Cultural and Gender Influences on Facial Attractiveness: A Comparative Study of Japanese and American Raters Using Geometric Morphometrics

Abstract

Facial attractiveness is a critical factor in forming interpersonal impressions. Evaluations of facial attractiveness were previously considered universal. However, it has recently been pointed out that individuals and cultures can diversify their evaluations. This study conducted Web experiments using the facial images of Japanese and American participants to examine the effects of raters' gender, age, and culture on facial attractiveness. Experiment 1 examined the impact of gender and age on Japanese raters. Experiment 2 explored the effects of culture on Japanese and American raters. Statistical and morphometric analyses were conducted on the obtained data. The results showed significant positive correlations between attractiveness ratings across gender, age, and culture. However, the results of the geometric morphometrics revealed that several differences in preferences regarding facial contours were observed among participants by gender. Additionally, Japanese raters were more likely than American raters to emphasize raised eyebrows for faces in attractive male images, and smaller mouths for faces in attractive female images. These results suggest that the facial features driving attractiveness evaluations differ depending on gender and culture, offering detailed insights into the culturally diverse standards of facial attractiveness. This study adds to the growing understanding of how cultural and individual factors shape aesthetic preferences, questioning the notion of universal beauty, and offering a clearer framework for future cross-cultural research on facial attractiveness.

Keywords

America / cultural differences / facial attractiveness / gender / Japan / Morphometrics

References

[1] Abend, P., L. S. Pflüger, M. Koppensteiner, M. Coquerelle, and K. Grammer. 2015. “The Sound of Female Shape: A Redundant Signal of Vocal and Facial Attractiveness.” Evolution and Human Behavior 36, no. 3: 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.10.004.

[2] Boothroyd, L. G., I. Scott, A. W. Gray, C. I. Coombes, and N. Pound. 2013. “Male Facial Masculinity as a Cue to Health Outcomes.” Evolutionary Psychology 11, no. 5: 147470491301100. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100508.

[3] Cloutier, J., T. F. Heatherton, P. J. Whalen, and W. M. Kelley. 2008. “Are Attractive People Rewarding? Sex Differences in the Neural Substrates of Facial Attractiveness.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20, no. 6: 941–951. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20062.

[4] Coetzee, V., J. M. Greeff, I. D. Stephen, and D. I. Perrett. 2014. “Cross-Cultural Agreement in Facial Attractiveness Preferences: The Role of Ethnicity and Gender.” PLoS One 9, no. 7: e99629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099629.

[5] Cunningham, M. R., A. R. Roberts, A. P. Barbee, P. B. Druen, and C.-H. Wu. 1995. ““Their Ideas of Beauty Are, on the Whole, the Same as Ours”: Consistency and Variability in the Cross-Cultural Perception of Female Physical Attractiveness.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, no. 2: 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261.

[6] De Jager, S., N. Coetzee, and V. Coetzee. 2018. “Facial Adiposity, Attractiveness, and Health: A Review.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2562. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02562.

[7] de Lurdes Carrito, M., I. M. B. dos Santos, C. E. Lefevre, R. D. Whitehead, C. F. da Silva, and D. I. Perrett. 2016. “The Role of Sexually Dimorphic Skin Colour and Shape in Attractiveness of Male Faces.” Evolution and Human Behavior 37, no. 2: 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.09.006.

[8] DeBruine, L. M., B. C. Jones, A. C. Little, et al. 2006. “Correlated Preferences for Facial Masculinity and Ideal or Actual Partner's Masculinity.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273, no. 1592: 1355–1360. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3445.

[9] DeBruine, L. M., B. C. Jones, A. C. Little, J. R. Crawford, and L. L. Welling. 2010. “Further Evidence for Regional Variation in Women's Masculinity Preferences.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278, no. 1707: 813–814. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2200.

[10] Ebner, N. C. 2008. “Age of Face Matters: Age-Group Differences in Ratings of Young and Old Faces.” Behavior Research Methods 40: 130–136. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.130.

[11] Farrera, A., M. Villanueva, M. Quinto-Sánchez, and R. González-José. 2015. “The Relationship Between Facial Shape Asymmetry and Attractiveness in Mexican Students.” American Journal of Human Biology 27, no. 3: 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22657.

[12] Foos, P. W., and M. C. Clark. 2011. “Adult Age and Gender Differences in Perceptions of Facial Attractiveness: Beauty Is in the Eye of the Older Beholder.” Journal of Genetic Psychology 172, no. 2: 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2010.526154.

[13] He, D., C. Workman, Y. Kenett, X. He, and A. Chatterjee. 2021. “The Effect of Aging on Facial Attractiveness: An Empirical and Computational Investigation.” Acta Psychologica 219: 103385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103385.

[14] Johnston, V. S. 2006. “Mate Choice Decisions: The Role of Facial Beauty.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10, no. 1: 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.003.

[15] Jones, B. C., A. C. Little, D. M. Burt, and D. I. Perrett. 2004. “When Facial Attractiveness Is Only Skin Deep.” Perception 33, no. 5: 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3463.

[16] Kendall, D. G. 1984. “Shape Manifolds, Procrustean Metrics, and Complex Projective Spaces.” Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 16, no. 2: 81–121. https://doi.org/10.1112/blms/16.2.81.

[17] Kruger, D. J. 2006. “Male Facial Masculinity Influences Attributions of Personality and Reproductive Strategy.” Personal Relationships 13, no. 4: 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00129.x.

[18] Langlois, J. H., L. Kalakanis, A. J. Rubenstein, A. Larson, M. Hallam, and M. Smoot. 2000. “Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review.” Psychological Bulletin 126, no. 3: 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390.

[19] Langlois, J. H., J. M. Ritter, L. A. Roggman, and L. S. Vaughn. 1991. “Facial Diversity and Infant Preferences for Attractive Faces.” Developmental Psychology 27, no. 1: 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.79.

[20] Leder, H., J. Goller, T. Rigotti, and M. Forster. 2016. “Private and Shared Taste in Art and Face Appreciation.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 155. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00155.

[21] Lewis, M. B. 2011. “Who Is the Fairest of Them All? Race, Attractiveness and Skin Color Sexual Dimorphism.” Personality and Individual Differences 50, no. 2: 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.018.

[22] Lin, T., H. Fischer, M. K. Johnson, and N. C. Ebner. 2020. “The Effects of Face Attractiveness on Face Memory Depend on Both Age of Perceiver and Age of Face.” Cognition and Emotion 34, no. 5: 875–889. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1694491.

[23] Little, A. C., D. M. Burt, I. S. Penton-Voak, and D. I. Perrett. 2001. “Self-Perceived Attractiveness Influences Human Female Preferences for Sexual Dimorphism and Symmetry in Male Faces.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 268, no. 1462: 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1327.

[24] Little, A. C., B. C. Jones, and L. M. DeBruine. 2011. “Facial Attractiveness: Evolutionary Based Research.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 366, no. 1571: 1638–1659. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0404.

[25] Little, A. C., B. C. Jones, I. S. Penton-Voak, D. M. Burt, and D. I. Perrett. 2002. “Partnership Status and the Temporal Context of Relationships Influence Human Female Preferences for Sexual Dimorphism in Male Face Shape.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269, no. 1496: 1095–1100. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.1984.

[26] Little, A. C., and H. Mannion. 2006. “Viewing Attractive or Unattractive Same-Sex Individuals Changes Self-Rated Attractiveness and Face Preferences in Women.” Animal Behaviour 72, no. 5: 981–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.026.

[27] Ma, D. S., J. Correll, and B. Wittenbrink. 2015. “The Chicago Face Database: A Free Stimulus Set of Faces and Norming Data.” Behavior Research Methods 47, no. 4: 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5.

[28] Marcinkowska, U. M., M. V. Kozlov, H. Cai, et al. 2014. “Cross-Cultural Variation in Men's Preference for Sexual Dimorphism in Women's Faces.” Biology Letters 10, no. 4: 20130850. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0850.

[29] Marcinkowska, U. M., M. J. Rantala, A. J. Lee, et al. 2019. “Women's Preferences for Men's Facial Masculinity Are Strongest Under Favorable Ecological Conditions.” Scientific Reports 9, no. 1: 3387. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39350-8.

[30] Matsumoto, D. 1992. “American-Japanese Cultural Differences in the Recognition of Universal Facial Expressions.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 23, no. 1: 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022192231005.

[31] Matsumoto, D., T. Consolacion, H. Yamada, et al. 2002. “American-Japanese Cultural Differences in Judgements of Emotional Expressions of Different Intensities.” Cognition and Emotion 16, no. 6: 721–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000608.

[32] Matsumoto, D., and P. Ekman. 1989. “American-Japanese Cultural Differences in Intensity Ratings of Facial Expressions of Emotion.” Motivation and Emotion 13, no. 2: 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992959.

[33] Miyamoto, Y., S. Yoshikawa, and S. Kitayama. 2011. “Feature and Configuration in Face Processing: Japanese Are More Configural Than Americans.” Cognitive Science 35, no. 3: 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01163.x.

[34] Montepare, J. M., and H. Dobish. 2003. “The Contribution of Emotion Perceptions and Their Overgeneralizations to Trait Impressions.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 27, no. 4: 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027332800296.

[35] Moore, F., M. L. Smith, C. Cassidy, and D. Perrett. 2009. “Female Reproductive Strategy Predicts Preferences for Sexual Dimorphism in Male Faces.” Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 7, no. 3: 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1556/jep.7.2009.3.2.

[36] Pavlovič, O., V. Fiala, and K. Kleisner. 2023. “Congruence in European and Asian Perception of Vietnamese Facial Attractiveness, Averageness, Symmetry and Sexual Dimorphism.” Scientific Reports 13, no. 1: 13320. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40458-1.

[37] Perrett, D. I., K. J. Lee, I. Penton-Voak, et al. 1998. “Effects of Sexual Dimorphism on Facial Attractiveness.” Nature 394, no. 6696: 884–887. https://doi.org/10.1038/29772.

[38] Proverbio, A. M., F. Riva, E. Martin, and A. Zani. 2010. “Neural Markers of Opposite-Sex Bias in Face Processing.” Frontiers in Psychology 1: 169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00169.

[39] Rhee, S. C., and S. H. Lee. 2010. “Attractive Composite Faces of Different Races.” Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 34: 800–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9606-7.

[40] Rhodes, G. 2006. “The Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Beauty.” Annual Review of Psychology 57, no. 1: 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208.

[41] Rhodes, G., K. Lee, R. Palermo, et al. 2005. “Attractiveness of Own-Race, Other-Race, and Mixed-Race Faces.” Perception 34, no. 3: 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5191.

[42] Rohlf, F. J. 2021a. “TpsRegr, 1.50 Edn. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook.”

[43] Rohlf, F. J. 2021b. “TpsRelw, 1.75 Edn. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook.”

[44] Rohlf, F. J. 2021c. “TpsSuper, 2.06 Edn. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook.”

[45] Rostovtseva, V. V., M. L. Butovskaya, A. A. Mezentseva, et al. 2024. “Cross-Cultural Differences in Perception of Facial Trustworthiness Based on Geometric Morphometric Morphs.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 55, no. 2: 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221231220013.

[46] Saito, T., K. Motoki, and Y. Takano. 2023. “Cultural Differences in Recognizing Emotions of Masked Faces.” Emotion 23, no. 6: 1648–1657. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001181.

[47] Sano, T. 2022. “Visualization of Facial Attractiveness Factors Using Gradient-Weighted Class Activation Mapping to Understand the Connection between Facial Features and Perception of Attractiveness.” International Journal of Affective Engineering 21, no. 2: 111–116. https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.ijae-d-21-00018.

[48] Sano, T. 2023. “Facial Attractiveness Factors and Their Learning Processes by Comparing the Results of Class Activation Mapping-Based Visualization Methods Using Convolutional Neural Networks.” International Journal of Affective Engineering 22, no. 3: 201–208. https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.ijae-d-22-00013.

[49] Sano, T. 2025. “How AI Models Judge Facial Attractiveness: Visualizing Features With CNN and Vision Transformer to Understand Attractiveness Factors.” Journal of Psychology and AI 1, no. 1: 2480062. https://doi.org/10.1080/29974100.2025.2480062.

[50] Sano, T., and H. Kawabata. 2023. “A Computational Approach to Investigating Facial Attractiveness Factors Using Geometric Morphometric Analysis and Deep Learning.” Scientific Reports 13, no. 1: 19797. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47084-x.

[51] Sano, T., and H. Kawabata. 2024. “The Relationships Among Facial Features and Impressions: Statistical Causal Discovery Using LiNGAM.” Current Psychology 44, no. 9: 7858–7868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06925-2.

[52] Sano, T., J. Shi, and H. Kawabata. 2024. “The Differences in Essential Facial Areas for Impressions Between Humans and Deep Learning Models: An Eye-Tracking and Explainable AI Approach.” British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12744.

[53] Stephen, I. D., D. L. Salter, K. W. Tan, C. B. Tan, and R. J. Stevenson. 2018. “Sexual Dimorphism and Attractiveness in Asian and White Faces.” Visual Cognition 26, no. 6: 442–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2018.1475437.

[54] Thornhill, R., and S. W. Gangestad. 1999. “Facial Attractiveness.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3, no. 12: 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01403-5.

[55] Voegeli, R., R. Schoop, E. Prestat-Marquis, A. V. Rawlings, T. K. Shackelford, and B. Fink. 2021. “Cross-Cultural Perception of Female Facial Appearance: A Multi-Ethnic and Multi-Centre Study.” PLoS One 16, no. 1: e0245998. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245998.

[56] Windhager, S., F. L. Bookstein, H. Mueller, E. Zunner, S. Kirchengast, and K. Schaefer. 2018. “Calibrating Facial Morphs for Use as Stimuli in Biological Studies of Social Perception.” Scientific Reports 8, no. 1: 6698. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24911-0.

[57] Windhager, S., K. Schaefer, and B. Fink. 2011. “Geometric Morphometrics of Male Facial Shape in Relation to Physical Strength and Perceived Attractiveness, Dominance, and Masculinity.” American Journal of Human Biology 23, no. 6: 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.21219.

[58] Zhan, J., M. Liu, O. G. Garrod, et al. 2021. “Modeling Individual Preferences Reveals That Face Beauty Is Not Universally Perceived Across Cultures.” Current Biology 31, no. 10: 2243–2252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.013.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.