A ductile self-centring joint for low-damage design of hybrid timber-concrete bridges

Abstract

This paper presents an advanced seismic design concept for bridge structures using Ductile Self-Centring Joint (DSJ) that enables highly resilient, low-damage performance under major earthquake events. The DSJ integrates a central rotational bearing with multiple Resilient Slip Friction Joints (RSFJs), arranged to provide controlled rocking, flag-shaped hysteresis, and self-centring capability. This configuration allows the joint to emulate the behaviour of a plastic hinge while avoiding inelastic deformation in concrete members, thereby addressing long-standing challenges associated with damage accumulation, residual drift, and post-earthquake repairability in conventional ductile bridge systems. A comprehensive suite of nonlinear analyses-including nonlinear static pushover, cyclic pushover, and nonlinear time-history simulations-was performed on a three-span timber-concrete hybrid bridge with timber beam composite with concrete deck and integral diaphragms at supports modelled in SAP2000 to evaluate the joint’s global and local seismic performance. The DSJ was modelled using friction–spring link elements to capture RSFJ hysteresis, combined with a rotationally free bearing to accommodate uplift and rocking. Results show that the introduction of DSJs significantly reduces seismic demands: base shear and peak acceleration decreased by up to 65% and 64%, respectively, compared with a conventional elastic low-damage configuration. Equivalent viscous damping ratios of approximately 20% were achieved, and displacement demands were substantially reduced across a broad suite of matched near-fault and far-field ground motions. RSFJ hysteresis loops remained fully elastic throughout all analyses, confirming the self-centring mechanism and absence of structural damage. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the proposed DSJ offers a practical, replaceable, and highly effective solution for next-generation low-damage seismic bridge design.

Keywords

Seismic damper / Earthquake / Energy dissipation / Advanced bridge design

References

[1] Bruneau M. Performance of steel bridges during the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe, Japan) earthquake. Engineering Structures 1995; 17(6): 455-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(95)00054-2.

[2] Chang SE. Disasters and transport systems: loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake. J Transp Geogr 2000; 8(1): 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(99)00036-6.

[3] Xu L, Wu Z, Zhai Y. Seismic damage of highway bridges during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 2009; 8(2): 263-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-009-9024-9.

[4] Chopra AK. Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering. 4th ed. Prentice Hall; 2012.

[5] Kowalsky MJ. A displacement-based approach for the seismic design of continuous bridge decks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2001; 30(9): 1347-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.67.

[6] Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ. Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press; 2007.

[7] Kelly JM. Earthquake-resistant design with rubber. Springer; 1997.

[8] Robinson WH, Tucker AG. Test results for lead-rubber bearings for WM. Clayton building, Toe Toe Bridge and Waiotukupuna Bridge. Bull N Z Natl Soc Earthq Eng 1981; 14(1): 21-33.

[9] Taylor DP. Fluid dampers for applications of seismic energy dissipation and seismic isolation (Paper No. 798). In: Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Elsevier Science Ltd; 1996.

[10] Whittaker D. Seismic isolation: a structural engineer's comparison of lead-rubber versus curved-surface-slider type isolation bearings. In: Proceedings of the 2016 NZSEE Conference; 2016.

[11] Zayas VA, Low SS, Mahin SA. A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation. Earth 1990.

[12] De Lautour O, Netley J, Twigden K. Low-damage seismic bridge design. In Proceedings of the Austroads Bridge Conference 2022. Department for Infrastructure and Transport; 2022.

[13] Fragiacomo M, Gregori A, Xue J, Demartino C, Toso M. Timber-concrete composite bridges: three case studies. J Traffic Transp Eng (Engl Ed) 2018; 5(6): 429-38.

[14] Rodrigues JN, Dias AMPG, Providência P. Timber-concrete composite bridges: state-of-the-art review. BioResources 2013; 8(4): 6630-49.

[15] Wacker JP, Dias AMPG, Hosteng TK. 100-year performance of timber-concrete composite bridges in the United States. J Bridge Eng 2020; 25(3): 04020006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001513.

[16] Rodrigues JN, Providência P, Dias AMPG. Sustainability and lifecycle assessment of timber-concrete composite bridges. J Infrastruct Syst 2017; 23(1): 04016025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000310.

[17] AASHTO. Standard specifications for highway bridges. 4th Ed. Washington, USA: American Association of State Highway Officials; 1944.

[18] CEN. Eurocode 5: design of timber structures - part 2: bridges. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization; 2004.

[19] RTA. Timber bridge manual, roads and traffic authority of nsw. 2008.

[20] Bouhaya L, Le Roy R, Feraille-Fresnet A. Simplified environmental study on innovative bridge structure. Env Sci Technol 2009; 43(6): 2066-71. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801351g.

[21] Mascia NT, Soriano J. Benefits of timber-concrete composite action in rural bridges. Mater Struct 2004; 37(2): 122-8.

[22] Molina JC, Calil Junior C, de Oliveira DR, Gomes NB. Analytical, experimental and numerical study of timber-concrete composite beams for bridges. Comput Concr 2019; 24(2): 103-15. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2019.24.2.103.

[23] Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency. ; Bridge manual. 3rd ed. Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency; 2018.

[24] Mashal M, Palermo A. Low-damage seismic design for accelerated bridge construction. J Bridge Eng 2019; 24(7): 04019066.

[25] Mashal M, White S, Palermo A. Quasi-static cyclic testing of emulative cast-in-place connections for Accelerated Bridge Construction in seismic regions. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 2016; 49(3): 267-82. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.49.3.267-282.

[26] Routledge P, McHaffie B, Cowan M, Palermo A. Wigram-Magdala Link bridge: low-damage details for a more efficient seismic design philosophy. Struct Eng Int: J Int Assoc Bridge Struct Eng (IABSE) 2020; 30(2): 177-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2019.1679696.

[27] Jafarkarimi M, Khanmohammadi M. Improving seismic behavior of existing multicolumn RC bridge bents using low-damage retrofit strategy. J Bridge Eng 2021; 26(3): 04021006.

[28] Liu R, Palermo A. Ten years of experiments on bridges using resilient damage-resistant systems and accelerated construction techniques. Struct Eng Int 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2020.1717406.

[29] Nikoukalam S, Sideris P. Resilient bridge rocking columns with polyurethane damage-resistant end segments and external replaceable energy dissipation links. 2017.

[30] Zhong X, Chen X, Shen Y, Li J, Bao Z. Low-damage self-centering rocking bridge columns using hemisphere-based rocking hinges: quasi-static experimental investigation. Eng Struct 2025; 335: 120323. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585573. quake Spectra, 6(2), 317-34.

[31] Hashemi A, Zarnani P, Quenneville P. Development of resilient seismic solutions for timber structures in New Zealand using innovative connections. Struct Eng Int 2019; 30(2): 242-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2019.1696660.

[32] Hashemi A, Zarnani P, Masoudnia R, Quenneville P. Experimental testing of rocking cross-laminated timber walls with resilient slip friction joints. J Struct Eng 2018; 144(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001931.

[33] Hashemi A, Fast T, Dickoff C, Jackson R, Mpidi Bita H, Malczyk R, Zarnani P, Quenneville P. Damage avoidance design of new and retrofitted structures using innovative resilient connections: Latest research, design methods and case studies. Proceedings of the 18th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE2024). Milan, Italy; 2024.

[34] Palermo A, Pampanin S, Marriott D. Design, modeling, and experimental response of seismic resistant bridge piers with post-tensioned dissipating connections. J Struct Eng 2007; 133(11): 1648-61. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1648).

[35] Shabankareh SM, Zarnani P, Hashemi A, Quenneville P. A novel connection system for seismic damage avoidance design of moment-resisting frames. In: Proceedings of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) Annual Conference; 2019.

[36] Bagheri H, Hashemi A, Zarnani P, Quenneville P. The resilient slip friction joint tension-only brace beyond its ultimate level. J Constr Steel Res 2020; 172: 106225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106225.

[37] Tectonus Ltd. Tectonus seismic energy dissipation devices: technical guide . 2024. https://www.tectonus.com/hubfs/Tectonus%20Guide%20Aug%202024%20online%20version.pd.

[38] Ministry of Business Innovation Employment. The seismic assessment of existing buildings: Technical guidelines for engineering assessments. Part C: Detailed seismic assessment, Section C2: Assessment procedures and analysis techniques. 2017. https://www.building.govt.nz/building-code-compliance/b-stability/b1-structure/seismic-assessment/.

[39] Applied Technology Council. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings (ATC-40). Appl Technol Counc 1996.

[40] Federal Emergency Management Agency. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures (FEMA 440). Federal Emergency Management Agency ; 2005.

[41] New Zealand Standards. NZS 1170.5:2004: structural design actions - Part 5: earthquake actions - New Zealand. Standards New Zealand ; 2004. https://www.standards.govt.nz/.