Community resilience: A multidisciplinary exploration for inclusive strategies and scalable solutions
Megan Boston , Desmond Bernie , Liz Brogden , Alan Forster , Laurent Galbrun , Leigh-Anne Hepburn , Taibat Lawanson , Jolanda Morkel
Resilient Cities and Structures ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 114 -130.
Community resilience: A multidisciplinary exploration for inclusive strategies and scalable solutions
This paper evaluates literature across multiple disciplines and stakeholder types to identify commonalities and contradictions in definitions for community resilience. It aims to support cross-disciplinary discourse to build an interdisciplinary understanding of community resilience. This work identifies the differences between mono-, multi-, inter-, and cross-disciplinary approaches to inform community resilience strategies in academic and practice-based contexts.
Four themes for community resilience were identified through a review of cross-disciplinary literature. These include (1) diverse yet convergent definitions of community resilience and the evolution from equilibrium to adaptation to transformation; (2) equitable and inclusive strategies for the development of community resilience initiatives; (3) when and at what scale strategies should be implemented; and (4) community resilience as a process or an outcome.
This work is valuable to those seeking to familiarise themselves with the concept of community resilience, including educators who deliver courses on community resilience and policy-makers. It is novel in that it presents an interdisciplinary framework for navigating the community resilience discourse beyond individual professional boundaries.
Community resilience / Interdisciplinary / Conceptual framework / Boundary object Public policy / Equity
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
Resilient Cities Network, “Co-creating a resilient future 2020-2021 ”re -silient cities network, 2022. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://resilientcitiesnetwork.org/downloadable_resources/UR/SP/2022/R-Cities-co-creating-a-resilient-future-2020-2021.pdf |
| [31] |
National adaptation plans: technical guidelines for the national adaptation plan process, Bonn, Germany: Least Developed Countries Expert Group; 2012. Bonn: UNFCCC secretariatAccessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available https://unfccc.int/files/adaptation/cancun_adaptation_framework/application/pdf/naptechguidelines_eng_high__res.pdf. |
| [32] |
Environment Ministry for the. Urutau, ka taurikura: kia t ū pakari a Aotearoa i ng āhuringa āhuarangi | Adapt and thrive: building a climate-resilient New Zealand. Minst Environ Aug 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://environment.govt.nz/assets/publications/climate-change/MFE-AoG-20664-GF-National-Adaptation-Plan-2022-WEB.pdf. |
| [33] |
Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management, “National disaster resilience strategy rautaki ā-motu manawaroa Aitu ā” Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management, New Zealand, 2019. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.civildefence.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/publications/National-Disaster-Resilience-Strategy/National-Disaster-Resilience-Strategy-10-April-2019.pdf |
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
“National Strategy for Disaster Resilience. ” Commonwealth of Australia, 2011. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/resources/national-strategy-for-disaster-resilience/ |
| [36] |
A. I. for D. R. “Community Engagement for Disaster Re-silience.” 2020. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://knowledge.aidr.org.au/media/7989/aidr_handbookcollection_communityengagementfordisasterresilience_2020.pdf |
| [37] |
N. I. of S. and T. NISTCommunity resilience planning guide for buildings and in-frastructure systems : volume I, ”national institute of standards and technology. NIST SP 1190v1 2015. doi: 10.6028/NIST.SP.1190v1. |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
“Community resilience development framework. ”cabinet Office, HM gov-ernment, 2019. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/828813/20190902-Community_Resilience_Development_Framework_Final.pdf |
| [40] |
The UK government resilience framework.HM Gov 2022. |
| [41] |
I. of I. S. of G. ISIG, “ReBus resilient building strategies toolkit. ”council of europe, centre of expertise for good governance, 2020. Accessed: Aug. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/0900001680a0700f |
| [42] |
European Union, “Recovery and Resilience Facility.” Accessed: 2023. [Online]. Available: https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en |
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
N.I.A.C. NIAC, “Critical Infrastructure resilience final report and recommenda-tions.” 2009. Accessed:Sep. 05, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/niac/niac_critical_infrastructure_resilience.pdf |
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
S.J.Lambert, “M āori and the Christchurch earthquakes: the interplay between In-digenous endurance and resilience through urban disaster,” 2014, Accessed: Aug. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/10182/7285 |
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
City Resilience Framework 2015. pdf. Ove Arup and Partners Interna-tions 2014. Accessed: Jun. 07, 2018. [Online]. Available https://assets. rockefellerfoundation.org/app/uploads/20140410162455/City-Resilience-Frame work-2015.pdf. |
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
|
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
|
| [119] |
|
| [120] |
|
| [121] |
|
| [122] |
M. of R. MoRST Science and TechnologyVision matauranga: unlocking the innova-tion potential of m āori knowledge, resources and people. Minist Res, Sci Technol 2015. |
| [123] |
|
| [124] |
|
| [125] |
|
| [126] |
|
| [127] |
|
| [128] |
|
| [129] |
|
| [130] |
|
| [131] |
|
| [132] |
|
| [133] |
|
| [134] |
|
| [135] |
|
| [136] |
|
| [137] |
|
| [138] |
|
| [139] |
|
| [140] |
|
| [141] |
|
| [142] |
|
| [143] |
|
| [144] |
|
| [145] |
|
| [146] |
|
| [147] |
|
| [148] |
|
| [149] |
|
| [150] |
|
| [151] |
|
| [152] |
|
| [153] |
|
| [154] |
|
| [155] |
|
| [156] |
|
| [157] |
|
| [158] |
|
| [159] |
|
| [160] |
|
| [161] |
|
| [162] |
|
| [163] |
|
| [164] |
|
| [165] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |