Strain improvement for cellulolytic enzymes for effective saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass by mutant of Penicillium funiculosum NCIM 1228
Lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) generated from various agro-waste can be effectively used to manufacture a broad range of value-added products cost-effectively. However, the high cost of cellulases is still a major challenge in producing biofuels and biochemicals from LCB on an industrial scale. The enzyme output and activity of cellulase in the fermentation broth are closely linked in terms of enzyme manufacturing costs. Therefore, research on efficient fermentation processes of hyperactive fungi, and cost-effective recovery systems have been directed toward lowering enzyme costs and increasing overall enzyme production. Penicillium funiculosum NCIM 1228 (P. funiculosum NCIM 1228) is a feasible cellulase-producing strain that possesses all four enzymes required to efficiently hydrolyse LCB. The primary objective of this study was to employ random mutagenesis to increase enzymes titer, yield, and productivity. The potential mutant D4 (derived by Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutation) exhibited 6.47, 3.05, 3.03, and 3.19-fold higher activities of FPase, CMCase, β-glucosidase, and xylanase, respectively, compared to the parent strain. Mutant D4 demonstrated a promising protein titer of 17.96 g/L at the 40 L fermenter scale, with productivities of 479, 4249, and 6987 U/L/day for FPase, CMCase, and Xylanase, respectively, on the tenth day. Interestingly, the crude form of enzymes from the mutant demonstrated promising saccharification, releasing 3.54% of glucose and achieving a 54.03% of cellulose conversion efficiency without formulation. In comparison, a commercially formulated enzyme exhibited 53.07% efficiency against pre-treated sugarcane bagasse, indicating its promising potential for future applications.
Lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) / Xylanase / CMCase / Cellulase / Penicillium funiculosum (P. Funiculosum) / Submerged fermentation (SmF)
1. | |
2. | |
3. | Sarsaiya S, Jain A, Kumar Awasthi S, et al. Microbial dynamics for lignocellulosic waste bioconversion and its importance with modern circular economy, challenges and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2019;291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121905. |
4. | |
5. | |
6. | Zabidi NAM, Foo HL, Loh TC, et al. Enhancement of versatile extracellular cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzyme productions by Lactobacillus plantarum RI 11 isolated from Malaysian food using renewable natural polymers. Molecules. 2020;25. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112607. |
7. | |
8. | Chavan S, Shete A, Mirza Y, Dharne MS. Investigation of cold-active and mesophilic cellulases: opportunities awaited. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2021;1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02047-y. |
9. | |
10. | |
11. | Peng ZQ, Li C, Lin Y et al. (2021) Cellulase production and efficient saccharification of biomass by a new mutant Trichoderma Afroharzianum MEA-12. Biotechnol Biofuels 14:. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13068-021-02072-Z. |
12. | |
13. | Taylor LE, Knott BC, Baker JO, et al. Engineering enhanced cellobiohydrolase activity. Nat Commun. 2018;9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03501-8. |
14. | |
15. | Chavan SB, Shete AM, Dharne MS. (2023) Bioprocess Optimization of Penicillium funiculosum NCIM 1228 for Improved Production and Hydrolytic Efficiency of Cellulases on Sugarcane Bagasse. Sugar Tech 2023 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12355-023-01324-6. |
16. | |
17. | |
18. | Ye Y, Li X, Cao Y, et al. A Β-xylosidase hyper-production Penicillium Oxalicum mutant enhanced ethanol production from alkali-pretreated corn stover. Bioresour Technol. 2017;245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.155. |
19. | Prasanna HN, Ramanjaneyulu G, Reddy BR. (2016) Optimization of cellulase production by Penicillium Sp. 3 Biotech 6:. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13205-016-0483-X. |
20. | |
21. | Zhang X, Li Y, Zhao X, Bai F. Constitutive cellulase production from glucose using the recombinant Trichoderma reesei strain overexpressing an artificial transcription activator. Bioresour Technol. 2017;223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.083. |
22. | |
23. | |
24. | |
25. | Mahmoud M, El-zyat S, El-sayed M. (2018) Cellulolytic activity of cellulose-decomposing fungi isolated from Aswan hot desert soil, Egypt. |
26. | Venkatachalam M, Shum-Chéong-sing A, Dufossé L, Fouillaud M. (2020) Statistical Optimization of the Physico-Chemical Parameters for Pigment Production in Submerged Fermentation of Talaromyces albobiverticillius 30548. Microorganisms 2020, Vol 8, Page 711 8:711. https://doi.org/10.3390/MICROORGANISMS8050711. |
27. | |
28. | |
29. | |
30. | |
31. | |
32. | |
33. | |
34. | |
35. | |
36. | Ribeiro O, Magalh?es F, Aguiar TQ, et al. Random and direct mutagenesis to enhance protein secretion in Ashbya Gossypii. Bioengineered. 2013;4. https://doi.org/10.4161/bioe.24653. |
37. | Paula CCPD, Montoya QV, Meirelles LA, et al. High cellulolytic activities in filamentous fungi isolated from an extreme oligotrophic subterranean environment (Cat?o cave) in Brazil. Acad Bras Cienc. 2019;91. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201920180583. |
38. | |
39. | |
40. | |
41. | |
42. | |
43. | |
44. | |
45. | |
46. | Yousaf M, Irfan M, Khokhar Z et al. (2010) Enhanced production of protease by mutagenized strain of Aspergillus Oryzae in solid substrate fermentation of Rice Bran. 22:119–23. |
47. | De Carvalho A, Carvalho ML, De Barros Gomes DF et al. E, (2014) Optimisation of cellulase production by Penicillium funiculosum in a stirred tank bioreactor using multivariate response surface analysis. Enzyme Res 2014:. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/703291. |
48. | |
49. | |
50. | |
51. | McGregor NGS, de Boer C, Santos M et al. (2022) Activity-based protein profiling reveals dynamic substrate-specific cellulase secretion by saprotrophic basidiomycetes. |
52. | |
53. | |
54. | |
55. |
/
〈 | 〉 |