Enhancing the value of clinical networks for rare diseases

Matthew Bolz-Johnson , Louise Clément , William Gahl , Carmencita Padilla , Yukiko Nishumura , Rachel Yang , Lisa Sarfaty , Nicoline Hoogerbrugge , Gareth Baynam , Thomas Kenny

Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal ›› 2022, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) : 9

PDF
Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal ›› 2022, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (2) :9 DOI: 10.20517/rdodj.2022.01
Opinion

Enhancing the value of clinical networks for rare diseases

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Healthcare networks for rare diseases are developing worldwide, concentrating expertise and knowledge from China and Japan to the United States and across Europe. Networked care is scaling up as an effective model of care for rare diseases, with prevention, diagnosis, care, and treatment administered locally, informed by the body of knowledge and expertise from the whole network. Now, as the United Nations encourages the development of rare disease networks in all countries, it is timely to reflect on the key characteristics of an effective network. This article aims to identify the core themes needed for a clinical network to be healthy. Drawing on experience from existing networks through a series of semi-structured interviews, insights from leaders of existing networks are then triangulated with the published evidence. The review seeks to identify themes that allow a clinical network to be effective and flourish. Healthcare networks are best understood as learning systems to generate collaborative knowledge used to inform the best possible care. Six themes are consistently reported in the literature and leaders’ experience: Trust, Communication, Leadership, Learning, Diversity, and Resources. Learning together is a key element of the success of effective networks and is most effective when networks are professionally multicultural and diverse, including the voices of people living with a rare disease. The involvement of patient representatives is fundamental to network collaboration and is recognized as a key aspect of early successes. Clinical leadership is critical to providing legitimacy and trust, creating a common identity, and promoting collaboration. Networks take time, resources, and coordination to develop. Although in-kind support and voluntary contributions of network members are important, inadequate resourcing is a critical barrier to the long-term sustainability and effectiveness of networks. This review explores the core themes of effective networks. By harnessing digital solutions that enable experts to coordinate care virtually across a clinical network, healthcare for people living with a rare disease is evolving to meet their complex needs. However, payment models to finance these models of care still lag behind innovative healthcare delivery models.

Keywords

Rare disease / healthcare / networks / leadership / collaboration / learning / knowledge management

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Matthew Bolz-Johnson, Louise Clément, William Gahl, Carmencita Padilla, Yukiko Nishumura, Rachel Yang, Lisa Sarfaty, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Gareth Baynam, Thomas Kenny. Enhancing the value of clinical networks for rare diseases. Rare Disease and Orphan Drugs Journal, 2022, 1(2): 9 DOI:10.20517/rdodj.2022.01

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Rath A,Peixoto S.A systematic literature review of evidence-based clinical practice for rare diseases: what are the perceived and real barriers for improving the evidence and how can they be overcome?.Trials2017;18:556 PMCID:PMC5700662

[2]

Ren Q.Network established to collaborate on diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases in China: a strategic alliance backed by tiered healthcare is the key to the future.Intractable Rare Dis Res2019;8:78-9 PMCID:PMC6409119

[3]

Tumiene B,Mathijssen IM.European Reference Networks: challenges and opportunities.J Community Genet2021;12:217-29 PMCID:PMC7968406

[4]

Vos JR,Röhl C,Hoogerbrugge N.Boosting care and knowledge about hereditary cancer: european reference network on genetic tumour risk syndromes (ERN GENTURIS).Fam Cancer2019;18:281-4 PMCID:PMC6449296

[5]

Adachi T,Furusawa Y.Japan’s initiative on rare and undiagnosed diseases (IRUD): towards an end to the diagnostic odyssey.Eur J Hum Genet2017;25:1025-8 PMCID:PMC5558173

[6]

Gahl WA,Ashley EA.The undiagnosed diseases network of the national institutes of health: a national extension.JAMA2015;314:1797-8

[7]

Gahl WA,Toro C.UDNThe NIH undiagnosed diseases program and network: applications to modern medicine.Mol Genet Metab2016;117:393-400 PMCID:PMC5560125

[8]

Ramoni RB,Adams DR.Undiagnosed Diseases NetworkThe undiagnosed diseases network: accelerating discovery about health and disease.Am J Hum Genet2017;100:185-92 PMCID:PMC5294757

[9]

Splinter K,Bacino CA.Undiagnosed Diseases NetworkEffect of genetic diagnosis on patients with previously undiagnosed disease.N Engl J Med2018;379:2131-9 PMCID:PMC6481166

[10]

Taruscio D,Cederroth H.Undiagnosed diseases network international (UDNI): white paper for global actions to meet patient needs.Mol Genet Metab2015;116:223-5

[11]

Taruscio D,Cederroth H.The Undiagnosed Diseases Network International: Five years and more!.Mol Genet Metab2020;129:243-54

[12]

Gahl WA,Toro C.The National Institutes of Health Undiagnosed Diseases Program: insights into rare diseases.Genet Med2012;14:51-9

[13]

Gahl WA.The NIH undiagnosed diseases program: lessons learned.JAMA2011;305:1904-5

[14]

Gahl WA,Boehm M.The NIH undiagnosed diseases program: bonding scientists and clinicians.Dis Model Mech2012;5:3-5 PMCID:PMC3255536

[15]

Dawkins HJS,Lasko P.International Rare Diseases Research Consortium (IRDiRC)Progress in rare diseases research 2010-2016: an IRDiRC perspective.Clin Transl Sci2018;11:11-20 PMCID:PMC5759730

[16]

Supper I,Lustman M.Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors.J Public Health (Oxf)2015;37:716-27

[17]

Pawson R. Realistic evaluation. Sage Publications; 1997. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-36931-000 [Last accessed on 6 Apr 2022]

[18]

Firn J,Walshe C.What are the views of hospital-based generalist palliative care professionals on what facilitates or hinders collaboration with in-patient specialist palliative care teams?.Palliat Med2016;30:240-56

[19]

Barnett S,Bennett S,Bonney A.General practice training and virtual communities of practice - a review of the literature.BMC Fam Pract2012;13:87 PMCID:PMC3515460

[20]

Bardet JD,Bedouch P.Physicians and community pharmacists collaboration in primary care: a review of specific models.Res Social Adm Pharm2015;11:602-22

[21]

Bookey-Bassett S,Mckey CA.Understanding interprofessional collaboration in the context of chronic disease management for older adults living in communities: a concept analysis.J Adv Nurs2017;73:71-84

[22]

Laverty H.The innovative medicines initiative -10 years of public-private collaboration.Front Med (Lausanne)2019;6:275 PMCID:PMC6902875

[23]

Lemetti T,Rickard N.Collaboration between hospital and primary care nurses: a literature review.Int Nurs Rev2015;62:248-66

[24]

Rumping S,de Ruyter DJ.Stimulating interdisciplinary collaboration among youth social workers: a scoping review.Health Soc Care Community2019;27:293-305

[25]

Halonen JI,Hakulinen H,Uitti J.Collaboration between employers and occupational health service providers: a systematic review of key characteristics.BMC Public Health2017;17:22 PMCID:PMC5217434

[26]

Cooper M,Pybis J.Interagency collaboration in children and young people’s mental health: a systematic review of outcomes, facilitating factors and inhibiting factors.Child Care Health Dev2016;42:325-42

[27]

Kabrhel C.Achieving multidisciplinary collaboration for the creation of a pulmonary embolism response team: creating a “Team of Rivals”.Semin Intervent Radiol2017;34:16-24 PMCID:PMC5334490

[28]

Kleijnen S,de Groot F.European collaboration on relative effectiveness assessments: what is needed to be successful?.Health Policy2015;119:569-76

[29]

McLoughlin C,O’Callaghan T.The use of virtual communities of practice to improve interprofessional collaboration and education: findings from an integrated review.J Interprof Care2018;32:136-42

[30]

Fung-Kee-Fung M,Crossley C.Regional collaborations as a tool for quality improvements in surgery: a systematic review of the literature.Ann Surg2009;249:565-72

[31]

Conklin J,Harris M.Knowledge brokers in a knowledge network: the case of seniors health research transfer network knowledge brokers.Implement Sci2013;8:7 PMCID:PMC3598713

[32]

Li LC,Nielsen C.Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: a systematic review.Implement Sci2009;4:27 PMCID:PMC2694761

[33]

McInnes S,Bonney A.An integrative review of facilitators and barriers influencing collaboration and teamwork between general practitioners and nurses working in general practice.J Adv Nurs2015;71:1973-85

[34]

Son D,Nakashima M.The pharmacist-physician collaboration for IPW: from physician’s perspective.Yakugaku Zasshi2015;135:109-15

[35]

Eikey EV,Kuziemsky CE.Examining the role of collaboration in studies of health information technologies in biomedical informatics: A systematic review of 25 years of research.J Biomed Inform2015;57:263-77

[36]

House S.Nurses’ and physicians’ perceptions of nurse-physician collaboration: a systematic review.J Nurs Adm2017;47:165-71

[37]

Karam M,Van Durme T.Comparing interprofessional and interorganizational collaboration in healthcare: a systematic review of the qualitative research.Int J Nurs Stud2018;79:70-83

[38]

Dellinger EP.Teamwork and collaboration for prevention of surgical site infections.Surg Infect2016;17:198-202

[39]

Havyer RD,Wingo MT.Addressing the interprofessional collaboration competencies of the association of american medical colleges: a systematic review of assessment instruments in undergraduate medical education.Acad Med2016;91:865-88

[40]

Braithwaite J.Bridging gaps to promote networked care between teams and groups in health delivery systems: a systematic review of non-health literature.BMJ Open2015;5:e006567 PMCID:PMC4593159

[41]

Mulvale G,Razavi SD.‘Gearing Up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: a systematic review and conceptual framework.BMC Fam Pract2016;17:83 PMCID:PMC4955241

[42]

Lunden A,Kvist T.A systematic review of factors influencing knowledge management and the nurse leaders’ role.J Nurs Manag2017;25:407-20

[43]

Bollen A,Aslani P.Factors influencing interprofessional collaboration between community pharmacists and general practitioners-a systematic review.Health Soc Care Community2019;27:e189-212

[44]

Trier H,Wensing M,Egebart J.Involving patients in patient safety programmes: a scoping review and consensus procedure by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.Eur J Gen Pract2015;21 Suppl:56-61 PMCID:PMC4828601

[45]

Buske OJ,Dumitriu S.PhenomeCentral: a portal for phenotypic and genotypic matchmaking of patients with rare genetic diseases.Hum Mutat2015;36:931-40 PMCID:PMC5467641

[46]

Barry M,Nieuwenhuis L.Communities of practice: a means to support occupational therapists’ continuing professional development. A literature review.Aust Occup Ther J2017;64:185-93

[47]

Braithwaite J.Between-group behaviour in health care: gaps, edges, boundaries, disconnections, weak ties, spaces and holes. A systematic review.BMC Health Serv Res2010;10:330 PMCID:PMC3004899

[48]

Leutz WN.Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom.Milbank Q1999;77:77-110, iv PMCID:PMC2751110

[49]

Heip T,Malfait S,Eeckloo K.The effects of interdisciplinary bedside rounds on patient centeredness, quality of care, and team collaboration: a systematic review.J Patient Saf2022;18:e40-4 PMCID:PMC8719516

[50]

Mahdizadeh M,Karimi Moonaghi H.Clinical interdisciplinary collaboration models and frameworks from similarities to differences: a systematic review.Glob J Health Sci2015;7:170-80 PMCID:PMC4803863

[51]

Stolp S,Seaton CL.Measurement and evaluation practices of factors that contribute to effective health promotion collaboration functioning: A scoping review.Eval Program Plann2017;61:38-44

[52]

Weißenborn M,Kraft M,Seidling HM.Potential benchmarks for successful interdisciplinary collaboration projects in germany: a systematic review.Gesundheitswesen2019;81:1057-68

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

78

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/