Influence of social mindfulness and Zhongyong thinking style on cooperative financial decision making in a Western sample

Abstract

Social mindfulness and Zhongyong thinking style are of high importance when evaluating relevant co-actors in the social world. The current study investigates the influence of social mindfulness and Zhongyong thinking style on cooperative financial decision making in a public goods game among a Canadian sample. We hypothesize that higher perceived social mindfulness and higher perceived Zhongyong thinking style will increase the amount of money contributed to a joint project in a public goods game. The sample was a prolific-based online recruited sample of n = 125 Canadians. We observed a significant main effect of Zhongyong thinking style on the amount of contributed money in the public goods game. Social mindfulness did not reach significance. The influence of Zhongyong thinking style was qualified by a significant Zhongyong by gender interaction, indicating that females but not males reduced their contributions if the Zhongyong thinking style of the co-actor was manipulated as being low. It is shown that Zhongyong thinking style is also relevant in a Western cultural setting. Future research is needed, however, to investigate further the reasons for the differences between females and males.

Keywords

cooperative financial decision making / modesty / public goods game / social mindfulness / Zhongyong

References

[1] Ackermann, K. A., & Murphy, R. O. (2019). Explaining cooperative behavior in public goods games: How preferences and beliefs affect contribution levels. Games, 10(1), 15.

[2] An, D., & Lee, H.-J. (2019). The relationships between Zhongyong, mental health, and psychological flexibility. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 275–286.

[3] Ben-Ze’ew, A. (1993). The virtue of modesty. American Philosophical Quarterly, 30(3), 235–246. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20014461

[4] Bilancini, E., Boncinelli, L., & Celadin, T. (2022). Social value orientation and conditional cooperation in the online one-shot public goods game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 200, 243–272.

[5] Burton-Chellew, M. N., Nax, H. H., & West, S. A. (2015). Payoff-based learning explains the decline in cooperation in public goods games. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1801), 20142678.

[6] Chang, T.-Y., & Yang, C.-T. (2014). Individual differences in Zhong-Yong tendency and processing capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1316.

[7] Chou, L. F., Chu, C. C., Yeh, H. C., & Chen, J. (2014). Work stress and employee well-being: The critical role of Zhong-Yong. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 115–127.

[8] Dahl, A. J., Peltier, J. W., & Schibrowsky, J. A. (2018). Critical thinking and reflective learning in the marketing education literature: A historical perspective and future research needs. Journal of Marketing Education, 40(2), 101–116.

[9] Dong, Y., Zhang, B., & Tao, Y. (2016). The dynamics of human behavior in the public goods game with institutional incentives. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 28809.

[10] Dou, K., Wang, Y.-J., Li, J.-B., Li, J.-J., & Nie, Y.-G. (2018). Perceiving high social mindfulness during interpersonal interaction promotes cooperative behaviors. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21(1–2), 97–106.

[11] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.

[12] Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–994.

[13] Hou, Y., Xiao, R., Yang, X., Chen, Y., Peng, F., Zhou, S., Zeng, X., & Zhang, X. (2020). Parenting style and emotional distress among Chinese college students: A potential mediating role of the Zhongyong thinking style. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1774.

[14] Houser, D., & Kurzban, R. (2002). Revisiting kindness and confusion in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1062–1069.

[15] Huang, C.-L., Lin, Y.-C., & Yang, C.-F. (2012). Revision of the ZhongYong belief-value scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 38, 3–41.

[16] Kil, H., O’Neill, D., & Grusec, J. E. (2021). Prosocial motivation as a mediator between dispositional mindfulness and prosocial behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 177, 110806.

[17] Kirkland, K., Van Lange, P. A. M., Van Doesum, N. J., Acevedo-Triana, C., Amiot, C. E., Ausmees, L., Baguma, P., Barry, O., Becker, M., Bilewicz, M., Boonyasiriwat, W., Castelain, T., Costantini, G., Dimdins, G., Espinosa, A., Finchilescu, G., Fischer, R., Friese, M., Gómez, Á., … Bastian, B. (2022). Social mindfulness predicts concern for nature and immigrants across 36 nations. Science Report, 12, 22102.

[18] Kurzban, R., & Houser, D. (2001). Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), S37–S52.

[19] Lawrenz, J. (2020). Confucius, Aristotle, and the golden mean: A diptych on ethical virtues. The European Legacy toward New Paradigms, 26(2), 149–169.

[20] Lemmers-Jansen, I. L. J., Krabbendam, L., Amodio, D. M., Van Doesum, N. J., Veltman, D. J., & Van Lange, P. A. (2018). Giving others the option of choice: An fMRI study on low-cost cooperation. Neuropsychologia, 109, 1–9.

[21] Li, C. (2020). Zhong and Zhongyong in Confucian classics. Key concepts in Chinese thoughts and culture. Palgrave Macmillan.

[22] Li, X., Andersen, T. J., & Hallin, C. A. (2019). A Zhong-Yong perspective on balancing the top-down and bottom-up processes in strategy-making. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 26(3), 313–336.

[23] Lin, R.-M., Hong, Y.-J., Xiao, H.-W., & Lian, R. (2020). Honesty-humility and dispositional awe in Confucian culture: The mediating role of Zhong-Yong thinking style. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, 110228.

[24] Losin, P. (1987). Aristotle’s doctrine of the mean. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 4(3), 329–341.

[25] Lu, J., Huang, X., Liao, C., Guan, Q., Qi, X. R., & Cui, F. (2020). Social mindfulness shown by individuals with higher status is more pronounced in our brain: ERP evidence. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1432.

[26] Lun, V. M.-C., Fischer, R., & Ward, C. (2010). Exploring cultural differences in critical thinking: Is it about my thinking style or the language I speak? Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 604–616.

[27] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991a). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.

[28] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991b). Cultural variation in the self-concept. In J. Strauss & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), The self: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 18–48). Springer.

[29] Mercier, S. (2014). Stoics and Confucians on their way to sagehood a westerner‘s further reading of the Zhongyong. The Journal of Greco-Roman Studies, 53(3), 113–152.

[30] Mischkowski, D., Teilmann, I., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Think it through before making a choice. Processing mode does not influence social mindfulness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 85–94.

[31] Ning, B., Omar, R., Ye, Y., Ting, H., & Ning, M. (2022). The role of Zhong-Yong thinking in business and management research: A review and future research agenda. In C. Rowley & J. Paul (Eds.), Trends in Asia Pacific business and management research -relevance and use of literature reviews (pp. 6–35). Routledge.

[32] Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27.

[33] Pan, W., & Sun, L. (2018). A self-regulation model of Zhong Yong thinking and employee adaptive performance. Management and Organization Review, 14(1), 135–159.

[34] Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9), 741–754.

[35] Sadler-Smith, E. (2020). "Don’t fly too close to the sun" – using myth to understand the hazards of hubristic leadership. In W. Küpers & M. Statler (Eds.), Leadership and wisdom narrating the future responsibly (pp. 44–62). Routledge.

[36] Sin, W. (2023). Modesty, Confucianism, and active indifference. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(2), 158–168.

[37] Van Doesum, N. J., Karremans, J. C., Fikke, R. C., de Lange, M. A., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2018). Social mindfulness in the real world: The physical presence of others induces other-regarding motivation. Social Influence, 13(4), 209–222.

[38] Van Doesum, N. J., Murphy, R. O., Gallucci, M., Aharonov-Majar, E., Athenstaedt, U., Au, W. T., Bai, L., Böhm, R., Bovina, I., Buchan, N. R., Chen, X.-P., Dumont, K. B., Engelmann, J. B., Eriksson, K., Euh, H., Fiedler, S., Friesen, J., Gächter, S., Garcia, C., … Van Lange, P. A. M. (2021). Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(35), e2023846118.

[39] Van Doesum, N. J., Van Lange, D. A. W., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Social mindfulness: Skill and will to navigate the social world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1), 86–103.

[40] Van Lange, P. A. M., & Van Doesum, N. J. (2015). Social mindfulness and social hostility. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 18–24.

[41] Wei, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, J. (2020). How does entrepreneurial self-efficacy influence innovation behavior? Exploring the mechanism of job satisfaction and Zhongyong thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 708.

[42] Wei, X., & Wang, F. (2020). Effect of Zhongyong thinking in the relationship of crystallized intelligence and wisdom. Social Behavior and Personality, 48(7), 1–8.

[43] Yang, C., & Lin, S. (2014). What does Huang, Lin, & Yang’s Zhongyong belief/value scale really measure? Chinese Social Psychological Review, 7, 59–77.

[44] Yang, X., Zhang, P., Zhao, J., Zhao, J., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Ding, S., & Zhang, X. (2016). Confucian culture still matters: The benefits of Zhongyong thinking (doctrine of the mean) for mental health. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(8), 1097–1113.

[45] Zhang, L.-F. (2003). Contributions of thinking styles to critical thinking dispositions. The Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied, 137(6), 517–544.

[46] Zhou, Z., Hu, L., Sun, C., Li, M., Guo, F., & Zhao, Q. (2019). The effect of Zhongyong thinking on remote association thinking: An EEG study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 207.

[47] Zhou, Z., Zhang, H. P., Li, M. Z., Sun, C. C., & Luo, H. L. (2021). The effect of Zhongyong thinking priming on creative problem-solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 145–153.

[48] Zubair, A., Kamal, A., & Artemeva, V. (2018). Mindfulness and resilience as predictors of subjective well-being among university students: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 28(1), 1–19.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.