The Effect of Emojis on L2 Irony Processing for Chinese EFL Learners

Wan Su , Hadina Habil

Psych Journal ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4) : e70116

PDF (563KB)
Psych Journal ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4) :e70116 DOI: 10.1002/pchj.70116
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The Effect of Emojis on L2 Irony Processing for Chinese EFL Learners
Author information +
History +
PDF (563KB)

Abstract

Second language (L2) learners often struggle to draw on embodied emotional experiences in the target language, which impedes their rapid and accurate interpretation of nonliteral ironic meaning. Grounded in embodied cognition theory, the present study examined how emojis and the valence congruity between emojis and contextual information modulate Chinese EFL learners’ comprehension of positive and negative irony in computer-mediated communication. The results of this study revealed that emojis improved accuracy in negative—but not positive—irony comprehension, whereas valence congruity enhanced accuracy in positive—but not negative—irony. Moreover, both the presence of emojis and valence congruity accelerated irony processing. These findings indicate that emojis and their emotional valences facilitate L2 irony processing by bolstering learners’ sensitivity to speakers’ affective states, and offer important implications for L2 discourse processing research from an embodied cognition perspective.

Keywords

Chinese EFL learners / embodied cognition / emojis / L2 irony

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wan Su, Hadina Habil. The Effect of Emojis on L2 Irony Processing for Chinese EFL Learners. Psych Journal, 2026, 15 (4) : e70116 DOI:10.1002/pchj.70116

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Attardo, S.2000. “Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness.” Journal of Pragmatics 32, no. 6: 793–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3.

[2]

Barsalou, L. W.1999. “Perceptual Symbol Systems.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, no. 4: 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149.

[3]

Boutet, I., M. LeBlanc, J. A. Chamberland, and C. A. Collin. 2021. “Emojis Influence Emotional Communication, Social Attributions, and Information Processing.” Computers in Human Behavior 119: 106722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106722.

[4]

Du, Y.2025. “The Impact of Emojis on Verbal Irony Comprehension in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Cross-Cultural Study.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 41, no. 8: 4979–4986. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2356398.

[5]

Du, Y., H. He, and Z. Chu. 2024. “Cross-Cultural Nuances in Sarcasm Comprehension: A Comparative Study of Chinese and American Perspectives.” Frontiers in Psychology 15: 1349002. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349002.

[6]

Du, Y., Y. Yuan, C. Wang, B. Zou, H. He, and K. Jia. 2026. “Was This Person Being Ironic? The Role of Emojis in Irony Comprehension and Memory in Computer-Mediated Communication: Insights From the UK and China.” Telematics and Informatics 106: 102390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2026.102390.

[7]

Ellis, N. C.2019. “Essentials of a Theory of Language Cognition.” Modern Language Journal 103, no. S1: 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12532.

[8]

Ellis, R., Y. Zhu, N. Shintani, and C. Roever. 2021. “A Study of Chinese Learners' Ability to Comprehend Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics 172: 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.003.

[9]

Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner, and A.-G. Lang. 2009. “Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses.” Behavior Research Methods 41: 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.

[10]

Filik, R., C. M. Hunter, and H. Leuthold. 2015. “When Language Gets Emotional: Irony and the Embodiment of Affect in Discourse.” Acta Psychologica 156: 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.08.007.

[11]

Garcia, C., A. Țurcan, H. Howman, and R. Filik. 2022. “Emoji as a Tool to Aid the Comprehension of Written Sarcasm: Evidence From Younger and Older Adults.” Computers in Human Behavior 126: 106971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106971.

[12]

Giora, R.1999. “On the Priority of Salient Meanings: Studies of Literal and Figurative Language.” Journal of Pragmatics 31, no. 7: 919–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00100-3.

[13]

Grice, H. P.1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Speech Acts, 41–58. Brill.

[14]

Guan, Q.2019. Embodied Linguistics: Language Science in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Science Press.

[15]

Hand, C. J., K. Burd, A. Oliver, and C. M. Robus. 2022. “Interactions Between Text Content and Emoji Types Determine Perceptions of Both Messages and Senders.” Computers in Human Behavior Reports 8: 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100242.

[16]

Harris, M., and P. M. Pexman. 2003. “Children's Perceptions of the Social Functions of Verbal Irony.” Discourse Processes 36, no. 3: 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3603_1.

[17]

Krygier-Bartz, M., and M. Glenwright. 2022. “Verbal Irony Comprehension in Adults Who Speak English as an Additional Language.” Studies in Linguistics and Literature 6, no. 2: 58–73. https://doi.org/10.22158/sll.v6n2p58.

[18]

Peirce, J. W.2007. “PsychoPy—Psychophysics Software in Python.” Journal of Neuroscience Methods 162, no. 1–2: 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017.

[19]

Pexman, P. M., and K. M. Olineck. 2002. “Does Sarcasm Always Sting? Investigating the Impact of Ironic Insults and Ironic Compliments.” Discourse Processes 33, no. 3: 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3303_1.

[20]

Schneegans, S., and G. Schöner. 2008. “Dynamic Field Theory as a Framework for Understanding Embodied Cognition.” In Handbook of Cognitive Science, edited by P. Calvo, and A. Gomila. 241–271. Elsevier.

[21]

Shively, R. L., J. Acevedo, R. Cano, and I. Etxeberria-Ortego. 2022. “Teaching Humorous Irony to L2 and Heritage Speakers of Spanish.” Language Teaching Research 26, no. 2: 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211068087.

[22]

Shuang, H. W.2023. bruceR: Broadly Useful Convenient and Efficient R Functions.

[23]

Wang, J., Y. Zhang, and L. R. Yang. 2023. “An Empirical Study on Pragmatic Processing of L2 Irony by Chinese English Learners With Different Proficiencies.” Foreign Language Education 3: 58–64.

[24]

Wilson, N. L., and R. W. Gibbs. 2007. “Real and Imagined Body Movement Primes Metaphor Comprehension.” Cognitive Science 31, no. 4: 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701399962.

[25]

Xu, T., M. Liu, and X. Wang. 2023. “How Humor Is Experienced: An Embodied Metaphor Account.” Current Psychology 42, no. 20: 16674–16686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02918-1.

Rights & permissions

2026 The Author(s). PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (563KB)

1

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉