Desert sand stabilization using biopolymers: review
Monika Dagliya , Neelima Satyam , Ankit Garg
Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities ›› 2023, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (1) : 5
Desert sand stabilization using biopolymers: review
Wind-driven sand erosion is the leading primary reason of earth deterioration in dry lands and a major global issue. Desert dust emissions and topsoil degradation caused by wind pose a global danger to the ecosystem, economy, and individual health. The aim of the current study is to critically analyze the different types of biopolymers and their interaction mechanism with sands for desert sand stabilization. Extensive experimental data with different percentages of biopolymers has been presented on various wind erosion studies using wind tunnel testing and their control rate on desert sand stabilization. Also, studies related to evaluating the engineering properties of sand using biopolymers were analyzed. Other biological approaches, namely Microbial-induced calcite precipitation (MICP) and Enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP), have been discussed to regulate wind-driven sand erosion in terms of percentage calcite formation at different compositions of urea and calcium chloride. Comparative analysis of MICP and EICP with biopolymer treatment and their limitations have been discussed. Biopolymers are not only demonstrated adeptness in engineering applications but are also helpful for environment safety. Biopolymers are suggested to be novel and nature-friendly soil-strengthening material. This review focuses on the fundamental mechanisms of biopolymer treatment to reduce wind-driven sand loss and its future scope as a binder for sand stabilization. The mechanism of soil-biopolymer interaction under various soil conditions (water content, density, and grain size distribution) and climatic circumstances (drying-wetting cycles) needs to be explored. Furthermore, before applying on a large scale, one should evaluate sand-biopolymer interaction in terms of durability and viability.
Biopolymer / Wind erosion / Desert / Environment / Human health
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Miao L, Wu L, Sun X, Li X, Zhang J (2020) Method for solidifying desert sands with enzyme-catalysed mineralization. Land Degrad Dev 31:1317–1324. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3499 |
| [4] |
Presley D, Tatarko J (2014) Principles of wind erosion and its control |
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
Sharma M, Satyam N (2021) Hybrid bacteria mediated cemented sand : wave velocity, stress-strain, and durability. Int J Damage Mech 30(4):618–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789521991196 |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
Sharma M, Satyam N, Reddy KR (2021) State of the art review of emerging and biogeotechnical methods for liquefaction mitigation in sands. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000557 |
| [11] |
Sharma M, Satyam N, Reddy KR (2020) Strength enhancement and lead immobilization of sand using consortia of bacteria and blue-green algae. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 24(4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000548 |
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
Goudie AS, Middleton NJ (2006) Desert Dust in the Global System. Springer, Berlin. pp 1-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32355-4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285998104_Desert_Dust_in_the_Global_System |
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Almajed A, Lemboye K, Arab MG, Alnuaim A (2020) Mitigating wind erosion of sand using biopolymer-assisted EICP technique. Soils Found 60:356-371 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.02.011 |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
Wang Z, Zhang N, Ding J, Lu C, Jin Y (2018) Experimental study on wind erosion resistance and strength of sands treated with microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:3463298. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3463298 |
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
Chang I, Im J, Cho GC (2016a) Introduction of microbial biopolymers in soil treatment for future environmentally-friendly and sustainable geotechnical engineering. Sustain 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030251 |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
Clark AH (1991) Structural and mechanical properties of biopolymer gels. The Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845698331.322 |
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
Fatehi H, Bahmani M, Noorzad A (2019) Strengthening of dune sand with sodium alginate biopolymer. In: Meehan CL, Kumarale S, Pando MA, Coe JT (ed) Geo-Congress 2019: Soil Improvement. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, p 157–66. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482117.015 |
| [42] |
Jana S, Kumar Trivedi M, Tallapragada RM (2015) Characterization of physicochemical and thermal properties of chitosan and sodium alginate after biofield treatment. Pharm Anal Acta 6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2153-2435.1000430 |
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
Allwyn SR (2012) A Review on pectin: chemistry due to general properties of pectin and its pharmaceutical uses. Corpus ID: 34752223. https://doi.org/10.4172/scientificreports.550 |
| [48] |
Dasin DY (2017) Investigation of molding characteristics of Acacia gum arabic grade 1 for making green sand cores. Int J Sci Res Sci Eng Technol 3:135-141. |
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
Refaei M, Arab MG, Omar M (2020) Sandy soil improvement through biopolymer assisted EICP. 612–619. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482780.060 |
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
Miękoś E, Zieliński M, Kołodziejczyk K, Jaksender M (2019) Application of industrial and biopolymers waste to stabilise the subsoil of road surfaces. Road Mater Pavement Des 20(2): 440-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1389766 |
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
Toufigh V, Ghassemi P (2020) Control and stabilization of fugitive dust : using eco-friendly and sustainable materials. Int J Geomech 20(9). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001762 |
| [79] |
Larson S, Ballard J, Griggs C, Newman JK (2010) An innovative non-petroleum rhizobium tropici biopolymer salt for soil stabilization. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Volume 5: Energy Systems Analysis, Thermodynamics and Sustainability; NanoEngineering for Energy; Engineering to Address Climate Change, Parts A and B. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. November 12–18, 2010. pp 1279-1284. ASME https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2010-38933 |
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
Chen R, Zhang L (2014) Mitigation of mine tailings dust with green biopolymer. pp 2198–205. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413272.214 |
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
Dagliya M, Satyam N, Garg A (2022) Experimental study on optimization of cementation solution for wind-erosion resistance using the MICP method. Sustainability 14:1770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031770 |
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |