Working memory components modulation of attentional disengagement from evaluative distractor

Abstract

It is important for people to disengage attention from a distraction, which can help them complete the task at hand as quickly as possible. Recent studies have shown that people’s attention stays longer on reward-distractors than on loss-distractors, and a delay in attentional disengagement is noted when reward-distractors are present. However, few studies have examined whether attentional disengagement from an evaluative distractor relies upon working memory (WM) components. In the present study, we used an attentional disengagement paradigm in which reward- or loss-distractors were presented at a central location and the target was presented at a peripheral location, in combination with different WM tasks. The results from Experiment 1 showed that participants were slower to disengage their attention from a central reward-distractor than a loss-distractor regardless of cognitive load when the phonological loop component of WM was involved. The results from Experiment 2 revealed that people had difficulty in shifting their attention away from a reward-distractor in comparison to a loss-distractor when spatial WM was low, whereas no such difference was observed when spatial WM was high. We conclude that WM components differently modulate attentional disengagement from evaluative distractors. That is, the processing of evaluative (reward and loss) distractors may rely on the same cognitive resources as the spatial WM component, but not the phonological loop component.

Keywords

attentional disengagement / reward / value salience / working memory components

References

[1] Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(25), 10367–10371.

[2] Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443.

[3] Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559.

[4] Baddeley, A. (1998). Working memory. Compets Rendus Biologies, 321(2–3), 167–173.

[5] Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.

[6] Bruyer, R., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: Is the inverse efficiency score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean reaction time (RT) and the percentage of errors (PE)? Psychologica Belgica, 51(1), 5–13.

[7] Burnham, B. R. (2010). Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search. Acta Psychologica, 135(1), 50–58.

[8] Burnham, B. R., Sabia, M., & Langan, C. (2014). Components of working memory and visual selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(1), 391–403.

[9] Cohen, J. D., Romero, R. D., Servan-Schreiber, D., & Farah, M. J. (1994). Mechanisms of spatial attention: The relation of macrostructure to microstructure in parietal neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(4), 377–387.

[10] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.

[11] Feng, J., Pratt, J., & Spence, I. (2012). Attention and visuospatial working memory share the same processing resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 103.

[12] Gao, Y., & Theeuwes, J. (2020). Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27(1), 96–104.

[13] Gaspelin, N., & Luck, S. J. (2018). The role of inhibition in avoiding distraction by salient stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(1), 79–92.

[14] Gueguen, M. C. M., Lopez-Persem, A., Billeke, P., Lachaux, J. P., Rheims, S., Kahane, P., Minotti, L., David, O., Pessiglione, M., & Bastin, J. (2021). Anatomical dissociation of intracerebral signals for reward and punishment prediction errors in humans. Nature Communications, 12(1), 3344.

[15] Gupta, R., Hur, Y. J., & Lavie, N. (2016). Distracted by pleasure: Effects of positive versus negative valence on emotional capture under load. Emotion, 16(3), 328–337.

[16] Hollingworth, A., & Maxcey-Richard, A. M. (2013). Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(4), 1047–1058.

[17] Jasp Team. (2018). JASP (Version 0.9)[Computer software]. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/2018/06/20/introducing-jasp-0-9/

[18] Lavie, N., & De Fockert, J. (2005). The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(4), 669–674.

[19] Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 339–354.

[20] Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4(7), 1863–1874.

[21] Rusz, D., Le Pelley, M. E., Kompier, M. A. J., Mait, L., & Bijleveld, E. (2020). Reward-driven distraction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(10), 872–899.

[22] Shucard, J. L., Tekok-Kilic, A., Shiels, K., & Shucard, D. W. (2009). Stage and load effects on ERP topography during verbal and spatial working memory. Brain Research, 1254, 49–62.

[23] Theeuwes, J. (2019). Goal-driven, stimulus-driven, and history-driven selection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 97–101.

[24] van Doorn, J., van den Bergh, D., Böhm, U., Dablander, F., Derks, K., Draws, T., Etz, A., Evans, N. J., Gronau, Q. F., Haaf, J. M., Hinne, M., Kucharský Š., Ly, A., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., Gupta, A. R. K. N., Sarafoglou, A., Stefan, A., Voelkel, J. G., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2021). The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28, 813–826.

[25] Van Moorselaar, D., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2014). In competition for the attentional template: Can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4), 1450–1464.

[26] Watson, P., Pearson, D., Chow, M., Theeuwes, J., Wiers, R. W., Most, S. B., & Le Pelley, M. E. (2019). Capture and control: Working memory modulates attentional capture by reward-related stimuli. Psychological Science, 30(8), 1174–1185.

[27] Watson, P., Pearson, D., Theeuwes, J., Most, S. B., & Le Pelley, M. E. (2020). Delayed disengagement of attention from distractors signalling reward. Cognition, 195, 104125.

[28] Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(2), 269–274.

[29] Yan, M., Li, Q., Long, Q., Xu, L., Hu, N., & Chen, A. (2022). Evaluative distractors modulate attentional disengagement: People would rather stay longer on rewards. Journal of Vision, 22(8), 12.

[30] Yan, M., Meng, Z., Hu, N., & Chen, A. (2023). Rewarding outcomes enhance attentional capture and delay attentional disengagement. PeerJ, 11, e15868.

[31] Zhang, Y., Ye, Q., He, H., Jin, R., & Peng, W. (2023). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying attention bias towards pain: Evidence from a drift-diffusion model and event-related potentials. Journal of Pain, 24(7), 1307–1320.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.