Further research of multi-scale assemble and matrix reassemble method for efficient analysis of railway track–substructure system subjected to a moving train

Lei Xu, Leizhen Wu, Zheng Li, Borong Peng, Tao Lu, Zhiwu Yu

Railway Engineering Science ›› 2025

Railway Engineering Science ›› 2025 DOI: 10.1007/s40534-024-00342-8
Article

Further research of multi-scale assemble and matrix reassemble method for efficient analysis of railway track–substructure system subjected to a moving train

Author information +
History +

Abstract

For a large-scale dynamic system, the efficiency of computation becomes a vital work sometimes in engineering practices. As a layered structural system, ballastless track and substructure occupy most part of the degrees of freedom of the whole system. It is, therefore, rather important to optimize the structural models in dynamic equation formulations. In this work, a three-dimensional and coupled model for multi-rigid-body of train and finite elements of track and substructures is presented by multi-scale assemble and matrix reassemble method. The matrix reassembling tactic is based on the multi-scale assemble method, through which the finite element matrix bandwidth is greatly narrowed, and the Cholesky factorization, iterative and multi-time-step solution have been introduced to efficiently obtain the train, track and substructure responses. The subgrade and its subsoil works as a typical substructural system, and comparisons with the previous model without matrix reassembling, SIMPACK and ABAQUS have been conducted to fully validate the efficiency and accuracy of this train–track–subgrade dynamic interaction model.

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lei Xu, Leizhen Wu, Zheng Li, Borong Peng, Tao Lu, Zhiwu Yu. Further research of multi-scale assemble and matrix reassemble method for efficient analysis of railway track–substructure system subjected to a moving train. Railway Engineering Science, 2025 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-024-00342-8

References

[1.]
Zhai W, Sun X. A detailed model for investigating vertical interaction between railway vehicle and track Veh Syst Dyn, 1994, 23(sup1.): 603-615.
CrossRef Google scholar
[2.]
Zhai W, Wang K, Cai C. Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics Veh Syst Dyn, 2019, 47(11): 1349-1376.
CrossRef Google scholar
[3.]
Knothe K, Grassie SL. Modelling of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies Veh Syst Dyn, 1993, 22(3–4): 209-262.
CrossRef Google scholar
[4.]
Nielsen JCO, Igeland A. Vertical dynamic interaction between train and track-influence of wheel and track imperfections J Sound Vib, 1995, 187(5): 825-839.
CrossRef Google scholar
[5.]
Oscarsson J, Dahlberg T. Dynamic train/track/ballast interaction—computer models and full-scale experiments Veh Syst Dyn, 1998, 28(sup1): 73-84.
CrossRef Google scholar
[6.]
Frohling RD. Low frequency dynamic vehicle–track interaction: modelling and simulation Veh Syst Dyn, 1998, 28(sup1): 30-46.
CrossRef Google scholar
[7.]
Jones DV, Petyt M. Ground vibration in the vicinity of a strip load: a two-dimensional half-space model J Sound Vib, 1991, 147(1): 155-166.
CrossRef Google scholar
[8.]
Dieterman HA, Metrikine AV. Equivalent stiffness of a half-space interacting with a beam. critical velocities of a moving load along the beam Eur J Mech A Solid, 1996, 15(1): 67-90
[9.]
Grundmann H, Lieb M, Trommer E. The response of a layered half-space to traffic loads moving along its surface Arch Appl Mech, 1999, 69(1): 55-67.
CrossRef Google scholar
[10.]
Hung HH, Yang YB. Elastic waves in visco-elastic half-space generated by various vehicle loads Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2001, 21(1): 1-17.
CrossRef Google scholar
[11.]
Lei X, Zhang B. Analysis of dynamic behavior for slab track of high-speed railway based on vehicle and track elements J Transp Eng, 2011, 137(4): 227-240.
CrossRef Google scholar
[12.]
Xu L, Chen Z, Zhai W. An advanced vehicle–slab track interaction model considering rail random irregularities J Vib Control, 2018, 24(19): 4592-4603.
CrossRef Google scholar
[13.]
Yang X, Gu S, Zhou S, et al.. Effect of track irregularity on the dynamic response of a slab track under a high-speed train based on the composite track element method Appl Acoust, 2015, 99: 72-84.
CrossRef Google scholar
[14.]
Sadeghi J, Khajehdezfuly A, Esmaeili M, et al.. Dynamic interaction of vehicle and discontinuous slab track considering nonlinear Hertz contact model J Transp Eng, 2016, 142(4): 04016011.
CrossRef Google scholar
[15.]
Matrikine AV, Popp K. Steady-state vibrations of an elastic beam on a visco-elastic layer under moving load Arch Appl Mech, 2000, 70: 399-408.
CrossRef Google scholar
[16.]
Uzzal RUA, Ahmed AKW, Bhat RB. Modelling, validation and analysis of a three-dimensional railway vehicle-track system model with linear and nonlinear track properties in the presence of wheel flats Veh Syst Dyn, 2013, 51(11): 1695-1721.
CrossRef Google scholar
[17.]
Zhang W, Shen Z, Zeng J. Study on dynamics of coupled systems in high-speed trains Veh Syst Dyn, 2013, 51(7): 966-1016.
CrossRef Google scholar
[18.]
Zhu S, Yang J, Yan H, et al.. Low-frequency vibration control of floating slab tracks using dynamic vibration absorbers Veh Syst Dyn, 2015, 53(9): 1296-1314.
CrossRef Google scholar
[19.]
Martínez-Casas J, Giner-Navarro J, Baeza L et al (2017) Improved railway wheelset–track interaction model in the high-frequency domain. J Comput Appl Math 309:642–653
[20.]
Chen J, Zhou Y. Dynamic responses of subgrade under double-line high-speed railway Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2018, 110: 1-12.
CrossRef Google scholar
[21.]
Galvín P, Romero A, Domínguez J. Fully three-dimensional analysis of high-speed train–track–soil–structure dynamic interaction J Sound Vib, 2010, 329(24): 5147-5163.
CrossRef Google scholar
[22.]
Zhou S, He C, Di H. Dynamic 25-D green’s function for a poroelastic half-space Eng Anal with Bound Elements, 2016, 67: 96-107.
CrossRef Google scholar
[23.]
Zhou S, He C, Guo P, et al.. Dynamic response of a segmented tunnel in saturated soil using a 2.5-D FE-BE methodology Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2019, 120: 368-397.
CrossRef Google scholar
[24.]
Zhao J, Huang X, Liu W, et al.. 2.5-D frequency-domain viscoelastic wave modelling using finite-element method Geophys J Int, 2017, 211(1): 164-187.
CrossRef Google scholar
[25.]
Bian X, Chao C, Jin W et al (2011) A 2.5D finite element approach for predicting ground vibrations generated by vertical track irregularities. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A Appl Phys Eng 12(12):885–894
[26.]
He C, Zhou S, Di H, et al.. Effect of longitudinal joint on train-induced vibrations from subway shield-driven tunnels in a homogeneous half-space Int J Trans Sci Technol, 2022, 11(2): 381-391
[27.]
Zhu J, Li X, Liang J. 25D FE-BE modelling of dynamic responses of segmented tunnels subjected to obliquely incident seismic waves Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2022, 163: 107564.
CrossRef Google scholar
[28.]
Hall L. Simulations and analyses of train-induced ground vibrations in finite element models Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2003, 23(5): 403-413.
CrossRef Google scholar
[29.]
Kouroussis G, Verlinden O, Conti C. Free field vibrations caused by high-speed lines: measurement and time domain simulation Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2011, 31(4): 692-707.
CrossRef Google scholar
[30.]
Galvín P, Romero A, Domínguez J. Vibrations induced by HST passage on ballast and non-ballast tracks Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2010, 30(9): 862-873.
CrossRef Google scholar
[31.]
Shan Y, Albers B, Savidis SA. Influence of different transition zones on the dynamic response of track–subgrade systems Comput Geotech, 2013, 48: 21-8.
CrossRef Google scholar
[32.]
Varandas JN, Hölscher P, Silva MAG. Three-dimensional track-ballast interaction model for the study of a culvert transition Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2016, 89: 116-127.
CrossRef Google scholar
[33.]
Connolly D, Giannopoulos A, Forde MC. Numerical modelling of ground borne vibrations from high speed rail lines on embankments Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 2013, 46: 13-19.
CrossRef Google scholar
[34.]
Xu L. On dynamic analysis method for large-scale train–track–substructure interaction Railw Eng Sci, 2022, 30(2): 162-182.
CrossRef Google scholar
[35.]
He D, Xiang J, Zeng Q. A new method for dynamics modeling of ballastless track J Central South Univ Technol, 2007, 38(6): 1206-1211
[36.]
Xu L, Xin L, Yu Z et al (2020) Construction of a dynamic model for the interaction between the versatile tracks and a vehicle. Eng Struct 206:110067
[37.]
Lou P, Yu Z, Au FTK. Rail–bridge coupling element of unequal lengths for analysing train–track–bridge interaction systems Appl Math Mode, 2012, 36(4): 1395-1414.
CrossRef Google scholar
[38.]
Zeng Q, Lou P, Xiang J. The principle of total potential energy with stationary value in elastic system dynamics and its application to the analysis of vibration and dynamic stability J Huazhong Univ Sci Tech (Urban Science Edition), 2002, 19(1): 7-14
[39.]
Zhai W Vehicle–track coupled dynamics: theory and application, 2020 Singapore Springer.
CrossRef Google scholar
[40.]
Xu L, Li Z, Zhao Y, Yu Z, Wang K. Modelling of vehicle–track related dynamics: a development of multi-finite-element coupling method and multi-time-step solution method Veh Syst Dyn, 2022, 60(4): 1097-1124.
CrossRef Google scholar
[41.]
Zhai W. Two simple fast integration methods for large-scale dynamic problems in engineering Int J Numer Meth Eng, 1996, 39(24): 4199-4214.
CrossRef Google scholar
[42.]
Xu L, Zhai W, Zhu S, Liu W. An efficient method for train–track–substructure dynamic interaction analysis by implicit–explicit integration and multi-time-step solution Rail Eng Sci, 2023, 31(1): 20-36.
CrossRef Google scholar
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1734208)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/