Synthetic modeling of water distribution systems for interdependent infrastructure systems resilience analysis with interdependencies via building-mediated clustering

Yesen Yang , Edmond Y. Lo

Resilient Cities and Structures ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) : 21 -36.

PDF (9940KB)
Resilient Cities and Structures ›› 2025, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) :21 -36. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2025.10.002
Research article
research-article
Synthetic modeling of water distribution systems for interdependent infrastructure systems resilience analysis with interdependencies via building-mediated clustering
Author information +
History +
PDF (9940KB)

Abstract

Resilience studies for water distribution systems (WDS) coupled with other interdependent infrastructure systems attract increasing attention from stakeholders and researchers. However, most existing large-scale WDS models are single infrastructure-based without consideration of other infrastructure systems. This is due to a lack of needed information on systems coupling, the structure of the simulator used, and the computation load involved. To address these gaps, this paper presents a synthetic modeling framework for a real-world WDS as coordinating with other infrastructure systems via a building-mediated clustering approach through consideration of physical distance and node capacity. First, the WDS network topology and operation parameters are inferred via bulk open-source information. A building-mediated clustering approach is designed to systematically derive the interdependence between the WDS and the power system similarly created as a case study. Second, a novel linearization method is developed in formulating the WDS model that can relieve computation load while maintaining accuracy. Finally, a disruption-recovery framework is developed to demonstrate the proposed methodology in modelling WDS resilience. The framework is applied to a neighborhood in Queenstown, Singapore, an area of 20.43 km 2 and 96,000 population. The near-real-time simulations on the coupled system involving 308 nodes and 384 links showcase the effectiveness and application of the proposed synthetic modeling and formulation.

Keywords

Water distribution system / Energy-water / Synthetic model / Linearization / Resilience study / Interdependencies

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yesen Yang, Edmond Y. Lo. Synthetic modeling of water distribution systems for interdependent infrastructure systems resilience analysis with interdependencies via building-mediated clustering. Resilient Cities and Structures, 2025, 4 (4) : 21-36 DOI:10.1016/j.rcns.2025.10.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Rodina L. Defining “water resilience”: debates, concepts, approaches, and gaps. WIREs Water 2019; 6: e1334. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1334.

[2]

Kilkis S, Krajacic G, Duic N, Montorsi L, Wang Q, Rosen M, Al-Nimr M. Research frontiers in sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems in a time of climate crisis. ENERGY Convers Manag 2019; 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111938.

[3]

Hou B, Huang J, Miao H, Zhao X, Wu S. Seismic resilience evaluation of water distribution systems considering hydraulic and water quality performance. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2023; 93: 103756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103756.

[4]

Quitana G, Molinos-Senante M, Chamorro A. Resilience of critical infrastructure to natural hazards: a review focused on drinking water systems. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2020; 48: 101575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101575.

[5]

Khatavkar P, Mays LW. Model for real-time operations of water distribution systems under limited electrical power availability with consideration of water quality. J Water Resour Plan Manag 2018; 144: 04018071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001000.

[6]

Fan X, Zhang X , (Bill) Yu X. A graph convolution network-deep reinforcement learning model for resilient water distribution network repair decisions. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12813.

[7]

Giustolisi O, Savic D. Identification of segments and optimal isolation valve system design in water distribution networks. Urban Water J 2010; 7: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620903287530.

[8]

Zhang Q, Zheng F, Chen Q, Kapelan Z, Diao K, Zhang K, Huang Y. Improving the resilience of postdisaster water distribution systems using dynamic optimization framework. J Water Resour Plan Manag 2020; 146: 04019075. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001164.

[9]

Paez D, Filion Y, Castro-Gama M, Quintiliani C, Santopietro S, Sweetapple C, Meng F, Farmani R, Fu G, Butler D, Zhang Q, Zheng F, Diao K, Ulanicki B, Huang Y, Deuerlein J, Gilbert D, Abraham E, Piller O, Bałut A, Brodziak R, Bylka J, Zakrzewski P, Li Y, Gao J, Jian C, Ou C, Hu S, Sophocleous S, Nikoloudi E, Mahmoud H, Woodward K, Romano M, Santonastaso GF, Creaco E, Di Nardo A, Di Natale M, Bibok A, Salcedo C, Aguilar A, Cuero P, González S, Muñoz S, Pérez J, Posada A, Robles J, Vargas K, Franchini M, Galelli S, Kim JH, Iglesias-Rey P, Kapelan Z, Saldarriaga J, Savic D, Walski T. Battle of postdisaster response and restoration. J Water Resour Plan Manag 2020; 146: 04020067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001239.

[10]

Wu Y, Chen Z, Gong H, Feng Q, Chen Y, Tang H. Defender-attacker-operator: tri-level game-theoretic interdiction analysis of urban water distribution networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2021; 214: 107703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107703.

[11]

Nayak MA, Turnquist MA. Optimal recovery from disruptions in water distribution networks. Comput-Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 2016; 31: 566-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12200.

[12]

Saldarriaga J, Bohorquez J, Celeita D, Vega L, Paez D, Savic D, Dandy G, Filion Y, Grayman W, Kapelan Z. Battle of the water networks district metered areas. J Water Resour Plan Manag 2019; 145: 04019002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001035.

[13]

Liu H, Walski TM, Fu G, Zhang C. Failure impact analysis of isolation valves in a water distribution network. J Water Resour Plan Manag 2017; 143: 04017019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000766.

[14]

Song Z, Liu W, Shu S. Resilience-based post-earthquake recovery optimization of water distribution networks. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2022; 74: 102934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102934.

[15]

Sitzenfrei R. A review on network generator algorithms for water supply modelling and application studies. World environ. water resour. congr. 2016, American society of civil engineers. Florida: West Palm Beach; 2016. p. 505-15. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479865.053.

[16]

Mair M, Rauch W, Sitzenfrei R. Spanning tree-based algorithm for generating water distribution network sets by using street network data sets. World environ. water resour. congr. 2014. Portland, Oregon: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2014. p. 465-74. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413548.050.

[17]

Ahmad N, Chester M, Bondank E, Arabi M, Johnson N, Ruddell BL. A synthetic water distribution network model for urban resilience. Sustain Resilient Infrastruct 2022; 7: 333-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2020.1788230.

[18]

Rinaldi SM, Peerenboom JP, Kelly TK. Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Syst Mag 2001; 21: 11-25.

[19]

Ouyang M. Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2014; 121: 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040.

[20]

Kuwata Y, Okamoto T. Analysis of the impact of water-supply outages due to multiple factors caused by the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake. J DISASTER Res 2012; 7: 701-10. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2012.p0701.

[21]

Rodriguez-Garcia L, Panteli M, Parvania M. Coordinated recovery of interdependent power and water distribution systems. IET Smart Grid 2024. https://doi.org/10.1049/stg2.12175.

[22]

Zuloaga S, Khatavkar P, Mays L, Vittal V. Resilience of cyber-enabled electrical energy and water distribution systems considering infrastructural robustness under conditions of limited water and/or energy availability. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 2022; 69: 639-55. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2937728.

[23]

Pournaras E, Taormina R, Thapa M, Galelli S, Palleti V, Kooij R. Cascading failures in interconnected power-to-water networks. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev 2020; 47: 16-20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397776.3397781.

[24]

Sharma N, Gardoni P. Mathematical modeling of interdependent infrastructure: an object-oriented approach for generalized network-system analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2022; 217: 108042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108042.

[25]

Oikonomou K, Mongird K, Rice JS, Homer JS. Resilience of interdependent water and power systems: a literature review and conceptual modeling framework. Water 2021; 13: 2846. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13202846.

[26]

Vieira BS, Mayerle SF, Campos LMS, Coelho LC. Optimizing drinking water distribution system operations. Eur J Oper Res 2020; 280: 1035-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.060.

[27]

Perelman L, Housh M, Ostfeld A. Robust optimization for water distribution systems least cost design: robust optimization for water networks least cost design. Water Resour Res 2013; 49: 6795-809. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20539.

[28]

Perelman LS, Allen M, Preis A, Iqbal M, Whittle AJ. Flexible reconfiguration of existing urban water infrastructure systems. Env Sci Technol 2015; 49: 13378-84. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03331.

[29]

Li Q, Yu S, Al-Sumaiti AS, Turitsyn K , Nexus Micro Water-Energy. Optimal demand-side management and quasi-convex hull relaxation. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst 2019; 6: 1313-22. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCNS.2018.2889001.

[30]

Oikonomou K, Parvania M. Optimal coordination of water distribution energy flexibility with power systems operation. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2019; 10: 1101-10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2018.2824308.

[31]

Yang Y, Li Z, Mandapaka PV, Lo EYM. Risk-averse restoration of coupled power and water systems with small pumped-hydro storage and stochastic rooftop renewables. Appl Energy 2023; 339: 120953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120953.

[32]

Open-elevation api, [online] available: https://open-elevation.com/., (2024).

[33]

Distance matrix api, [online] available: https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/distance-matrix., (2024).

[34]

Mays LW. Water Resources Engineering. Water Resour Eng 2010.

[35]

Wang Y, Yu J-Z, Baroud H. Generating synthetic systems of interdependent critical infrastructure networks. 2021- IEEE Syst J 2022; 16: 3191-202. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2021.3126308.

[36]

Makonin S, Ellert B, Bajić IV, Popowich F. Electricity, water, and natural gas consumption of a residential house in Canada from 2012 to 2014. Sci Data 2016; 3: 160037. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.37.

[37]

Qiu GY, Zou Z, Li W, Li L, Yan C. A quantitative study on the water-related energy use in the urban water system of Shenzhen. Sustain Cities Soc 2022; 80: 103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103786.

[38]

Li Z, Wang C, Liu Y, Wang J. Enhancing the explanation of household water consumption through the water-energy nexus concept. Npj Clean Water 2024; 7: 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-024-00298-6.

[39]

Li J, Xu Y, Wang Y, Li M, He J, Liu C-C, Schneider KP. Resilience-motivated distribution system restoration considering electricity-water-gas interdependency. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2021; 12: 4799-812. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2021.3105234.

[40]

Baran ME, Wu FF. Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 1989; 4: 1401-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/61.25627.

[41]

Singapore Master Plan, [Online] Available: https://www.ura.gov.sg/Corporate/Planning/Master-Plan, (2024).

[42]

Singapore buildings and construction footprints. [online] https://data.nextgis.com/en/region/SG-CITY-001/msbld/, (2024).

[43]

L.A. Rossman , EPANET 2 Users Manual, (2000).

PDF (9940KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/