PDF
(4632KB)
Abstract
Flooding remains one of the most destructive natural disasters, posing significant risks to both human lives and infrastructure. In India, where a large area is susceptible to flood hazards, the importance of accurate flood frequency analysis (FFA) and flood susceptibility mapping cannot be overstated. This study focuses on the Haora River basin in Tripura, a region prone to frequent flooding due to a combination of natural and anthropogenic factors. This study evaluates the suitability of the Log-Pearson Type III (LP-III) and Gumbel Extreme Value-1 (EV-1) distributions for estimating peak discharges and delineates flood-susceptible zones in the Haora River basin, Tripura. Using 40 years of peak discharge data (1984–2023), the LP-III distribution was identified as the most appropriate model based on goodness-of-fit tests. Flood susceptibility mapping, integrating 16 thematic layers through the Analytical Hierarchy Process, identified 8%, 64%, and 26% of the area as high, moderate, and low susceptibility zones, respectively, with a model success rate of 0.81. The findings highlight the need for improved flood management strategies, such as enhancing river capacity and constructing flood spill channels. These insights are critical for designing targeted flood mitigation measures in the Haora basin and other flood-prone regions.
Keywords
analytic hierarchy process
/
disaster management
/
flood frequency analysis
/
flood Risk
/
flood susceptibility
/
North East India
/
vulnerability
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Asif Iqbal Shah, Kirtica Das, Nibedita Das Pan.
Flood frequency analysis and susceptibility zonation of the Haora River Basin, Northeast India.
River, 2025, 4(1): 116-133 DOI:10.1002/rvr2.70001
| [1] |
Ahmed, I., Das (Pan), N., Debnath, J., Bhowmik, M., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2024). Flood hazard zonation using GIS-based multi-parametric analytical hierarchy process. Geosystems and Geoenvironment, 3 (2), 100250.
|
| [2] |
Arnell, N. W., & Gosling, S. N. (2016). The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale. Climatic Change, 134, 387–401.
|
| [3] |
Bhat, M. S., Alam, A., Ahmad, B., Kotlia, B. S., Farooq, H., Taloor, A. K., & Ahmad, S. (2019). Flood frequency analysis of river Jhelum in Kashmir basin. Quaternary International, 507, 288–294.
|
| [4] |
Bobée, B., Cavadias, G., Ashkar, F., Bernier, J., & Rasmussen, P. (1993). Towards a systematic approach to comparing distributions used in flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 142(1–4), 121–136.
|
| [5] |
Bubeck, P., De Moel, H., Bouwer, L. M., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2011). How reliable are projections of future flood damage? Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11 (12), 3293–3306.
|
| [6] |
Central Water Commission. (2018). Annual Report. Ministry of Water Resources.
|
| [7] |
Chow, V. T., Maidment, D. R., & Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, Civil Engineering Series.
|
| [8] |
Cunnane, C. (1989). Statistical distribution for flood frequency analysis. WMO Operational Hydrology, Report No. 33, WMO-No. 718, Geneva, Switzerland.
|
| [9] |
Doocy, S., Daniels, A., Murray, S., & Kirsch, T. D. (2013). The human impact of floods: a historical review of events 1980–2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS Currents, 5(5).
|
| [10] |
Dutta, P., & Deka, S. (2023). Reckoning flood frequency and susceptibility area in the lower Brahmaputra floodplain using geospatial and hydrological approach. River, 2 (3), 384–401.
|
| [11] |
Engmann, S., & Cousineau, D. (2011). Comparing distributions: The two-sample Anderson-Darling test as an alternative to the Kolmogorov–Smirnoff test. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 6 (3), 1–17.
|
| [12] |
Farooq, M., Shafique, M., & Khattak, M. S. (2018). Flood frequency analysis of river swat using Log Pearson type 3, Generalized Extreme Value, Normal, and GUMBEL MAX distribution methods. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11, 216.
|
| [13] |
Ferdows, M., & Hossain, M. (2005). Flood frequency analysis at different rivers in Bangladesh: A comparison study on probability distribution functions. Science & Technology Asia, 10, 53–62.
|
| [14] |
Gan, F. F., & Koehler, K. J. (1990). Goodness-of-fit tests based on P-P probability plots. Technometrics, 32 (3), 289–303.
|
| [15] |
Ghosh, A., & Kar, S. K. (2018). Application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for flood risk assessment: A case study in Malda district of West Bengal, India. Natural Hazards, 94, 349–368.
|
| [16] |
Gupta, L., & Dixit, J. (2022). A GIS-based flood risk mapping of assam, India, using the MCDA-AHP approach at the regional and administrative level. Geocarto International, 37 (26), 11867–11899.
|
| [17] |
Haddad, K., & Rahman, A. (2011). Selection of the best fit flood frequency distribution and parameter estimation procedure: A case study for Tasmania in Australia. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 25, 415–428.
|
| [18] |
Hammami, S., Zouhri, L., Souissi, D., Souei, A., Zghibi, A., Marzougui, A., & Dlala, M. (2019). Application of the GIS based multi-criteria decision analysis and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in the flood susceptibility mapping (Tunisia). Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12, 653.
|
| [19] |
Holmes Jr, R. R., & Dinicola, K. (2010). 100-Year flood–it’s all about chance (No. 106). US Geological Survey.
|
| [20] |
Houessou-Dossou, E. A. Y., Mwangi Gathenya, J., Njuguna, M., & Abiero Gariy, Z. (2019). Flood frequency analysis using participatory GIS and rainfall data for two stations in Narok Town, Kenya. Hydrology, 6 (4), 90.
|
| [21] |
Islam, A., & Sarkar, B. (2020). Analysing flood history and simulating the nature of future floods using Gumbel method and Log-Pearson Type III: The case of the Mayurakshi River Basin, India. Bulletin of Geography. Physical Geography Series, 19 (1), 43–69.
|
| [22] |
Jia, Y., Song, S., & Ge, L. (2023). Trimmed L-moments of the Pearson type III distribution for flood frequency analysis. Water Resources Management, 37 (3), 1321–1340.
|
| [23] |
Kaliraj, S., Chandrasekar, N., & Magesh, N. S. (2014). Identification of potential groundwater recharge zones in Vaigai upper basin, Tamil nadu, using GIS-based analytical hierarchical process (AHP) technique. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7, 1385–1401.
|
| [24] |
Kazemzadeh, M., Malekian, A., & Noori, Z. (2022). Variability and normality analysis of streamflow over a 51-year period (case study: Western and northwestern Iran). Sustainable Water Resources Management, 8 (6), 176.
|
| [25] |
Kumar, R. (2019). Flood frequency analysis of the Rapti river basin using log Pearson Type-III and Gumbel Extreme Value-1 methods. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 94 (5), 480–484.
|
| [26] |
Laio, F. (2004). Cramer–von Mises and Anderson-Darling goodness of fit tests for extreme value distributions with unknown parameters. Water Resources Research, 40 (9), 0.
|
| [27] |
Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
|
| [28] |
Massey Jr., F. J., (1951). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46 (253), 68–78.
|
| [29] |
McCuen, R. H. (2016). Modeling hydrologic change: Statistical methods. CRC Press.
|
| [30] |
Matori, A. N., Lawal, D. U., Yusof, K. W., Hashim, M. A., & Balogun, A. L. (2014). Spatial analytic hierarchy process model for flood forecasting: An integrated approach, In IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science (20, p. 012029). IOP Publishing.
|
| [31] |
Meyer, V., Scheuer, S., & Haase, D. (2009). A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde River, Germany. Natural hazards, 48, 17–39.
|
| [32] |
Millington, N., Das, S., & Simonovic, S. P. (2011). The comparison of GEV, log-Pearson type 3 and Gumbel distributions in the Upper Thames River watershed under global climate models (Water Resources Research Report. 40).
|
| [33] |
Mishra, K., & Sinha, R. (2020). Flood risk assessment in the Kosi megafan using multi-criteria decision analysis: A hydro-geomorphic approach. Geomorphology, 350, 106861.
|
| [34] |
Mitra, R., Saha, P., & Das, J. (2022). Assessment of the performance of GIS-based analytical hierarchical process (AHP) approach for flood modelling in Uttar Dinajpur district of West Bengal, India. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 13 (1), 2183–2226.
|
| [35] |
Moges, S. A., & Taye, M. T. (2019). Regional flood frequency curves for remote rural areas of the Nile River Basin: The case of Baro-Akobo drainage basin, Ethiopia, Extreme hydrology and climate variability (pp. 385–393). Elsevier.
|
| [36] |
National Disaster Management Authority. (2008). National disaster management guidelines: Management of floods. Government of India.
|
| [37] |
Pandey, H. K., Dwivedi, S., & Kumar, K. (2018). Flood frequency analysis of Betwa River, Madhya Pradesh India. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 92, 286–290.
|
| [38] |
Perez, G., Coon, E. T., Rathore, S. S., & Le, P. V. V. (2024). Advancing process-based flood frequency analysis for assessing flood hazard and population flood exposure. Journal of Hydrology, 639, 131620.
|
| [39] |
Phien, H. N., & Ajirajah, T. J. (1984). Applications of the log Pearson type-3 distribution in hydrology. Journal of Hydrology, 73(3–4), 359–372.
|
| [40] |
Razandi, Y., Pourghasemi, H. R., Neisani, N. S., & Rahmati, O. (2015). Application of analytical hierarchy process, frequency ratio, and certainty factor models for groundwater potential mapping using GIS. Earth Science Informatics, 8, 867–883.
|
| [41] |
Salarpour, M., Yusop, Z., & Yusof, F. (2012). Modeling the distributions of flood characteristics for a tropical river basin. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5 (6), 419–429.
|
| [42] |
Samantaray, S., & Sahoo, A. (2020). Estimation of flood frequency using statistical method: Mahanadi River basin, India. H2Open Journal, 3 (1), 189–207.
|
| [43] |
Şen, Z. (2018). Flood modeling, prediction and mitigation (p. 431). Springer International Publishing.
|
| [44] |
Shah, A. I., & Pan, N. D. (2024). Evaluation of probability distribution methods for flood frequency analysis in the Jhelum Basin of North-Western Himalayas, India. Cleaner Wate, 2, 100044.
|
| [45] |
Strupczewski, W. G., Kochanek, K., & Bogdanowicz, E. (2017). Historical floods in flood frequency analysis: Is this game worth the candle? Journal of Hydrology, 554, 800–816.
|
| [46] |
Suhartanto, E., Limantara, L. M., Noviadriana, D., Harta, F. I., & Aryani, K. D. (2018). Estimation of design flood with four frequency analysis distributions. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2 (1), 13–27.
|
| [47] |
Swain, D. L., Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., Done, J. M., Johnson, K. A., & Cameron, D. R. (2020). Increased flood exposure due to climate change and population growth in the United States. Earth’s Future, 8(11), e2020EF001778.
|
| [48] |
Swets, J. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240 (4857), 1285–1293.
|
| [49] |
Tabari, H. (2020). Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability. Scientific Reports, 10 (1), 13768.
|
| [50] |
Tanaka, T., Tachikawa, Y., Ichikawa, Y., & Yorozu, K. (2017). Impact assessment of upstream flooding on extreme flood frequency analysis by incorporating a flood-inundation model for flood risk assessment. Journal of Hydrology, 554, 370–382.
|
| [51] |
Viero, D. P., D’Alpaos, A., Carniello, L., & Defina, A. (2013). Mathematical modeling of flooding due to river bank failure. Advances in Water Resources, 59, 82–94.
|
| [52] |
Vojtek, M., & Vojteková J. (2019). Flood susceptibility mapping on a national scale in Slovakia using the analytical hierarchy process. Water, 11 (2), 364.
|
| [53] |
Walter, J. Ed. (2004). World disasters report 2004: Focus on community resilience. Kumarian.
|
| [54] |
Yue, S., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Bobée, B., Legendre, P., & Bruneau, P. (1999). The Gumbel mixed model for flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 226(1–2), 88–100.
|
| [55] |
Zhang, H., Yao, Z., Yang, Q., Li, S., Baartman, J. E., Gai, L., & Geissen, V. (2017). An integrated algorithm to evaluate flow direction and flow accumulation in flat regions of hydrologically corrected DEMs. Catena, 151, 174–181.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2025 The Author(s). River published by Wiley-VCH GmbH on behalf of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (IWHR).