How leadership and digital capability drive operational performance in railway supply chains: the mediating role of agility

Meisam Karami

Railway Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 453 -472.

PDF (875KB)
Railway Sciences ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) :453 -472. DOI: 10.1108/RS-04-2026-0027
Research article
research-article
How leadership and digital capability drive operational performance in railway supply chains: the mediating role of agility
Author information +
History +
PDF (875KB)

Abstract

Purpose-This study examines how leadership and digital capability influence supply chain agility and operational performance within railway supply chains in North America, with a focus on both direct and indirect pathways.

Design/methodology/approach-A quantitative research design was employed using survey data collected from 214 organizations operating within railway-centered supply chain networks across Canada, the United States and Mexico. The proposed model was tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).

Findings-The results indicate that leadership plays a dual role in railway supply chain networks by directly enhancing supply chain agility and indirectly influencing agility through digital capability. Digital capability significantly improves both operational agility and performance within railway supply chain networks, while supply chain agility partially mediates the relationship between digital capability and performance.

Practical implications-The findings suggest that railway organizations should align leadership, digital investments and agile operational processes to improve responsiveness, coordination and operational performance in infrastructure-intensive environments.

Originality/value-This study extends existing literature by integrating leadership into capability-based models and demonstrating its direct and indirect influence on agility and performance in railway supply chains. This study highlights how performance in railway systems depends on the alignment of leadership, digital capability and agility within structurally constrained operational environments.

Keywords

Leadership / Digital capability / Supply chain agility / Operational performance / Railway supply chains / Dynamic capabilities

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Meisam Karami. How leadership and digital capability drive operational performance in railway supply chains: the mediating role of agility. Railway Sciences, 2026, 5 (4) : 453-472 DOI:10.1108/RS-04-2026-0027

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abourokbah, S. H., Mashat, R. M., & Salam, M. A. (2023). Role of absorptive capacity, digital capability, agility, and resilience in supply chain innovation performance. Sustainability, 15(4), 3636. doi: 10.3390/su15043636.

[2]

Albannai, N. A., Raziq, M. M., Malik, M., Scott-kennel, J., & Igoe, J. (2025). Unraveling the role of digital leadership in developing digital dynamic capabilities for the digital transformation of firms. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 32(6), 2250-2275. doi: 10.1108/bij-10-2023-0756.

[3]

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108.

[4]

Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Kaesser, M. (2013). Ambidextrous governance in supply chains: The impact on innovation and cost performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(4), 59-80.

[5]

Browder, R. E., Dwyer, S. M., & Koch, H. (2024). Upgrading adaptation: How digital transformation promotes organizational resilience. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 18(1), 128-164. doi: 10.1002/sej.1483.

[6]

Cantele, S., Russo, I., Kirchoff, J. F., & Valcozzena, S. (2023). Supply chain agility and sustainability performance: A configurational approach to sustainable supply chain management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137493. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137493.

[7]

Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Giovando, G. (2023). Digital workplace and organization performance: Moderating role of digital leadership capability. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 8(1), 100334. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100334.

[8]

Cheng, W., Li, Q., Wu, Q., Ye, F., & Jiang, Y. (2024). Digital capability and green innovation: The perspective of green supply chain collaboration and top management’s environmental awareness. Heliyon, 10(11), e32290. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32290.

[9]

Christopher, M. (2000). The agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 37-44. doi: 10.1016/s0019-8501(99)00110-8.

[10]

Cui, L., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., & Cao, G. (2024). How does data-driven supply chain analytics capability enhance supply chain agility in the digital era?. International Journal of Production Economics, 277, 109404. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109404.

[11]

Durman, S., Iyiola, K., Alzubi, A. B., & Aljuhmani, H. Y. (2025). Dynamic capabilities in action: Digital capability, business model innovation and absorptive capacity. Management Decision, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. 1-36. doi: 10.1108/md-04-2025-0951.

[12]

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2017). Dynamic capabilities: What are they?. In The Sms Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Capabilities (pp. 341-363).

[13]

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104.

[14]

Gligor, D.M., Holcomb, M.C., & Stank, T.P. (2013). A multidisciplinary approach to supply chain agility: Conceptualization and scale development. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 94-108.

[15]

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of Pls-sem. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. doi: 10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203.

[16]

Hamann-lohmer, J., Bendig, M., & Lasch, R. (2023). Investigating the impact of digital transformation on relationship and collaboration dynamics in supply chains and manufacturing networks-a multi-case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 262, 108932. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108932.

[17]

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

[18]

Imran, F., Shahzad, K., Butt, A., & Kantola, J. (2021). Digital transformation of industrial organizations: Toward an integrated framework. Journal of Change Management, 21(4), 451-479. doi: 10.1080/14697017.2021.1929406.

[19]

Karami, M. (2026). Resilience and risk management in railway supply chains: The interplay of leadership, innovation and competitive advantage. Railway Sciences, Vol. 5 No. 1 pp. 117-135, doi: 10.1108/RS-09-2025-0045.

[20]

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in Pls-sem: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. doi: 10.4018/ijec.2015100101.

[21]

Leana-morales, C., & Cuevas-vargas, H. (2024). Unlocking supply chain agility: Exploring the nexus of transformational leadership and knowledge management. Procedia Computer Science, 242, 1339-1346. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.08.129.

[22]

Li, Z., Miao, S., & Xu, L. (2024). Digital transformation and environmental, social, and governance greenwashing: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 365, 121460. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121460.

[23]

Lis, A., Glińska-newes, A., & Kalińska, M. (2014). The role of leadership in shaping interpersonal relationships in the context of positive organizational potential. Journal of Positive Management, 5(4), 28-49. doi: 10.12775/jpm.2014.022.

[24]

Ludwikowska, K., & Tworek, K. (2022). Dynamic capabilities of it as a factor shaping servant leadership influence on organizational performance. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.035.

[25]

Manzoor, U., Baig, S. A., Hashim, M., Sami, A., Rehman, H.-U., & Sajjad, I. (2022). The effect of supply chain agility and lean practices on operational performance: A resource-based view and dynamic capabilities perspective. The Tqm Journal, 34(5), 1273-1297. doi: 10.1108/tqm-01-2021-0006.

[26]

Oke, A., Munshi, N., & Walumbwa, F.O. (2009). The influence of leadership on innovation processes and activities. Organizational Dynamics, 38(1), 64-72.

[27]

Permana, E., Poerwoko, B., Widyastuti, S., & Rachbini, W. (2019). Digital capability and innovation strategy to develop the performance and competitive advantages of fashion Smes in Jakarta, Indonesia. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 7, 2349-0349, 0711002.

[28]

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

[29]

Prabhu, H. M., & Srivastava, A. K. (2023). CEO transformational leadership, supply chain agility and firm performance: A tism modeling among Smes. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(1), 51-65. doi: 10.1007/s40171-022-00323-y.

[30]

Prater, E., Biehl, M., & Smith, M. A. (2001). International supply chain agility-tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5/6), 823-839. doi: 10.1108/01443570110390507.

[31]

Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Seth, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 225-246.

[32]

Saari, A., Sinclair, S., Leshinsky, R., & Junnila, S. (2025). Best practices for blockchain-driven digital transformation in cross-industry settings. Digital Business, 5(2), 100127. doi: 10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100127.

[33]

Schweitzer, J. (2014). Leadership and innovation capability development in strategic alliances. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(5), 442-469. doi: 10.1108/lodj-01-12-0001.

[34]

Swafford, P.M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170-188.

[35]

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. doi: 10.1002/smj.640.

[36]

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::aid-smj882>3.0.co;2-z.

[37]

Truong, T. C. (2022). The impact of digital transformation on environmental sustainability. Advances in Multimedia. doi: 10.1155/2022/6324325.

[38]

Tse, Y. K., Zhang, M., Akhtar, P., & Macbryde, J. (2016). Embracing supply chain agility: An investigation in the electronics industry. Supply Chain Management: International Journal, 21(1), 140-156. doi: 10.1108/scm-06-2015-0237.

[39]

Turner, J. R., Baker, R., Schroeder, J., Johnson, K. R., & Chung, C.-h. (2018). Leadership development techniques: Mapping leadership development techniques with leadership capacities using a typology of development. European Journal of Training and Development, 42(9), 538-557. doi: 10.1108/ejtd-03-2018-0022.

[40]

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207.

[41]

Yu, Y., Zeng, H., & Zhang, M. (2025). Digital transformation for supply chain collaborative innovation and market performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(6), 2446-2468. doi: 10.1108/ejim-09-2023-0736.

[42]

Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G Jr, & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. doi: 10.1086/651257.

PDF (875KB)

8

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉