Resilience of metro systems subjected to external disturbances: A state-of-the-art review

Abstract

Metro systems are important transport infrastructures in megacities, and their long-term operational safety is challenged by frequent external disturbances, such as environmental extremes and human construction activities. A metro system must be resilient to resist, adapt to, and recover its performance when such disruptions occur. Current studies on metro system resilience often lack a comprehensive view from a complex system perspective, leading to a plethora of choices for methods of analysis and indicators applied to different metro systems and external disturbances. Therefore, the present paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the topics and works revolving around the resilience of metro systems. It first clarifies the concept of metro system resilience based on classical definitions from a technical perspective. Metro resilience encompasses both the structural and operational aspects of metro systems, including their damage mechanisms, analysis methods and indicators of resilience. Methods for enhancing metro system resilience across structural, operational and monitoring dimensions are explored. Finally, future research directions are discussed, emphasizing the importance of considering the "system of systems" formed by interdependent infrastructure, refining uncertainty analysis, and investigating the opportunities arising from the application of artificial intelligence for improving metro system resilience against external disturbances.

Keywords

Metro system / External disturbance / Natural hazards / Human-caused threats / Resilience

References

[1] UITP. Statistics brief: metro figures 2021. International Association of Public Transport; 2021.

[2] Leng B, Zhao XX, Xiong Z. Evaluating the evolution of subway networks: evidence from Beijing subway network. EPL 2014; 105: 58004. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/105/58004.

[3] Yu XY, Chen Z, Liu F, Zhu HH. How urban metro networks grow: from a complex network perspective. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 131: 104841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104841.

[4] Wang H, Liu Z, Zhou Y. Assessing urban resilience in China from the perspective of socioeconomic and ecological sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2023; 102: 107163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107163.

[5] Lin D, Zhou Z, Weng M, Broere W, Cui J. Metro systems: construction, operation and impacts. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 143: 105373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105373.

[6] Champagne MP, Dubé J, Legros D. Standing strong? The causal impact of metro stations on service firms’ survival. Transp Res A: Policy Pract 2024; 181: 103994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2024.103994.

[7] Liu SC, Peng FL, Qiao YK, Dong YH. Quantitative evaluation of the contribution of underground space to urban resilience: a case study in China. Undergr Space 2024; 17: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2023.11.007.

[8] Hu WJ, Dong JJ, Yang K, Hwang BG, Ren R, Chen ZL. Modeling real-time operations of metro-based urban underground logistics system network: a discrete event simulation approach. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 132: 104896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104896.

[9] Admiraal H, Cornaro A. Future cities, resilient cities - the role of underground space in achieving urban resilience. Undergr Space 2020; 5: 223-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2019.02.001.

[10] Ou Y, Song W, Nam KM. Metro-line expansions and local air quality in Shenzhen: focusing on network effects. Transp Res D: Transp Environ 2024; 126: 103991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103991.

[11] Rajagopal P, Shanthi Priya R. Comprehensive analysis of the impact of elevated metro line infrastructure on the urban heat island effect in Chennai: a multi-model approach. Energy Build 2024; 319: 114541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114541.

[12] He RF, Tiong RLK, Yuan Y, Zhang L. Enhancing resilience of urban underground space under floods: current status and future directions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 147: 105674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105674.

[13] Chen XS, Shen J, Bao XH, Wu XL, Tang WC, Cui HZ. A review of seismic resilience of shield tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 136: 105075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105075.

[14] Huang HW, Zhang DM, Huang ZK. Resilience of city underground infrastructure under multi-hazards impact: from structural level to network level. Resilient Cities Struct 2022; 1: 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2022.07.003.

[15] Fenton GA, Griffiths DV. Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470284704.

[16] Wu HL, Cheng WC, Shen SL, Lin MY, Arulrajah A. Variation of hydro-environment during past four decades with underground sponge city planning to control flash floods in Wuhan, China: an overview. Undergr Space 2020; 5: 184-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2019.01.003.

[17] Jiao LD, Zhu YH, Huo XS, Wu Y, Zhang Y. Resilience assessment of metro stations against rainstorm disaster based on cloud model: a case study in Chongqing, China. Nat Hazards 2023; 116: 2311-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05765-2.

[18] Zhou Y, Li Z, Meng Y, Li Z, Zhong M. Analyzing spatio-temporal impacts of extreme rainfall events on metro ridership characteristics. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 2021; 577: 126053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126053.

[19] Huang ZK, Zhang DM, Pitilakis K, Tsinidis G, Huang HW, Zhang DM, et al. Resilience assessment of tunnels: Framework and application for tunnels in alluvial deposits exposed to seismic hazard. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2022; 162: 107456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107456.

[20] Ng CWW, Liu GB, Li Q. Investigation of the long-term tunnel settlement mechanisms of the first metro line in Shanghai. Can Geotech J 2013; 50: 674-84. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0298.

[21] Lu Y, Han T. Resilience of metro tunnel structures: monitoring deformation due to surrounding engineering activities and effect of remediation treatment. Urban Lifeline 2023; 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44285-023-00009-6.

[22] Chen RP, Meng FY, Li ZC, Ye YH, Ye JN. Investigation of response of metro tunnels due to adjacent large excavation and protective measures in soft soils. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2016; 58: 224-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.06.002.

[23] Bruyelle JL, O’Neill C, El-Koursi EM, Hamelin F, Sartori N, Khoudour L. Improving the resilience of metro vehicle and passengers for an effective emergency response to terrorist attacks. Saf Sci 2014; 62: 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.022.

[24] Okumura T, Taki K, Suzuki K, Yoshida T, Kuroiwa Y, Satoh T. The Tokyo subway sarin attack. Handbook of toxicology of chemical warfare agents. Elsevier; 2015. p. 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800159-2.00004-X.

[25] Zhang Z, Chai H, Guo Z. Quantitative resilience assessment of the network-level metro rail service’s responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustain Cities Soc 2023; 89: 104315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104315.

[26] Li J, Yin A. The Influence of Covid-19 on metro resilience: evidence from four Chinese cities. SSRN J 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3997619.

[27] Latora V, Marchiori M. Is the Boston subway a small-world network? Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 2002; 314: 109-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01089-0.

[28] Derrible S, Kennedy C. The complexity and robustness of metro networks. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 2010; 389: 3678-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2010.04.008.

[29] Albert R, Jeong H, Barabasi AL. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 2000; 406: 378-82. https://doi.org/10.1038/35019019.

[30] Guo XN, Cheng J, Yin CL, Li Q, Chen RS, Fang JY. The extraordinary Zhengzhou flood of 7/20, 2021: how extreme weather and human response compounding to the disaster. Cities 2023; 134: 104168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104168.

[31] Rotta Loria AF. The silent impact of underground climate change on civil infrastructure. Commun Eng 2023; 2: 44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-023-00092-1.

[32] Kandalai S, John NJ, Patel A. Effects of climate change on geotechnical infrastructures — state of the art. Env Sci Pollut Res 2023;30:16878–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24788-7.

[33] Leal Filho W, Azul AM, Brandli L, Lange Salvia A, Wall T , editors. Industry, innovation and infrastructure. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95873-6.

[34] Zhang DM, Gan BL, Huang ZK, Zhu R, Zhang W. Resilience of shield tunnel subjected to adjacent construction disturbances: a review. Undergr Space 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2024.12.007.

[35] Wang Y, Zhao O, Zhang L. Multiplex networks in resilience modeling of critical infrastructure systems: a systematic review. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2024: 110300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110300.

[36] Bešinić N. Resilience in railway transport systems: a literature review and research agenda. Transp Rev 2020; 40: 457-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1728419.

[37] Zhou Y, Wang J, Yang H. Resilience of transportation systems: concepts and comprehensive review. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2019; 20: 4262-76. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2883766.

[38] Wei Y, Yang X, Xiao X, Ma Z, Zhu T, Dou F, et al. Understanding the resilience of urban rail transit: concepts, reviews, and trends. Engineering 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.01.022. S2095809924001280.

[39] Hu J, Wen W, Zhai C, Pei S. A comprehensive review of resilience of urban metro systems: a perspective from earthquake engineering. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 152: 105920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105920.

[40] Capacci L, Biondini F, Frangopol DM. Resilience of aging structures and infrastructure systems with emphasis on seismic resilience of bridges and road networks: review. Resilient Cities Struct 2022; 1: 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2022.05.001.

[41] Shadabfar M, Mahsuli M, Zhang Y, Xue Y, Ayyub BM, Huang H, et al. Resilience-based design of infrastructure: review of models, methodologies, and computational tools. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst A: Civ Eng 2022; 8: 03121004. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001184.

[42] Bi W, MacAskill K, Schooling J. Old wine in new bottles? Understanding infrastructure resilience: foundations, assessment, and limitations. Transp Res D: Transp Environ 2023; 120: 103793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103793.

[43] Alexander DE. Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2013; 13: 2707-16. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013.

[44] Holling C. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1973; 4(1): 1-23.

[45] Holling C. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. Eng Ecol Constraints 1996; 31(1996): 32.

[46] Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig AP. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. E&S 2004; 9: art5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205.

[47] Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, Lee GC, O’Rourke TD, Reinhorn AM, et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq Spectra 2003; 19: 733-52. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497.

[48] Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M. Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Eng Struct 2010; 32: 3639-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008.

[49] Hua YS, Huang HW, Zhang DM. Longitudinal structural resilience of shield tunnel: characterization and field application. Transp Geotech 2024; 49: 101373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101373.

[50] Lin XT, Chen XS, Su D, Han KH, Zhu M. An analytical model to evaluate the resilience of shield tunnel linings considering multistage disturbances and recoveries. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2022; 127: 104581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104581.

[51] Huang HW, Zhang DM. Resilience analysis of shield tunnel lining under extreme surcharge: characterization and field application. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2016; 51: 301-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.044.

[52] Zhang Y, Saadat Y, Huang H, Zhang D, Ayyub BM. Experimental study on deformational resilience of longitudinal joint in shield tunnel lining. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2024; 20: 368-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2022.2095409.

[53] Xu PC, Lu QC, Feng T, Li J, Li G, Xu X. Resilience analysis of metro stations integrating infrastructures and passengers. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2024; 252: 110467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110467.

[54] Yin J, Ren X, Liu R, Tang T, Su S. Quantitative analysis for resilience-based urban rail systems: a hybrid knowledge-based and data-driven approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2022; 219: 108183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108183.

[55] Zhang DM, Du F, Huang HW, Zhang F, Ayyub BM, Beer M. Resiliency assessment of urban rail transit networks: Shanghai metro as an example. Saf Sci 2018; 106: 230-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.023.

[56] Li Z, Yin J, Chai S, Tang T, Yang L. Optimization of system resilience in urban rail systems: train rescheduling considering congestions of stations. Comput Ind Eng 2023; 185: 109657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109657.

[57] Iida H, Hiroto T, Yoshida N, Iwafuji M. Damage to Daikai subway station. Soils Found 1996; 36: 283-300. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.Special_283.

[58] Li Z, Chen Z, Yang Y, Jiang Y, Xu X, Hu Q. Deformation characteristics of existing tunnels induced by above-crossing quasi-rectangular shield tunnel. Transp Geotech 2024; 45: 101227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101227.

[59] Gattinoni P, Scesi L. The groundwater rise in the urban area of Milan (Italy) and its interactions with underground structures and infrastructures. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2017; 62: 103-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.12.001.

[60] Wang C, Qin G. Corrosion of underground infrastructures under metro-induced stray current: a review. Corros Commun 2024; 14: 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corcom.2023.08.005.

[61] Liu J, Shi C, Wang Z, Lei M, Zhao D, Cao C. Damage mechanism modelling of shield tunnel with longitudinal differential deformation based on elastoplastic damage model. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2021; 113: 103952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103952.

[62] Sakellariou MG. Topics of analytical and computational methods in tunnel engineering. In: Sakellariou M, editor. Tunnel Engineering - selected topics. IntechOpen; 2020. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90849.

[63] Meng FY, Chen RP, Xu Y, Wu K, Wu HN, Liu Y. Contributions to responses of existing tunnel subjected to nearby excavation: a review. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2022; 119: 104195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104195.

[64] Niu G, He X, Xu H, Dai S. Tunnelling-induced ground surface settlement: a comprehensive review with particular attention to artificial intelligence technologies. Nat Hazards Res 2024; 4: 148-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2023.11.002.

[65] Chang J, Huang H, Thewes M, Zhang D, Wu H. Data-Based postural prediction of shield tunneling via machine learning with physical information. Comput Geotech 2024; 174: 106584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106584.

[66] Chastre C, Neves J, Ribeiro D, Neves MG, Faria P , editors. Advances on testing and experimentation in civil engineering: geotechnics, transportation, hydraulics and natural resources. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05875-2.

[67] Tang X, Mai S, Song D, Yan Z, Yin X. Full-scale experiment on the bearing and deformation characteristics for prestressed double-layered shield tunnel linings under high internal pressure. Int J Press Vessels Pip 2024; 210: 105239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2024.105239.

[68] Coutinho CP, Baptista AJ, Dias Rodrigues J. Reduced scale models based on similitude theory: a review up to 2015. Eng Struct 2016; 119: 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.016.

[69] Lirola JM, Castañeda E, Lauret B, Khayet M. A review on experimental research using scale models for buildings: application and methodologies. Energy Build 2017; 142: 72-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.060.

[70] Casaburo A, Petrone G, Franco F, De Rosa S. A review of similitude methods for structural engineering. Appl Mech Rev 2019; 71: 030802. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043787.

[71] Gilbert BP, Fernando D, Pham CH. Experimental techniques in structural testing: common mistakes, how to avoid them and other advice. Structures 2022; 41: 1687-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.091.

[72] Ding WQ, Gong YF, Qiao YF, Gong CJ. Experimental investigation on mechanical behavior of segmental joint under combined loading of compression-bending-shear. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2020; 98: 103346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103346.

[73] Zhang J, Zhao M. Experimental study on the mechanical properties of longitudinal joints of shield tunnels under large deformation conditions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 144: 105447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105447.

[74] Wei G, Feng F, Cui Y, Wang X, Diao H, Wu Y. Research on the influence of foundation pit excavation on the lateral force and deformation of side shield tunnels based on full-scale experiments. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 140: 105236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105236.

[75] Wei G, Zhou X, Xu T, Zhang Y, Yao Z, Feng S. Full-scale experimental and structural characterization study of shield tunnel reinforcement under ground stacking loads. Structures 2024; 60: 105865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.105865.

[76] Qiu T, Chen XS, Su D, Zhang J, Song R, Wang J, et al. Full-scale experimental study and mechanical model for beam-wall joints of prefabricated enclosure structure. Eng Struct 2023; 294: 116807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116807.

[77] Qiu T, Sun XH, Chen XS, Su D, Zhang JQ, Xu ZY, et al. Experimental study and resilience modeling for prefabricated hollow diaphragm walls of full-assembled underground stations under urban multi-disturbance conditions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 135: 105044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105044.

[78] Ding Z, Huang X, Sun MM, Xu L, Huang ZG, Zhou QH. Experimental study on the influence of cracks on tunnel vibration under subway train load. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 142: 105444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105444.

[79] Zhang JZ, Huang HW, Zhang DM, Phoon KK. Experimental study of the coupling effect on segmental shield tunnel lining under surcharge loading and excavation unloading. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 140: 105199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105199.

[80] Tang Y, Chen H, Ye Z, Liu T, Yang Y. Experimental study on the transverse effective bending rigidity of segmental lining structures. Adv Civ Eng 2020; 2020: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8836505.

[81] Gou YX, Huang QB, Liu N, Chen DP, Peng JB. Influence of ground fissures on metro shield tunnels: large-scale experiment and numerical analysis. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.05.022. S167477552400297X.

[82] Ding Z, Zhang X, He SH, Qi YJ, Lin CG. Experimental and theoretical study on longitudinal deformation and internal force of shield tunnel under surcharge. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 144: 105506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105506.

[83] Huang QB, Miao CY, Yuan Y, Qu Y, Gou YX. Failure analysis of metro tunnel induced by land subsidence in Xi’an, China. Eng Fail Anal 2023; 145: 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106996.

[84] Hua Y, Zhang D, Huang H. Understanding the longitudinal performance of shield tunnel from settlement to joint behavior by a novel physical modeling system. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2025; 155: 106149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.106149.

[85] Dillard DA, Mukherjee B, Karnal P, Batra RC, Frechette J. A review of Winkler’s foundation and its profound influence on adhesion and soft matter applications. Soft Matter 2018; 14: 3669-83. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SM02062G.

[86] Liang R, Xia T, Huang M, Lin C. Simplified analytical method for evaluating the effects of adjacent excavation on shield tunnel considering the shearing effect. Comput Geotech 2017; 81: 167-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.08.017.

[87] Zhang DM, Huang ZK, Li ZL, Zong X, Zhang DM. Analytical solution for the response of an existing tunnel to a new tunnel excavation underneath. Comput Geotech 2019; 108: 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.12.026.

[88] Liu X, Fang Q, Zhang D, Wang Z. Behaviour of existing tunnel due to new tunnel construction below. Comput Geotech 2019; 110: 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.02.013.

[89] Li P, Du SJ, Shen SL, Wang YH, Zhao HH. Timoshenko beam solution for the response of existing tunnels because of tunneling underneath: analytical solution for the response of tunnels. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 2016; 40: 766-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2426.

[90] Hong XF, Zhang DL, Zhou MZ, Fang Q, Hou YJ, Fang HC, et al. Approximate analytical solution of tunneling-induced responses of a soil-foundation system using contact mechanics. Num Anal Meth Geomech 2022; 46: 3442-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3457.

[91] Wang B, Li J, Zhao C, Wang J. An improved analytical solution for solving the shield tunnel uplift problem. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.05.011. S167477552400235X.

[92] Cao S, Liang RZ, Kang C, Wu WB, Ke ZB, Guo Y. Analytical prediction for longitudinal deformation of shield tunnel subjected to ground surface surcharge considering the stiffness reduction. Num Anal Meth Geomech 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3673. nag.3673.

[93] Gan XL, Gong X, Liu NW, Yu JL, Li WB. Random analysis method for nonlinear interaction between shield tunnel and spatially variable soil. Comput Geotech 2024; 166: 105964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105964.

[94] Di HG, Zhou SH, Luo Z, He C, Xiao JH, Li X. A vehicle-track-tunnel-soil model for evaluating the dynamic response of a double-line metro tunnel in a poroelastic half-space. Comput Geotech 2018; 101: 245-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.12.003.

[95] Zhang P, Yin ZY, Chen RP. Analytical and semi-analytical solutions for describing tunneling-induced transverse and longitudinal settlement troughs. Int J Geomech 2020; 20: 04020126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001748.

[96] Puzrin AM, Burland JB, Standing JR. Simple approach to predicting ground displacements caused by tunnelling in undrained anisotropic elastic soil. Géotechnique 2012; 62: 341-52. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.10.P.127.

[97] Zhang D, Feng H, Zhang J, Huang H. Failure-prone region identification for extreme circumferential joint dislocation based on shear behavior analysis of oblique bolts. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2026; 167: 107064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2025.107064.

[98] Shen Y, Zhu HH, Yan ZG, Zhou L, Lu Y. Semi-analytical thermo-mechanical model for the shield tunnel segmental joint subjected to elevated temperatures. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2021; 118: 104170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104170.

[99] Wang HN, Chen XP, Jiang MJ, Song F, Wu L. The analytical predictions on displacement and stress around shallow tunnels subjected to surcharge loadings. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2018; 71: 403-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.015.

[100] Jain H, Kumar J. Displacements and stresses around a circular tunnel in an elastic medium with pseudo-static horizontal earthquake body forces. Comput Geotech 2023; 162: 105663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105663.

[101] Jain H, Kumar J. Ground displacements and stresses around a non-uniformly deforming circular tunnel in elastic media using complex variable method. Acta Geotech 2023; 18: 2169-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01718-y.

[102] Zhang Z, Pan Y, Zhang M, Lv X, Jiang K, Li S. Complex variable analytical prediction for ground deformation and lining responses due to shield tunneling considering groundwater level variation in clays. Comput Geotech 2020; 120: 103443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103443.

[103] Li G, Cheng WC, Bai XD. Analytical modelling of segmental liner joints for close-proximity tunnelling in soft ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2022; 125: 104495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104495.

[104] Wang F, Shi JK, Huang HW, Zhang DM. Modified analytical solution of shield tunnel lining considering nonlinear bending stiffness of longitudinal joint. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2020; 106: 103625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103625.

[105] Zhang W, De Corte W, Liu X, Taerwe L. A comparative investigation between the beam spring method and the modified routine method in special-section shield tunnels: a case study for quasi-rectangular tunnels. Num Anal Meth Geomech 2022; 46: 1754-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3367.

[106] Liu J, Shi C, Lei M, Cao C, Lin Y. Improved analytical method for evaluating the responses of a shield tunnel to adjacent excavations and its application. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2020; 98: 103339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103339.

[107] Huang SF, Chen ZB, Xie YN, Lin ZY. A variational approach to the analysis of excavation-induced vertical deformation in a segmental tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2022; 122: 104342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104342.

[108] Wang Z, Shi C, Chen H, Peng Z, Sun Y, Zheng X. Probabilistic analysis of the longitudinal performance of shield tunnels based on a simplified finite element procedure and its surrogate model considering spatial soil variability. Comput Geotech 2023; 162: 105662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105662.

[109] Liang RZ, Kang C, Xiang LM, Li ZC, Lin CG, Gao K, et al. Responses of in-service shield tunnel to overcrossing tunnelling in soft ground. Environ Earth Sci 2021; 80: 183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09374-3.

[110] Cheng HZ, Chen RP, Wu HN, Meng FY, Yi YL. General solutions for the longitudinal deformation of shield tunnels with multiple discontinuities in strata. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2021; 107: 103652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103652.

[111] Feng H, Zhang D, Bai H, Zhou Y, Huang H. Analytical solution for shield tunnel structural behavior considering nonlinear shear stiffness of circumferential joint. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2026; 168: 107138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2025.107138.

[112] Zhang Z, Liang R, Li Z, Kang C, El Naggar M, Xiao M, et al. Analytical solution for longitudinal deformation of shield tunnel induced by overcrossing tunnelling considering circumferential joints. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2023; 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.12.028.

[113] Gan XL, Yu JL, Bezuijen A, Gong XN, Wang CC. Tunneling-induced longitudinal responses of existing tunnel with discontinuities in structure stiffness. Transp Geotech 2023; 42: 101113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.101113.

[114] Wan P, Lu JF, Shi MQ. Analytical method for a tunnel with periodically jointed lining in the poroelastic soil under seismic waves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2023; 175: 108216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108216.

[115] Liu J, Shi C, Gong C, Lei M, Wang Z, Peng Z, et al. Investigation of ultimate bearing capacity of shield tunnel based on concrete damage model. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2022; 125: 104510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104510.

[116] Liu ZQ, Chen ZY, Huang Y, Fan YF. Seismic performance evaluation of a metro station structure under multi-source random conditions based on probability density evolution method. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2024; 179: 108509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108509.

[117] Wu H, Gan X, Liu N, Yang K, Sun Z. Analysis of tunneling-induced ground movements in spatially variable soil under the influence of existing building. Comput Geotech 2024; 166: 106003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.106003.

[118] Manolis GD, Parvanova SL, Makra K, Dineva PS. Seismic response of buried metro tunnels by a hybrid FDM-BEM approach. Bull Earthq Eng 2015; 13: 1953-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9698-6.

[119] Zhao GF, Ma GW, Fan LF, Sasaki T. Foreword: recent advancement of computational methods for tunneling and underground construction. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2021; 114: 103998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103998.

[120] Wang FY, Zhang DM, Huang HW, Huang Q. A phase-field-based multi-physics coupling numerical method and its application in soil-water inrush accident of shield tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 140: 105233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105233.

[121] Ghangale D, Arcos R, Clot A, Cayero J, Romeu J. A methodology based on 2.5D FEM-BEM for the evaluation of the vibration energy flow radiated by underground railway infrastructures. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2020; 101: 103392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103392.

[122] Shen Y, Ling JX, Wang WZ, Zhu HH, Yan ZG. 3D numerical investigation on response of shield tunnel under combined effects of fire and structural loading. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2022; 128: 104659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104659.

[123] Shen Y, Zhu HH, Yan ZG, Zhou L, Zhang T, Men YQ, et al. Thermo-mechanical analysis of fire effects on the structural performance of shield tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 132: 104885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104885.

[124] Zhou Z, Shen Y, Yang W, Yan Z, Zhu H. Coupled CFD-FEM methodology for structural fire safety of composite lining shield tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 150: 105834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105834.

[125] Rashiddel A, Kharghani M, Dias D, Hajihassani M. Numerical study of the segmental tunnel lining behavior under a surface explosion - impact of the longitudinal joints shape. Comput Geotech 2020; 128: 103822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103822.

[126] Wu HN, Chen S, Chen RP, Cheng HZ, Feng DL. Deformation behaviors and failure mechanism of segmental RC lining under unloading condition. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2022; 130: 104687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104687.

[127] Zhang JZ, Huang HW, Zhang DM, Zhou ML, Tang C, Liu DJ. Effect of ground surface surcharge on deformational performance of tunnel in spatially variable soil. Comput Geotech 2021; 136: 104229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104229.

[128] Zhou S, Zhu Z, Sun Y, Mao L, Zhang Y, Xu H. Numerical investigations on the dynamic responses of metro tunnel-soil-ground building under oblique incidence of seismic wave. Structures 2023; 58: 105450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105450.

[129] Liu B, Zhang DW, Yang C, Zhang QB. Long-term performance of metro tunnels induced by adjacent large deep excavation and protective measures in Nanjing silty clay. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2020; 95: 103147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103147.

[130] He C, Cai YH, Pu CQ, Zhou SH, Di HG, Zhang XH. Deformation analysis and protection measures of existing metro tunnels effected by river channel excavation in soft soils. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 144: 105504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105504.

[131] Wu L, Zhang X, Bian X, Liu G. Effects of concrete materials on the vibration of the adjacent tunnel and surroundings by DEM and experiment. Constr Build Mater 2022; 335: 127477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127477.

[132] Lei HY, Liu YN, Hu Y, Jia R, Zhang YJ. Active stability of the shield tunneling face crossing an adjacent existing tunnel: transparent clay model test and DEM simulation. Can Geotech J 2023; 60: 864-84. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2022-0294.

[133] Zhou F, Zhou P, Li J, Lin J, Ge T, Deng S, et al. Deformation characteristics and failure evolution process of the existing metro station under unilateral deep excavation. Eng Fail Anal 2022; 131: 105870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105870.

[134] Zhao T, Han T, Wu G, Gao Y, Lu Y. Effects of grouting in reducing excessive tunnel lining deformation: field experiment and numerical modelling using material point method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2021; 116: 104114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104114.

[135] Qin W, Chen EJ, Wang F, Liu W, Zhou C. Data-driven models in reliability analysis for tunnel structure: a systematic review. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 152: 105928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105928.

[136] Zhang DM, Guo XY, Shen YM, Zhou WD, Sheng CX. Data- and experience-driven neural networks for long-term settlement prediction of tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 147: 105669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105669.

[137] Huang MQ, Ninić J, Zhang QB. BIM, machine learning and computer vision techniques in underground construction: current status and future perspectives. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2021; 108: 103677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103677.

[138] Zhou Z, Zhou Z, Lu C, He C. A tunnel structure health monitoring method based on surface strain monitoring. J Civ Struct Health Monit 2024; 14: 1339-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-024-00788-8.

[139] Huang HW, Zhang DM, Ayyub B. An integrated risk sensing system for geo-structural safety. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2017; 9: 226-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.09.005.

[140] Soga K, Laver RG, Li Z. Long-term tunnel behaviour and ground movements after tunnelling in clayey soils. Undergr Space 2017; 2: 149-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2017.08.001.

[141] Liu Y, Liao S, Yang Y, Zhang B. Data-driven and physics-informed neural network for predicting tunnelling-induced ground deformation with sparse data of field measurement. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 152: 105951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105951.

[142] Zhang YL, Xie XY, Li HQ, Zhou B, Wang Q, Shahrour I. Subway tunnel damage detection based on in-service train dynamic response, variational mode decomposition, convolutional neural networks and long short-term memory. Autom Constr 2022; 139: 104293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104293.

[143] Ye XW, Ma SY, Liu ZX, Chen YB, Lu CR, Song YJ, et al. LSTM-based deformation forecasting for additional stress estimation of existing tunnel structure induced by adjacent shield tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 146: 105664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105664.

[144] Nie C, Zhang DM, Ouyang LH, Huang X, Zhang B, Tong Y. Dynamic prediction of longitudinal settlement of existing tunnel using Convres-Dlinear model with integration of undercrossing construction process information. Geosciences 2023; 13: 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13070189.

[145] Feng Y, Feng SJ, Zhang XL, Zhang DM, Zhao Y. A two-step deep learning-based framework for metro tunnel lining defect recognition. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 150: 105832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105832.

[146] Zhang R. Reactive UAV-based automatic tunnel surface defect inspection with a field test. Automation in Construction; 2024.

[147] Yang F, Feng X, Zhang J, Zhong G, Yuan Y. Structural damage identification of subseabed shield tunnels based on distributed fiber optic sensors and information fusion. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 139: 105215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105215.

[148] Li D, Xie Q, Gong X, Yu Z, Xu J, Sun Y, et al. Automatic defect detection of metro tunnel surfaces using a vision-based inspection system. Adv Eng Inform 2021; 47: 101206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101206.

[149] Zhao S, Zhang DM, Xue YD, Zhou ML, Huang HW. A deep learning-based approach for refined crack evaluation from shield tunnel lining images. Autom Constr 2021; 132: 103934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103934.

[150] Yang Z, Barroca B, Weppe A, Bony-Dandrieux A, Laffréchine K, Daclin N, et al. Indicator-based resilience assessment for critical infrastructures - a review. Saf Sci 2023; 160: 106049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.106049.

[151] Zhang J, He C, Geng P, He Y, Wang W. Improved longitudinal seismic deformation method of shield tunnels based on the iteration of the nonlinear stiffness of ring joints. Sustain Cities Soc 2019; 45: 105-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.019.

[152] Guo X, Geng P, Wang Q, Chen C, Tang R, Yang Q. Full-scale test on seismic performance of circumferential joint of shield-driven tunnel. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2021; 151: 106957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106957.

[153] Cui HZ, Tao R, Bao XH, Wu XL, Qiu T, Shen J, et al. Seismic resilience evolution of shield tunnel with structure degradation. Appl Sci 2023; 14: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010072.

[154] Huang Q, Gou Y, Peng J. Disaster prevention and structural resilience of metro tunnels crossing active ground fissures in Xi’an, China. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2025; 162: 106665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2025.106665.

[155] Zhu M, Chen XS, Xia CQ, Wang C, Bao XH. Resilience evolution of shield tunnel structures under ground surcharge. Chin J Geotech Eng 2024; 46: 35-44.

[156] Huang HW, Zhang DM. Resilience analysis of shield tunnel lining under extreme surcharge: characterization and field application. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2016; 51: 301-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.044.

[157] Huang D, Zhu H, Shen Y, Yan Z, Ju JWW. Resilient analysis on tunnel structural serviceability based on lifetime dynamic prediction model. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2022; 129: 104690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104690.

[158] Zhang C, Zhang D, Huang Z, Huang H. Resilience assessment method for subway stations considering uncertainty of seismic intensity. Chin J Geotech Eng 2025; 47: 164-72. https://doi.org/10.11779/CJGE20231153.

[159] Zhang D, Zhang C, Lei C, Huang Z, Huang H. Multi-parameter assessment method for seismic resilience of subway stations based on economic losses and recovery paths. Front Struct Civ Eng 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-025-1174-7.

[160] Qiu T, Chen XS, Chen KY, Su D, Shen J, Wang L, et al. An adaptation resilience assessment framework for key components of prefabricated underground stations. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 136: 105037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105037.

[161] Allen J, Muñoz JC, Ortúzar JDD. Understanding public transport satisfaction: using Maslow’s hierarchy of (transit) needs. Transp Policy 2019; 81: 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.06.005.

[162] Diab E, Shalaby A. Metro transit system resilience: understanding the impacts of outdoor tracks and weather conditions on metro system interruptions. Int J Sustain Transp 2020; 14: 657-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2019.1600174.

[163] Li X, Zhao Z, Zeng X. Applying BIM and pedestrian simulation for architectural flow line optimization in subway stations: an empirical analysis at Chongqing Ranjiaba Station. J Asian Archit Build Eng 2025; 0: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2025.2455035.

[164] Jeong J, Lee I, Oh Y, Park J, Ahn S. Assessment of impact of bottlenecks on evacuation in subway stations using network analysis. Dev Built Environ 2025; 21: 100632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100632.

[165] Su Z, Li Y, Zhong H, Li J, Guo Z, Yang X, et al. Advancements in smoke control strategies for metro tunnel cross-passage: a theoretical and numerical study on critical velocity and driving force. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 147: 105734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105734.

[166] Shi C, Zhong M, Chen C, Jiao W, Li J, Zhang Y, et al. Metro train carriage combustion behaviors - full-scale experiment study. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2020; 104: 103544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103544.

[167] Guo C, Pan YH, Wang K, Zhou XF, Yan ZG. Full-scale experimental study on combustion characteristics and smoke temperature of double-source fires in different tunnels. Fire Saf J 2024; 146: 104177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104177.

[168] Kong J, You WJ, Deng E, Li HH. Study of the evolution mechanism of multi-window carriage fire under longitudinal ventilation in a metro tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2022; 127: 104618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104618.

[169] Liu C, Zhong M, Song S, Xia F, Tian X, Yang Y, et al. Experimental and numerical study on critical ventilation velocity for confining fire smoke in metro connected tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2020; 97: 103296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103296.

[170] Qiu P, Long Z, Liu C, Yang Y, Tian X, Zhong M. Full-scale experiment on smoke propagation in metro station tunnel fire under opening the platform screen doors. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2021; 107: 103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103662.

[171] El Koursi EM, Bruyelle JL, Seddon R, O’Neill C. Design solutions to improve resilience of metro vehicle to blast events. Transp Res A: Policy Pract 2018; 118: 280-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.09.015.

[172] Dong WX, Huang H, Zhong MH, Long Z. Experimental study on the inundation characteristics of flooding in a long straight subway tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 144: 105566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105566.

[173] Dias C, Rahman NA, Zaiter A. Evacuation under flooded conditions: experimental investigation of the influence of water depth on walking behaviors. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2021; 58: 102192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102192.

[174] Li Q, Xia J, Zhou M, Deng S, Dong B. Risk assessment of metro tunnel evacuation in devastating urban flooding events. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 144: 105540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105540.

[175] Mignot E, Dewals B. Hydraulic modelling of inland urban flooding: recent advances. J Hydrol 2022; 609: 127763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127763.

[176] Lyu HM, Shen SL, Yang J, Yin ZY. Inundation analysis of metro systems with the storm water management model incorporated into a geographical information system: a case study in Shanghai. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2019; 23: 4293-307. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4293-2019.

[177] Martinez E, Hernandez J, Rodriguez-Nikl T, Mazari M. Resilience of underground transportation infrastructure in coastal regions: a case study. In: International conference on transportation and development 2018. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2018. p. 223-30. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481561.022.

[178] Zhang Z, Huang G. Flood resilience assessment of metro station entrances based on the PSR model framework: a case study of the Donghaochong Basin, Guangzhou. J Environ Manag 2024; 366: 121922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121922.

[179] Liang C, Guo K, Guan M. Computational hydraulics and hazard assessment of flooding on underground staircases. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 144: 105511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105511.

[180] Lyu HM, Shen SL, Zhou AN, Yang J. Perspectives for flood risk assessment and management for mega-city metro system. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2019; 84: 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.10.019.

[181] Lin XT, Chen XS, Su D, Zhu M, Han KH, Chen RP. Evaluation method for resilience of shield tunnel linings considering multiple disturbances and its application. Chin J Geotech Eng 2022; 44: 591.

[182] Huang Q, Li P, Zhang D, Huang H, Zhang F. Field measurement and numerical simulation of train-induced vibration from a metro tunnel in soft deposits. Adv Civ Eng 2021; 2021: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6688746.

[183] Niu G, Zhang G, Jin Z, Zhang W, Liu X. Assessment of the influence of tunnel settlement on operational performance of subway vehicles. SDHM 2024; 18: 55-71. https://doi.org/10.32604/sdhm.2023.044832.

[184] Zhang J, Zhu Z, Zhu X, Meng Y, Chu W. Study on the influence of uneven settlement and small curve radius on metro train running safety and riding comfort. Structures 2023; 51: 1806-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.094.

[185] Li J, Lou Y, Yang X, Jin X. Nonlinear seismic analysis of a train-tunnel-soil system and running safety assessment of metro vehicles. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2021; 147: 106772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106772.

[186] Shan S, Guo X, Wei Z, Sun W, Zheng H, Pan H, et al. Simulation analysis of evacuation processes in a subway station based on multi-disaster coupling scenarios. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2023; 96: 103998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103998.

[187] Pynadath DV, Dilkina B, Jeong DC, John RS, Marsella SC, Merchant C, et al. Disaster world: decision-theoretic agents for simulating population responses to hurricanes. Comput Math Organ Theory 2023; 29: 84-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-022-09359-y.

[188] Yang Y, Yin J, Wang D, Liu Y, Lu Y, Zhang W, et al. ABM-based emergency evacuation modelling during urban pluvial floods: a “7.20” pluvial flood event study in Zhengzhou, Henan Province. SCI SIN Terrae 2022; 66: 282-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-022-1015-6.

[189] Edrisi A, Lahoorpoor B, Lovreglio R. Simulating metro station evacuation using three agent-based exit choice models. Case Stud Transp Policy 2021; 9: 1261-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.06.011.

[190] Wang F. Subway fire and evacuation simulation based on multi-agent. Beijing Jiaotong University; 2023.

[191] Li Z, Yan F, Shi Z, Jian Y, Hua C, Si Y, et al. Multi-agent behavior simulation for metro station passenger. J Syst Simul 2020; 32: 2341-52.

[192] Mandal T, Ramachandra Rao K, Tiwari G. Evacuation of metro stations: a review. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 140: 105304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105304.

[193] Zheng Y, Li XG, Jia B, Jiang R. Simulation of pedestrians’ evacuation dynamics with underground flood spreading based on cellular automaton. Simul Model Pract Theory 2019; 94: 149-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2019.03.001.

[194] Zhang Q, Qu J, Han Y. Pedestrian small group behaviour and evacuation dynamics on metro station platform. J Rail Transp Plan Manag 2023; 26: 100387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2023.100387.

[195] Shen P, Ouyang L, Wang C, Shi Y, Su Y. Cluster and characteristic analysis of Shanghai metro stations based on metro card and land-use data. Geo-Spat Inf Sci 2020; 23: 352-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2020.1846463.

[196] Xiu C, Sun Y, Peng Q. Modelling traffic as multi-graph signals: using domain knowledge to enhance the network-level passenger flow prediction in metro systems. J Rail Transp Plan Manag 2022; 24: 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100342.

[197] Liu J, Chau KW, Bao Z. Multiscale spatial analysis of metro usage and its determinants for sustainable urban development in Shenzhen, China. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 133: 104912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104912.

[198] Zhang Y, Manley E, Martens K, Batty M. A metro smart card data-based analysis of group travel behaviour in Shanghai, China. J Transp Geogr 2024; 114: 103764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103764.

[199] Wang B, Zhang F, Liu J, Tan Z. The impacts of extreme hot weather on metro ridership: a case study of Shenzhen, China. J Transp Geogr 2024; 117: 103899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103899.

[200] Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 1998; 393(6684): 440-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918.

[201] Barabasi AL, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999; 286: 509-12. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509.

[202] von Ferber C, Holovatch T, Yu H, Palchykov V. Public transport networks: empirical analysis and modeling. Eur Phys J B 2009; 68: 261-75. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2009-00090-x.

[203] Chen RP, Lang ZX, Zhang C, Zhao NN, Deng P. A paradigm for seismic resilience assessment of subway system. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 135: 105061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105061.

[204] Zhang YJ, Ayyub BM, Saadat Y, Zhang DM, Huang HW. A double-weighted vulnerability assessment model for metrorail transit networks and its application in Shanghai metro. Int J Crit Infrastruct Prot 2020; 29: 100358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100358.

[205] Saadat Y, Ayyub BM, Zhang YJ, Zhang DM, Huang HW. Resilience of metrorail networks: quantification With Washington, DC as a case study. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncert Engrg Sys B Mech Engrg 2019; 5: 041011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044038.

[206] Sun D, Zhao YH, Lu QC. Vulnerability analysis of urban rail transit networks: a case study of Shanghai, China. Sustainability 2015; 7: 6919-36. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066919.

[207] Yang Y, Liu Y, Zhou M, Li F, Sun C. Robustness assessment of urban rail transit based on complex network theory: a case study of the Beijing Subway. Saf Sci 2015; 79: 149-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.006.

[208] Zhao B, Tang Y, Wang C, Zhang S, Soga K. Evaluating the flooding level impacts on urban metro networks and travel demand: behavioral analyses, agent-based simulation, and large-scale case study. Resilient Cities Struct 2022; 1: 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2022.10.004.

[209] Zhang YJ, Ayyub BM, Zhang DM, Huang HW, Saadat Y. Impact of water level rise on urban infrastructures: Washington, DC, and Shanghai as case studies. Risk Anal 2019; 39: 2718-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13390.

[210] Yadav N, Chatterjee S, Ganguly AR. Resilience of urban transport network-of-networks under intense flood hazards exacerbated by targeted attacks. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 10350. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66049-y.

[211] Ermagun A, Tajik N, Janatabadi F, Mahmassani H. Uncertainty in vulnerability of metro transit networks: a global perspective. J Transp Geogr 2023; 113: 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103710.

[212] Bai H, Zhang DM, Shang JH, Huang HW, Ayyub B, Shao CZ. A comparative study on the vulnerability of metro network efficiency: New York City, Shanghai, and Jinan. In: Geo-Risk 2023, Arlington, Virginia: American society of civil engineers; 2023. p. 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484968.011.

[213] Zhang J, Wang S, Wang X. Comparison analysis on vulnerability of metro networks based on complex network. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 2018; 496: 72-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.094.

[214] Li M, Liu RR, Lü LY, Hu MB, Xu S, Zhang YC. Percolation on complex networks: theory and application. Phys Rep 2021; 907: 1-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.12.003.

[215] Li D, Zhang Q, Zio E, Havlin S, Kang R. Network reliability analysis based on percolation theory. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2015; 142: 556-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.021.

[216] Li DQ, Fu BW, Wang YP, Lu GQ, Berezin Y, Stanley HE, et al. Percolation transition in dynamical traffic network with evolving critical bottlenecks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015; 112: 669-72. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419185112.

[217] Sun D, Guan S. Measuring vulnerability of urban metro network from line operation perspective. Transp Res A: Policy Pract 2016; 94: 348-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.024.

[218] Hamedmoghadam H, Jalili M, Vu HL, Stone L. Percolation of heterogeneous flows uncovers the bottlenecks of infrastructure networks. Nat Commun 2021; 12: 1254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21483-y.

[219] Chen JQ, Liu XW, Du B, Li WX, Yin Y, Xu XY. Passenger-oriented resilience assessment of an urban rail transit network under partial disturbances. J Transp Eng A: Syst 2023; 149: 04023114. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-8017.

[220] Xu Z, Chopra SS. Network-based assessment of metro infrastructure with a spatial-temporal resilience cycle framework. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2022; 223: 108434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108434.

[221] Zhang DM, Bai H, Zheng CZ, Huang HW, Ayyub BM, Cao WJ. Extreme rainfall induced risk mapping for metro transit systems: Shanghai metro network as a case. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2025; 262: 111234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111234.

[222] De Domenico M. More is different in real-world multilayer networks. Nat Phys 2023; 19: 1247-62. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02132-1.

[223] Goldbeck N, Angeloudis P, Ochieng WY. Resilience assessment for interdependent urban infrastructure systems using dynamic network flow models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2019; 188: 62-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.007.

[224] Lu Q, Liu P, Xu B, Cui X. Resilience-based protection decision optimization for metro network under operational incidents. J Traffic Transp Eng 2023; 23: 209-20.

[225] Wang Y, Zhao O, Zhang L. Modeling urban rail transit system resilience under natural disasters: a two-layer network framework based on link flow. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2024; 241: 109619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109619.

[226] Yin D, Huang W, Shuai B, Liu H, Zhang Y. Structural characteristics analysis and cascading failure impact analysis of urban rail transit network: from the perspective of multi-layer network. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2022; 218: 108161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108161.

[227] Wang J, Huang J, Yang H, Levinson D. Resilience and recovery of public transport use during COVID-19. Npj Urban Sustain 2022; 2: 18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-022-00061-1.

[228] Cats O, Koppenol GJ, Warnier M. Robustness assessment of link capacity reduction for complex networks: application for public transport systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2017; 167: 544-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.07.009.

[229] Lu QC. Modeling network resilience of rail transit under operational incidents. Transp Res A: Policy Pract 2018; 117: 227-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.015.

[230] Zhang L, Chen T, Liu Z, Yu B, Wang Y. Analysis of multi-modal public transportation system performance under metro disruptions: a dynamic resilience assessment framework. Transp Res A: Policy Pract 2024; 183: 104077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104077.

[231] Zhang DM, Li HY, Huang ZK, Gao JH, Yang G, Zhu MH. A resilience optimization design model considering surcharge for large diameter shield tunnel. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. 1333. IOP Publishing; 2024, 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1333/1/012019.

[232] Wang C, Ayyub BM, Ahmed A. Time-dependent reliability and resilience of aging structures exposed to multiple hazards in a changing environment. Resilient Cities Struct 2022; 1: 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2022.10.001.

[233] Zhu T, Huang F, Li S, Ouyang T, Ying J, Zhao H. Optimization of pre-grouting construction and evaluation of grouting effect in a deeply buried silt-filled shield tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 152: 105902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105902.

[234] Lu C, Zhang X, Shi B, Jiang J, Lin Z. Deformation in settlement and grouting remediation of thickened larger-diameter metro shield tunnel in soft soil: a case study. Case Stud Constr Mater 2024; 20: e02736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02736.

[235] Hua Y, Zhang D, Huang H. Model test study of soil grouting effect on shield tunnel longitudinal structural behavior. Eng Geol 2025; 347: 107912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.107912.

[236] Fu YB, Wang BL, Wu H, Chen XS, Sun XH, Bian YW, et al. Theoretical analysis on horizontal rectification of tunnel near deep foundation pit by grouting. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 133: 104977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104977.

[237] Huang H, Hua Y, Zhang D, Wang L, Yan J. Recovery of longitudinal deformational performance of shield tunnel lining by soil Grouting: a case study in Shanghai. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2023; 134: 104929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104929.

[238] Feng H, Ye F, Wen X, Han X, Liang X, Lei P. Secondary grouting pressure limit of shield tunnels in loess strata based on bolt shear behavior. Period Polytech Civ Eng 2023; 67: 152-65. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.21053.

[239] Zhang DM, Ye ZW, Chu W, Zhang JZ, Shao H. Experimental study on the rehabilitation of a shield tunnel lining with excessive transverse deformation by lateral grouting. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 148: 105748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105748.

[240] Jiang X, Zhu HH, Yan ZG, Zhang FS, Ye F, Li PN, et al. A state-of-art review on development and progress of backfill grouting materials for shield tunneling. Dev Built Environ 2023; 16: 100250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100250.

[241] Zhao S, Wu SF, Zhang DM, Huang HW, Chu J. Experimental study on shield tunnel seepage control via microbially induced calcite precipitation. Undergr Space 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2024.03.007. S2467967424000758.

[242] Feng H, Zhang D. Behavior of a novel circumferential joint with concave and convex tenons reinforced by anti-crack meshes and rebars. Tunnelling into a sustainable future - methods and technologies. 1st ed. London: CRC Press; 2025. p. 2722-9. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003559047-347.

[243] Zhai WZ, Chapman D, Zhang DM, Huang HW. Experimental study on the effectiveness of strengthening over-deformed segmental tunnel lining by steel plates. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2020; 104: 103530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103530.

[244] Chen RP, Gao BY, Ruan SQ, Wu HN, Fan M, Feng DL. Experimental study on the mechanical behavior of segmental joints of shield tunnels strengthened by a steel plate-UHPC composite. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 144: 105536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105536.

[245] Gong CJ, Cheng MJ, Ge YY, Song JR, Zhou Z. Leakage mechanisms of an operational underwater shield tunnel and countermeasures: a case study. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 152: 105892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105892.

[246] Gilbert S, Ayyub BM. Models for the economics of resilience. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst A: Civ Eng 2016; 2: 04016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000867.

[247] Fotouhi H, Moryadee S, Miller-Hooks E. Quantifying the resilience of an urban traffic-electric power coupled system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2017; 163: 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.01.026.

[248] Jin JG, Tang LC, Sun L, Lee DH. Enhancing metro network resilience via localized integration with bus services. Transp Res E: Logist Transp Rev 2014; 63: 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.01.002.

[249] Xu PC, Lu QC, Xie C, Cheong T. Modeling the resilience of interdependent networks: the role of function dependency in metro and bus systems. Transp Res A: Policy Pract 2024; 179: 103907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103907.

[250] Li M, Wang HW, Wang HS. Resilience assessment and optimization for urban rail transit networks: a case study of Beijing subway network. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 71221-34. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919105.

[251] Saadat Y, Ayyub BM, Zhang YJ, Zhang DM, Huang HW. Resilience-based strategies for topology enhancement and recovery of metrorail transit networks. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst A: Civ Eng 2020; 6: 04020017. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001057.

[252] Zhang X, Miller-Hooks E, Denny K. Assessing the role of network topology in transportation network resilience. J Transp Geogr 2015; 46: 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.05.006.

[253] Liu Q, Guo K, Wu X, Xiao Z, Zhang L. Simulation-based rescue plan modeling and performance assessment towards resilient metro systems under emergency. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2024; 241: 109642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109642.

[254] Yang X, Dai W, Li Y, Yang X. An efficient evacuation path optimization for passengers in subway stations under floods. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 143: 105473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105473.

[255] Zhang DM, Du F, Huang HW, Zhang F, Ayyub BM, Beer M. Resiliency assessment of urban rail transit networks: Shanghai metro as an example. Saf Sci 2018; 106: 230-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.023.

[256] Lv B, Guan XY, Gao ZQ. Evaluation and optimal recovery strategy of metro network service resilience. J Transp Syst Eng Inf Technol 2021; 21: 198-221.

[257] González AD, Dueñas-Osorio L, Sánchez-Silva M, Medaglia AL. The interdependent network design problem for optimal infrastructure system restoration: the interdependent network design problem for infrastructure restoration. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 2016; 31: 334-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12171.

[258] Xing J, Yin X, Zhang J, Chen J. Resilience modeling and improvement of metro systems considering statistical behaviors of passenger mobility. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2023; 96: 103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103975.

[259] Dong S, Yu T, Farahmand H, Mostafavi A. Bayesian modeling of flood control networks for failure cascade characterization and vulnerability assessment. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 2020; 35: 668-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12527.

[260] Dong S, Yu T, Farahmand H, Mostafavi A. Probabilistic modeling of cascading failure risk in interdependent channel and road networks in urban flooding. Sustain Cities Soc 2020; 62: 102398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102398.

[261] Buldyrev SV, Parshani R, Paul G, Stanley HE, Havlin S. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 2010; 464: 1025-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08932.

[262] Radicchi F. Percolation in real interdependent networks. Nat Phys 2015; 11: 597-602. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3374.

[263] Radicchi F, Arenas A. Abrupt transition in the structural formation of interconnected networks. Nat Phys 2013; 9: 717-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2761.

[264] Yang Z, Dong X, Guo L. Scenario inference model of urban metro system cascading failure under extreme rainfall conditions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2023; 229: 108888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108888.

[265] Li Q, Song L, List GF, Deng Y, Zhou Z, Liu P. A new approach to understand metro operation safety by exploring metro operation hazard network (MOHN). Saf Sci 2017; 93: 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.10.010.

[266] Santos-Reyes J, Padilla-Pérez D, Beard AN. Modeling critical infrastructure interdependency: the case of the Mexico City metro transport system. Hum Ecol Risk Assess: Int J 2015; 21: 1428-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2014.957956.

[267] Liu Z, Yu B, Zhang L, Sun Y. Resilience enhancement of multi-modal public transportation system via electric bus network redesign. Transp Res E: Logist Transp Rev 2025; 193: 103810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103810.

[268] Chai H, Sun T, Yin T. Navigating the impact of metro network on bus ridership: insights into the interdependency between metro and bus systems. Transp Res A: Policy Pract 2025; 199: 104595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104595.

[269] Li J, Dong J, Ren R, Chen Z. Modeling resilience of metro-based urban underground logistics system based on multi-layer interdependent network. Sustainability 2024; 16: 9892. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229892.

[270] D’Agostino G, Scala A , editors. Networks of networks: the last frontier of complexity. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03518-5.

[271] Artime O, Grassia M, De Domenico M, Gleeson JP, Makse HA, Mangioni G, et al. Robustness and resilience of complex networks. Nat Rev Phys 2024; 6: 114-31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00676-y.

[272] Clavijo Mesa MV, Di Maio F, Zio E. Dynamic inoperability input-output modeling of a system of systems made of multi-state interdependent critical infrastructures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2025; 264: 111303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111303.

[273] He R, Zhang L, Tiong RLK. Responding of metro stations to upcoming floods: to close or to protect? Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2025; 256: 110683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110683.

[274] Zhang DM, Li HY, Zhou WD, Chen SR, Huang ZK. A multi-layer coupling framework for hydrodynamic simulation of underground station flooding. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2026; 168: 107208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2025.107208.

[275] Zhang DM, Zhou YL, Phoon KK, Huang HW. Multivariate probability distribution of Shanghai clay properties. Eng Geol 2020; 273: 105675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105675.

[276] Phoon KK. What geotechnical engineers want to know about reliability. ASCE-ASME J Risk Uncertainty Eng Syst Part A: Civ Eng 2023; 9: 03123001. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1002.

[277] Hernandez-Fajardo I, Dueñas-Osorio L. Probabilistic study of cascading failures in complex interdependent lifeline systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2013; 111: 260-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.012.

[278] Hong L, Ouyang M, Peeta S, He XZ, Yan YZ. Vulnerability assessment and mitigation for the Chinese railway system under floods. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2015; 137: 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.12.013.

[279] Praks P, Kopustinskas V, Masera M. Monte-Carlo-based reliability and vulnerability assessment of a natural gas transmission system due to random network component failures. Sustain Resilient Infrastruct 2017; 2: 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1294881.

[280] Panteli M, Mancarella P. Modeling and evaluating the resilience of critical electrical power infrastructure to extreme weather events. IEEE Syst J 2017; 11: 1733-42. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2015.2389272.

[281] Hosseini S, Ivanov D, Blackhurst J. Conceptualization and measurement of supply chain resilience in an open-system context. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 2022; 69: 3111-26. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3026465.

[282] Yang Z, Su H, Du X, Zio E, Xiang Q, Peng S, et al. Supply resilience assessment of natural gas pipeline network systems. J Clean Prod 2023; 385: 135654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135654.

[283] Tee KF, Khan LR, Chen HP, Alani AM. Reliability based life cycle cost optimization for underground pipeline networks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2014; 43: 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2014.04.007.

[284] Tee KF, Khan LR, Li H. Application of subset simulation in reliability estimation of underground pipelines. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2014; 130: 125-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.05.006.

[285] Mu L, Yan Z, Kang Y, Zhu G. Flood risk assessment of urban rail transit stations based on uncertainty analysis. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-025-03066-1.

[286] Liu K, Zhu J, Wang M. An event-based probabilistic model of disruption risk to urban metro networks. Transp Res A: Policy Pract 2021; 147: 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.010.

[287] Zhang D, Zhou Y, Phoon KK, Huang H. Multivariate probability distribution of Shanghai clay properties. Eng Geol 2020; 273: 105675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105675.

[288] Lei H, Hua X, Yu W, Zheng Y, Wang W. Analysis of cascading failure in urban metro networks: a dynamic perspective incorporating changes in travel decisions. J Adv Transp 2025; 2025: 5576254. https://doi.org/10.1155/atr/5576254.

[289] Qu L, Liu S, Tan M, Huang H. Research on risk management and control of undersea tunnel construction based on blockchain technology. Tunnelling for a Better Life - proceedings of the ITA-AITES world tunnel congress. Shenzhen, China: WTC; 2024. p. 3647-51. 2024.

[290] Wang X, Lu H, Wei X, Wei G, Behbahani SS, Iseley T. Application of artificial neural network in tunnel engineering: a systematic review. IEEE Access 2020; 8: 119527-43. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3004995.

[291] Zhou C, Su Y, He L, Peng L, Zhang Y, Wu G, et al. An intelligent resilience evaluation model for the development of urban underground space with safety concern of surrounding existing built environment. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2024; 149: 105783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105783.

[292] Zhang DM, Zhou YL, Huang HW, Zhang JZ. A physics and information dual-driven intelligent diagnosis method for longitudinal mechanical behavior of long-distance shield tunnels. Rock Soil Mech 2023; 44: 2997-3010.

[293] Rustell M. Artificial intelligence and data in civil engineering. In: Ghaffar SH, Mullett P, Pei E, Roberts J, editors. Innovation in construction: a practical guide to transforming the construction industry. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 147-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95798-8_8.

[294] Park JS, O’Brien JC, Cai CJ, Morris MR, Liang P, Bernstein MS. Generative agents: interactive simulacra of human behavior. 2023.

[295] Chen J, Lu X, Rejtig M, Du D, Bagley R, Horn MS, et al. Learning agent-based modeling with LLM companions: experiences of novices and experts using ChatGPT & NetLogo chat. In: Proceedings of the CHI conference on human factors in computing systems; 2024. p. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642377.

[296] Mattsson LG, Jenelius E. Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems - a discussion of recent research. Transp Res A: Policy Pract 2015; 81: 16-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002.