Psychological capacity profiles of different age groups and gender in a national representative sample

Abstract

Beyond the specific cognitive capacities like numerical or verbal intelligence and cognitive speed, the so-called soft skills, namely, psychological capacities, have become highly important in modern life. This is the first representative study on the distribution of work-relevant psychological capacities in the general population. We investigate capacities in different age groups, gender, and their relation with basic sociodemographics. A representative sample of 2531 people aged 14–95 years was investigated concerning work-relevant psychological capacities with the mini self-rating for psychological activities and participation (Mini-ICF-APP-S). The strongest capacities in young people were mobility, flexibility, proactivity, contact to thirds, and group interaction. Other capacities were stronger in midlife (30–59 years), such as adjustment to rules and routines, planning and structuring, decision making and judgement, application of competence and knowledge, assertiveness, dyadic relationships, endurance, and self-care. Women reported better dyadic relationship capacities, and men felt more assertive. The study provides, for the first time, representative data on a broad range of psychological capacities according to an internationally validated capacity concept. Good psychological capacities occur not primarily in youth, but especially in midlife and older age. Regarding demographic change, this implies older people are highly competent in the working world.

Keywords

age groups / coping / gender / life span / psychological capacities / soft skills

References

[1] Arden, R., Luciano, M., Deary, I. J., Reynolds, C. A., Pedersen, N. L., Plassman, B., McGue, M., Christensen, K., & Visscher, P. M. (2016). The association between intelligence and lifespan is mostly genetic. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45, 176–185.

[2] Ardila, A., Ostrosky-Solis, F., Rosselli, M., & Gómez, C. (2000). Age-related cognitive decline during normal aging: The complex effect of education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15(6), 495–513.

[3] AWMF. (2019). Leitlinie zur Begutachtung psychischer und psychosomatischer Störungen. [Guideline for capacity and social medicine assessment in mental disorders]. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften AWMF.

[4] Balestrieri, M., Isola, M., Bonn, R., Tam, T., Vio, A., Linden, M., & Maso, E. (2013). Validation of the Italian version of mini-ICF-APP, a short instrument for rating activity and participation restrictions in psychiatric disorders. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 22(1), 81–91.

[5] Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). Cambridge University Press.

[6] Blanke, E. S., Rauers, A., & Riediger, M. (2016). Does being empathic pay off?-associations between performance-based measures of empathy and social adjustment in younger and older women. Emotion, 16, 671–683.

[7] Booth, A., & Katic, P. (2013). Cognitive skills, gender and risk preferences. Economic Record, 98, 19–30.

[8] Burke, S., & Collins, K. M. (2001). Gender differences in leadership styles and management skills. Women in Management Review, 16, 244–257.

[9] Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Ist structure, growth and action. North-Holland.

[10] de Vries, H., Fishta, A., Weikert, B., Rodriguez Sanchez, A., & Wegewitz, U. (2018). Determinants of sickness absence and return to work among employees with common mental disorders: A scoping review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 28, 393–417.

[11] DRV. (2012). Leitlinien für die sozialmedizinische Begutachtung. Sozialmedizinische Beurteilung bei psychischen und Verhaltensstörungen. [Guideline for social medicine assessment of mental disorders]. Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund.

[12] Fastame, M. C., Manca, C., Penna, M. P., Lucangeli, D., & Hitchcott, P. K. (2019). Numeracy skills and self-reported mental health in people aging well. The Psychiatric Quarterly, 90, 629–635.

[13] Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95–103.

[14] Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st century skills: What are they and how do we assess them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29, 245–249.

[15] Janacsek, K., Fiser, J., & Nemeth, D. (2012). The best time to acquire new skills: Age-related differences in implicit sequence learning across the human lifespan. Developmental Science, 15, 496–505.

[16] Juhasz, D., Nemeth, D., & Janacsek, K. (2019). Is there more room to improve? The lifespan trajectory of procedural learning and its relationship to the between-and within-group differences in average response times. PLoS One, 14, e0215116.

[17] Klindt, D., Devaine, M., & Daunizeau, J. (2017). Does the way we read others’ mind change over the lifespan? Insights from a massive web poll of cognitive skills from childhood to late adulthood. Cortex, 86, 205–215.

[18] Linden, M., Baron, S., & Muschalla, B. (2009). Mini-ICF-Rating für psychische Störungen (Mini-ICF-APP). Ein Kurzinstrument zur Beurteilung von Fähigkeits-bzw. Kapazitätsstörungen bei psychischen Störungen. [A short rating for capacity limitations in mental disorders (Mini-ICF-APP)]. Hans Huber.

[19] Linden, M., Deck, R., & Muschalla, B. (2018). Rate and spectrum of participation impairment in patients with chronic mental disorders: Comparison of self-and expert ratings. Contemporary Behavioral Health Care, 3, 1–5.

[20] Linden, M., Keller, L., Noack, N., & Muschalla, B. (2018). Self-rating of capacity limitations in mental disorders: The “Mini-ICF-APP-S”. Praxis Klinische Verhaltensmedizin Und Rehabilitation, 31, 14–21.

[21] Lukács, A., & Kemény, F. (2015). Development of different forms of skill learning throughout the lifespan. Cognitive Science, 39, 383–404.

[22] Lövdén, M., Fratiglioni, L., Glymour, M. M., Lindenberger, U., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2020). Education and cognitive functioning across the life span. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21, 6–41.

[23] Mauno, S., Kubicek, B., Feldt, T., & Minkkinen, J. (2020). Intensified job demands and job performance: Does SOC strategy use make a difference? Industrial Health, 58, 224–237.

[24] Molodynski, A., Linden, M., Juckel, G., Yeeles, K., Anderson, C., Vazquez-Montes, M., & Burns, T. (2013). The reliability, validity, and applicability of an English language version of the mini-ICF-APP. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48(8), 1347–1354.

[25] Muschalla, B. (2016). Different work capacity impairments in patients with different work-anxieties. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 89, 609–619.

[26] Muschalla, B. (2018). A concept of psychological work capacity demands–First evaluation in rehabilitation patients with and without mental disorders. Work, 59, 375–386.

[27] OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. Conceptual learning framework. OECD better policies for Bettter Lifes. OECD.

[28] Pinna, F., Fiorillo, A., Tusconi, M., Guiso, B., & Carpiniello, B. (2015). Assessment of functioning in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders with the mini-ICF-APP: A validation study in Italy. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 9, 37.

[29] Proust-Lima, C., Amieva, H., Letenneur, L., Orgogozo, J. M., Jacqmin-Gadda, H., & Dartigues, J. F. (2008). Gender and education impact on brain aging: A general cognitive factor approach. Psychology and Aging, 23, 608–620.

[30] Santos, S. R., & Cox, K. (2000). Workplace adjustment and intergenerational differences between matures, boomers, and Xers. Nursing Economics, 18, 7–13.

[31] Schirinzi, T., Canevelli, M., Suppa, A., Bologna, M., & Marsili, L. (2020). The continuum between neurodegeneration, brain plasticity, and movement: A critical appraisal. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 31, 723–742.

[32] Schupf, N., Costa, R., Tang, M. X., Andrews, H., Tycko, B., Lee, J. H., & Mayeux, R. (2004). Preservation of cognitive and functional ability as markers of longevity. Neurobiology of Aging, 25, 1231–1240.

[33] SGPP. (2012). Qualitätsleitlinien für psychiatrische Gutachten in der Eidgenössischen Invalidenversicherung. Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie und Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Versicherungspsychiatrie.

[34] Strenze, T. (2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35, 401–426.

[35] Syzmanowicz, A., & Furnham, A. (2011). Gender differences in self-estimates of general, mathematical, spatial and verbal intelligence: Four meta analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 493–504.

[36] Thalmeyer, A. G., Saucier, G., Srivastava, S., Flournoy, J. C., & Costello, C. K. (2019). Ethics-relevant values in adulthood: Longitudinal findings from the life and time study. Journal of Personality, 87, 1119–1135.

[37] USUMA. (2019). Field report: Representative survey of the German general population on their physical and mental wellbeing. Coordinated by Prof. Elmar Brähler. Project number 180702. USUMA Markt-und Sozialforschung; 2019.

[38] WHO. (2001). International classification of functioning disability and health: ICF. Weltgesundheitsorganisation.

[39] Wiersma, D., DeJong, A., Kraaijkamp, H. J. M., & Ormel, J. (1990). The Groningen social disability schedule. Manual and questionnaires. Second Version. University of Groningen, Department of Social Psychiatry.

[40] Zell, E., Strickhouser, J. E., Sedikides, C., & Alicke, M. D. (2020). The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 118–149.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.