When advisors do not know what is best for advisees: Uncertainty inhibits advice giving

Abstract

While seeking advice can be beneficial for advisees, advisors may not always possess the necessary knowledge to provide appropriate guidance. Poor-quality advice can mislead advisees rather than offering assistance. Despite the research interest in advisees, few studies have investigated advisors’ psychological and behavioral responses, especially when they faced uncertainty regarding the optimal course of action for advisees. To fill this gap, we developed novel paradigms aiming at manipulating advisors’ uncertainty, allowing for a systematic investigation of advisors’ behavior, motivation, and emotion. Across four studies, we consistently found that advisors under uncertainty give less advice. Furthermore, we observed that uncertainty modulates advisors’ motivation to influence, worry about harm to others, and/or sense of power. The motivation to influence and/or worry about harm to others can mediate the effect of uncertainty on advice giving. Besides, we identified nuanced distinctions in the effects of ambiguity and risk, two distinct types of uncertainty, on advisors’ psychological processes. Our findings shed light on advisors’ self-monitoring of the quality of their advice, thereby contributing to a deeper understanding of advisor–advisee communication from the perspective of advisors.

Keywords

advice giving / motivation to influence / sense of power / uncertainty / worry about harm to others

References

[1] Agler, R., & De Boeck, P. (2017). On the interpretation and use of mediation: Multiple perspectives on mediation analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–11.

[2] Anderson, C., & Brion, S. (2014). Perspectives on power in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 67–97.

[3] Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313–344.

[4] Barneron, M., & Yaniv, I. (2020). Advice-giving under conflict of interest: Context enhances self-serving behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91, 104046.

[5] Blankenstein, N. E., Huettel, S. A., & Li, R. (2021). Resolving ambiguity: Broadening the consideration of risky decision making over adolescent development. Developmental Review, 62, 100987.

[6] Blunden, H., Logg, J. M., Brooks, A. W., John, L. K., & Gino, F. (2019). Seeker beware: The interpersonal costs of ignoring advice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 83–100.

[7] Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2006). Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(2), 127–151.

[8] Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., & Moore, D. A. (2005). The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. The Journal of Legal Studies, 34(1), 1–25.

[9] Camerer, C., & Mobbs, D. (2017). Differences in behavior and brain activity during hypothetical and real choices. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(1), 46–56.

[10] Camerer, C., & Weber, M. (1992). Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 325–370.

[11] Chang, L. J., Smith, A., Dufwenberg, M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011). Triangulating the neural, psychological, and economic bases of guilt aversion. Neuron, 70(3), 560–572.

[12] Curley, S. P., Yates, J. F., & Abrams, R. A. (1986). Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38(2), 230–256.

[13] Dana, J., & Cain, D. M. (2015). Advice versus choice. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 173–176.

[14] De Hooge, I. E., Verlegh, P. W. J., & Tzioti, S. C. (2014). Emotions in advice taking: The roles of agency and valence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(3), 246–258.

[15] Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1975). Unit weighting schemes for decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(2), 171–192.

[16] Eskreis-Winkler, L., Fishbach, A., & Duckworth, A. L. (2018). Dear Abby: Should I give advice or receive it? Psychological Science, 29(11), 1797–1806.

[17] Fiedler, K., Schott, M., & Meiser, T. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1231–1236.

[18] Fisher, J. D., Nadler, A., & Whitcher-Alagna, S. (1982). Recipient reactions to aid. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 27–54.

[19] Gaertig, C., & Simmons, J. P. (2018). Do people inherently dislike uncertain advice? Psychological Science, 29(4), 504–520.

[20] Goldsmith, D. J., & Fitch, K. (1997). The normative context of advice as social support. Human Communication Research, 23(4), 454–476.

[21] Guntzviller, L. M., Pulido, M. D., Liao, D., & Butkowski, C. P. (2020). Advisor interaction goals and verbal messages: Merging a multiple goals approach and the integrated model of advice giving. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(3), 292–317.

[22] Hadar, L., & Fischer, I. (2008). Giving advice under uncertainty: What you do, what you should do, and what others think you do. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(5), 667–683.

[23] Haran, U., & Shalvi, S. (2020). The implicit honesty premium: Why honest advice is more persuasive than highly informed advice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(4), 757–773.

[24] Harvey, N., & Fischer, I. (1997). Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(2), 117–133.

[25] Heath, C., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Interaction with others increases decision confidence but not decision quality: Evidence against information collection views of interactive decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(3), 305–326.

[26] Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2021). Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Communication, 18(1), 38–52.

[27] Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Camerer, C. F. (2005). Neuroscience: Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science, 310(5754), 1680–1683.

[28] Imai, K., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2013). Experimental designs for identifying causal mechanisms. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society, 176(1), 5–51.

[29] Isopi, A., Nosenzo, D., & Starmer, C. (2014). Does consultation improve decision-making? Theory and Decision, 77(3), 377–388.

[30] Jenkins, A. C., & Mitchell, J. P. (2010). Mentalizing under uncertainty: Dissociated neural responses to ambiguous and unambiguous mental state inferences. Cerebral Cortex, 20(2), 404–410.

[31] Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Frey, D. (2005). Giving advice or making decisions in someone else’s place: The influence of impression, defense, and accuracy motivation on the search for new information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(7), 977–990.

[32] Kämmer, J. E., Choshen-Hillel, S., Müller-Trede, J., Black, S. L., & Weibler, J. (2023). A systematic review of empirical studies on advice-based decisions in behavioral and organizational research. Decision, 10(2), 107–137.

[33] Kappes, A., Nussberger, A. M., Faber, N. S., Kahane, G., Savulescu, J., & Crockett, M. J. (2018). Uncertainty about the impact of social decisions increases prosocial behaviour. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(8), 573–580.

[34] Kassirer, S., Levine, E. E., & Gaertig, C. (2020). Decisional autonomy undermines advisees’ judgments of experts in medicine and in life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(21), 11368–11378.

[35] Kramer, M. M. (2016). Financial literacy, confidence and financial advice seeking. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 131, 198–217.

[36] Landau, M. J., Kay, A. C., & Whitson, J. A. (2015). Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 694–722.

[37] Leong, Y. C., & Zaki, J. (2018). Unrealistic optimism in advice taking: A computational account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(2), 170–189.

[38] Losin, E. A. R., Woo, C. W., Medina, N. A., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Eisenbarth, H., & Wager, T. D. (2020). Neural and sociocultural mediators of ethnic differences in pain. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 517–530.

[39] MacGeorge, E. L., Graves, A. R., Feng, B., Gillihan, S. J., & Burleson, B. R. (2004). The myth of gender cultures: Similarities outweigh differences in Men’s and Women’s provision of and responses to supportive communication. Sex Roles, 50(3–4), 143–175.

[40] Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). 8 social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.

[41] Mahmoodi, A., Bahrami, B., & Mehring, C. (2018). Reciprocity of social influence. Nature. Communications, 9(1), 1–9.

[42] Melamed, D., Savage, S. V., & Munn, C. (2019). Uncertainty and social influence. Socius, 5, 1–9.

[43] Mirc, N., & Parker, A. (2020). If you do not know who knows what: Advice seeking under changing conditions of uncertainty after an acquisition. Social Networks, 61, 53–66.

[44] Mobbs, D., Hagan, C. C., Yu, R., Takahashi, H., FeldmanHall, O., Calder, A. J., & Dalgleish, T. (2015). Reflected glory and failure: The role of the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum in self vs other relevance during advice-giving outcomes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(10), 1323–1328.

[45] Ove Hansson, S. (1996). Decision making under great uncertainty. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 26(3), 369–386.

[46] Parnell, K. J., & Hammer, J. H. (2018). Deciding on couple therapy: The role of masculinity in relationship help-seeking. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 19(2), 212–222.

[47] Peluso, A. M., Bonezzi, A., De Angelis, M., & Rucker, D. D. (2017). Compensatory word of mouth: Advice as a device to restore control. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(2), 499–515.

[48] Rader, C. A., Larrick, R. P., & Soll, J. B. (2017). Advice as a form of social influence: Informational motives and the consequences for accuracy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(8), 1–17.

[49] Raiffa, H. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms: Comment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 690–694.

[50] Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.

[51] Sah, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2012). More affected = more neglected: Amplification of bias in advice to the unidentified and many. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 365–372.

[52] Schaerer, M., Swaab, R. I., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Anchors weigh more than power: Why absolute powerlessness liberates negotiators to achieve better outcomes. Psychological Science, 26(2), 170–181.

[53] Schaerer, M., Tost, L. P., Huang, L., Gino, F., & Larrick, R. (2018). Advice giving: A subtle pathway to power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(5), 746–761.

[54] Sherman, R. (1974). The psychological difference between ambiguity and risk. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88(1), 166–169.

[55] Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1974). Who accepts Savage’s axiom? Behavioral Science, 19(6), 368–373.

[56] Sniezek, J. A., & Van Swol, L. M. (2001). Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(2), 288–307.

[57] Szollosi, A., Donkin, C., & Newell, B. R. (2022). Toward nonprobabilistic explanations of learning and decision-making. Psychological Review, 130(2), 546–568.

[58] Tost, L. P. (2015). When, why, and how do powerholders “feel the power”? Examining the links between structural and psychological power and reviving the connection between power and responsibility. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 29–56.

[59] Vives, M. L., & Feldmanhall, O. (2018). Tolerance to ambiguous uncertainty predicts prosocial behavior. Nature Communications, 9(1), 25–27.

[60] Volz, K. G., Schubotz, R. I., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Why am I unsure? Internal and external attributions of uncertainty dissociated by fMRI. NeuroImage, 21(3), 848–857.

[61] Zhang, T., & North, M. S. (2020). What goes down when advice goes up: Younger advisers underestimate their impact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(10), 1444–1460.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.