A multi-criteria approach to risk-based sustainability performance scoring: Integrating environmental, structural, and green aspects with fuzzy systems and ensemble learning

Masoomeh Mirrashid , Nader M. Okasha , Danial Jahed Armaghani , Biswajeet Pradhan , Omer Mughieda , Omar Ghareeb Alshammari

Resilient Cities and Structures ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) : 65 -90.

PDF (28060KB)
Resilient Cities and Structures ›› 2026, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) :65 -90. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2026.03.003
Research Article
research-article
A multi-criteria approach to risk-based sustainability performance scoring: Integrating environmental, structural, and green aspects with fuzzy systems and ensemble learning
Author information +
History +
PDF (28060KB)

Abstract

Current sustainability assessments for buildings often fail to account for the interactions between environmental risks, structural safety, and green performance, resulting in suboptimal prioritization for maintenance and retrofitting. To solve this problem, a novel framework is proposed to evaluate and prioritize the risk-based sustainability performance at the building asset level. The proposed framework integrates three different key aspects, including environmental, structural, and green, due to the multifaceted nature of sustainability. In the presented approach, fuzzy systems are modeled for each of these three aspects to address the uncertainties within the problem. These models introduced three indices: Environmental Risk index (considering factors like fault proximity and vegetation barriers), Structural Safety index (evaluating factors such as material quality and age), and Green index (evaluating factors such as energy efficiency and carbon footprint). The efficiency of the assessment process is upgraded using the results of three ensemble learning models, XGBoost, AdaBoost, and Random Forest, which are trained on a generated database obtained through the fuzzy system evaluations. Due to the complexities existing in the problem under study, a Graphical User Interface (GUI) is also presented based on the final systems, making the use of the computational framework simpler for the user. The framework helps engineers to make more informed decisions regarding maintenance, retrofitting, and redevelopment strategies in a construction project. The successful combination of fuzzy systems with machine learning and providing a user-friendly interface makes this research a significant contribution to advancing sustainable constructions.

Keywords

Structural sustainability / Fuzzy logic / Ensemble learning / Multi-criteria decision making / Risk assessment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Masoomeh Mirrashid, Nader M. Okasha, Danial Jahed Armaghani, Biswajeet Pradhan, Omer Mughieda, Omar Ghareeb Alshammari. A multi-criteria approach to risk-based sustainability performance scoring: Integrating environmental, structural, and green aspects with fuzzy systems and ensemble learning. Resilient Cities and Structures, 2026, 5 (2) : 65-90 DOI:10.1016/j.rcns.2026.03.003

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

G.K. Ding , "The evaluation of environmentally sustainable residential development using a building sustainability index," in Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2007-Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference, 2007.

[2]

Han Y, Dai L-M, Zhao X-F, Yu D-P, Wu S-N. Construction and application of an assessment index system for evaluating the eco-community’s sustainability. J For Res 2008; 19(2): 154-8.

[3]

Mori K, Christodoulou A. Review of sustainability indices and indicators: towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environ Impact Assess Rev 2012; 32(1): 94-106.

[4]

Zmeureanu R. Exergy-based index for assessing the building sustainability. Build Environ 2013; 60: 202-10.

[5]

Tambouratzis T. Analysing the construction of the environmental sustainability index 2005. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2016; 13(12): 2817-36.

[6]

Berry S, Moore T, Ambrose M. Flexibility versus certainty: the experience of mandating a building sustainability index to deliver thermally comfortable homes. Energy Policy 2019; 133: 110926.

[7]

Coppola L, Coffetti D, Crotti E, Gazzaniga G, Pastore T. An Empathetic Added Sustainability Index (EASI) for cementitious based construction materials. J Clean Prod 2019; 220: 475-82.

[8]

Hendiani S, Bagherpour M. Developing an integrated index to assess social sustainability in construction industry using fuzzy logic. J Clean Prod 2019; 230: 647-62.

[9]

Ibrahim AH, Shaker MA. Sustainability index for highway construction projects. Alex Eng J 2019; 58(4): 1399-411.

[10]

Chen H, Tang L, Qiu Q, Hou L, Wang B. Construction and case analysis of an index for the sustainability of ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 2020; 115: 106370.

[11]

Gui X, Gou Z. Regional differences in household water technology adoption: a longitudinal study of Building Sustainability Index-certified dwelling units in New South Wales, Australia. J Clean Prod 2021; 307: 127338.

[12]

Mahmoud H, Beheiry S. Sustainability inclusion in construction contracts index. J Legal Aff Dispute Resolution Eng Construct 2021; 13(4): 04521033.

[13]

Salah M, Elmasry M, Mashhour IM, Amer N. A sustainability index of construction projects. In: International Conference on Environment Science and Engineering. Springer; 2023. p. 117-27.

[14]

Furlan M, Lima PAB, Pai˜ao Junior GD, Mariano EB, Pires SMM. Proposing a composite index and maturity model for urban sustainability in the Brazilian context: a machine learning and data envelopment analysis approach. Sustain Dev 2024.

[15]

Medina-Pérez PC, Villanueva-Solís J, Ceballos-Pérez SG. Construction of the Urban Sustainability Index for cities in Mexico and its application in the municipalities of Pachuca and Mineral De La Reforma, 2020. Sustainable spaces in arid and semiarid zones of Mexico. Springer; 2024. p. 33-49.

[16]

Domaneschi M, Cucuzza R, Di Bari R, Argyroudis S, Mitoulis S, Kopiika N. Resilience and sustainability assessment of a prestressed concrete viaduct. Bridge maintenance, safety, management, digitalization and sustainability. CRC Press; 2024. p. 2594-602.

[17]

Kopiika N, Di Bari R, Argyroudis S, Ninic J, Mitoulis S-A. Sustainability and resilience-driven prioritisation for restoring critical infrastructure after major disasters and conflict. Transp Res Part D 2025; 139: 104592.

[18]

Soysa R, Pallegedara A, Kumara A, Jayasena D, Samaranayake M. Construction of a sustainability reporting score index integrating sustainable development goals (SDGs). The case of Sri Lankan listed firms. J Asian Bus Econ Stud 2024; 31: 190. no. ahead-of-print.

[19]

Wijaksono S, Indrianti Y, Rahmayati Y. Empirical study on the effect of green building and risk management on economic quality and Sustainability in the Indonesian Sustainable Architecture Index. In: International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS). IEEE; 2024. p. 1-5.

[20]

Ahmadlou M, Adeli H. Enhanced probabilistic neural network with local decision circles: a robust classifier. Integr Comput Aided Eng 2010; 17(3): 197-210.

[21]

Ghosh-Dastidar S, Adeli H. A new supervised learning algorithm for multiple spiking neural networks with application in epilepsy and seizure detection. Neural Netw 2009; 22(10): 1419-31.

[22]

Rafiei MH, Adeli H. A new neural dynamic classification algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2017; 28(12): 3074-83.

[23]

Adel H, Ghazaan MI, Korayem AH. Machine learning applications for developing sustainable construction materials. Artificial intelligence and data science in environmental sensing. Elsevier; 2022. p. 179-210.

[24]

Toosi HA, Lavagna M, Leonforte F, Del Pero C, Aste N. A novel LCSA-machine learning based optimization model for sustainable building design-A case study of energy storage systems. Build Environ 2022; 209: 108656.

[25]

Farahzadi L, Kioumarsi M. Application of machine learning initiatives and intelligent perspectives for CO2 emissions reduction in construction . J Clean Prod 2023; 384: 135504.

[26]

Khan M, Javed MF. Towards sustainable construction: machine learning based predictive models for strength and durability characteristics of blended cement concrete. Mater Today Commun 2023; 37: 107428.

[27]

Sánchez-Garrido AJ, Navarro IJ, García J, Yepes V. A systematic literature review on modern methods of construction in building: an integrated approach using machine learning. J Build Eng 2023; 73: 106725.

[28]

Zadeh LA. Fuzzy logic. Computer 1988; 21(4): 83-93.

[29]

Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 1965; 8: 338-53.

[30]

Mirrashid M, Naderpour H. Innovative computational intelligence-based model for vulnerability assessment of RC frames subject to seismic sequence. J Struct Eng 2021; 147(3): 04020350.

[31]

M. Mirrashid and H. Naderpour , "Recent trends in prediction of concrete elements behavior using soft computing (2010-2020)," Arch Comput Methods Eng, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 3307-27, 2021.

[32]

"An introduction to Fema coastal floodplain mapping." Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). https://arcg.is/1bD1m8 (accessed).

[33]

Ross TJ. Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. John Wiley & Sons; 2005.

[34]

Alam KMR, Siddique N, Adeli H. A dynamic ensemble learning algorithm for neural networks. Neural Comput Appl. 2020; 32(12): 8675-90.

[35]

Pereira DR, Piteri MA, Souza AN, Papa JP, Adeli H. FEMa: a finite element machine for fast learning. Neural Comput Appl 2020; 32: 6393-404.

[36]

Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn 2001; 45: 5-32.

[37]

T. Chen and C. Guestrin , "XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system," presented at the KDD'16, 2016.

[38]

Y. Freund and R.E. Schapire , "A desicion-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting," presented at the European conference on computational learning theory, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995.

[39]

Bergstra J, Bardenet R, Bengio Y, Kégl B. Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2011; 24.

PDF (28060KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/