A comparative study on pretreatment of rice straw and saccharification by commercial and isolated cellulase–xylanase cocktails towards enhanced bioethanol production

Manish Paul1,6, Gireesh Kumar Shroti2, Sonali Mohapatra3, Pradeep Kumar DasMohapatra4,5, Hrudayanath Thatoi1,7,e()

Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 731-749. DOI: 10.1007/s43393-023-00228-6
Original Article

A comparative study on pretreatment of rice straw and saccharification by commercial and isolated cellulase–xylanase cocktails towards enhanced bioethanol production

  • Manish Paul1,6, Gireesh Kumar Shroti2, Sonali Mohapatra3, Pradeep Kumar DasMohapatra4,5, Hrudayanath Thatoi1,7,e()
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The aim of this work was to study the efficiency of native lignocellulolytic enzymes obtained from isolated bacteria towards enhanced bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass. Maximum cellulose (199.33 ± 0.2 mg/g) and hemicellulose (62.21 ± 0.22 mg/g) content was measured from rice straw in alkali condition compared to acid and biological pretreatment, while significant lignin removal has been observed in biological pretreatment. Saccharification of rice straw using isolated cellulase–xylanase enzymes exhibited 60.33% production of total reducing sugar obtained by commercial cellulase–xylanase cocktail. Maximum glucose, xylose, and total reducing sugar yield of 309 ± 0.32, 190.7 ± 0.42, and 499.7 ± 0.37 mg/g, respectively, at 37.5 °C, pH-7, rice straw concentration of 2.5 g/100 mL, enzyme loading 175 μl, and incubation period 42 h by commercial cellulase–xylanase enzyme mediated hydrolysis. While in case of using the native cellulase–xylanase cocktail from the isolated bacterial strains, highest yields of glucose, xylose and total reducing sugar production was 253.52 ± 0.56 mg/g, 47.94 ± 0.78 mg/g, and 301.46 ± 0.67 mg/g, respectively. While applying the isolated enzymes on alkali-pretreated rice straw, bioethanol concentration of around 32.57 ± 0.25 g/L was recorded after the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The above mentioned bioethanol concentration was obtained at a process parameter of temperature 35 °C, incubation time 58 h, and pH 5.5 for isolated cellulase–xylanase enzymes. A maximum bioethanol concentration using isolated cellulase–xylanase enzymes was nearly 93.89% of bioethanol concentration (34.69 ± 0.28 g/L) obtained using commercial cellulase–xylanase. The present study interpreted that the cutting-edge approach for the native enzymes along with metabolic engineering of the isolated bacteria could be promising towards enhanced bioethanol production.

Keywords

Rice straw / Pretreatment / Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation / Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Enzyme engineering / Bioethanol

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Manish Paul, Gireesh Kumar Shroti, Sonali Mohapatra, Pradeep Kumar DasMohapatra, Hrudayanath Thatoi. A comparative study on pretreatment of rice straw and saccharification by commercial and isolated cellulase–xylanase cocktails towards enhanced bioethanol production. Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing, 2024, 4(2): 731‒749 https://doi.org/10.1007/s43393-023-00228-6

References

1.
Afifi MMI, Massoud ON, El-Akasher YS. Bioethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using pretreated rice straw. Sciences, 2015, 5(03): 769-776
2.
Agarwal UP, Reiner RS. Near-IR surface-enhanced Raman spectrum of lignin. J Raman Spectrosc, 2009, 40(11): 1527-1534
3.
Alam A, Wang Y, Liu F, Kang H, Tang SW, Wang Y, Cai Q, Wang H, Peng H, Li Q, Zeng Y. Modeling of optimal green liquor pretreatment for enhanced biomass saccharification and delignification by distinct alteration of wall polymer features and biomass porosity in Miscanthus. Renew Energy, 2020, 159: 1128-1138
4.
Alam A, Zhang R, Liu P, Huang J, Wang Y, Hu Z, Madadi M, Sun D, Hu R, Ragauskas AJ, Tu Y. A finalized determinant for complete lignocellulose enzymatic saccharification potential to maximize bioethanol production in bioenergy Miscanthus. Biotechnol Biofuels, 2019, 12: 1-22
5.
An X, Zong Z, Zhang Q, Li Z, Zhong M, Long H, Cai C, Tan X. Novel thermo-alkali-stable cellulase-producing Serratia sp. AXJ-M cooperates with Arthrobacter sp. AXJ-M1 to improve degradation of cellulose in papermaking black liquor. J Hazard Mater, 2022, 421,
6.
Anu KV, Singh D, Singh B. A greener, mild, and efficient bioprocess for the pretreatment and saccharification of rice straw. Biomass Convers Biorefin, 2021, 2021: 1-13
7.
Anuradha A, Sampath MK. Optimization of alkali, acid and organic solvent pretreatment on rice husk and its techno economic analysis for efficient sugar production. Prep Biochem Biotechnol, 2023, 53: 279-287
8.
Banoth C, Sunkar B, Tondamanati PR, Bhukya B. Improved physicochemical pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw for bioethanol production by yeast fermentation. 3 Biotech, 2017, 7(5): 1-11
9.
Barik D. Energy extraction from toxic waste originating from food processing industries. Energy from toxic organic waste for heat and power generation, 2019 Sawston Woodhead Publishing 17-42
10.
Belal EB. Bioethanol production from rice straw residues. Braz J Microbiol, 2013, 44: 225-234, pmcid: 3804203
11.
Bhardwaj N, Kumar B, Agrawal K, Verma P. Current perspective on production and applications of microbial cellulases: a review. Bioresour Bioprocess, 2021, 8: 1-34
12.
Boukir A, Fellak S, Doumenq P. Structural characterization of Argania spinosa Moroccan wooden artifacts during natural degradation progress using infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and X-Ray diffraction (XRD). Heliyon, 2019, 5(9), pmcid: 6819844
13.
Capolupo L, Faraco V. Green methods of lignocellulose pretreatment for biorefinery development. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2016, 100(22): 9451-9467, pmcid: 5071362
14.
Chen WH, Lin TS, Guo GL, Huang WS. Ethanol production from rice straw hydrolysates by Pichia stipitis. Energy Procedia, 2012, 14: 1261-1266
15.
Chen C, Deng X, Kong W, Qaseem MF, Zhao S, Li Y, Wu AM. Rice straws with different cell wall components differ on abilities of saccharification. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2021, 8, pmcid: 7855461
16.
Chen X, Xin D, Wang R, Qin Y, Wen P, Hou X, Zhang J. Factors affecting hydrolytic action of xylanase during pennisetum saccharification: role of cellulose and its derivatives. Ind Crops Prod, 2019, 130: 49-56
17.
Chukwuma OB, Rafatullah M, Tajarudin HA, Ismail N. A review on bacterial contribution to lignocellulose breakdown into useful bio-products. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(11): 6001, pmcid: 8199887
18.
Dadwal A, Sharma S, Satyanarayana T. Progress in ameliorating beneficial characteristics of microbial cellulases by genetic engineering approaches for cellulose saccharification. Front Microbiol, 2020, 11: 1387, pmcid: 7327088
19.
Dampanaboina L, Yuan N, Mendu V. Estimation of crystalline cellulose content of plant biomass using the Updegraff method. JoVE (J Vis Exp), 2021, 171
20.
DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PT, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem, 1956, 28(3): 350-356
21.
Erdei B, Galbe M, Zacchi G. Simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation of whole wheat in integrated ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy, 2013, 56: 506-514
22.
Francisco R, Silvia B, Coca M, González-Benito G, García-Cubero MT. Effect of xylanase on the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-exploded wheat straw. New Biotechnol, 2009, 25(25): S261
23.
Goel A, Wati L. Ethanol production from rice (Oryza sativa) straw by simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation. Ind J Exp Biol, 2016, 54: 525-529
24.
Haq IU, Qaisar K, Nawaz A, Akram F, Mukhtar H, Xu Y, Mumtaz MW, Rashid U, Ghani WAWAK, Choong TSY. Advances in valorization of lignocellulosic biomass towards energy generation. Catalysts, 2021, 11(3): 309
25.
Janshekar H, Brown C, Fiechter A. Determination of biodegraded lignin by ultraviolet spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta, 1981, 130: 81-91
26.
Karimi K, Taherzadeh MJ. A critical review of analytical methods in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: composition, imaging, and crystallinity. Bioresour Technol, 2016, 200: 1008-1018,
27.
Kim JJ, Kwon YK, Kim JH, Heo SJ, Lee Y, Lee SJ, Shim WB, Jung WK, Hyun JH, Kwon KK, Kang DH. Effective microwell plate-based screening method for microbes producing cellulase and xylanase and its application. J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2014, 24(11): 1559-1565,
28.
Kumar R, Wyman CE. Effect of xylanase supplementation of cellulase on digestion of corn stover solids prepared by leading pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol Rep, 2009, 100(18): 4203-4213
29.
Li B, Gao X, Sun Q, Chen K. Enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw based on 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid method. Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach, 2013, 44(1): 106-118
30.
Maicas S. The role of yeasts in fermentation processes. Microorganisms, 2020, 8(8): 1142, pmcid: 7466055
31.
Malik WA, Javed S. Biochemical characterization of cellulase from Bacillus subtilis strain and its effect on digestibility and structural modifications of lignocellulose rich biomass. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2021, 9, pmcid: 8721162
32.
Marulanda VA, Gutierrez CDB, Alzate CAC. Thermochemical, biological, biochemical, and hybrid conversion methods of bio-derived molecules into renewable fuels. Advanced bioprocessing for alternative fuels, biobased chemicals, and bioproducts, 2019 Sawston Woodhead Publishing 59-81
33.
Mesbah NM. Industrial biotechnology based on enzymes from extreme environments. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2022, 10, pmcid: 9036996
34.
Mishra RR, Samantaray B, Behera BC, Pradhan BR, Mohapatra S. Process optimization for conversion of waste banana peels to biobutanol by a yeast co-culture fermentation system. Renew Energy, 2020, 162: 478-488
35.
Mital S, Christie G, Dikicioglu D. Recombinant expression of insoluble enzymes in Escherichia coli: a systematic review of experimental design and its manufacturing implications. Microb Cell Fact, 2021, 20: 1-20
36.
Mohapatra S, Mishra RR, Nayak B, Behera BC, Mohapatra PKD. Development of co-culture yeast fermentation for efficient production of biobutanol from rice straw: a useful insight in valorization of agro industrial residues. Bioresour Technol, 2020, 318,
37.
Momayez F, Karimi K, Karimi S, Horváth IS. Efficient hydrolysis and ethanol production from rice straw by pretreatment with organic acids and effluent of biogas plant. RSC Adv, 2017, 7(80): 50537-50545
38.
Okamoto K, Nitta Y, Maekawa N, Yanase H. Direct ethanol production from starch, wheat bran and rice straw by the white rot fungus Trametes hirsuta. Enzyme Microb Technol, 2011, 48(3): 273-277,
39.
Okamoto K, Uchii A, Kanawaku R, Yanase H. Bioconversion of xylose, hexoses and biomass to ethanol by a new isolate of the white rot basidiomycete Trametes versicolor. Springerplus, 2014, 3(1): 1-9
40.
Patel SJ, Onkarappa R, Shobha KS. Comparative study of ethanol production from microbial pretreated agricultural residues. J Appl Sci Environ Manag, 2007, 11(4): 137-141
41.
Paul M, Das Mohapatra PK, Thatoi H. Purified cellulase-mediated simultaneous sugar utilization by Bacillus albus isolated from Similipal, Odisha, India. J Basic Microbiol, 2023, 63: 759-780,
42.
Paul M, Nayak DP, Thatoi H. Optimization of xylanase from Pseudomonas mohnii isolated from Simlipal Biosphere Reserve, Odisha, using response surface methodology. J Genet Eng Biotechnol, 2020, 18: 1-19
43.
Rajesh Banu J, Poornima Devi T, Yukesh Kannah R, Kavitha S, Kim SH, Mu?oz R, et al.. A review on energy and cost effective phase separated pretreatment of biosolids. Water Res, 2021, 198,
44.
Rath S, Paul M, Behera HK, Thatoi H. Response surface methodology mediated optimization of Lignin peroxidase from Bacillus mycoides isolated from Simlipal Biosphere Reserve, Odisha, India. J Genet Eng Biotechnol, 2022, 20: 1-20
45.
Rivers DB, Zanin GM, Emert GH. Evaluation of sugar cane bagasse and rice straw as process substrates for the production of ethyl alcohol. J Arkansas Acad Sci, 1984, 38(1): 95-96
46.
Sasikumar V, Priya V, Shankar CS, Sekar SD. Isolation and preliminary screening of lignin degrading microbes. J Acad Ind Res, 2014, 3(6): 291-294
47.
Shangdiar S, Cheng PC, Chen SC, Amesho KT, Ponnusamy VK, Lin YC. Enhancing sugar yield for bioconversion of rice straw: optimization of microwave-assisted pretreatment using dilute acid hydrolysis. Environ Technol Innov, 2023, 32
48.
Shengdong Z, Yuanxin W, Yufeng Z, Shaoyong T, Yongping X, Ziniu Y, Xuan Z. Fed-batch simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of microwave/acid/alkali/H2O2 pretreated rice straw for production of ethanol. Chem Eng Commun, 2006, 193(5): 639-648
49.
Sindhu R, Binod P, Janu KU, Sukumaran RK, Pandey A. Organosolvent pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw for the production of bioethanol. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2012, 28(2): 473-483,
50.
Singh A, Bishnoi NR. Optimization of ethanol production from microwave alkali pretreated rice straw using statistical experimental designs by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Ind Crops Prod, 2012, 37(1): 334-341
51.
Singh B, Kumar A. Process development for sodium carbonate pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of rice straw for bioethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy, 2020, 138
52.
Sluiter A, Hames B, Hyman D, Payne C, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Wolfe JJNREL. Determination of total solids in biomass and total dissolved solids in liquid process samples. Natl Renew Energy Lab, 2008, 9: 1-6
53.
Sun D, Li Y, Wang J, Tu Y, Wang Y, Hu Z, Zhou S, Wang L, Xie G, Huang J, Alam A. Biomass saccharification is largely enhanced by altering wall polymer features and reducing silicon accumulation in rice cultivars harvested from nitrogen fertilizer supply. Bioresour Technol, 2017, 243: 957-965,
54.
Sun S, Sun S, Cao X, Sun R. The role of pretreatment in improving the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials. Bioresour Technol, 2016, 199: 49-58,
55.
Takano M, Hoshino K. Bioethanol production from rice straw by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with statistical optimized cellulase cocktail and fermenting fungus. Bioresour Bioprocess, 2018, 5(1): 1-12
56.
Tayyab M, Noman A, Islam W, Waheed S. Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass by environment-friendly pretreatment methods: a review. Appl Ecol Environ Res, 2017, 16(1): 225-249
57.
Terasawat A, Phoolphundh S. Simultaneous biological pretreatment and saccharification of rice straw by ligninolytic enzymes from Panus neostrigosus I9 and commercial cellulase. J Fungi, 2021, 7(10): 853
58.
Tiwari UP, Fleming SA, Rasheed MSA, Jha R, Dilger RN. The role of oligosaccharides and polysaccharides of xylan and mannan in gut health of monogastric animals. J Nutr Sci, 2020, 9, pmcid: 7303790
59.
Vasi? K, Knez ?, Leitgeb M. Bioethanol production by enzymatic hydrolysis from different lignocellulosic sources. Molecules, 2021, 26(3): 753, pmcid: 7867074
60.
Vlasenko EY, Ding H, Labavitch JM, Shoemaker SP. Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated rice straw. Bioresour Technol, 1997, 59(2–3): 109-119
61.
Xu C, Xia T, Peng H, Liu P, Wang Y, Wang Y, Kang H, Tang J, Aftab MN, Peng L. BsEXLX of engineered Trichoderma reesei strain as dual-active expansin to boost cellulases secretion for synergistic enhancement of biomass enzymatic saccharification in corn and Miscanthus straws. Bioresour Technol, 2023, 376,
62.
Wang Y, Liu P, Zhang G, Yang Q, Lu J, Xia T, Peng L, Wang Y. Cascading of engineered bioenergy plants and fungi sustainable for low-cost bioethanol and high-value biomaterials under green-like biomass processing. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2021, 137
63.
Wu J, Elliston A, Le Gall G, Colquhoun IJ, Collins SR, Dicks J, Roberts IN, Waldron KW. Yeast diversity in relation to the production of fuels and chemicals. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1), pmcid: 5660169
64.
Wu LM, Tong DS, Zhao LZ, Yu WH, Zhou CH, Wang H. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis for hydrothermal transformation of microcrystalline cellulose on montmorillonite. Appl Clay Sci, 2014, 95: 74-82
65.
Wu Z, Peng K, Zhang Y, Wang M, Yong C, Chen L, Qu P, Huang H, Sun E, Pan M. Lignocellulose dissociation with biological pretreatment towards the biochemical platform: a review. Materials Today Bio, 2022, 16, pmcid: 9535326
66.
Yang H, Chen J, Chen Q, Wang K, Sun RC. The synergic relationship between xylan removal and enhanced cellulose digestibility for bioethanol production: reactive Area, Crystallinity, and Inhibitation. Bioenergy Res, 2015, 8(4): 1847-1855
67.
Yoswathana N, Phuriphipat P, Treyawutthiwat P, Eshtiaghi MN. Bioethanol production from rice straw. Energy Res J, 2010, 1(1): 26
68.
Zahoor W, Tan X, Imtiaz M, Wang Q, Miao C, Yuan Z, Zhuang X. Rice straw pretreatment with KOH/urea for enhancing sugar yield and ethanol production at low temperature. Ind Crop Prod, 2021, 170
69.
Zhang R, Gao H, Wang Y, He B, Lu J, Zhu W, Peng L, Wang Y. Challenges and perspectives of green-like lignocellulose pretreatments selectable for low-cost biofuels and high-value bioproduction. Bioresour Technol, 2023, 369,
70.
Zhang R, Hu Z, Peng H, Liu P, Wang Y, Li J, Lu J, Wang Y, Xia T, Peng L. High density cellulose nanofibril assembly leads to upgraded enzymatic and chemical catalysis of fermentable sugars, cellulose nanocrystals and cellulase production by precisely engineering cellulose synthase complexes. Green Chem, 2023, 25(3): 1096-1106
71.
Zhang R, Hu Z, Wang Y, Hu H, Li F, Li M, Ragauskas A, Xia T, Han H, Tang J, Yu H. Single-molecular insights into the breakpoint of cellulose nanofibers assembly during saccharification. Nat Commun, 2023, 14(1): 1100, pmcid: 9968341
72.
Zhao X, Qi F, Liu D. Hierarchy nano-and ultrastructure of lignocellulose and its impact on the bioconversion of cellulose. Nanotechnology for bioenergy and biofuel production, 2017 Cham Springer 117-151

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/