The relationship between college students’ belief in a just world and online prosocial behavior

Abstract

Previous studies have highlighted the critical role that the belief in a just world (BJW) plays in maintaining and promoting prosocial behaviors within individuals. Considered a stable personality trait, the crux of BJW lies in the conviction that individuals receive what they deserve, and deserve what they receive. Simultaneously, the relationship between BJW and prosocial behavior is impacted by an individual’s sense of fairness or unfairness. However, past research has primarily focused on real-life prosocial behavior, with limited exploration into the relationship between BJW and online prosocial behavior. This study, comprising a survey and an experiment, aimed to delve deeper into this relationship. The survey section randomly selected 4212 college students to examine how BJW correlates with online prosocial behavior. Findings predominantly revealed a significant positive correlation between online prosocial behavior and BJW. Additionally, the study explored how gender and place of origin influence these behaviors. Results showed that male students and those from urban areas exhibited significantly higher online prosocial behavior. The experimental research investigated the performance differences in online prosocial behaviors among college students under different fairness scenarios, revealing that the online prosocial behavior in an unfair situation was significantly higher than in fair or neutral situations. Furthermore, in unfair situations, a significant correlation was observed between BJW and online prosocial behavior. The findings from this study significantly advance our understanding of the dynamics between BJW and online prosocial behavior among college students, emphasizing that perceived injustices can markedly enhance prosocial behaviors in virtual settings. This study underscores the profound impact of fairness perceptions and highlights the modulating effects of gender and geographical background on online interactions.

Keywords

belief in a just world / college students / online prosocial behavior / sense of fairness / sense of unfairness

References

[1] Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48.

[2] Bègue, L., & Bastounis, M. (2003). Two spheres of belief in justice: Extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world. Journal of Personality, 71(3), 435–463.

[3] Best, P., Manktelow, R., & Taylor, B. (2014). Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review. Children and Youth Services Review, 41, 27–36.

[4] Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4(2), 167–182.

[5] Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2007). Victim’s innocence, social categorization, and the threat to the belief in a just world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 31–38.

[6] Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79–98.

[7] De Cremer, D., & Van Lange, P. A. (2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15(1_suppl), S5–S18.

[8] Eagly, A. H. (2013). Sex differences in social behavior: Comparing social role theory and evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 52, 1380–1383.

[9] Emerson, R. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 335–362.

[10] Espinosa, M. P., & Kovářík, J. (2015). Prosocial behavior and gender. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 88.

[11] Fan, Y. (2020). Personal oriented values and online prosocial behavior: A moderated mediation model from the perspective of self-determination. Master’s thesis. East China Normal University.

[12] Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(5), 795–817.

[13] Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Harvard UniversityPress.

[14] Gollwitzer, M., Rothmund, T., Pfeiffer, A., & Ensenbach, C. (2009). Why and when justice sensitivity leads to pro-and antisocial behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 999–1005.

[15] Gu, X., Chen, H., & Huang, Y. (2021). The influence of perceived justice on prosocial behavior of community residents under recall priming paradigm. In Abstracts of the 23rd National Conference on psychology (part 1).

[16] Guo, Y., Chen, X., Ma, J., Li, Y., & Hommey, C. (2022). How belief in a just world leads to prosocial behaviours: The role of communal orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 195, 111642.

[17] Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 128–167.

[18] Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206.

[19] Kaliuzhna, M. (2020). Symmetries and asymmetries in the belief in a just world. Personality and Individual Differences, 161, 109940.

[20] Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16(3), 240–246.

[21] Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. Springer.

[22] Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1030–1051.

[23] Li, L., Liu, H., Wang, G., Chen, Y., & Huang, L. (2022). The relationship between ego depletion and prosocial behavior of college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of social self-efficacy and personal belief in a just world. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 801006.

[24] Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2015). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford University Press.

[25] Marmot, M., Friel, S., Bell, R., Houweling, T. A., & Taylor, S. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1661–1669.

[26] Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., Crain, A. L., & De Vries, R. (2006). Scientists’ perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 51–66.

[27] Mathur, V. A., Trost, Z., Ezenwa, M. O., Sturgeon, J. A., & Hood, A. M. (2022). Mechanisms of injustice: What we (do not) know about racialized disparities in pain. Pain, 163(6), 999–1005.

[28] Mikula, G., Scherer, K. R., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(7), 769–783.

[29] Misbahudholam, A. R. M., & Hardiansyah, F. (2022). Prosocial behavior of elementary school students based on gender differences in society 5.0. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(3), 390–396.

[30] Montada, L., & Lerner, M. J. (1998). Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world. Springer Science & Business Media.

[31] Mulder, L. B., Van Dijk, E., De Cremer, D., & Wilke, H. A. (2006). Undermining trust and cooperation: The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 147–162.

[32] Newman, A., Ucbasaran, D., Zhu, F., & Hirst, G. (2014). Psychological capital: A review and synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S120–S138.

[33] Norris, P. (2003). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. University of Toronto Press.

[34] Rossa-Roccor, V., Giang, A., & Kershaw, P. (2021). Framing climate change as a human health issue: Enough to tip the scale in climate policy? The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(8), e553–e559.

[35] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

[36] Semyonov, M., Raijman, R., & Gorodzeisky, A. (2006). The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988–2000. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 426–449.

[37] Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331.

[38] Smith, P. K. (2012). Cyberbullying and cyber aggression. In S. Jimerson, A. Nickerson, M. J. Mayer, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety (pp. 93–103). Routledge.

[39] Su, Z., et al. (2012). Revision of the Belief in a Just World Scale and a study of its reliability and validity among college students. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science, 21(6), 561–563.

[40] Tan, J. J., Kraus, M. W., Carpenter, N. C., & Adler, N. E. (2020). The association between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(11), 970–1020.

[41] Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.

[42] Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361.

[43] Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901.

[44] Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 1–5.

[45] Wang, C., & Si, L. (2024). The intersection of public policy and public access: Digital inclusion, digital literacy education, and libraries. Sustainability, 16(5), 1878.

[46] Wang, S., Fu, L., & Shen, M. (2021). Performance, cause and implication of the second digital divide among contemporary college students. Documentation, Information and Knowledge, 38(1), 125–135.

[47] Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., & Cameron, K. (2012). Do retributive and restorative justice processes address different symbolic concerns? Critical Criminology, 20, 25–44.

[48] Wenzel, M., & Thielmann, I. (2006). Why we punish in the name of justice: Just desert versus value restoration and the role of social identity. Social Justice Research, 19, 450–470.

[49] Yue, Y. (2015). The effect of trait empathy and empathy on online altruistic behavior of college students. Master’s Thesis (Vol. 50, pp. 1051–1060). Central China Normal University.

[50] Zhang, K., Zhang, S., & Dong, Y. (2010). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with mental health. Psychological and Behavioral Research, 8(1), 58–64.

[51] Zhang, W., Chen, Y., & Zhu, L. (2023). “Attraction of the like”: The influence of peer’s donation choice on prosocial behavior of adolescents and the role of the belief in a just world. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55(9), 1453–1464.

[52] Zheng, X. (2010). Online altruistic behavior of college students: Scale development and multilevel linear analysis. Doctoral dissertation. Shanghai Normal University.

[53] Zhou, C., & Guo, Y. (2013). Belief in a just world: A double-edged sword for justice restoration. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(1), 144.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.