Enhancing the Cohesion and Influence of Minority Opinions Through Clustering: A Social Network Experiment

Baizhou Wu , Jun Liu , Ying Li , Chenran Shen-Zhang , Shenghua Luan

Psych Journal ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6) : 940 -951.

PDF
Psych Journal ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6) :940 -951. DOI: 10.1002/pchj.70051
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Enhancing the Cohesion and Influence of Minority Opinions Through Clustering: A Social Network Experiment
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Minority opinions can be of crucial importance to the diversity, productivity, and harmony of a group, but are often left unattended and unheard. Previous methods that tried to enhance minority influence are usually overly forceful and low on ecological validity. To overcome these pitfalls, we proposed a new intervention method called minority clustering and examined its effects with a social network experiment (N = 456). Minority clustering was implemented by increasing the network connections among participants with initial opinions that deviated from the mainstream opinion and forming an opinion cluster among these minority members. Our results show that minority clustering significantly slowed down the rate at which minority members shifted toward majority opinions, thereby sustaining minority cohesion, and moved majority members closer to minority opinions, thus enhancing minority influence. An additional filter bubble intervention, through which all members of a network were exposed to neighbors with similar opinions to their own, further strengthened minority cohesion but weakened minority influence. Minority clustering is an unobtrusive intervention that does not need overt cooperations of network members and can be implemented easily in social media platforms. The working mechanisms of minority clustering and its effects on group opinion formation are further discussed.

Keywords

filter bubble / minority influence / public opinion / social influence / social network

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Baizhou Wu, Jun Liu, Ying Li, Chenran Shen-Zhang, Shenghua Luan. Enhancing the Cohesion and Influence of Minority Opinions Through Clustering: A Social Network Experiment. Psych Journal, 2025, 14(6): 940-951 DOI:10.1002/pchj.70051

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abid, A., and P. Harrigan. 2020. “An Exploration of Social Media-Enabled Voter Relationships Through Uses and Gratifications Theory, Psychological Contract and Service-Dominant Orientation.” Australasian Marketing Journal 28, no. 2: 71–82.

[2]

Asch, S. E. 1951. “Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments.” In Groups, Leadership, and Men, edited by H. Guetzkow, 177–190. Carnegie Press.

[3]

Bail, C. A., L. P. Argyle, T. W. Brown, et al. 2018. “Exposure to Opposing Views on Social Media Can Increase Political Polarization.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, no. 37: 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115.

[4]

Bakshy, E., S. Messing, and L. A. Adamic. 2015. “Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook.” Science 348, no. 6239: 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160.

[5]

Bandura, A. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.

[6]

Barkoczi, D., and M. Galesic. 2016. “Social Learning Strategies Modify the Effect of Network Structure on Group Performance.” Nature Communications 7: 13109. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13109.

[7]

Barr, D. J., R. Levy, C. Scheepers, and H. J. Tily. 2013. “Random Effects Structure for Confirmatory Hypothesis Testing: Keep It Maximal.” Journal of Memory and Language 68, no. 3: 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.

[8]

Becker, J., D. Brackbill, and D. Centola. 2017. “Network Dynamics of Social Influence in the Wisdom of Crowds.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 26: E5070–E5076. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1615978114.

[9]

Behrens, T. E. J., L. T. Hunt, M. W. Woolrich, and M. F. S. Rushworth. 2008. “Associative Learning of Social Value.” Nature 456, no. 7219: 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07538.

[10]

Bonacich, P. 1987. “Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures.” American Journal of Sociology 92, no. 5: 1170–1182. https://doi.org/10.1086/228631.

[11]

Borgatti, S. P., A. Mehra, D. J. Brass, and G. Labianca. 2009. “Network Analysis in the Social Sciences.” Science 323, no. 5916: 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821.

[12]

Botte, N., J. Ryckebusch, and L. E. C. Rocha. 2022. “Clustering and Stubbornness Regulate the Formation of Echo Chambers in Personalised Opinion Dynamics.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 599: 127423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127423.

[13]

Brehm, J. W. 1966. “A Theory of Psychological Reactance.” Psychological Review 73, no. 3: 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023016.

[14]

Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press.

[15]

Centola, D. 2010. “The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment.” Science 329, no. 5996: 1194–1197. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185231.

[16]

Centola, D., J. Becker, D. Brackbill, and A. Baronchelli. 2018. “Experimental Evidence for Tipping Points in Social Convention.” Science 360, no. 6393: 1116–1119. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas8827.

[17]

Cialdini, R. B., and N. J. Goldstein. 2004. “Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity.” Annual Review of Psychology 55: 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.

[18]

DeGroot, M. H. 1974. “Reaching a Consensus.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 69, no. 345: 118–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/2285509.

[19]

Deutsch, M., and H. B. Gerard. 1955. “A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influences Upon Individual Judgment.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51: 629–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408.

[20]

Downs, A. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 65, no. 2: 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897.

[21]

Flaxman, S., S. Goel, and J. M. Rao. 2016. “Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80, no. S1: 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006.

[22]

Garrett, R. K. 2009. “Echo Chambers Online? Politically Motivated Selective Exposure Among Internet News Users.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, no. 2: 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x.

[23]

Granovetter, M. 1978. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology 83, no. 6: 1420–1443. https://doi.org/10.1086/226707.

[24]

Hogg, M. A., and D. Abrams. 2007. “Intergroup Behavior and Social Identity.” In The Sage Handbook of Social Psychology: Concise Student Edition, edited by J. P. Forgas, K. D. Williams, and W. Hippel, 335–360. SAGE.

[25]

Jayles, B., H. R. Kim, R. Escobedo, et al. 2017. “How Social Information Can Improve Estimation Accuracy in Human Groups.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 47: 12620–12625. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703695114.

[26]

Kao, A. B., A. M. Berdahl, A. T. Hartnett, et al. 2018. “Counteracting Estimation Bias and Social Influence to Improve the Wisdom of Crowds.” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 15, no. 141: 20180130. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0130.

[27]

Kuznetsova, A., P. B. Brockhoff, and R. H. B. Christensen. 2017. “lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 82, no. 13: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.

[28]

Latané, B. 1981. “The Psychology of Social Impact.” American Psychologist 36, no. 4: 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343.

[29]

Lorenz, J., H. Rauhut, F. Schweitzer, and D. Helbing. 2011. “How Social Influence Can Undermine the Wisdom of Crowd Effect.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, no. 22: 9020–9025. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008636108.

[30]

Maass, A., and R. D. Clark. 1984. “Hidden Impact of Minorities: Fifteen Years of Minority Influence Research.” Psychological Bulletin 95, no. 3: 428–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.428.

[31]

Mobilia, M. 2003. “Does a Single Zealot Affect an Infinite Group of Voters?” Physical Review Letters 91, no. 2: 028701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.028701.

[32]

Moscovici, S. 1980. “Toward a Theory of Conversion Behavior.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 13: 209–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60133-1.

[33]

Moscovici, S., E. Lage, and M. Naffrechoux. 1969. “Influence of a Consistent Minority on the Responses of a Majority in a Color Perception Task.” Sociometry 32, no. 4: 365–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786541.

[34]

Nemeth, C. J. 1986. “Differential Contributions of Majority and Minority Influence.” Psychological Review 93, no. 1: 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.1.23.

[35]

Nguyen, T. T., P. M. Hui, F. M. Harper, L. Terveen, and J. A. Konstan. 2014. “Exploring the Filter Bubble: The Effect of Using Recommender Systems on Content Diversity.” In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, 677–686. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2568012.

[36]

Page, S. E. 2007. “Making the Difference: Applying a Logic of Diversity.” Academy of Management Perspectives 21, no. 4: 6–20. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMP.2007.27895335.

[37]

Pariser, E. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding From You. Penguin Press.

[38]

Plutarch . 2001. The Rise and Fall of Athens: Nine Greek Lives (I. Scott-Kilvert, Trans.). Penguin Classics. [Original Work Published ca. 75 C.E.].

[39]

Rand, D. G., S. Arbesman, and N. A. Christakis. 2011. “Dynamic Social Networks Promote Cooperation in Experiments With Humans.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, no. 48: 19193–19198. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108243108.

[40]

Salganik, M. J., and D. J. Watts. 2008. “Leading the Herd Astray: An Experimental Study of Self-Fulfilling Prophecies in an Artificial Cultural Market.” Social Psychology Quarterly 71, no. 4: 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250807100404.

[41]

Sunstein, C. R. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton University Press.

[42]

Sunstein, C. R. 2018. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press.

[43]

Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.

[44]

Tump, A. N., T. J. Pleskac, and R. H. Kurvers. 2020. “Wise or Mad Crowds? The Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Information Cascades.” Science Advances 6, no. 29: eabb0266.

[45]

Wood, W., S. Lundgren, J. A. Ouellette, S. Busceme, and T. Blackstone. 1994. “Minority Influence: A Meta-Analytic Review of Social Influence Processes.” Psychological Bulletin 115, no. 3: 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.323.

[46]

Wu, W., Z. Xu, and G. Kou. 2020. “Evaluation of Group Decision Making Based on Group Preferences Under a Multi-Criteria Environment.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy 26, no. 6: 1187–1212. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2020.13378.

[47]

Xie, J., S. Sreenivasan, G. Korniss, W. Zhang, C. Lim, and B. K. Szymanski. 2011. “Social Consensus Through the Influence of Committed Minorities.” Physical Review E 84, no. 1: 011130. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.011130.

[48]

Yildiz, E., A. Ozdaglar, D. Acemoglu, A. Saberi, and A. Scaglione. 2013. “Binary Opinion Dynamics With Stubborn Agents.” ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation 1, no. 4: 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538508.

[49]

Zarei, F., Y. Gandica, and L. E. C. Rocha. 2024. “Bursts of Communication Increase Opinion Diversity in the Temporal Deffuant Model.” Scientific Reports 14, no. 1: 2222. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52458-w.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/