The Christchurch post-earthquake reconstruction – Year 14 update

Abstract

Reconstruction of buildings in the Christchurch central business district following the 2011 earthquake has been a massive undertaking that is not yet completed. Interviews have been conducted with representatives of the consulting engineering companies who designed 55 of these buildings from 2017 until 2025 to determine: (i) the building construction materials and structural system types used, and (ii) the drivers for the selection of these systems. The information obtained is compared with a 2017 survey, by the authors, with the same design companies for buildings constructed from 2012 to 2017, as part of the Christchurch rebuild after the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes. It is found that 47 % and 45 % of the buildings constructed had steel and concrete lateral force resisting systems, respectively, with the remainder using timber. In terms of floor space areas, the steel buildings were typically larger and the ratios were 70 % and 24 %, respectively. The most popular structural steel seismic systems were MRFs and BRBFs with 29 % and 20 % of the floor areas, respectively. Gravity systems, when needed, were generally steel. Although slightly different, these numbers are similar in magnitude to those reported in the prior study. However, comparing the factors driving choice of structure systems reported in the previous study, many of the engineers interviewed commented that, as the Canterbury earthquakes became further away in time, fewer of their clients requested resilient designs that would help achieve functionality (e.g., maintain business continuity) following future earthquakes, requesting instead lowest-cost designs. Nonetheless, it is expected that much of the newer construction will provide improvements in seismic performance given that many buildings were designed for significantly higher strength and lower drift than permitted in the standards.

Keywords

Resilience / Steel structures / Lateral-load-resisting systems / Reconstruction / Horizontal study / Design decisions

References

[1] Gates, C., 2011. “1240 central Christchurch buildings demolished”, https://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/66290638/1240-central-christchurch-buildings-demolished, last accessed June 30, 2025.

[2] Park R, Paulay T. Reinforced concrete structures. New York: Wiley; 1975. p. 800.

[3] Pauley T, Priestley N. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York: Wiley; 1992. p. 768.

[4] Bruneau M, MacRae G. Reconstructing Christchurch: a seismic shift in building structural systems. New Zealand: Quake Center, University of Canterbury; 2017. p. 170.

[5] Bruneau M, MacRae G. Building structural systems in Christchurch’s post-earthquake reconstruction. EERI Earthq Spectra 2019;Vol. 35(No. 4): 1953-78.

[6] Wikipedia, 2025c. “ COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand” https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=COVID-19_pandemic_in_New_Zealand&oldid=1303498434, last accessed September 21, 2025.

[7] Wikipedia, 2025d. “ Economy of New Zealand”, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Economy_of_New_Zealand&oldid=1311748939, last accessed September 21, 2025.

[8] Xe.com, 2025. “ New Zealand dollar to us dollar chart”, https://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=NZD&to=USD&view=10Y, last accessed July 1, 2025.

[9] Wikipedia, 2025a. “ Longitudinal study”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longitudinal_study, last accessed June 30, 2025.

[10] Tectonus, 2024. “ Introduction and design guide”, https://tectonus.com/hubfs/Tectonus%20Guide%20Aug%202024%20online%20version.pdf, last accessed July 2, 2025.

[11] Dubina D, Stratan A, Dinu F. Dual high-strength steel eccentrically braced frames with removable links. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2008; 37(15): 1703-20.

[12] Ji X, Wang Y, Ma Q, Okazaki T. Cyclic behavior of replaceable steel coupling beams. J Struct Eng 2017; 143(2).

[13] Press-Lam, 2025. “ About Press-Lam”, https://pres-lam.com/about/, Last accessed November 26, 2025.

[14] Potius flooring systems , 2025. “ A more efficient way to build” https://www.potius.co.nz/, Last accessed November 26, 2025.

[15] Wikipedia, 2025b. “ Christchurch central city” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christchurch_Central_City?utm_source=chatgpt.com, last accessed July 3, 2025.

[16] Whittaker D, Alexander G, Barnett J, Charman N. Assessment and restoration of an earthquake-damaged sports stadium in New Zealand. In: Proceedings of the 16th world conference on earthquake; 2017. Paper N◦ 914.

[17] RNZ, 2025 “ Christ Church Cathedral could reopen in five years in cheaper restoration plan, https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/572743/christ-church-cathedral-could-reopen-in-five-years-in-cheaper-restoration-plan Last Accessed October 2, 2025.

[18] Japan Travel. A historical landmark and symbol of pride and resilience for the people of kumamoto. Kumamoto City: Kumamoto Prefecture; 2025. https://www.japan.travel/en/japans-local-treasures/kumamoto-castle-2020/Last. Accessed October 2, 2025.

[19] Gardoni P. Routledge handbook of sustainable and resilient infrastructure. Taylor and Francis; 2019. p. 950.

[20] Domaneschi M, Cimellaro GP, Xie L, Bruneau M, Wu Z, Didier M, Noori M, Mufti A, Lu X, Xinzheng L, Ou J, Sheikh S, Zhou Y, Yoda T, Taciroglu E, Häring I, Sextos A. Present and future resilience research driven by science and technology. Int J Sustain Mater Struct Syst 2021; 5(1/2): 50-89. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMSS.2021.115783. Special Issue on: Resilience in the World: Share the Knowledge, See the Future, Help Communities, Vol.No.

[21] Renschler CS, Frazier AE, Arendt LA, Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M. A framework for defining and measuring resilience at the community scale: The PEOPLES resilience framework. Gaithersburg, Maryland: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Office of Applied Economics, Engineering Laboratory; 2010. p. 106. Technical report MCEER-10-0006, MCEER, university at buffalo, buffalo, NY - also published as report NIST GCR 10-930pages.

[22] Law, T., and McDonald, L., 2020. “ Call for action as 20pc of central Christchurch sites remain undeveloped”, https://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/business/the-rebuild/123646110/call-for-action-as-20pc-of-central-christchurch-sites-remain-undeveloped, last accessed July 3, 2025.

[23] Christchurch City Council , 2025a. “ Vacant-Site-Improvement-Guide”, https://ccc.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Culture-Community/Central-City/Vacant-Site-Improvement-Guide-Jan2022-v2.pdf, last accessed July 2, 2025.

[24] Christchurch City Council , 2025b. “ Tracking the progress of our Central City’”, https://ccc.govt.nz/culture-and-community/central-city-christchurch/our-progress, last accessed July 2, 2025.

[25] Christchurch City Council , 2025c. “ Vacant sites”, https://ccc.govt.nz/culture-and-community/central-city-christchurch/develop-here/vacantsites, last accessed July 2, 2025.

[26] MacRae GA. A case against increased seismic performance legislation for buildings. In: Proceedings of the 18th world conference on earthquake engineering; 2025. SDM4, 30 June - 5 July 2024 and Journal of Resilient Cities and Structures Webinar, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c7MFJ5nuV4&list=PLZWyFifoawUuru6r09Lso0DUfB-7uLH8U&index=1.

[27] DBH. Compliance document for New Zealand building code clause B1 structure. Wellington: Department of Building and Housing; 2011.

[28] MacRae GA. Lessons from the February 2011 M6.3 Christchurch earthquake. J Seismol Earthq Eng 2012; 14(3): 81-93. Tehran, Iran2012.

[29] Royal Commission. Volume 2: the performance of christchurch cbd buildings, section 7: cost implications of changing the seismic hazard factor. Royal commission of inquiry into building failure caused by the Canterbury earthquakes. New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs; 2012. https://canterbury.royalcommission.govt.nz/Final-Report-Volume-Two-Contents.

[30] MBIE. Acceptable solutions and verification methods for new zealand building code clause B1 structure. Ministry of Business Innovation and Enterprise; 2016. https://www.building.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/building-code-compliance/b-stability/b1-structure/asvm/b1-structure-1st-edition-amendment-16.pdf.

[31] Bruneau M. The blessings of disaster. Prometheus Books; 2022. p. 450. https://www.globepequot.com/9781633888234/the-blessings-of-disaster/.

[32] Midorikawa, M., Okawa, I., Iiba, M., Teshigawara, M., 2003. “ Performance-based seismic design code for buildings in japan”, https://www.ctsee.org.tw/%E5%87%BA%E7%89%88%E5%93%81/200310/ee0401-02.pdf, Last accessed October 2, 2025.

[33] Ishiyama, Y. 2017. “ Earthquake damage and seismic code for buildings in Japan”, http://ares.tu.chiba-u.jp/peru/pdf/meeting/120817/M6_Ishiyama.pdf, Last accessed October 2, 2025.

[34] Lagos R, Lafontaine M, Bonelli P, Borocheck R, Guendelman R, Massone LM, Saragoni R, Rojas F, Yañez F. The quest for resilience: the Chilean practice of seismic design for reinforced concrete buildings. Earthq Spectra 2021; 37(1): 26-45. Vol.No.