A discussion about the limitations of the Eurocode’s high-speed load model for railway bridges

Abstract

High-speed railway bridges are subjected to normative limitations concerning maximum permissible deck accelerations. For the design of these structures, the European norm EN 1991-2 introduces the high-speed load model (HSLM)—a set of point loads intended to include the effects of existing high-speed trains. Yet, the evolution of current trains and the recent development of new load models motivate a discussion regarding the limits of validity of the HSLM. For this study, a large number of randomly generated load models of articulated, conventional, and regular trains are tested and compared with the envelope of HSLM effects. For each type of train, two sets of 100,000 load models are considered: one abiding by the limits of the EN 1991-2 and another considering wider limits. This comparison is achieved using both a bridge-independent metric (train signatures) and dynamic analyses on a case study bridge (the Canelas bridge of the Portuguese Railway Network). For the latter, a methodology to decrease the computational cost of moving loads analysis is introduced. Results show that some theoretical load models constructed within the stipulated limits of the norm can lead to effects not covered by the HSLM. This is especially noted in conventional trains, where there is a relation with larger distances between centres of adjacent vehicle bogies.

Keywords

High-speed load model / Dynamic analysis / High-speed railways / Train signature / Railway bridges / Deck acceleration

References

[1.] Zhang N, Zhou Z, Wu Z. Safety evaluation of a vehicle-bridge interaction system using the pseudo-excitation method. Railw Eng Sci, 2022, 30(1): 41-56,

[2.] Gong W, Zhihui Zhu Y, Liu RL, Tang Y, Jiang L. Running safety assessment of a train traversing a three-tower cable-stayed bridge under spatially varying ground motion. Railw Eng Sci, 2020, 28(2): 184-198,

[3.] Montenegro PA, Carvalho H, Ribeiro D, Calçada R, Tokunaga M, Tanabe M, Zhai WM. Assessment of train running safety on bridges: a literature review. Eng Struct, 2021, 241,

[4.] Commité European de Normalisation (2005) Eurocode 0—Basis of structural design—Annex A2: applications for bridges (normative). Brussels

[5.] Zacher M, Baeßler M (2008) Dynamic behaviour of ballast on railway bridges. In: Dynamics of high-speed railway bridges. CRC Press, London

[6.] European Rail Research Institute (1999) Rail bridges for speeds > \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$>$$\end{document} 200 km/h: Confirmation of values against experimental data, ERRI D 214/RP 8. Utrecht

[7.] European Rail Research Institute (1999) Rail bridges for speeds > \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$>$$\end{document} 200 km/h: Final report, ERRI D 214/RP 9. Utrecht

[8.] European Commission (2014) Commission Regulation (EU) No 1299/2014 of 18 November 2014 on the technical specifications for interoperability relating to the ‘infrastructure’ subsystem of the rail system in the European Union Text with EEA relevance. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/1299/oj/eng

[9.] Commité European de Normalisation (2003) Eurocode 1—part 2: Actions on structures—traffic load on bridges. Brussels

[10.] European Rail Research Institute (1999) Rail bridges for speeds > \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$>$$\end{document} 200 km/h: Calculations for bridges with simply supported beams during the passage of a train ERRI D 214/RP 6. Utrecht

[11.] Vestroni F, Vidoli S. Closed-form solutions for the structural response to train loads. J Sound Vib, 2007, 303(3): 691-706,

[12.] Matsuoka K, Collina A, Somaschini C, Ma Sogabe. Influence of local deck vibrations on the evaluation of the maximum acceleration of a steel-concrete composite bridge for a high-speed railway. Eng Struct, 2019, 200,

[13.] Auersch L. Resonances of railway bridges analysed in frequency domain by the modal-force-excitation, bridge-transfer and axle-sequence spectra. Eng Struct, 2021, 249,

[14.] Marvillet D, Tartary JP (2003) Bridges, high speed and dynamic calculation - short version. In: IABSE Symposium: Structures for High-Speed Railway Transportation, Antwerp, pp 80–81

[15.] Bernhard Glatz, Josef Fink. A redesigned approach to the additional damping method in the dynamic analysis of simply supported railway bridges. Eng Struct, 2021, 241,

[16.] Reiterer M, Firus A, Vorwagner A et al (2021) Railway bridge dynamics: Development of a new high-speed train load model for dynamic analyses of train crossing. In: IABSE Congress Ghent 2021—Structural Engineering for Future Societal Needs, Ghent, pp 1633–1642

[17.] Andersson A, Allahvirdizadeh R, Albright A et al (2021) Report No. D5.6–Performed high-speed low-cost bridges I2T3 demonstrators. H2020-Sift2Rail-In2Track3 project: Research into optimised and future railway infrastructure (S2R-CFM-IP3-01-2020 Innovation Action). Tunnel and Bridge I2T2 Report-High speed low cost bridges-D5.2.5. Porto, Stockholm and Valencia

[18.] Reiterer M, Kohl AM, Vorwagner A et al (2022) Development of a new high-speed load model and validation on existing railway bridges. In: The 5th International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance, Montpellier

[19.] Vorwagner A, Kwapisz M, Flesch R et al (2021) FEM based approach for development of a new high-speed load model for railway bridges. In: IABSE Congress, Ghent 2021—Structural Engineering for Future Societal Needs, Ghent, pp 1614–1622

[20.] Harald U, Schörghofer DA, Taras A. 06.01: critical bridges in high-speed railway lines: systematic identification for specific trains. ce/papers, 2017, 1(2–3): 1427-1436,

[21.] Museros P, Andersson A, Martí V, Karoumi R. Dynamic behaviour of bridges under critical articulated trains: signature and bogie factor applied to the review of some regulations included in EN 1991–2. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rap Transit, 2021, 235(5): 655-675, ISSN 0954-4097

[22.] MATLAB ^® (2018) version 9.4.0.813654 (R2018a). The Mathworks, Inc., Natick

[23.] Bonifácio C, Ribeiro D, Calçada R et al (2014) Calibration and validation of the numerical model of a short-span railway bridge based on dynamic tests. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, Porto, pp 1315–1321

[24.] Pimentel R, Barbosa C, Costa N et al (2007) Characterization of railway traffic and its effects on a short span bridge by sing a hybrid fibre optic/electrical measurement system. In: Third European Workshop on Optical Fibre Sensors, Naples, pp 66193Y. International Society for Optics and Photonics

[25.] Rocha João M, Abel HA, Rui Calçada. Probabilistic assessment of the train running safety on a short-span high-speed railway bridge. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 2016, 12(1): 78-92,

[26.] ANSYS®, (2018) Release 19.2. ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, Pennsylvania

[27.] Zhai WM, Wang KY, Lin JH. Modelling and experiment of railway ballast vibrations. J Sound Vib, 2004, 270(4): 673-683,

[28.] Manterola J (2006) Puentes: apuntes para su diseño, cálculo y construcción. Colegio de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos.

[29.] Rocha J (2015) Probabilistic methodologies for the safety assessment of short span railway bridges for high-speed traffic. Dissertation, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto

Funding

Funda??o para a Ciência e a Tecnologia(UIDB/04708/2020); H2020 Transport(101012456)