A comparative analysis of web-based tools for landslide mapping and visualization
Badariah Solemon , Alshami Mohammed Zaid Ahmed , Nur Aishah Zarime
Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1)
A comparative analysis of web-based tools for landslide mapping and visualization
Effective management of landslide events requires robust mapping and visualization tools to ensure prompt responses and a thorough understanding of the situation. This study undertakes a comparative analysis of web-based tools specifically tailored for landslide reporting, mapping, and viewing, to evaluate their functionalities, usability, and suitability across diverse stakeholder groups and operational contexts. This article offers valuable considerations for users seeking specific functionalities and geographical coverage, contributing to ongoing efforts to leverage the capabilities of web-based technologies in the realm of landslide management in addressing this critical geological hazard. The research encompasses a comprehensive literature review and hands-on evaluations of selected platforms designed to meet the needs of landslide management. Key dimensions under scrutiny include data input mechanisms, spatial analysis features, visualization capabilities, user interfaces, accessibility, and customization options. Four publicly available web-based tools underwent examination in this study: the NASA Landslide Viewer, the Global Landslide Detector, the Western North Carolina (WNC) Landslide Hazard Data Viewer, and the Landslide Susceptibility Map Viewer. Each platform enables users to visualize landslide occurrences, access pertinent datasets, and scrutinize specific details about each landslide event. Notably, the Landslide Viewer, to monitor global landslides. In contrast, the WNC Landslide Hazard Data Viewer focuses specifically on North Carolina, United States, while the Landslide Susceptibility Map Viewer prioritizes comprehensive mapping within Ireland. Of all the platforms, only the Landslide Susceptibility Map Viewer actively encourages users to contribute by submitting landslide reports, thereby providing real-time observations that enhance the dataset.
Landslide / Infrastructure / Web-based tools / Mapping / Visualization
| [1] |
Zhu L, Huang LH, Fan L, Huang J, Huang F, Chen J, Zhang Z, Wang Y (2020) Landslide susceptibility prediction modeling based on remote sensing and a novel deep learning algorithm of a cascade-parallel recurrent neural network. Sensors 20(6):1576. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20061576 |
| [2] |
Hou W, Lu X, Wu P, Xue A, Li L (2017) An integrated approach for monitoring and information management of the Guanling Landslide (China). ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 6(3):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6030079 |
| [3] |
Miller S, Harris N, Williams L, Bhalai S (2007) Landslide susceptibility assessment for St. Thomas, Jamaica, using geographical information system and remote sensing methods. Geol Soc London Spec Publ 283(1):77. https://doi.org/10.1144/sp283.7 |
| [4] |
Huang H, Ni J, Zhang Y, Qian T, Shen D, Wang J (2016) Web3DGIS-Based system for reservoir landslide monitoring and early warning. Applied Sciences 6(2):44. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6020044 |
| [5] |
Albrecht F, Hölbling D, Weinke E (2020) Towards a web service for rapid landslide mapping based on Copernicus data. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 509(1):12002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/509/1/012002 |
| [6] |
Williams JG, Rosser N, Kincey M, Benjamin J, Oven K, Densmore AL, Milledge D, Robinson T, Jordan C, Dijkstra T (2018) Satellite-based emergency mapping using optical imagery: experience and reflections from the 2015 Nepal earthquakes. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18(1):185. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-185-2018 |
| [7] |
Marco G, Daniele G, S Ambrogio (2004) GIS technologies for data collection, management and visualization of large slope instabilities. https://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/4/197/2004/nhess-4-197-2004.pdf |
| [8] |
Frigerio S, Schenato L, Bossi G, Cavalli M, Mantovani M, Marcato G, Pasuto A (2013) A web-based platform for automatic and continuous landslide monitoring: The Rotolon (Eastern Italian Alps) case study. Computers & Geosciences 63:96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.10.015 |
| [9] |
Souza JH ,Soares CAP, Santos G, Silva WS (2017) Web-based emergency management information system for landslides occurrences. Am J Environ Sci 13(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2017.1.10 |
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
Yan T, Shen SL, Zhou A, Chen J (2019) A brief report of Pingdi landslide (23 July 2019) in Guizhou Province, China. Geosciences, 9(8):368. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9090368 |
| [12] |
Coman CM, Manea S (2017) Landslides hazard assessment using different approaches. De Gruyter Open, 13(2):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/mmce-2017-0004 |
| [13] |
Natijne AV, Lindenbergh R, Bogaard T (2020) Machine learning: New potential for local and regional deep-seated landslide nowcasting. Sensors 20(5):1425–1425. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20051425 |
| [14] |
Mirus BB, Jones ES, Baum RL, Godt JW, Slaughter SL, Crawford MM, Lancaster JT, Stanley T, Kirschbaum D, Burns WJ, Schmitt RG, Lindsey KO, McCoy K (2020) Landslides across the USA: occurrence, susceptibility, and data limitations. Landslides 17(10):2271–2285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01424-4 |
| [15] |
Fachrizal F, Zarlis M, Efendi S (2020). Waspmote-based landslide early disaster detection system with GSM communication. J Phys Conf Ser 1566(1):12036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1566/1/012036 |
| [16] |
Lissak C, Bartsch A, Michele MD, Gomez C, Maquaire O, Raucoules D, Roulland T (2020) Remote Sensing for Assessing Landslides and Associated Hazards. Surv Geophys 41(6):1391–1435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09609-1 |
| [17] |
RH Dananjaya, N Djarwanti, BJ Gunawan (2021) Development of Web-based Mapping Program for Spatially Distributed Slope Stability Analysis. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 1144: 012093. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1144/1/012093 |
| [18] |
B Aiazzi, S Baronti, M Selva (2012) Landslide inventory maps: New tools for an old problem. Earth-Science Reviews, 112(1–2):42–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.02.001 |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
NASA (n.d.). Landslide Viewer - NCCS Spatial Analytics Platform. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://maps.nccs.nasa.gov/arcgis/apps/experiencebuilder/experience/?id=29bd25e78fff45f0a6dbfd0328b4d03e. |
| [25] |
Qatar Computing Research Institute (n.d.). Global Landslide Detector. Retrieved January 3, 2024, form https://landslide-aidr.qcri.org/service.php#home . |
| [26] |
North Carolina Geological Survey (n.d.). Western North Carolina Landslide Hazard Data Viewer. Retrieved January 3, 2024, form https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=e9f79de934f24e40a71bab8db8050612/ |
| [27] |
Geological Survey Ireland. (n.d.). Landslide Susceptibility Map Viewer. Retrieved January 3, 2024, form https://dcenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=b68cf1e4a9044a5981f950e9b9c5625c. |
| [28] |
Werner RJ, Young JB (1991) A Checklist to Evaluate Mapping Software. J Geogr 90(3):118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221349108979250 |
| [29] |
Ridder W, Turnpenny J, Nilsson M, Raggamby A (2007) A framework for tool selection and use in integrated assessment for sustainable development. J Environ Assessment Policy & Management 9(4):423. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1464333207002883 |
| [30] |
Mcleod E, weis SWM, Wongbusarakum S, Gombos M, Dazé A, Otzelberger A, Hammill A, Agostini VN, Cot DU, Wiggins M (2015) Community-based climate vulnerability and adaptation tools: A review of tools and their applications. Coastal Management 43(4):439. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2015.1046809 |
| [31] |
Basak J, Bhaumik P, Roy S, Bandyopadhyay S (2020) A crowdsourcing based information system framework for coordinated disaster management and building community resilience. ICDCN '20: Proc 21st International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking 33. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369740.3372730 |
| [32] |
Gershon M (1996) A spatial decision aid: A multicriterion evaluation approach. Computers Environ and Urban Systems 20(6):351–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(97)00002-1 |
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Landslide Team Project. (n.d.). Landslide@NASA. https://gpm.nasa.gov/landslides/projects.html. |
| [35] |
Stanley TA, Kirschbaum DB, Benz G, Emberson RA, Amatya PM, Medwedeff W, Clark MK (2021) Data-driven landslide nowcasting at the global scale. Front Earth Sci 9:640043. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.640043 |
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |