Community resilience: A multidisciplinary exploration for inclusive strategies and scalable solutions
Megan Boston , Desmond Bernie , Liz Brogden , Alan Forster , Laurent Galbrun , Leigh-Anne Hepburn , Taibat Lawanson , Jolanda Morkel
Resilient Cities and Structures ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 114 -130.
This paper evaluates literature across multiple disciplines and stakeholder types to identify commonalities and contradictions in definitions for community resilience. It aims to support cross-disciplinary discourse to build an interdisciplinary understanding of community resilience. This work identifies the differences between mono-, multi-, inter-, and cross-disciplinary approaches to inform community resilience strategies in academic and practice-based contexts.
Four themes for community resilience were identified through a review of cross-disciplinary literature. These include (1) diverse yet convergent definitions of community resilience and the evolution from equilibrium to adaptation to transformation; (2) equitable and inclusive strategies for the development of community resilience initiatives; (3) when and at what scale strategies should be implemented; and (4) community resilience as a process or an outcome.
This work is valuable to those seeking to familiarise themselves with the concept of community resilience, including educators who deliver courses on community resilience and policy-makers. It is novel in that it presents an interdisciplinary framework for navigating the community resilience discourse beyond individual professional boundaries.
Community resilience / Interdisciplinary / Conceptual framework / Boundary object Public policy / Equity
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
Resilient Cities Network, “Co-creating a resilient future 2020-2021 ”re -silient cities network, 2022. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://resilientcitiesnetwork.org/downloadable_resources/UR/SP/2022/R-Cities-co-creating-a-resilient-future-2020-2021.pdf |
| [31] |
National adaptation plans: technical guidelines for the national adaptation plan process, Bonn, Germany: Least Developed Countries Expert Group; 2012. Bonn: UNFCCC secretariatAccessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available https://unfccc.int/files/adaptation/cancun_adaptation_framework/application/pdf/naptechguidelines_eng_high__res.pdf. |
| [32] |
Environment Ministry for the. Urutau, ka taurikura: kia t ū pakari a Aotearoa i ng āhuringa āhuarangi | Adapt and thrive: building a climate-resilient New Zealand. Minst Environ Aug 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://environment.govt.nz/assets/publications/climate-change/MFE-AoG-20664-GF-National-Adaptation-Plan-2022-WEB.pdf. |
| [33] |
Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management, “National disaster resilience strategy rautaki ā-motu manawaroa Aitu ā” Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management, New Zealand, 2019. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.civildefence.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/publications/National-Disaster-Resilience-Strategy/National-Disaster-Resilience-Strategy-10-April-2019.pdf |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
“National Strategy for Disaster Resilience. ” Commonwealth of Australia, 2011. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/resources/national-strategy-for-disaster-resilience/ |
| [36] |
A. I. for D. R. “Community Engagement for Disaster Re-silience.” 2020. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/media/7989/aidr_handbookcollection_communityengagementfordisasterresilience_2020.pdf |
| [37] |
N. I. of S. and T. NISTCommunity resilience planning guide for buildings and in-frastructure systems : volume I, ”national institute of standards and technology. NIST SP 1190v1 2015. doi: 10.6028/NIST.SP.1190v1. |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
“Community resilience development framework. ”cabinet Office, HM gov-ernment, 2019. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/828813/20190902-Community_Resilience_Development_Framework_Final.pdf |
| [40] |
The UK government resilience framework.HM Gov 2022. |
| [41] |
I. of I. S. of G. ISIG, “ReBus resilient building strategies toolkit. ”council of europe, centre of expertise for good governance, 2020. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/0900001680a0700f |
| [42] |
European Union, “Recovery and Resilience Facility.” Accessed: 2023. [Online]. Available: https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en |
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
N.I.A.C. NIAC, “Critical Infrastructure resilience final report and recommenda-tions.” 2009. Accessed:Sep. 05, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/niac/niac_critical_infrastructure_resilience.pdf |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
S.J.Lambert, “M āori and the Christchurch earthquakes: the interplay between In-digenous endurance and resilience through urban disaster,” 2014, Accessed: Aug. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/10182/7285 |
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
City Resilience Framework 2015. pdf. Ove Arup and Partners Interna-tions 2014. Accessed: Jun. 07, 2018. [Online]. Available https://assets. rockefellerfoundation.org/app/uploads/20140410162455/City-Resilience-Frame work-2015.pdf. |
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
|
| [119] |
|
| [120] |
|
| [121] |
|
| [122] |
M. of R. MoRST Science and TechnologyVision matauranga: unlocking the innova-tion potential of m āori knowledge, resources and people. Minist Res, Sci Technol 2015. |
| [123] |
|
| [124] |
|
| [125] |
|
| [126] |
|
| [127] |
|
| [128] |
|
| [129] |
|
| [130] |
|
| [131] |
|
| [132] |
|
| [133] |
|
| [134] |
|
| [135] |
|
| [136] |
|
| [137] |
|
| [138] |
|
| [139] |
|
| [140] |
|
| [141] |
|
| [142] |
|
| [143] |
|
| [144] |
|
| [145] |
|
| [146] |
|
| [147] |
|
| [148] |
|
| [149] |
|
| [150] |
|
| [151] |
|
| [152] |
|
| [153] |
|
| [154] |
|
| [155] |
|
| [156] |
|
| [157] |
|
| [158] |
|
| [159] |
|
| [160] |
|
| [161] |
|
| [162] |
|
| [163] |
|
| [164] |
|
| [165] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |