Distributive fairness during the transition to adolescence: The role of peer comparison and social value orientation

Abstract

Combining the dictator game (DG) and the ultimatum game (UG), this study recruited 546 Chinese children (321 boys, aged 9–12 years) as distributors, and found that both peer comparison and social value orientation (SVO) significantly influenced children’s distributive fairness from late childhood to early adolescence. Results showed that as the unfairness of peer proposals increased, participants decreased the amount of gold coins distributed to the receiver in both tasks, revealing a peer comparison effect. This effect was more pronounced for adolescents than for children in both tasks. In addition, participants’ fair distribution behaviors in the DG showed a three-way interaction effect of SVO, grade, and peer comparison. Specifically, for proselfs, children were not influenced by peers and consistently proposed self-interested distributions, whereas adolescents exhibited a peer comparison effect; for prosocials, both children and adolescents were influenced by peers, but children decreased the amount of their distributions only when they saw peers make extremely unfair distributions, whereas adolescents decreased the amount of their distributions when they saw peers make both mildly and extremely unfair distributions. This study highlights the importance of social environment and personal trait in shaping children’s fair distribution behavior during the transition from late childhood to early adolescence.

Keywords

adolescents / children / fairness / peer comparison / social value orientation

References

[1] Allgaier, K., Ścigała, K. A., Trautwein, U., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2020). Honesty-humility and dictator and ultimatum game-giving in children. Journal of Research in Personality, 85, 103907.

[2] Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2010). Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance. Science, 328(5982), 1176–1178.

[3] Anderson, W. D., & Patterson, M. L. (2008). Effects of social value orientations on fairness judgments. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(2), 223–246.

[4] Asscheman, J. S., He, J., Koot, S., Buil, J. M., Krabbendam, L., & van Lier, P. A. C. (2020). Classroom peer preferences and the development of sharing behavior with friends and others. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(5), 412–423.

[5] Bieleke, M., Gollwitzer, P. M., Oettingen, G., & Fischbacher, U. (2017). Social value orientation moderates the effects of intuition versus reflection on responses to unfair ultimatum offers: Processing unfair ultimatum offers. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 569–581.

[6] Bishop, B. R., & Beckman, L. (1971). Developmental conformity. Developmental Psychology, 5(3), 536.

[7] Blake, P. R., McAuliffe, K., & Warneken, F. (2014). The developmental origins of fairness: The knowledge–behavior gap. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 559–561.

[8] Bono, S. A., van der Schalk, J., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2020). The roles of social value orientation and anticipated emotions in intergroup resource allocation decisions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1455.

[9] Camerer, C. F. (2003). Strategizing in the brain. Science, 300(5626), 1673–1675.

[10] Campbell, J. I., & Thompson, V. A. (2012). MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 1255–1265.

[11] Cason, T. N., & Mui, V. L. (1998). Social influence in the sequential dictator game. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42(2–3), 248–265.

[12] Chaparro, M. P., Kim, H., Fernández, A., & Malti, T. (2013). The development of children’s sympathy, moral emotion attributions, and moral reasoning in two cultures. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(4), 495–509.

[13] Chiang, Y., & Wu, C. (2015). Social influence and the adaption of parochial altruism: A dictator-game experiment on children and adolescents under peer influence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(6), 430–437.

[14] Cochard, F., Le Gallo, J., Georgantzis, N., & Tisserand, J. C. (2021). Social preferences across different populations: Meta-analyses on the ultimatum game and dictator game. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90, 101613.

[15] Cornelissen, G., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2011). Are social value orientations expressed automatically? Decision making in the dictator game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(8), 1080–1090.

[16] DesChamps, T. D., Eason, A. E., & Sommerville, J. A. (2016). Infants associate praise and admonishment with fair and unfair individuals. Infancy, 21(4), 478–504.

[17] Du, S., Wei, L., Zhu, Y., & Nie, T. (2018). Peer-regarding fairness in supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 56(10), 3384–3396.

[18] Eisenberg, N., VanSchyndel, S. K., & Spinrad, T. L. (2016). Prosocial motivation: Inferences from an opaque body of work. Child Development, 87(6), 1668–1678.

[19] Engelmann, J. M., Zhang, Z., Zeidler, H., Dunham, Y., & Herrmann, E. (2021). The influence of friendship and merit on children’s resource allocation in three societies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 208, 105149.

[20] Fabbri, M., & Carbonara, E. (2017). Social influence on third-party punishment: An experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62, 204–230.

[21] Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

[22] Fuhrmann, D., Knoll, L. J., & Blakemore, S. J. (2015). Adolescence as a sensitive period of brain development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 558–566.

[23] Gächter, S., Gerhards, L., & Nosenzo, D. (2017). The importance of peers forcompliance with norms of fair sharing. European Economic Review, 8(2), 149–165.

[24] Gächter, S., Nosenzo, D., & Sefton, M. (2013). Peer effects in pro-social behavior: Social norms or social preferences? Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 548–573.

[25] Gonzalez, G., Ahl, R. E., Cordes, S., & McAuliffe, K. (2021). Children strategically conceal selfishness. Child Development, 93(1), 71–86.

[26] Gummerum, M., Keller, M., Takezawa, M., & Mata, J. (2008). To give or not to give: Children’s and adolescents’ sharing and moral negotiations in economic decision situations. Child Development, 79(3), 562–576.

[27] Güroğlu, B., van den Bos, W., & Crone, E. A. (2009). Fairness considerations: Increasing understanding of intentionality during adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(4), 398–409.

[28] Hashimoto, H., Mifune, N., & Yamagishi, T. (2014). To be perceived as altruistic: Strategic considerations that support fair behavior in the dictator game. Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 5(2), 17–20.

[29] Hashimoto, Y., & Toda, Y. (2019). Young children’s fairness judgements on the distribution of rewards and responsibilities: Allocation patterns and consistencies across two kinds of distribution. Early Child Development and Care, 189(7), 1051–1062.

[30] Heilman, R. M., & Kusev, P. (2020). Personal values associated with prosocial decisions. Behavioral Science, 10(4), 77.

[31] Ho, T., & Su, X. (2009). Peer-induced fairness in games. American Economic Review, 99(5), 2022–2049.

[32] Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008). The right and the good: Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science, 320(5879), 1092–1095.

[33] Hu, X., & Mai, X. (2021). Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: Evidence from behavior and brain potentials. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(7), 670–682.

[34] Hu, Y., Zhou, M., Shao, Y., Wei, J., Li, Z., Xu, S., Maguire, P., & Wang, D. (2021). The effects of social comparison and depressive mood on adolescent social decision-making. BMC Psypsychiatry, 21(1), 5.

[35] Iedema, J., & Poppe, M. (1994). Effects of social value orientation on expecting and learning others’ orientations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(5), 565–579.

[36] Knoll, L. J., Magis-Weinberg, L., Speekenbrink, M., & Blakemore, S. J. (2015). Social influence on risk perception during adolescence. Psychological Science, 26(5), 583–592.

[37] Krettenauer, T., Bauer, K., & Sengsavang, S. (2019). Fairness, prosociality, hypocrisy, and happiness: Children’s and adolescents’ motives for showing unselfish behaviour and positive emotions. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 505–518.

[38] Leimgruber, K. L., Shaw, A., Santos, L. R., & Olson, K. R. (2012). Young children are more generous when others are aware of their actions. PloS one, 7(10), e48292.

[39] Leman, P. J., Keller, M., Takezawa, M., & Gummerum, M. (2009). Children’s and adolescents’ decisions about sharing money with others. Social Development, 18(3), 711–727.

[40] Li, J., Wang, W., Yu, J., & Zhu, L. Q. (2016). Young children’s development of fairness preference. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1274.

[41] Li, J., Zhu, L., Gummerum, M., & Sun, Y. (2013). The development of social value orientation across different contexts. International Journal of Psychology, 48(4), 469–480.

[42] Liu, S., Hu, X., & Mai, X. (2021). Social distance modulates outcome processing when comparing abilities with others. Psychophysiology, 58(5), e13798.

[43] Lucca, K., Horton, R., & Sommerville, J. A. (2020). Infants rationally decide when and how to deploy effort. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 372–379.

[44] Malti, T., & Dys, S. P. (2018). From being nice to being kind: Development of prosocial behaviors. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 45–49.

[45] Merriman, K. K., Mumi, A., & Turner, L. A. (2020). Extending evidence for inter-individual differences in social comparison orientation to pay fairness evaluations. Psychological Reports, 123(4), 1335–1354.

[46] Murphy, R. O., & Ackermann, K. A. (2014). Social value orientation: Theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 13–41.

[47] Ongley, S. F., & Malti, T. (2014). The role of moral emotions in the development of children’s sharing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1148–1159.

[48] Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., & van de Kuilen, G. (2004). Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 7(2), 171–188.

[49] Piaget, J. (1997). The moral judgment of the child. Free Press.

[50] Pletzer, J. L., Balliet, D., Joireman, J., Kuhlman, D. M., Voelpel, S. C., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2018). Social value orientation, expectations, and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32(1), 62–83.

[51] Riyanto, Y. E., & Zhang, J. (2014). The impact of social comparison of ability on pro-social behaviour. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 47, 37–46.

[52] Ruggeri, A., Luan, S., Keller, M., & Gummerum, M. (2018). The influence of adult and peer role models on children’ and adolescents’ sharing decisions. Child Development, 89(5), 1589–1598.

[53] Shaw, A., DeScioli, P., & Olsen, K. R. (2012). Fairness versus favoritism in children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(6), 736–745.

[54] Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (2014). Anti-equality: Social comparison in young children. Cognition, 130(2), 152–156.

[55] Smith, C. E., Blake, P. R., & Harris, P. L. (2013). I should but I won’t: Why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them. PLoS One, 8(3), 11.

[56] Steinbeis, N., Bernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T. (2012). Impulse control and underlying functions of the left DLPFC mediate age-related and age-independent individual differences in strategic social behavior. Neuron, 73(5), 1040–1051.

[57] Sutter, M. (2007). Outcomes versus intentions: On the nature of fair behavior and its development with age. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(1), 69–78.

[58] Thöni, C., & Gächter, S. (2015). Peer effects and social preferences in voluntary cooperation: A theoretical and experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 48, 72–88.

[59] van der Aar, L., Peters, S., & Crone, E. A. (2019). The development of self-views across adolescence: Investigating self-descriptions with and without social comparison using a novel experimental paradigm. Cognitive Development, 48, 256–270.

[60] van Dijk, E., Cremer, D. D., & Handgraaf, M. J. J. (2004). Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 697–707.

[61] van Dijk, E., & Vermunt, R. (2000). Strategy and fairness in social decision making: Sometimes it pays to be powerless. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(1), 1–25.

[62] Van Lange, P. A. M., De Bruin, E., Otten, W., Joireman, J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 733–746.

[63] Wei, Z., Zhao, Z., & Zheng, Y. (2016). Moderating effects of social value orientation on the effect of social influence in prosocial decisions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 952.

[64] Weimer, A. A., Parault Dowds, S. J., Fabricius, W. V., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Suh, G. W. (2017). Development of constructivist theory of mind from middle childhood to early adulthood and its relation to social cognition and behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 154, 28–45.

[65] Yucel, M., Drell, M. B., Jaswal, V. K., & Vaish, A. (2022). Young children do not perceive distributional fairness as a moral norm. Developmental Psychology, 58(6), 1103–1113.

[66] Zhang, H., Deng, W., & Zhu, J. (2017). How do individuals evaluate and respond to pro-equality decision makers? It depends on joint outcome and social value orientation. Judgment and Decision making, 12(3), 224–235.

[67] Zhu, L., Huangfu, G., Keller, M., Mou, Y., & Chen, D. (2008). The development of Chinese children’s decision-making in ultimatum and dictator games. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40(4), 402–408.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.