Further research of multi-scale assemble and matrix reassemble method for efficient analysis of railway track–substructure system subjected to a moving train

Abstract

For a large-scale dynamic system, the efficiency of computation becomes a vital work sometimes in engineering practices. As a layered structural system, ballastless track and substructure occupy most part of the degrees of freedom of the whole system. It is, therefore, rather important to optimize the structural models in dynamic equation formulations. In this work, a three-dimensional and coupled model for multi-rigid-body of train and finite elements of track and substructures is presented by multi-scale assemble and matrix reassemble method. The matrix reassembling tactic is based on the multi-scale assemble method, through which the finite element matrix bandwidth is greatly narrowed, and the Cholesky factorization, iterative and multi-time-step solution have been introduced to efficiently obtain the train, track and substructure responses. The subgrade and its subsoil works as a typical substructural system, and comparisons with the previous model without matrix reassembling, SIMPACK and ABAQUS have been conducted to fully validate the efficiency and accuracy of this train–track–subgrade dynamic interaction model.

Keywords

Train–track interaction / Railway track / Dynamics / Finite elements / Iterative solution

References

[1] ZhaiW, SunX. A detailed model for investigating vertical interaction between railway vehicle and track. Veh Syst Dyn, 1994, 23(sup1.): 603-615.

[2] ZhaiW, WangK, CaiC. Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn, 2019, 47111349-1376.

[3] KnotheK, GrassieSL. Modelling of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies. Veh Syst Dyn, 1993, 223–4209-262.

[4] NielsenJCO, IgelandA. Vertical dynamic interaction between train and track-influence of wheel and track imperfections. J Sound Vib, 1995, 1875825-839.

[5] OscarssonJ, DahlbergT. Dynamic train/track/ballast interaction—computer models and full-scale experiments. Veh Syst Dyn, 1998, 28sup173-84.

[6] FrohlingRD. Low frequency dynamic vehicle–track interaction: modelling and simulation. Veh Syst Dyn, 1998, 28sup130-46.

[7] JonesDV, PetytM. Ground vibration in the vicinity of a strip load: a two-dimensional half-space model. J Sound Vib, 1991, 1471155-166.

[8] DietermanHA, MetrikineAV. Equivalent stiffness of a half-space interacting with a beam. critical velocities of a moving load along the beam. Eur J Mech A Solid, 1996, 15167-90

[9] GrundmannH, LiebM, TrommerE. The response of a layered half-space to traffic loads moving along its surface. Arch Appl Mech, 1999, 69155-67.

[10] HungHH, YangYB. Elastic waves in visco-elastic half-space generated by various vehicle loads. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2001, 2111-17.

[11] LeiX, ZhangB. Analysis of dynamic behavior for slab track of high-speed railway based on vehicle and track elements. J Transp Eng, 2011, 1374227-240.

[12] XuL, ChenZ, ZhaiW. An advanced vehicle–slab track interaction model considering rail random irregularities. J Vib Control, 2018, 24194592-4603.

[13] YangX, GuS, ZhouS, et al. . Effect of track irregularity on the dynamic response of a slab track under a high-speed train based on the composite track element method. Appl Acoust, 2015, 99: 72-84.

[14] SadeghiJ, KhajehdezfulyA, EsmaeiliM, et al. . Dynamic interaction of vehicle and discontinuous slab track considering nonlinear Hertz contact model. J Transp Eng, 2016, 142404016011.

[15] MatrikineAV, PoppK. Steady-state vibrations of an elastic beam on a visco-elastic layer under moving load. Arch Appl Mech, 2000, 70: 399-408.

[16] UzzalRUA, AhmedAKW, BhatRB. Modelling, validation and analysis of a three-dimensional railway vehicle-track system model with linear and nonlinear track properties in the presence of wheel flats. Veh Syst Dyn, 2013, 51111695-1721.

[17] ZhangW, ShenZ, ZengJ. Study on dynamics of coupled systems in high-speed trains. Veh Syst Dyn, 2013, 517966-1016.

[18] ZhuS, YangJ, YanH, et al. . Low-frequency vibration control of floating slab tracks using dynamic vibration absorbers. Veh Syst Dyn, 2015, 5391296-1314.

[19] Martínez-Casas J, Giner-Navarro J, Baeza L et al (2017) Improved railway wheelset–track interaction model in the high-frequency domain. J Comput Appl Math 309:642–653

[20] ChenJ, ZhouY. Dynamic responses of subgrade under double-line high-speed railway. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2018, 110: 1-12.

[21] GalvínP, RomeroA, DomínguezJ. Fully three-dimensional analysis of high-speed train–track–soil–structure dynamic interaction. J Sound Vib, 2010, 329245147-5163.

[22] ZhouS, HeC, DiH. Dynamic 25-D green’s function for a poroelastic half-space. Eng Anal with Bound Elements, 2016, 67: 96-107.

[23] ZhouS, HeC, GuoP, et al. . Dynamic response of a segmented tunnel in saturated soil using a 2.5-D FE-BE methodology. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2019, 120: 368-397.

[24] ZhaoJ, HuangX, LiuW, et al. . 2.5-D frequency-domain viscoelastic wave modelling using finite-element method. Geophys J Int, 2017, 2111164-187.

[25] Bian X, Chao C, Jin W et al (2011) A 2.5D finite element approach for predicting ground vibrations generated by vertical track irregularities. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A Appl Phys Eng 12(12):885–894

[26] HeC, ZhouS, DiH, et al. . Effect of longitudinal joint on train-induced vibrations from subway shield-driven tunnels in a homogeneous half-space. Int J Trans Sci Technol, 2022, 112381-391

[27] ZhuJ, LiX, LiangJ. 25D FE-BE modelling of dynamic responses of segmented tunnels subjected to obliquely incident seismic waves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2022, 163: 107564.

[28] HallL. Simulations and analyses of train-induced ground vibrations in finite element models. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2003, 235403-413.

[29] KouroussisG, VerlindenO, ContiC. Free field vibrations caused by high-speed lines: measurement and time domain simulation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2011, 314692-707.

[30] GalvínP, RomeroA, DomínguezJ. Vibrations induced by HST passage on ballast and non-ballast tracks. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2010, 309862-873.

[31] ShanY, AlbersB, SavidisSA. Influence of different transition zones on the dynamic response of track–subgrade systems. Comput Geotech, 2013, 48: 21-8.

[32] VarandasJN, HölscherP, SilvaMAG. Three-dimensional track-ballast interaction model for the study of a culvert transition. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2016, 89: 116-127.

[33] ConnollyD, GiannopoulosA, FordeMC. Numerical modelling of ground borne vibrations from high speed rail lines on embankments. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2013, 46: 13-19.

[34] XuL. On dynamic analysis method for large-scale train–track–substructure interaction. Railw Eng Sci, 2022, 302162-182.

[35] HeD, XiangJ, ZengQ. A new method for dynamics modeling of ballastless track. J Central South Univ Technol, 2007, 3861206-1211

[36] Xu L, Xin L, Yu Z et al (2020) Construction of a dynamic model for the interaction between the versatile tracks and a vehicle. Eng Struct 206:110067

[37] LouP, YuZ, AuFTK. Rail–bridge coupling element of unequal lengths for analysing train–track–bridge interaction systems. Appl Math Mode, 2012, 3641395-1414.

[38] ZengQ, LouP, XiangJ. The principle of total potential energy with stationary value in elastic system dynamics and its application to the analysis of vibration and dynamic stability. J Huazhong Univ Sci Tech (Urban Science Edition), 2002, 1917-14

[39] ZhaiWVehicle–track coupled dynamics: theory and application, 2020SingaporeSpringer.

[40] XuL, LiZ, ZhaoY, YuZ, WangK. Modelling of vehicle–track related dynamics: a development of multi-finite-element coupling method and multi-time-step solution method. Veh Syst Dyn, 2022, 6041097-1124.

[41] ZhaiW. Two simple fast integration methods for large-scale dynamic problems in engineering. Int J Numer Meth Eng, 1996, 39244199-4214.

[42] XuL, ZhaiW, ZhuS, LiuW. An efficient method for train–track–substructure dynamic interaction analysis by implicit–explicit integration and multi-time-step solution. Rail Eng Sci, 2023, 31120-36.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(52378468)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)