Train post-derailment behaviours and containment methods: a review

Abstract

Railway accidents, particularly serious derailments, can lead to catastrophic consequences. Therefore, it is essential to prevent derailment escalation to reduce the likelihood of severe derailments. Train post-derailment behaviours and containment methods play a critical role in preventing derailment escalation and providing passive safety protection and accident prevention in the event of a derailment. However, despite the increasing attention on this field from academia and industry in recent years, there is a lack of systematic exploration and summarization of emerging applications and containment methods in train post-derailment research. For this reason, this paper presents a comprehensive review of existing studies on train post-derailment behaviours, encompassing various topics such as post-derailment contact–impact models, dynamic modelling and simulation techniques, and the primary factors influencing post-derailment behaviours. Significantly, this review introduces and elucidates substitute guidance mechanisms (SGMs), which serve as railway-specific passive safety protection and accident prevention measures. The various types of SGMs are depicted, and their ongoing developments and applications are explored in depth. The review additionally points out several unresolved challenges including the adverse effects of SGMs, and proposes future research directions to advance the theoretical understanding and practical application of train post-derailment behaviours and containment methods. This review seeks to be a valuable reference for railway industry professionals in preventing catastrophic derailment consequences through post-derailment containment methods.

Keywords

Railway passive safety / Railway accident prevention / Post-derailment behaviours / Substitute guidance mechanisms (SGMs) / Contact–impact model

References

[1.] Cao Y, An Y, Su S, et al.. A statistical study of railway safety in China and Japan 1990–2020. Accid Anal Prev, 2022, 175,

[2.] Evans AW. Fatal train accidents on Europe’s railways: An update to 2019. Accid Anal Prev, 2021, 158,

[3.] Liu X, Rapik Saat M, Barkan CPL. Freight-train derailment rates for railroad safety and risk analysis. Accid Anal Prev, 2017, 98: 1-9,

[4.] Federal Railroad Administration (2020) Train accident reports.

[5.] European Union Agency for Railways (2022) Report on railway safety and interoperability in the EU

[6.] International Union of Railways (2021) UIC safety report 2021—significant accidents 2020—public report

[7.] Kajitani Y, Kato H, Asano K. Development of an L-shaped guide to prevent deviation from rails. JR East Tech Rev, 2010, 15(1): 53-56

[8.] Liu X, Barkan CPL, Saat MR. Analysis of derailments by accident cause: evaluating railroad track upgrades to reduce transportation risk. Transp Res Rec, 2011, 2261(1): 178-185,

[9.] Hamilton BA. . Report on the findings of: current practice and effectiveness of derailment containment provisions on high speed lines, 2004 Zoetermeer HSL-Zuid Organisation

[10.] Kuzuta M, Ueki K, Miyamoto T, et al.. Numerical dynamic simulation of a train set running on ballasted track after derailment. Q Rep RTRI, 2013, 54(2): 112-117,

[11.] Lai J, Xu J, Wang P, et al.. Numerical investigation on the dynamic behaviour of derailed railway vehicles protected by guard rail. Veh Syst Dyn, 2021, 59(12): 1803-1824,

[12.] Guo L, Wang K, Lin J, et al.. Study of the post-derailment safety measures on low-speed derailment tests. Veh Syst Dyn, 2016, 54(7): 943-962,

[13.] Bae HU, Moon J, Lim SJ, et al.. Full-scale train derailment testing and analysis of post-derailment behavior of casting bogie. Appl Sci, 2020, 10(1): 59-78,

[14.] Schafer DH, Barkan CPL. Relationship between train length and accident causes and rates. Transp Res Rec, 2008, 2043(1): 73-82,

[15.] Eboli L, Forciniti C, Mazzulla G. Factors influencing accident severity: an analysis by road accident type. Transp Res Procedia, 2020, 47: 449-456,

[16.] Yang T, Manos W, Johnstone B (1972) A study continuation of derailment behavior final report (phase 08 report on computer derailment study). Railroad tank car safety research and test project. Association of American Railroads, Washington DC

[17.] Yang T, Manos W, Johnstone B (1972). Dynamic analysis of train derailments. In: ASME winter annual meeting, New York

[18.] Birk A, Anderson R, Coppens A. A computer simulation of a derailment accident part II-sample simulation. J Hazard Mater, 1990, 25(1–2): 149-165,

[19.] Birk A, Anderson R, Coppens A. A computer simulation of a derailment accident: part I-model Basis. J Hazard Mater, 1990, 25(1–2): 121-147,

[20.] Toma EE (2000). A computer model of a train derailment. Dissertation, Queen’s University,

[21.] Wu X, Chi M, Gao H, et al.. The study of post-derailment measures to limit the extent of a derailment. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2016, 230(1): 64-76,

[22.] Cao L, Yang C, Zhang J. Derailment behaviors of the train-ballasted track-subgrade system subjected to earthquake using shaking table. KSCE J Civ Eng, 2020, 24(10): 2949-2960,

[23.] Han H-S, Koo J-S. Simulation of train crashes in three dimensions. Veh Syst Dyn, 2003, 40(6): 435-450,

[24.] Sunami H, Morimura T, Terumichi Y, et al.. Model for analysis of bogie frame motion under derailment conditions based on full-scale running tests. Multibody Syst Dyn, 2012, 27(3): 321-349,

[25.] Zhao H, Xu P, Li B, et al.. Full-scale train-to-train impact test and multi-body dynamic simulation analysis. Machines, 2021, 9(11): 297,

[26.] Diana G, Sabbioni E, Somaschini C, et al.. Full-scale derailment tests on freight wagons. Veh Syst Dyn, 2021, 60(6): 1-18

[27.] Song IH, Kim JW, Koo JS, et al.. Modeling and simulation of collision-causing derailment to design the derailment containment provision using a simplified vehicle model. Appl Sci, 2020, 10(1): 118,

[28.] Nishimura K, Terumichi Y, Morimura T, Fukada J (2010) Experimental study on the vehicle safety by earthquake track excitation with 1/10 scale vehicle and roller rig. J Sys Des Dyn 4(1):226–238

[29.] Braghin F, Bruni S, Giorgio D. Experimental and numerical investigation on the derailment of a railway wheelset with solid axle. Veh Syst Dyn, 2006, 44(4): 305-325,

[30.] Miyamoto T, Nobuyuki M, Masamichi S, et al.. Railway vehicle dynamic behavior against large-amplitude track vibration. Q Rep Rtri, 2004, 45: 111-115,

[31.] Wu X, Chi M, Gao H. The study of post-derailment dynamic behavior of railway vehicle based on running tests. Eng Fail Anal, 2014, 44: 382-399,

[32.] Zhai W, Wang K, Liu P et al (2011) Full-scale derailing principle test stand with steering frame operating on rails, CN Patent ZL101995340B (in Chinese)

[33.] Comite Europeen de Normalisation (2008) Railway applications—crashworthiness requirements for railway vehicle bodies (EN15227 B)

[34.] Beason WL, Hirsch TJ, Campise WL. . Measurement of heavy vehicle impact forces and inertia properties final report, 1989 Washington DC . Department of Transportation

[35.] Brabie D, Andersson E. Dynamic simulation of derailments and its consequences. Veh Syst Dyn, 2006, 44(sup1): 652-662,

[36.] Brabie D, Andersson E. Post-derailment dynamic simulation of rail vehicles—methodology and applications. Veh Syst Dyn, 2008, 46(sup1): 289-300,

[37.] Wu X, Chi M, Gao H. Post-derailment dynamic behaviour of a high-speed train under earthquake excitations. Eng Fail Anal, 2016, 64: 97-110,

[38.] Pombo J, Ambrósio J, Miguel S. A new wheel–rail contact model for railway dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn, 2007, 45(2): 165-189,

[39.] Liang L, Dhanasekar M, Thambiratnam D, et al.. Lateral impact derailment mechanisms, simulation and analysis. Int J Impact Eng, 2016, 94: 36-49,

[40.] Tanabe M, Goto K, Watanabe T, et al.. A simple and efficient numerical model for dynamic interaction of high speed train and railway structure including derailment during an earthquake. Procedia Eng, 2017, 199: 2729-2734,

[41.] Goto K, Sogabe M, Tanabe M, et al.. Simple method for analyzing contact between wheelset members and track structures using MBD. Q Rep RTRI, 2018, 59(1): 57-64,

[42.] Wu X, Chi M, Gao H, et al.. Post-derailment dynamic behavior of railway vehicles travelling on a railway bridge during an earthquake. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2016, 230(2): 418-439,

[43.] Gottschalk S, Lin MC, Manocha D (1996). OBBTree: a hierarchical structure for rapid interference detection. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp 171–180, New York

[44.] Eberly D. (2016) Dynamic collision detection using oriented bounding boxes. http://gingaminga.com/Data/Note/oriented_bounding_boxes/DynamicCollisionDetection.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2022.

[45.] Anderson RJ. . A train derailment simulation software package, 1997 Dynamics laboratory report Queen’s University

[46.] Jeong D, Lyons M, Orringer O et al (2007) Equations of motion for train derailment dynamics. In: ASME 2007 Rail Transportation Division Fall Technical Conference, pp 21–27, Chicago

[47.] Boronenko Y, Orlova A, Iofan A, et al.. Effects that appear during the derailment of one wheelset in the freight wagon: simulation and testing. Veh Syst Dyn, 2006, 44(sup1): 663-668,

[48.] Zhu X, Lu X-Z, Cheng Q-L, et al.. Simulation of the running attitude of a train after derailment. Int J Crashworthiness, 2020, 25(2): 213-219,

[49.] Ling L, Dhanasekar M, Wang K, et al.. Collision derailments on bridges containing ballastless slab tracks. Eng Fail Anal, 2019, 105: 869-882,

[50.] Kim S-W (1999) Contact dynamics and force control of flexible multi-body systems. Dissertation, McGill University.

[51.] Yao S, Zhu H, Liu M, et al.. A study on the frontal oblique collision-induced derailment mechanism in subway vehicles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2020, 234(6): 584-595,

[52.] Luo F, Liu C, Sun Z (2009) Intelligent vehicle simulation and debugging environment based on physics engine. In: 2009 International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, pp 329–333, Bangkok

[53.] Cho HJ, Koo JS. A numerical study of the derailment caused by collision of a rail vehicle using a virtual testing model. Veh Syst Dyn, 2012, 50(1): 79-108,

[54.] Bae H-U, Yun K-M, Lim N-H. Containment capacity and estimation of crashworthiness of derailment containment walls against high-speed trains. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2018, 232(3): 680-696,

[55.] Sakdirat K, Wang Y, Ngamkhanong C. Derailment-resistant performance of modular composite rail track slabs. Eng Struct, 2018, 160: 1-11,

[56.] Zhou H, Wang W, Hecht M. Three-dimensional derailment analysis of a crashed city tram. Veh Syst Dyn, 2013, 51(8): 1200-1215,

[57.] Ling L, Guan Q, Dhanasekar M. Dynamic simulation of train-truck collision at level crossings. Veh Syst Dyn, 2017, 55(1): 1-22,

[58.] Zhou H, Zhang J, Hecht M. Three-dimensional derailment analysis of crashed freight trains. Veh Syst Dyn, 2014, 52(3): 341-361,

[59.] Brabie D (2005). On the influence of rail vehicle parameters on the derailment process and its consequences. Dessertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology,

[60.] Brabie D. Wheel-sleeper impact model in rail vehicles analysis. J Syst Des Dyn, 2007, 1(3): 468-480

[61.] Ling L, Dhanasekar M, Thambiratnam DP. Dynamic response of the train–track–bridge system subjected to derailment impacts. Veh Syst Dyn, 2018, 56(4): 638-657,

[62.] Tanabe M, Wakui H, Sogabe M et al (2010) A combined multibody and finite element approach for dynamic interaction analysis of high-speed train and railway structure including post-derailment behavior during an earthquake. In: 9th World Congress on Computational Mechanics and 4th Asian Pacific Congress on Computational Mechanics, Sydney

[63.] Tanabe M, Sogabe M, Wakui H, et al.. Exact time integration for dynamic interaction of high-speed train and railway structure including derailment during an earthquake. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn, 2016, 11(3),

[64.] Ling L, Dhanasekar M, Thambiratnam DP. Frontal collision of trains onto obliquely stuck road trucks at level crossings: derailment mechanisms and simulation. Int J Impact Eng, 2017, 100: 154-165,

[65.] Tanabe M, Goto K, Watanabe T, et al.. An efficient contact model for dynamic interaction analysis of high-speed trainand railway structure including derailment during an earthquake. Int J Transp Dev Integr, 2017, 1(3): 540-551,

[66.] Lankarani HM, Nikravesh PE. Continuous contact force models for impact analysis in multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn, 1994, 5(2): 193-207,

[67.] Hajdin N, Mandic R, Miskovic Z (1996) Computer aided analysis of train impact on structures adjacent to the track. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, Budapest, pp 133–137

[68.] Paetsch C, Perlman AB, Jeong D (2006) Dynamic simulation of train derailments. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, pp 105–114, Chicago

[69.] Schupp G, Weidemann C, Lutz M. Modelling the contact between wheel and rail within multibody system simulation. Veh Syst Dyn, 2004, 41(5): 349-364,

[70.] Pogorelov D, Yazykov V, Lysikov N, et al.. Train 3D: the technique for inclusion of three-dimensional models in longitudinal train dynamics and its application in derailment studies and train simulators. Veh Syst Dyn, 2017, 55(4): 583-600,

[71.] Brabie D, Andersson E. An overview of some high-speed train derailments: means of minimizing consequences based on empirical observations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit, 2008, 222(4): 441-463,

[72.] Brabie D, Andersson E (2008). High-Speed train derailments: minimizing consequences through innovative design. In: The 8th World Congress of Railway Research (WCRR 2008), Seoul

[73.] Zhai W, Wang K, Cai C. Fundamentals of vehicle–track coupled dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn, 2009, 47(11): 1349-1376,

[74.] Song IH, Kim J, Koo JS, et al.. Simplified vehicle modeling technique for design of derailment containment provisions (DCP). J Korean Soc Railw, 2019, 22(7): 527-537,

[75.] Zhai W, Han Z, Chen Z, et al.. Train–track–bridge dynamic interaction: a state-of-the-art review. Veh Syst Dyn, 2019, 57(7): 984-1027,

[76.] Asanuma K, Sogabe M, Watanabe T, et al.. Development of ballasted ladder track equipped with a vehicle guide device. Q Rep RTRI, 2009, 50(4): 233-240,

[77.] Bae H-U, Yun K-M, Moon J, et al.. Impact force evaluation of the derailment containment wall for high-speed train through a collision simulation. Adv Civ Eng, 2018, 2018: 1-14,

[78.] Shu X, Wilson N. . TCRP research results digest 82: use of guard/girder/restraining rails, 2007 Washington DC Transportation Research Board

[79.] Tang Z, Yuan X, Xie X, et al.. Implementing railway vehicle dynamics simulation in general-purpose multibody simulation software packages. Adv Eng Softw, 2019, 131: 153-165,

[80.] Nie Y, Tang Z, Liu F, et al.. A data-driven dynamics simulation framework for railway vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn, 2018, 56(3): 406-427,

[81.] Tang Z, Zhu YR, Nie Y, et al.. Data-driven train set crash dynamics simulation. Veh Syst Dyn, 2017, 55(2): 149-167,

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.52172407); Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province(No.2022NSFSC0415)