Modelling dynamic pantograph loads with combined numerical analysis

Abstract

Appropriate interaction between pantograph and catenary is imperative for smooth operation of electric trains. Changing heights of overhead lines to accommodate level crossings, overbridges, and tunnels pose significant challenges in maintaining consistent current collection performance as the pantograph aerodynamic profile, and thus aerodynamic load changes significantly with operational height. This research aims to analyse the global flow characteristics and aerodynamic forces acting on individual components of an HSX pantograph operating in different configurations and orientations, such that the results can be combined with multibody simulations to obtain accurate dynamic insight into contact forces. Specifically, computational fluid dynamics simulations are used to investigate the pantograph component loads in a representative setting, such as that of the recessed cavity on a Class 800 train. From an aerodynamic perspective, this study indicates that the total drag force acting on non-fixed components of the pantograph is larger for the knuckle-leading orientation rather than the knuckle-trailing, although the difference between the two is found to reduce with increasing pantograph extension. Combining the aerodynamic loads acting on individual components with multibody tools allows for realistic dynamic insight into the pantograph behaviour. The results obtained show how considering aerodynamic forces enhance the realism of the models, leading to behaviour of the pantograph–catenary contact forces closely matching that seen in experimental tests.

Keywords

Pantograph–catenary interaction / Pantograph aerodynamics / Computational fluid dynamics / Pantograph loads / Current collection performance

References

[1.] CENLEC (2012) EN-50367:2012 Railway applications—fixed installations and rolling stock in criteria to achieve technical compatibility between pantographs and overhead contact line

[2.] Pombo J, Ambrósio J, Pereira M, et al.. Influence of the aerodynamic forces on the pantograph–catenary system for high-speed trains. Veh Syst Dyn, 2009, 47(11): 1327-1347,

[3.] Baker C, Johnson T, Flynn D, et al.. . Train aerodynamics: fundamentals and applications, 2019 New York Elsevier

[4.] Luo J, Yang Z, Yu C et al (2009) Numerical research on aerodynamic characteristic optimization of pantograph fixing place on high speed train. In: 2nd International Conference on Power Electronics and Intelligent Transportation System (PEITS), Shenzhen, pp 94–97

[5.] Dai Z, Tian L, Zhou L, et al.. Numerical simulation and optimization of aerodynamic uplift force of a high-speed pantograph. Railway Eng Sci, 2022, 30(1): 117-128,

[6.] Dai Z, Tian L, Jian D, et al.. Effect of the strip spacing on the aerodynamic performance of a high-speed double-strip pantograph. Veh Syst Dyn, 2022, 60(10): 3358-3374,

[7.] Xiao C, Yang M, Tan C, et al.. Effects of platform sinking height on the unsteady aerodynamic performance of high-speed train pantograph. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2020, 204: 104284,

[8.] Qing D, Li T, Zhang J, et al.. Effects of train pantograph operating height on aerodynamic performance. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2020, 50(3): 335-345, in Chinese

[9.] Li X, Zhou D, Jia L, et al.. Effects of yaw angle on the unsteady aerodynamic performance of the pantograph of a high-speed train under crosswind. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2018, 182: 49-60,

[10.] Mohebbi M, Rezvani MA. Multi objective optimization of aerodynamic design of high speed railway windbreaks using Lattice Boltzmann method and wind tunnel test results. Int J Rail Transport, 2018, 6(3): 183-201,

[11.] Mohebbi M, Safaee AM. The optimum model determination of porous barriers in high-speed tracks. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2022, 236(1): 15-25,

[12.] Mohebbi M, Rezvani MA. Analysis of the effects of lateral wind on a high speed train on a double routed railway track with porous shelters. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2019, 184: 116-127,

[13.] Kim H, Hu Z, Thompson D. Effect of cavity flow control on high-speed train pantograph and roof aerodynamic noise. Railway Eng Sci, 2020, 28(1): 54-74,

[14.] Zhang Y, Zhang J, Li T, et al.. Investigation of the aeroacoustic behavior and aerodynamic noise of a high-speed train pantograph. Sci China Technol Sci, 2017, 60(4): 561-575,

[15.] AbdelGawad AF, Aljameel NM, Shaltout RE. Computational modelling of the aerodynamic noise of the full-scale pantograph of high-speed trains. J Adv Res Fluid Mech Therm Sci, 2022, 93(1): 94-109

[16.] Ji Z, Guo Y, Guo D, et al.. Effects of running speed on coupling between pantograph of high-speed train and tunnel based on aerodynamics and multi-body dynamics coupling. Appl Sci, 2021, 11(21): 10008,

[17.] Niu J-Q, Zhou D, Liang X, et al.. Numerical simulation of the Reynolds number effect on the aerodynamic pressure in tunnels. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2018, 173: 187-198,

[18.] Li R, Zhang W, Ning Z, et al.. Influence of a high-speed train passing through a tunnel on pantograph aerodynamics and pantograph–catenary interaction. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2017, 231(2): 198-210,

[19.] Carnevale M, Facchinetti A, Rocchi D. Procedure to assess the role of railway pantograph components in generating the aerodynamic uplift. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn, 2017, 160: 16-29,

[20.] Carnevale M, Facchinetti A, Maggiori L, et al.. Computational fluid dynamics as a means of assessing the influence of aerodynamic forces on the mean contact force acting on a pantograph. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2016, 230(7): 1698-1713,

[21.] Menter F (1993) Zonal two equation k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. In: 23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics, and Lasers Conference, Orlando, AIAA-93-2906

[22.] Ambrósio J, Pombo J, Antunes P. PantoCat statement of method. Veh Syst Dyn, 2015, 53(3): 314-328,

[23.] Ambrósio J, Rauter F, Pombo J, et al.. Arczewski K, Blajer W, Fraczek J, Wojtyra M, et al.. A flexible multibody pantograph model for the analysis of the catenary–pantograph contact. Multibody dynamics: computational methods and applications, 2011 Dordrecht Springer,

[24.] Pombo J, Ambrósio J. Influence of pantograph suspension characteristics on the contact quality with the catenary for high speed trains. Comput Struct, 2012, 110–111: 32-42,

[25.] Ambrósio J, Pombo J, Pereira M. Optimization of high-speed railway pantographs for improving pantograph–catenary contact. Theor Appl Mech Lett, 2013, 3(1): 013006,

[26.] Ambrósio J, Pombo J, Rauter F, et al.. Bottasso CL, et al.. A memory based communication in the co-simulation of multibody and finite element codes for pantograph-catenary interaction simulation. Multibody dynamics: computational methods and applications, 2009 Dordrecht Springer

[27.] Antunes P, Magalhães H, Ambrósio J, et al.. A co-simulation approach to the wheel–rail contact with flexible railway track. Multibody Sys Dyn, 2019, 45(2): 245-272,

[28.] Rauter FG, Pombo J, Ambrósio J, et al.. Contact model for the pantograph-catenary interaction. J Syst Design Dyn, 2007, 1(3): 447-457,

[29.] Pombo J, Ambrósio J. Multiple pantograph interaction with catenaries in high-speed trains. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn, 2012, 7(4): 041008,

[30.] Pombo J, Antunes P. A comparative study between two pantographs in multiple pantograph high-speed operations. Int J Railway Technol, 2013, 2(1): 83-108,

[31.] Pombo J, Ambrósio J. Environmental and track perturbations on multiple pantograph interaction with catenaries in high-speed trains. Comput Struct, 2013, 124: 88-101,