Convergent and divergent spatial topographies of individualized brain functional networks and their developmental origins

Jianlong Zhao , Yu Zhai , Yuehua Xu , Lianglong Sun , Tengda Zhao

Psychoradiology ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : kkag013

PDF
Psychoradiology ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) :kkag013 DOI: 10.1093/psyrad/kkag013
Research Article
research-article
Convergent and divergent spatial topographies of individualized brain functional networks and their developmental origins
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Background The human brain is intrinsically organized as canonical functional networks with distinct spatial topographies. While precision functional mapping studies have delineated individualized topographies of single networks, the spatial coordination among these networks and its developmental origin remains largely unknown.

Methods Utilizing three well-established task-free functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) datasets encompassing both conventional and densely sampled scans across neonatal and adult cohorts, we proposed functional topography covariance analysis (FOCA), a novel framework that quantifies convergent and divergent spatial alignments across individualized functional networks and further delineated their internetwork relationships, neurobiological basis, ontogenetic layouts, and cognitive outcomes.

Results In adults, FOCA consistently revealed self-clustered and gradient-distributed functional hierarchies characterized by convergent couplings within primary systems and divergent couplings in higher-order systems. Such pattern was well predicted by fundamental neurobiological attributes, especially aerobic glycolysis. In a large public neonatal cohort, FOCA matrix exhibited adult-inverted hierarchical couplings and prominent changes in auditory and action-mode networks, driven primarily by redistributions of negative couplings. Moreover, neonatal FOCA profiles in the primary visual system significantly predicted neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 months. Finally, compared with conventional functional connectivity, FOCA demonstrated greater robustness to the global signal and higher sensitivity to the maturation of negative couplings.

Conclusions These findings highlight the critical role of negative functional connectivity and deepen our understanding of the cooperative–competitive interactions among functional systems and their developmental origins.

Keywords

functional network / negative connectivity / functional topography / cortical hierarchy / neonatal brain

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jianlong Zhao, Yu Zhai, Yuehua Xu, Lianglong Sun, Tengda Zhao. Convergent and divergent spatial topographies of individualized brain functional networks and their developmental origins. Psychoradiology, 2026, 6 (1) : kkag013 DOI:10.1093/psyrad/kkag013

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Bayley N, (2006) BSID-III: Bayley Scales of infant development Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.

[2]

Braddick O, Atkinson J (2011) Development of human visual function. Vision Res 51: 1588-609.

[3]

Braga RM, Buckner RL . (2017) Parallel interdigitated distributed networks within the individual estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. Neuron 95: 457-71. e5.

[4]

Buckner RL, Krienen FM . (2013) The evolution of distributed association networks in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci 17: 648-65.

[5]

Bullmore E, Sporns O (2009) Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 186-98.

[6]

Chai XJ, Castañón AN, Öngür D, et al. (2012) Anticorrelations in resting state networks without global signal regression. Neuroimage 59: 1420-28.

[7]

Cole EJ, Stimpson KH, Bentzley BS, et al. (2020) Stanford accelerated intelligent neuromodulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression. Am J Psychiatry 177: 716-26.

[8]

Cole MW, Bassett DS, Power JD, et al. (2014) Intrinsic and task-evoked network architectures of the Human brain. Neuron 83: 238-51.

[9]

Cui Z, Li H, Xia CH, et al. (2020) Individual variation in functional topography of association networks in youth. Neuron 106: 340-53.e8.

[10]

Davidson EJ, Spreng RN (2026) Anticorrelation emerges within a dynamic and competitive neural landscape. Curr Opin Behav Sci 67: 101621.

[11]

Demertzi A, Kucyi A, Ponce-Alvarez A, et al. (2022) Functional network antagonism and consciousness. Network Neurosci 6: 998-1009.

[12]

Dosenbach NUF, Raichle ME, Gordon EM . (2025) The brain’s action-mode network. Nat Rev Neurosci 26: 158-68.

[13]

Du J, DiNicola LM, Angeli PA, et al. (2024) Organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated within individuals: networks, global topography, and function. J Neurophysiol 131: 1014-82.

[14]

Du J, Tripathi V, Elliott ML, et al. (2025) Within-individual precision mapping of brain networks exclusively using task data. Neuron 113: 1-15.

[15]

Dworetsky A, Seitzman BA, Adeyemo B, et al. (2024) Two common and distinct forms of variation in human functional brain networks. Nat Neurosci 27: 1187-98.

[16]

Edwards AD, Rueckert D, Smith SM, et al. (2022) The Developing Human Connectome Project neonatal Data release. Front Neurosci 16: 886772.

[17]

Erecinska M, Cherian S, Silver IA (2004) Energy metabolism in mammalian brain during development. Prog Neurobiol 73: 397-445.

[18]

Fair DA, Cohen AL, Power JD, et al. (2009) Functional brain networks develop from a “local to distributed” organization. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000381.

[19]

Fair DA, Dosenbach NUF, Moore AH, et al. (2021) Developmental cognitive neuroscience in the era of networks and big data: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Ann Rev Dev Psychol 3: 249-75.

[20]

Fornito A, Harrison BJ, Zalesky A, et al. (2012) Competitive and cooperative dynamics of large-scale brain functional networks supporting recollection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 12788-93.

[21]

Fox MD, Buckner RL, White MP, et al. (2012) Efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation targets for depression is related to intrinsic functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. Biol Psychiatry 72: 595-603.

[22]

Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, et al. (2005) The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102: 9673-78.

[23]

Froemke RC (2015) Plasticity of cortical excitatory-inhibitory balance. Annu Rev Neurosci 38: 195-219.

[24]

Gao W (2025) A hierarchical model of early brain functional network development. Trends Cogn Sci 29: 855-68.

[25]

Gilmore JH, Knickmeyer RC, Gao W . (2018) Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood. Nat Rev Neurosci 19: 123-37.

[26]

Glasser MF, Sotiropoulos SN, Wilson JA, et al. (2013) The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 80: 105-24.

[27]

Gordon EM, Chauvin RJ, Van AN, et al. (2023) A somato-cognitive action network alternates with effector regions in motor cortex. Nature 617: 351-9.

[28]

Gordon EM, Laumann TO, Adeyemo B, et al. (2017a) Individual variability of the system-level organization of the human brain. Cereb Cortex 27: 386-99.

[29]

Gordon EM, Laumann TO, Gilmore AW, et al. (2017b) Precision functional mapping of individual human brains. Neuron 95: 791-807. e7.

[30]

Gordon EM, Laumann TO, Marek S, et al. (2020) Default-mode network streams for coupling to language and control systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117: 17308-19.

[31]

Gordon EM, Nelson SM . (2021) Three types of individual variation in brain networks revealed by single-subject functional connectivity analyses. Current Opin Behav Sci 40: 79-86.

[32]

Grayson DS, Fair DA . (2017) Development of large-scale functional networks from birth to adulthood: a guide to the neuroimaging literature. Neuroimage 160: 15-31.

[33]

Hermosillo RJM, Moore LA, Feczko E, et al. (2024) A precision functional atlas of personalized network topography and probabilities. Nat Neurosci 27: 1000-13.

[34]

Horovitz SG, Braun AR, Carr WS, et al. (2009) Decoupling of the brain’s default mode network during deep sleep. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 11376-81.

[35]

Isaacson JS, Scanziani M . (2011) How inhibition shapes cortical activity. Neuron 72: 231-43.

[36]

Keller AS, Pines AR, Shanmugan S, et al. (2023) Personalized functional brain network topography is associated with individual differences in youth cognition. Nat Commun 14: 8411.

[37]

Kilb W (2012) Development of the GABAergic system from birth to adolescence. Neuroscientist 18: 613-30.

[38]

Knudsen EI . (2004) Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior. J Cogn Neurosci 16: 1412-25.

[39]

Kong R, Li J, Orban C, et al. (2018) Spatial topography of individual-specific cortical networks predicts Human cognition, personality, and emotion. Cereb Cortex 29: 2533-51.

[40]

Laumann TO, Gordon EM, Adeyemo B, et al. (2015) Functional system and areal organization of a highly sampled individual human brain. Neuron 87: 657-70.

[41]

Li M, Dahmani L, Wang D, et al. (2021) Co-activation patterns across multiple tasks reveal robust anti-correlated functional networks. Neuroimage 227: 117680.

[42]

Lynch CJ, Elbau IG, Ng T, et al. (2024) Frontostriatal salience network expansion in individuals in depression. Nature 633: 624-33.

[43]

Magistretti PJ, Allaman I . (2015) A cellular perspective on brain energy metabolism and functional imaging. Neuron 86: 883-901.

[44]

Makropoulos A, Robinson EC, Schuh A, et al. (2018) The developing human connectome project: a minimal processing pipeline for neonatal cortical surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 173: 88-112.

[45]

Marek S, Tervo-Clemmens B, Calabro FJ, et al. (2022) Reproducible brain-wide association studies require thousands of individuals. Nature 603: 654-60.

[46]

Ment LR, Hirtz D, Hüppi PS (2009) Imaging biomarkers of outcome in the developing preterm brain. Lancet Neurol 8: 1042-55.

[47]

Molloy MF, Saygin ZM (2022) Individual variability in functional organization of the neonatal brain. Neuroimage 253: 119101.

[48]

Moore LA, Hermosillo RJM, Feczko E, et al. (2024) Towards personalized precision functional mapping in infancy. Imaging Neurosci 2: 1-20.

[49]

Murphy K, Birn RM, Handwerker DA, et al. (2009) The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anticorrelated networks introduced? Neuroimage 44: 893-905.

[50]

Murphy K, Fox MD (2017) Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI. Neuroimage 154: 169-73.

[51]

Nelson CA, Zeanah CH, Fox NA, et al. (2007) Cognitive recovery in socially deprived young children: the Bucharest Early Intervention Project. Science 318: 1937-40.

[52]

Ooi LQR, Orban C, Zhang S, et al. (2025) Longer scans boost prediction and cut costs in brain-wide association studies. Nature 644: 731-40.

[53]

Petersen SE, Seitzman BA, Nelson SM, et al. (2024) Principles of cortical areas and their implications for neuroimaging. Neuron 112: 2837-53.

[54]

Power JD, Cohen AL, Nelson SM, et al. (2011) Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72: 665-78.

[55]

Scharf RJ, Scharf GJ, Stroustrup A . (2016) Developmental milestones. Pediatr Rev 37: 25-38.

[56]

Seitzman BA, Gratton C, Laumann TO, et al. (2019) Trait-like variants in human functional brain networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116: 22851-61.

[57]

Snider SB, Shi H, Bodien YG, et al. (2025) Preservation of anticorrelated brain networks predicts recovery after traumatic brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci 122: e2518159122.

[58]

Sun L, Zhao T, Liang X, et al. (2025) Human lifespan changes in the brain’s functional connectome. Nat Neurosci 28: 891-901.

[59]

Sydnor VJ, Bagautdinova J, Larsen B, et al. (2025) Human thalamocortical structural connectivity develops in line with a hierarchical axis of cortical plasticity. Nat Neurosci 28: 1772-86.

[60]

Sydnor VJ, Larsen B, Bassett DS, et al. (2021) Neurodevelopment of the association cortices: patterns, mechanisms, and implications for psychopathology. Neuron 109: 2820-46.

[61]

Sylvester CM, Kaplan S, Myers MJ, et al. (2022) Network-specific selectivity of functional connections in the neonatal brain. Cereb Cortex 33: 2200-14.

[62]

Tavor I, Jones OP, Mars RB, et al. (2016) Task-free MRI predicts individual differences in brain activity during task performance. Science 352: 216-20.

[63]

Vaishnavi SN, Vlassenko AG, Rundle MM, et al. (2010) Regional aerobic glycolysis in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 17757-62.

[64]

Van Essen DC, Smith SM, Barch DM, et al. (2013) The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage 80: 62-79.

[65]

Vázquez-Rodríguez B, Suárez LE, Markello RD, et al. (2019) Gradients of structure-function tethering across neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116: 21219-27.

[66]

Wei G, Liang C, Adali T, et al., (2025) Cooperative and competitive functional connectivity based on improved ising model. ICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Hyderabad, India: IEEE, 1-5.

[67]

Yates TS, Ellis CT, Turk-Browne NB (2023) Functional networks in the infant brain during sleep and wake states. Cereb Cortex 33: 10820-35.

[68]

Yeo BTT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, et al. (2011) The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 106: 1125-65.

[69]

Yin W, Li T, Wu Z, et al. (2025) Charting brain functional development from birth to 6 years of age. Nat Hum Behav 1-14.

[70]

Zhang S, Larsen B, Sydnor VJ, et al. (2024) In vivo whole-cortex marker of excitation-inhibition ratio indexes cortical maturation and cognitive ability in youth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 121: e2318641121.

[71]

Zhao T, Xu Y, He Y (2019) Graph theoretical modeling of baby brain networks. Neuroimage 185: 711-27.

[72]

Zuo X-N, He Y, Betzel RF, et al. (2017) Human Connectomics across the life span. Trends Cogn Sci 21: 32-45.

PDF

8

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉