Theory of Mind Development in Children With Congenital Visual Impairment: Role of Visual Impairment and Verbal Ability

Yong Yang , Boyao Zhao , Linli Xie , Buxin Han

Psych Journal ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1) : e70063

PDF
Psych Journal ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1) :e70063 DOI: 10.1002/pchj.70063
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Theory of Mind Development in Children With Congenital Visual Impairment: Role of Visual Impairment and Verbal Ability
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This study aims to explore the theory of mind (ToM) status in individuals with congenital visual impairment (CVI) and identify key predictive factors. For Study 1, the false-belief task was used to assess ToM ability in children aged 7–10 years (60 with normal sight, 33 with legal blindness, and 23 with total blindness). The results showed that children with total blindness had significantly lower false-belief scores than sighted children, with those with legal blindness performing in between. In the first-order false-belief task, verbal ability only moderated differences between children with total blindness and sighted children. Meanwhile, in the second-order false-belief task, verbal ability moderated differences between children with total blindness and sighted children and between children with legal blindness and sighted children. For Study 2, the faux pas task was used to examine the roles of age, residual vision, and verbal ability in ToM development among 166 adolescents aged 7–19 years with CVI. While age and verbal ability significantly predicted ToM development, residual vision had no significant predictive effect. In conclusion, compared with sighted children, those with CVI show delayed ToM development, though children with legal blindness perform better than those with total blindness. Age and verbal ability are key predictors of ToM development in children with CVI. Thus, in the early stages of ToM development, maximizing the use of residual vision and other senses is crucial. Further, enhancing verbal abilities, such as through using mental state terms in conversations and reading literary works, can mitigate the negative impact of CVI. Finally, intervention strategies should be tailored to age characteristics.

Keywords

blindness / cognition / compensation / congenital visual impairment / language / theory of mind

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yong Yang, Boyao Zhao, Linli Xie, Buxin Han. Theory of Mind Development in Children With Congenital Visual Impairment: Role of Visual Impairment and Verbal Ability. Psych Journal, 2026, 15(1): e70063 DOI:10.1002/pchj.70063

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Arcos, K., N. Harhen, R. Loiotile, and M. Bedny. 2022. “Superior Verbal but Not Nonverbal Memory in Congenital Blindness.” Experimental Brain Research 240, no. 3: 897–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06304-4.

[2]

Aslier, M., N. G. Y. Aslier, G. Kirkim, and E. A. Güneri. 2020. “The Influence of Age and Language on Developmental Trajectory of Theory of Mind in Children With Cochlear Implants.” International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 135: 110127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110127.

[3]

Bäckman, L., and R. A. Dixon. 1992. “Psychological Compensation: A Theoretical Framework.” Psychological Bulletin 112, no. 2: 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.259.

[4]

Bao, M., C. Huang, L. Wang, Q. Zhang, and Y. Jiang. 2017. “Neuro-Visual Information Processing and Its Brain Mechanism.” Science and Technology Review 35, no. 19: 15–20. https://doi.org/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2017.19.001.

[5]

Baron-Cohen, S., M. O'Riordan, V. Stone, R. Jones, and K. Plaisted. 1999. “Recognition of Faux Pas by Normally Developing Children and Children With Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning Autism.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 29, no. 5: 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023035012436.

[6]

Barsalou, L. W. 2008. “Grounded Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.

[7]

Bartoli, G., D. Bulgarelli, and P. Molina. 2019. “Theory of Mind Development in Children With Visual Impairment: The Contribution of the Adapted Comprehensive Test ToM Storybooks.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 49, no. 9: 3494–3503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04064-3.

[8]

Bedny, M., A. Pascual-Leone, and R. R. Saxe. 2009. “Growing Up Blind Does Not Change the Neural Bases of Theory of Mind.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, no. 27: 11312–11317. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900010106.

[9]

Bedny, M., and R. Saxe. 2012. “Insights Into the Origins of Knowledge From the Cognitive Neuroscience of Blindness.” Cognitive Neuropsychology 29, no. 1–2: 56–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2012.713342.

[10]

Begeer, S., M. Dik, M. J. Voor De Wind, D. Asbrock, M. Brambring, and S. Kef. 2014. “A New Look at Theory of Mind in Children With Ocular and Ocular-Plus Congenital Blindness.” Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 108, no. 1: 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1410800103.

[11]

Bigelow, F. J., G. M. Clark, J. A. G. Lum, and P. G. Enticott. 2021. “The Mediating Effect of Language on the Development of Cognitive and Affective Theory of Mind.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 209: 105158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105158.

[12]

Bradford, E. E., I. Jentzsch, J. C. Gomez, Y. Chen, D. Zhang, and Y. Su. 2018. “Cross-Cultural Differences in Adult Theory of Mind Abilities: A Comparison of Native-English Speakers and Native-Chinese Speakers on the Self/Other Differentiation Task.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71, no. 12: 2665–2676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818757170.

[13]

Brambring, M., and D. Asbrock. 2010. “Validity of False Belief Tasks in Blind Children.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 40, no. 12: 1471–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1002-2.

[14]

Brandone, A. C., and W. Stout. 2023. “The Origins of Theory of Mind in Infant Social Cognition: Investigating Longitudinal Pathways From Intention Understanding and Joint Attention to Preschool Theory of Mind.” Journal of Cognition and Development 24, no. 3: 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2022.2146117.

[15]

Chen, L. J., and X. D. Xu. 2020. “How Does Literature Reading Affect Readers' Theory of Mind.” Advances in Psychological Science 28, no. 3: 434–442. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.00434.

[16]

Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum.

[17]

Colus, K. M., and A. de Souza. 2019. “Establishment of Joint Attention in a Baby With Severe Visual Impairment/O Estabelecimento da Atencao Conjunta Em Um Bebe Com Deficiencia Visual Severa.” Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa 35: E3541. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e3541.

[18]

Conway, J. R., C. Catmur, and G. Bird. 2019. “Understanding Individual Differences in Theory of Mind via Representation of Minds, Not Mental States.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 26, no. 3: 798–812. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1559-x.

[19]

Fafsca, L., S. Afonseca, M. Brüne, G. Gonçalves, A. Gomes, and A. T. Martins. 2016. “Portuguese Adaptation of a Faux Pas Test and a Theory of Mind Picture Stories Task.” Psychopathology 49, no. 3: 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444689.

[20]

Farina, M. 2021. “Embodied Cognition: Dimensions, Domains and Applications.” Adaptive Behavior 29, no. 1: 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712320912963.

[21]

Green, S., L. Pring, and J. Swettenham. 2004. “An Investigation of First-Order False Belief Understanding of Children With Congenital Profound Visual Impairment.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 22, no. 1: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151004772901087.

[22]

Han, B. X., and Q. Y. Kong. 2025. “The Psychological Healing Function of Art and Culture—A Re-Appraisal of Disordered Cognition.” Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition) 2025, no. 1: 58–67.

[23]

Imbiriba, L. A., M. M. Russo, L. A. S. de Oliveira, et al. 2013. “Perspective-Taking in Blindness: Electrophysiological Evidence of Altered Action Representations.” Journal of Neurophysiology 109, no. 2: 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00332.2011.

[24]

Jeffrey Farrar, M., H. K. Seung, and H. Lee. 2017. “Language and False-Belief Task Performance in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60, no. 7: 1999–2013. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-15-0422.

[25]

Kerr, C. E. 2008. “Dualism Redux in Recent Neuroscience: “Theory of Mind” and “Embodied Simulation” Hypotheses in Light of Historical Debates About Perception, Cognition, and Mind.” Review of General Psychology 12, no. 2: 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.12.2.205.

[26]

Koustriava, E., and K. Papadopoulos. 2010. “Mental Rotation Ability of Individuals With Visual Impairments.” Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 104, no. 9: 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1010400910.

[27]

Le, B. L., Y. H. Huang, L. L. Wang, et al. 2024. “Individuals With High Levels of Autistic Traits Exhibit Impaired Cognitive but Not Affective Theory of Mind and Empathy.” PsyCh Journal 13, no. 3: 486–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.727.

[28]

Lin, X., X. Zhang, Q. Liu, et al. 2021. “Theory of Mind in Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis.” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 121: 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.010.

[29]

Mahy, C. E. V., N. Vetter, N. Kühn-Popp, C. Löcher, S. Krautschuk, and M. Kliegel. 2014. “The Influence of Inhibitory Processes on Affective Theory of Mind in Young and Old Adults.” Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 21, no. 2: 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2013.789096.

[30]

Marschark, M., L. Edwards, C. Peterson, K. Crowe, and D. Walton. 2019. “Understanding Theory of Mind in Deaf and Hearing College Students.” Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 24, no. 2: 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eny039.

[31]

Mcalpine, L. M., and C. L. Moore. 1995. “The Development of Social Understanding in Children With Visual Impairments.” Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 89, no. 4: 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X9508900408.

[32]

Meinhardt-Injac, B., M. M. Daum, and G. Meinhardt. 2020. “Theory of Mind Development From Adolescence to Adulthood: Testing the Two-Component Model.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 38, no. 2: 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12320.

[33]

Miletic, G. 1995. “Perspective Taking: Knowledge of Level 1 and Level 2 Rules by Congenitally Blind, Low Vision, and Sighted Children.” Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 89, no. 6: 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X9508900607.

[34]

Miller, S. A. 2009. “Children's Understanding of Second-Order Mental States.” Psychological Bulletin 135, no. 5: 749–773. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016854.

[35]

Milligan, K., J. W. Astington, and L. A. Dack. 2007. “Language and Theory of Mind: Meta-Analysis of the Relation Between Language Ability and False-Belief Understanding.” Child Development 78, no. 2: 622–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x.

[36]

Minter, M., R. P. Hobson, and M. Bishop. 1998. “Congenital Visual Impairment and “Theory of Mind”.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 16, no. 2: 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1998.tb00918.x.

[37]

Osterhaus, C., and S. Koerber. 2021. “The Development of Advanced Theory of Mind in Middle Childhood: A Longitudinal Study From Age 5 to 10 Years.” Child Development 92, no. 5: 1872–1888. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13627.

[38]

Papageorgiou, C. C., G. T. Kouroupetroglou, X. P. Stachtea, et al. 2020. “Perspective-Taking in Blindness: An Event-Related Brain Potentials Study With the Continuous Wavelet Transform.” IEEE Access 8: 76657–76670. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990095.

[39]

Perszyk, D. R., and S. R. Waxman. 2018. “Linking Language and Cognition in Infancy.” Annual Review of Psychology 69: 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011701.

[40]

Peterson, C. C., J. L. Peterson, and J. Webb. 2000. “Factors Influencing the Development of a Theory of Mind in Blind Children.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 18, no. 3: 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151000165788.

[41]

Pijnacker, J., M. P. J. Vervloed, and B. Steenbergen. 2012. “Pragmatic Abilities in Children With Congenital Visual Impairment: An Exploration of Non-Literal Language and Advanced Theory of Mind Understanding.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 42, no. 11: 2440–2449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1500-5.

[42]

Premack, D., and G. Woodruff. 1978. “Does the Chimpanzee Have a Theory of Mind?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1, no. 4: 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512.

[43]

Quesque, F., and Y. Rossetti. 2020. “What Do Theory-Of-Mind Tasks Actually Measure? Theory and Practice.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 15, no. 2: 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619896607.

[44]

Roch-Levecq, A. C. 2006. “Production of Basic Emotions by Children With Congenital Blindness: Evidence for the Embodiment of Theory of Mind.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 24, no. 3: 507–528. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X50663.

[45]

Ruffman, T. 2023. “Belief It or Not: How Children Construct a Theory of Mind.” Child Development Perspectives 17, no. 2: 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12483.

[46]

Schopler, E., R. J. Reichler, R. F. DeVellis, and K. Daly. 1980. “Toward Objective Classification of Childhood Autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS).” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 10, no. 1: 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408436.

[47]

Schott, N., P. Haibach-Beach, I. Knöpfle, and V. Neuberger. 2021. “The Effects of Visual Impairment on Motor Imagery in Children and Adolescents.” Research in Developmental Disabilities 109: 103835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103835.

[48]

Schurz, M., J. Radua, M. Aichhorn, F. Richlan, and J. Perner. 2014. “Fractionating Theory of Mind: A Meta-Analysis of Functional Brain Imaging Studies.” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 42: 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009.

[49]

Siu, C. T. S., and H. Cheung. 2022. “A Longitudinal Reciprocal Relation Between Theory of Mind and Language.” Cognitive Development 62: 101176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101176.

[50]

Slaughter, V., K. Imuta, C. C. Peterson, and J. D. Henry. 2015. “Meta-Analysis of Theory of Mind and Peer Popularity in the Preschool and Early School Years.” Child Development 86, no. 4: 1159–1174. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12372.

[51]

Sorokowska, A., A. Oleszkiewicz, and P. Sorokowski. 2018. “A Compensatory Effect on Mate Selection? Importance of Auditory, Olfactory, and Tactile Cues in Partner Choice Among Blind and Sighted Individuals.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 47, no. 3: 597–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1156-0.

[52]

Wang, X. R., J. S. Meng, and B. X. Han. 2020. “Cultural and Spiritual Foundations of Positive Psychology and Mental Health.” Psychological Communications 3, no. 3: 176–185. https://doi.org/10.12100/j.issn.2096-5494.219036.

[53]

Wellman, H. M., D. Cross, and J. Watson. 2001. “Meta-Analysis of Theory-Of-Mind Development: The Truth About False Belief.” Child Development 72, no. 3: 655–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00304.

[54]

Witt, S., A. Weitkämper, H. Neumann, T. Lücke, and N. Zmyj. 2018. “Delayed Theory of Mind Development in Children Born Preterm: A Longitudinal Study.” Early Human Development 127: 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.10.005.

[55]

Xie, J., H. Cheung, M. Shen, and R. Wang. 2018. “Mental Rotation in False Belief Understanding.” Cognitive Science 42, no. 4: 1179–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12594.

[56]

Zhang, H. 2009. “The Revision of WISC–IV Chinese Version.” Psychological Science 5: 1177–1179.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/