First, SOM is a heterogeneous mixture of compounds from a number of sources, and the presence of non-amino sugar compounds may interfere with soil amino sugar determination. Following the widely-used aldononitrile acetate derivatization GC-FID protocol (
Guerrant and Moss, 1984;
Zhang and Amelung, 1996;
Liang et al., 2012),
Liang et al. (2009a;
2009b) detected significant interference by aminoglycoside antibiotics, compromising the utility of glucosamine and muramic acid as reliable microbial necromass biomarkers under certain conditions. Such issues serve as a cautionary note regarding the potential limitations when biomarkers identified in pure laboratory cultures are applied to natural environments.
Second, the mixture of compounds that comprise SOM exists in a successive stage of degradation, and the decomposition stage of polymers consisting of amino sugar monomers can affect the efficiency of amino sugar extraction. The amino sugars that are extracted from soils exist
in situ as structural components of polymers, such as peptidoglycan, which need to be broken down by hydrolysis to release amino sugar monomers for determination (
Amelung, 2001). The amino sugar binding polymers of varying decomposition degrees differ in chemical structure and thus reactivity, leading to different efficiency of hydrolysis release of amino sugar monomers and their ultimate quantifications. Indeed, whether the extracted biomarker compounds are from young or older C pools could lead to inconsistent interpretation when evaluating C stabilization based on the biomarker compounds. For example, newly-synthesized amino acids were found to decompose faster than originally-present counterparts (
Zhang et al., 2015). Such difference in stability among “old and new” amino acids engenders concern and the need to investigate whether this distinct C stabilization of identifiable and identical organic molecules extracted from soils occurs with amino sugars as well.
Third, as organic matter is degraded in soils, it ubiquitously leads to a sequence of molecular changes in chemical structure, accompanying with numerous varied products with embedded monomer structures of interest (e.g., amino sugars). It is reasonable to expect that some amino sugar-containing polymers have undergone only slight changes (but that change happened to amino sugar chemical skeleton) during microbial attack and thus might escape the “analytical window” of the amino sugar analysis. In another words, slight changes in the structural composition of a compound during biodegradation may sufficiently alter the structure so that its intrinsic target component is no longer recognizable at the molecular level, while intensive changes may not be necessary to destroy the target moiety of polymers to influence biomarker determination.
Fourth, bias exists for the interpretations on microbial necromass stability in soil based on the mere use of amino sugar compounds combined with stable C isotope technique. Uncertainties of residence time will happen to molecular compounds and its inside “C,” when using isotopic C signature to calculate the residence time of parent molecular compounds (i.e., amino sugars), which overestimates molecule’s stability. In simple words, while the C from amino sugar compounds might logically persist in soils for a longer while, during that time the structure of the amino sugar molecule is likely to change as the initial compound is broken down and the C is reused in new components; in that instance, the longer mean residence time of the inside “C” simply indicates that microbes repeatedly cycle the isotope C through their own biomass, rather than long residence time of those C in the compound.