Flood vulnerability map of the Bagmati River basin, Nepal: a comparative approach of the analytical hierarchy process and frequency ratio model

Sushmita Malla , Koichiro Ohgushi

Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities ›› 2024, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 16

PDF
Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities ›› 2024, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (1) : 16 DOI: 10.1007/s44268-024-00041-7
Research

Flood vulnerability map of the Bagmati River basin, Nepal: a comparative approach of the analytical hierarchy process and frequency ratio model

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and frequency ratio model (FR), along with the integration of GIS, have proven to be successful approaches for assessing flood-prone areas. However, in Nepal flood vulnerability mapping based on GIS decision analysis is limited. Thus, this study focused on comparing the data-driven FR method and expert knowledge-based AHP technique in a GIS environment to prepare a flood vulnerability map for the Bagmati River basin, helping to explore the gap in flood vulnerability mapping methodologies and approaches. By combining all class-weighted contributing factors, like elevation, precipitation, flow accumulation, drainage density, soil, distance from the river, land use land cover, normalized difference vegetative index, slope and topographic wetness index, the study evaluated the efficiency of FR and AHP in assessing flood vulnerability maps. An inventory map of floods containing 107 flood points was created. Subsequently, the flood vulnerability maps generated using FR and AHP models revealed that 9.30% and 11.36% of regions were in highly vulnerable areas, respectively. Receiver operating characteristics validated the model outcomes, indicating that the FR model’s accuracy of 91% outperformed the AHP model’s 84% accuracy. The study findings will assist decision-makers in enacting sustainable management techniques to reduce future damage in the Bagmati basin.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sushmita Malla, Koichiro Ohgushi. Flood vulnerability map of the Bagmati River basin, Nepal: a comparative approach of the analytical hierarchy process and frequency ratio model. Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities, 2024, 2(1): 16 DOI:10.1007/s44268-024-00041-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

OstiR, TanakaS, TokiokaT. Flood hazard mapping in developing countries: problems and prospects. Disaster Prev Manag Int J, 2008, 17(1): 104-113

[2]

GetahunYS, GebreSL. Flood hazard assessment and mapping of flood inundation area of the Awash River Basin in Ethiopia using GIS and HEC-GeoRAS/HEC-RAS model. J Civ Environ Eng, 2015, 5(4): 1

[3]

SharmaVK, PriyaT. Development strategies for flood-prone areas, case study: Patna. India Disaster Prev Manag Int J, 2001, 10(2): 101-110

[4]

Findikakis AN, Barneet AG (2021) Extreme flooding events, International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research, (4). https://static.iahr.org/library/HydroLink/HL2021_4/Hydrolink_2021_4_Extreme_Flooding_Events.pdf

[5]

Fischer C, Stanchev P (2022) Flood hazard and risk maps: a key instrument for flood risk management. The Water Blog. Retrieved from https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/water/flood-hazard-and-risk-maps-key-instrument-flood-risk-management

[6]

Rentschler J, Salhab M (2020) People in harm’s way: flood exposure and poverty in 189 countries. The World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/669141603288540994/pdf/People-in-Harms-Way-Flood-Exposure-and-Poverty-in-189-Countries.pdf

[7]

ElalemS, PalI. Mapping the vulnerability hotspots over Hindu-Kush Himalaya region to flooding disasters. Weather Clim Extrem, 2015, 8: 46-58

[8]

Rimal B, Sharma R, Kunwar R, Keshtkar H, Stork NE, Rijal S, Baral H (2019) Effects of land use and land cover change on ecosystem services in the Koshi River Basin, Eastern Nepal. Ecosyst Serv 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100963

[9]

Shrestha BR, Rai RK, Marasini S (2020) Review of flood hazards studies in Nepal. Geogr Base 7:24–32. https://doi.org/10.3126/tgb.v7i0.34266

[10]

Gautam DK, Pokherl AP (2004) Extreme floods in Bagmati River basin. In Hydroinformatics (In 2 Volumes, with CD-ROM). pp 1800–1807. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812702838_0222

[11]

Billa L, Shattri M, Mahmud AR, Ghazali AH (2006) Comprehensive planning and the role of SDSS in food disaster management in Malaysia. Disaster Prev Manag 15:233–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560610659775

[12]

TehranyMS, PradhanB, JeburMN. Flood susceptibility analysis and its verification using a novel ensemble support vector machine and frequency ratio method. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, 2015, 29: 1149-1165

[13]

JinM, FreadDL. Dynamic flood routing with explicit and implicit numerical solution schemes. J Hydraul Eng, 1997, 123(3): 166-173

[14]

Hokr M, Marysk J, Sotner O (2003) Problems and modeling in forecasting of floods. In: Hokr M, Sembera J (eds), Proceedings of SIMONA. Technical University of Liberec, pp 37–46

[15]

AryalD, WangL, AdhikariTR, ZhouJ, LiX, ShresthaM, ChenD. A model-based flood hazard mapping on the southern slope of Himalaya. Water, 2020, 12(2): 540

[16]

BasnyatDB. Post-flood assessment of the 2019 flooding in the Bagmati River basin. Nepal J Dev Innov, 2020, 4(1): 20-47

[17]

TehranyMS, LeeMJ, PradhanB, JeburMN, LeeS. Flood susceptibility mapping using integrated bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Environ Earth Sci, 2014, 72: 4001-4015

[18]

AliSA, KhatunR, AhmadA, AhmadSN. Application of GIS-based analytic hierarchy process and frequency ratio model to flood vulnerable mapping and risk area estimation at Sundarban region, India. Model Earth Syst Environ, 2019, 5: 1083-1102

[19]

Lee MJ, Kang JE, Jeon S. Application of frequency ratio model and validation for predictive flooded area susceptibility mapping using GIS. In 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2012895-898

[20]

FacciniF, LuinoF, PaliagaG, RoccatiA, TurconiL. Flash flood events along the west Mediterranean coasts: Inundations of urbanized areas conditioned by anthropic impacts. Land, 2021, 10(6): 620

[21]

SamantaS, PalDK, PalsamantaB. Flood susceptibility analysis through remote sensing, GIS, and frequency ratio model. Appl Water Sci, 2018, 8(2): 66

[22]

BritoDMM, EversM. Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: A survey of the current state of the art. Nat Hazard Earth Sys, 2016, 16(4): 1019-1033

[23]

Youssef AM, Hegab MA (2019) Flood-hazard assessment modeling using multicriteria analysis and GIS: A case study—Ras Gharib Area, Egypt. In Spatial Modeling in GIS and R for Earth and Environmental Sciences. Elsevier, pp 229–257. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9110193

[24]

LyuHM, ShenSL, ZhouA, YangJ. Risk assessment of mega-city infrastructures related to land subsidence using improved trapezoidal FAHP. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 717

[25]

LyuHM, SunWJ, ShenSL, ZhouAN. Risk assessment using a new consulting process in fuzzy AHP. J Constr Eng Manag, 2020, 146(3): 04019112

[26]

AlizadehM, NgahI, HashimM, PradhanB, PourAB. A hybrid analytic network process and artificial neural network (ANP-ANN) model for urban earthquake vulnerability assessment. Remote Sens, 2018, 10(6): 975

[27]

KittipongvisesS, PhetrakA, RattanapunP, BrundiersK, BuizerJL, MelnickR. AHP-GIS analysis for flood hazard assessment of the communities nearby the world heritage site on Ayutthaya Island. Thailand Int J Disaster Risk Reduct, 2020, 48

[28]

ZhangD, ShiX, XuH, JingQ, PanX, LiuT, HouH. A GIS-based spatial multi-index model for flood risk assessment in the Yangtze River Basin. China Environ Impact Assess Rev, 2020, 83

[29]

AidinidouMT, KaparisK, GeorgiouAC. Analysis, prioritization and strategic planning of flood mitigation projects based on sustainability dimensions and a spatial/value AHP-GIS system. Expert Syst Appl, 2023, 211

[30]

AliZ, DahriN, VancloosterM, MehmandoostkotlarA, LabbaciA, Ben ZaiedM, OuessarM. Hybrid fuzzy AHP and frequency ratio methods for assessing flood susceptibility in Bayech Basin. Southwestern Tunisia Sustain, 2023, 15(21): 15422

[31]

AroraA. Flood susceptibility prediction using multi criteria decision analysis and bivariate statistical models: a case study of Lower Kosi River Basin, Ganga River Basin. India Stoch Env Res Risk Assess, 2023, 37(5): 1855-1875

[32]

RahmatiO, ZeinivandH, BesharatM. Flood hazard zoning in Yasooj region, Iran, using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk, 2015, 7(3): 1000-1017

[33]

PourghasemiH, PradhanB, GokceogluC, MoezziKD. A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of Dempster-Shafer and weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk, 2013, 4(2): 93-118

[34]

BansalN, MukherjeeM, GairolaA. Evaluating urban flood hazard index (UFHI) of Dehradun city using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Model Earth Syst Environ, 2022, 8: 1-14

[35]

ChaulagainD, RimalPR, NgandoSN, NsafonBEK, SuhD, HuhJS. Flood susceptibility mapping of Kathmandu metropolitan city using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecol Indic, 2023, 154

[36]

ParajuliG, NeupaneS, KunwarS, AdhikarR, AcharyaTD. A GIS-based evacuation route planning in flood-susceptible area of Siraha Municipality. Nepal ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf, 2023, 12(7): 286

[37]

NachappaTG, PiralilouST, GholamniaK, GhorbanzadehO, RahmatiO, BlaschkeT. Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory. J Hydrol, 2020, 590

[38]

AllaftaH, OppC. GIS-based multi-criteria analysis for flood-prone areas mapping in the transboundary Shatt Al-Arab basin. Iraq-Iran Geomat Nat Hazards Risk, 2021, 12(1): 2087-2116

[39]

HongH, TsangaratosP, IliaI, ZhuJL-X, ChenW. Application of fuzzy weight of evidence and data mining techniques in the construction of flood susceptibility map of Poyang County, China. Sci Tot Environ, 2018, 625: 575-588

[40]

Ogden FL, Pradhan NR, Downer CW, Zahner JA (2011) Relative importance of impervious area, drainage density, width function, and subsurface storm drainage on flood runoff from an urbanized catchment. Water Resour Res 47(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010550

[41]

DasS. Geospatial mapping of flood susceptibility and hydro-geomorphic response to the floods in Ulhas basin, India. Remote Sens Appl: Soc Environ, 2019, 14: 60-74

[42]

OumaYO, TateishiR. Urban flood vulnerability and risk mapping using integrated multi-parametric AHP and GIS: Methodological overview and case study assessment. Water, 2014, 6(6): 1515-1545

[43]

OgatoGS, BantiderA, AbebeK, GenelettiD. Geographic information system (GIS)-based multicriteria analysis of flooding hazard and risk in Ambo Town and its watershed, West Shoa Zone, Oromia Regional State. Ethiopia J Hydrol Reg, 2020, 27

[44]

AjibadeFO, AjibadeTF, IdowuTE, NwogwuNA, AdelodunB, LasisiKH, AdewumiJR. Flood-prone area mapping using GIS-based analytical hierarchy frameworks for the Ibadan city. Nigeria J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal, 2021, 28(5–6): 283-295

[45]

NegeseA, WorkuD, ShitayeA, GetnetH. Potential flood-prone area identification and mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making and analytical hierarchy process in Dega Damot district, northwestern Ethiopia. Appl Water Sci, 2022, 12(12): 255

[46]

ChenY, LiuR, BarrettD, GaoL, ZhouM, RenzulloL, EmelyanovaI. A spatial assessment framework for evaluating flood risk under extreme climates. Sci Total Environ, 2015, 538: 512-523

[47]

MahmoudSH, GanTY. Multi-criteria approach to develop flood susceptibility maps in arid regions of Middle East. J Clean Prod, 2018, 196: 216-229

[48]

HagosYG, AndualemTG, YibeltalM, MengieMA. Flood hazard assessment and mapping using GIS integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in upper Awash River basin. Ethiopia Appl Water Sci, 2022, 12(7): 148

[49]

AnTT, IzuruS, NarumasaT, RaghavanV, Van AnN, LongNV, TruongPM. Flood vulnerability assessment at the local scale using remote sensing and GIS techniques: A case study in Da Nang City. Vietnam J Water Clim Change, 2022, 13(9): 3217

[50]

NuisslH, HaaseD, LanzendorfM, WittmerH. Environmental impact assessment of urban land use transitions—A context-sensitive approach. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26(2): 414-424

[51]

RahmanZU, UllahW, BaiS, UllahS, JaMA, KhanM, TayyabM. GIS-based flood susceptibility mapping using a bivariate statistical model in Swat River Basin, Eastern Hindukush region. Pakistan Front Environ Sci, 2023, 11: 1178540

[52]

LiuJ, WangJ, XiongJ, ChengW, SunH, YongZ, WangN. Hybrid models incorporating bivariate statistics and machine learning methods for flash flood susceptibility assessment based on remote sensing datasets. Remote Sens, 2021, 13(23): 4945

[53]

SahariaM, JainA, BaishyaRR, HaobamS, SreejithOP, PaiDS, RafieeinasabA. India flood inventory: Creation of a multi-source national geospatial database to facilitate comprehensive flood research. Nat Hazards, 2021, 108: 619-633

[54]

RashidH. Interpreting flood disasters and flood hazard perceptions from newspaper discourse: Tale of two floods in the Red River valley, Manitoba. Canada Appl Geogr, 2011, 31(1): 35-45

[55]

Merz B, Thieken AH, Gocht M. Flood risk mapping at the local scale: concepts and challenges. In flood risk management in Europe: innovation in policy and practice, 2007231-251

[56]

SantangeloN, SantoA, Di CrescenzoG, FoscariG, LiuzzaV, SciarrottaS, ScorpioV. Flood susceptibility assessment in a highly urbanized alluvial fan: The case study of Sala Consilina (southern Italy). Nat Hazard Earth Sys, 2011, 11(10): 2765-2780

[57]

SaatyRW. The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used. Math Model, 1987, 9(3–5): 161-176

[58]

DasS, GuptaA. Multi-criteria decision-based geospatial mapping of flood susceptibility and temporal hydro-geomorphic changes in the Subarnarekha basin, India. Geosci Front, 2021, 12(5): 101206

[59]

RimbaAB, SetiawatiMD, SambahAB, MiuraF. Physical flood vulnerability mapping applying geospatial techniques in Okazaki City, Aichi Prefecture. Japan Urban Sci, 2017, 1(1): 7

[60]

SaatyTL. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol, 1977, 15(3): 234-281

[61]

SaatyTL. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). J Oper Res Soc, 1980, 41(11): 1073-1076

[62]

MunirA, GhufranMA, AliSM, MajeedA, BatoolA, KhanMBAS, AbbasiGH. Flood susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio modelling approach in Northern Sindh and Southern Punjab. Pakistan Pol J Environ Stud, 2022, 31(4): 3249-3261

[63]

ChungCJF, FabbriAG. Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Hazards, 2003, 30: 451-472

[64]

KutlugSE, ColkesenI. Performance analysis of advanced decision tree-based ensemble learning algorithms for landslide susceptibility mapping. Geocarto Int, 2021, 36(11): 1253-1275

[65]

RafieiSE, AzarehA, ChoubinB, MosaviAH, ClagueJJ. Evaluating urban flood risk using hybrid method of TOPSIS and machine learning. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct, 2021, 66

[66]

RakibMR, IslamMN, IslamMN. Flood vulnerability mapping to riverine floods: A study on the old Brahmaputra River. Curr Res Geosci, 2017, 7(2): 47-58

[67]

Hasanuzzaman M, Adhikary PP, Bera B, Shit PK. Flood vulnerability assessment using AHP and frequency ratio techniques. In spatial modeling of flood risk and flood hazards: societal implications, 2022ChamSpringer International Publishing91-104

[68]

Timilsina NP, Shreatha A, Poudel DP, Upadhyaya (2020) Trend of urban growth in Nepal with a focus in Kathmandu Valley: a review of processes and drivers of change. Tomorrows cities working paper 001. https://doi.org/10.7488/era/722

[69]

YariyanP, AvandM, AbbaspourRA, TorabiHaghighiA, CostacheR, GhorbanzadehO, BlaschkeT. Flood susceptibility mapping using an improved analytic network process with statistical models. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk, 2020, 11(1): 2282-2314

[70]

ChenYR, YehCH, YuB. Integrated application of the analytic hierarchy process and the geographic information system for food risk assessment and food plain management in Taiwan. Nat Hazards, 2011, 59(3): 1261-1276

[71]

LiaoX, CarinL. Migratory logistic regression for learning concept drift between two data sets with application to UXO sensing. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 2009, 47: 1454-1466

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

633

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/