A communication toolkit for the most impactful symptoms of Fabry disease: co-creation with Fabry disease patients and their treating clinicians in the UK

Derralynn Hughes , Sophie Thomas , Natalie Joseph-Williams , Katy Bunn , Stuart Gaffney , Kamran Iqbal , Thomas Kenny

Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) : 31

PDF
Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) :31 DOI: 10.20517/rdodj.2025.27
Original Article

A communication toolkit for the most impactful symptoms of Fabry disease: co-creation with Fabry disease patients and their treating clinicians in the UK

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Aim: To co-create a communication aid with patients with Fabry disease (FD) and FD specialists.

Methods: The co-development of the aid involved four steps: (1) need validation and insight gathering through focus groups and review of existing resources and literature; (2) expert review of focus group findings and drafting of the aid; (3) wider patient review of the draft materials at a FD patient conference; and (4) real-world evaluation following the aid’s launch.

Results: Eight patients participated in one focus group and five FD specialists participated in another. In a wider patient review, a feedback survey was completed by 57 patients. Patients in the focus group reported pain, fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms as most impactful. Most patients preferred a shared rather than a paternalistic approach to decision-making and FD specialists agreed that all decisions should be shared. Insight gathering revealed that barriers to shared decision-making (SDM) included patient fears of being dismissed, challenges to recall or communication and time constraints. Enablers to SDM included patient empowerment, patient preparation for appointments and positive relationships between patients and healthcare professionals. Overall, 97.7% (42/43) of patients participating in a survey considered that the toolkit would/might encourage them to discuss concerns with their FD specialist.

Conclusion: Insights from the study underline the need for a communication aid to facilitate patient preparation for appointments, discussions and decisions about FD. The resulting toolkit has been co-created to empower patients and help specialists and patients make the best decisions for each individual.

Keywords

Fabry disease / shared decision making / patient decision aids / rare disease / co-creation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Derralynn Hughes, Sophie Thomas, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Katy Bunn, Stuart Gaffney, Kamran Iqbal, Thomas Kenny. A communication toolkit for the most impactful symptoms of Fabry disease: co-creation with Fabry disease patients and their treating clinicians in the UK. Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal, 2025, 4(4): 31 DOI:10.20517/rdodj.2025.27

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Mehta A. Fabry disease. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al, Editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle: University of Washington; 2002 [Updated 2024 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1292/?utm_source [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[2]

Bokhari SR,Hariz A. Fabry disease. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 [Updated 2023 Jul 4]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK435996/?utm_source [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[3]

Orphanet. Fabry Disease. Updated 2022. Available from: https://www.orpha.net/en/disease/detail/324 [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[4]

Desnick RJ,Eng CM. α-galactosidase a deficiency: Fabry disease. In: Valle DL, Antonarakis S, Ballabio A, Beaudet AL, Mitchell GA, Editors. The Online Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. McGraw-Hill Education; 2019. Available from: https://ommbid.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=2709&sectionid=225546984 [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[5]

Arends M,Hughes D.Characterization of classical and nonclassical Fabry disease: a multicenter study.J Am Soc Nephrol2017;28:1631-41

[6]

Berry L,Johnson J.Patient-reported experience with Fabry disease and its management in the real-world setting: results from a double-blind, cross-sectional survey of 280 respondents.Orphanet J Rare Dis2024;19:153 PMCID:PMC11007961

[7]

British Inherited Metabolic Disease Group. Guidelines for the treatment of Fabry Disease; 2025. Available from: https://bimdg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2025.05.30.Fabry-Clinical-Guidance.pdf [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[8]

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Shared decision making; 2021. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng197/resources/shared-decision-making.pdf-66142087186885 [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[9]

Desroches S.Shared decision making and chronic diseases.All Asth Clin Immun2010;6:A8

[10]

Coulter A,Elwyn G.Implementing shared decision making in the UK.Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes2011;105:300-4

[11]

General Medical Council. Decision making and consent; 2020. Available from: https://www.gmc-uk.org/professional-standards/professional-standards-for-doctors/decision-making-and-consent [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[12]

Hahlweg P,Levke Brütt A.Moving towards patient-centered care and shared decision-making in Germany.Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes2022;171:49-57

[13]

Davidson KW, Mangione CM, Barry MJ, et al.; US Preventive Services Task Force. Collaboration and shared decision-making between patients and clinicians in preventive health care decisions and US preventive services task force recommendations. JAMA 2022;327:1171-6.

[14]

Moumjid N,Carretier J.Implementation of shared decision-making and patient-centered care in France: towards a wider uptake in 2022.Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes2022;171:42-8

[15]

Matlock DD,Sandhu A.Past, present, and future of shared decision-making.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes2024;17:e010584

[16]

Hughes DA,Milligan A,Mehta A. A multidisciplinary approach to the care of patients with Fabry disease. In: Mehta A, Beck M, Sunder-Plassmann G, Editors. Fabry disease: perspectives from 5 years of FOS. Oxford: Oxford Pharmagenesis; 2006. Chapter 35. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11587/ [Last accessed on 29 October 2025]

[17]

Care Quality Commission. Better care in my hands: a review of how people are involved in their care; 2016. Available from: https://www.cqc.org.uk/publications/themed-work/better-care-my-hands-review-how-people-are-involved-their-care [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[18]

Babac A,Litzkendorf S,Damm K.Integrating patient perspectives in medical decision-making: a qualitative interview study examining potentials within the rare disease information exchange process in practice.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2019;19:188 PMCID:PMC6751820

[19]

Inagaki N,Otani K.Shared decision making between patients with Fabry disease and physicians in Japan: an online survey.Mol Genet Metab Rep2022;32:100899 PMCID:PMC9421488

[20]

Yoo H.Fabry disease: current treatment and future perspective.J Genet Med2023;20:6-14

[21]

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Pegunigalsidase alfa for treating Fabry disease; 2023. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta915 [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[22]

Joseph-Williams N,Collin-Histed T,Gregory D. Shared decision making in rare disease in the United Kingdom, White Paper; 2021. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395133038_White_Paper_-_SDM_in_Rare_Disease_White_Paper [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[23]

Hughes DA,Lidove O.Do clinical guidelines facilitate or impede drivers of treatment in Fabry disease?.Orphanet J Rare Dis2022;17:42 PMCID:PMC8822651

[24]

Stacey D,Smith M.Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2024;1:CD001431

[25]

Braun V.Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis.Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health2019;11:589-97

[26]

PMCPA. 2021 interactive ABPI Code of Practice; 2021. Available from: https://www.pmcpa.org.uk/the-code/previous-abpi-codes-of-practice/2021-interactive-abpi-code-of-practice/ [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[27]

BHBIA legal and ethical guidelines for healthcare market research: your essential guide; 2024. Available from: https://www.bhbia.org.uk/guidelines-and-legislation/legal-and-ethical-guidelines [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[28]

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Standards framework for shared-decision-making support tools, including patient decision aids; 2021. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/corporate/ecd8 [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[29]

MPS Society. Living well with Fabry: a shared decision-making toolkit; 2024. Available from: https://mpssociety.org.uk/resources/living-well-with-fabry [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[30]

Col NF,Springmann V.Whose Preferences matter? A patient-centered approach for eliciting treatment goals.Med Decis Making2018;38:44-55

[31]

Joseph-Williams N,Edwards A.Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme.BMJ2017;357:j1744 PMCID:PMC6284240

[32]

Edwards A.Inside the black box of shared decision making: distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision.Health Expect2006;9:307-20 PMCID:PMC5060371

[33]

Naik AD,Walder A.Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus: the effects of collaborative and proactive health communication.Circulation2008;117:1361-8 PMCID:PMC3717409

[34]

Wilson SR, Strub P, Buist AS, et al.; Better Outcomes of Asthma Treatment (BOAT) Study Group. Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181:566-77.

[35]

Ben-Zacharia A,Boyd A.Impact of shared decision making on disease-modifying drug adherence in multiple sclerosis.Int J MS Care2018;20:287-97 PMCID:PMC6295876

[36]

Shay LA.Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.Med Decis Making2015;35:114-31

[37]

Joseph-Williams N,Edwards A.Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making.Patient Educ Couns2014;94:291-309

[38]

Gravel K,Graham ID.Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions.Implement Sci2006;1:16 PMCID:PMC1586024

[39]

The Health Foundation. Helping people share decision making: A review of evidence considering whether shared decision making is worthwhile. London; 2012. Available from: https://www.health.org.uk/reports-and-analysis/reports/helping-people-share-decision-making [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[40]

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Decision guides (mostly for any decision). Available from: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/decguide.html [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

[41]

Waldron T,McMullen L.Development of a program theory for shared decision-making: a realist synthesis.BMC Health Serv Res2020;20:59 PMCID:PMC6979294

[42]

Brennan P.Case-finding in Fabry disease: experience from the North of England.J Inherit Metab Dis2014;37:103-7

[43]

Office for National Statistics. Population estimates for the UK, England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland: mid-2023. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2023 [Last accessed on 27 October 2025]

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

104

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/