano-antioxidants. Springer Nature; 2021. pp. 1–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1143-8.
|
[69.] |
|
[70.] |
|
[71.] |
Carranco Jáuregui ME. Calvo Carrillo Ma De La C, Pérez-Gil Romo F. Carotenoides Y Su función Antioxidante: Revisión. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2011;61(3):233.
|
[72.] |
Shree Nagraj G, Jaiswal S, Harper N, Jaiswal AK. Carrot. In: Jaiswal AK, editor. Nutritional composition and antioxidant properties of fruits and vegetables. Academic; 2020. pp. 323–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812780-3.00020-9.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |