The Comparative Effect of Immediate and Delayed Feedback on EFL Learners' Engagement and Willingness to Collaborate

Hongyu Mai

doi:10.1002/pchj.70046

Psych Journal ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6) :1008 -1017. DOI: 10.1002/pchj.70046

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The Comparative Effect of Immediate and Delayed Feedback on EFL Learners' Engagement and Willingness to Collaborate

Hongyu Mai ¹^,²

Author information +

History +

PDF

Abstract

This study examines the comparative effects of immediate and delayed feedback on the engagement and willingness to participate in collaborative learning of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Ninety EFL students at Guangxi University participated in a quasi-experimental study across three conditions: no feedback, immediate feedback, and delayed feedback. Using one-way ANOVA, the results revealed that both feedback types significantly influenced learners' engagement across affective, cognitive, and behavioral dimensions, with immediate feedback yielding significant effects in the affective and cognitive domains. Delayed feedback, however, was more effective in fostering willingness to collaborate, likely due to the reflective space it provided. These findings suggest that the timing of feedback plays a crucial role in shaping learner outcomes and should be strategically aligned with instructional goals. The study highlights the importance of context-sensitive feedback practices, particularly in digital learning environments where timing constraints and student autonomy vary.

Keywords

delayed feedback / EFL learners / engagement / immediate feedback / willingness to practice collaborative learning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Hongyu Mai. The Comparative Effect of Immediate and Delayed Feedback on EFL Learners' Engagement and Willingness to Collaborate. Psych Journal, 2025, 14(6): 1008-1017 DOI:10.1002/pchj.70046

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	Best, K., L. Jones-Katz, B. Smolarek, M. Stolzenburg, and D. Williamson. 2015. “Listening to Our Students: An Exploratory Practice Study of ESL Writing Students' Views of Feedback.” TESOL Journal 6, no. 2: 332–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.152.

[2]	Burr, V. 2015. Social Constructionism. 3rd ed. Routledge.

[3]	Canals, L., G. Granena, Y. Yilmaz, and A. Malicka. 2020. “Second Language Learners' and Teachers' Perceptions of Delayed and Immediate Corrective Feedback in an Asynchronous Online Setting: An Exploratory Study.” TESL Canada Journal 37, no. 3: 181–209. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v37i2.1336.

[4]

Cockerill, M., N. Craig, and A. Thurston. 2018. “Teacher Perceptions of the Impact of Peer Learning in Their Classrooms: Using Social Interdependence Theory as a Model for Data Analysis and Presentation.” International Journal of Education and Practice 6, no. 1: 14–27. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2018.61.14.27.

[5]	Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2002. Research Methods in Education. Routledge.

[6]	DeKeyser, R., S. Loewen, and M. Sato. 2017. “Knowledge and Skill in ISLA.” In The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, edited by S. Loewen and M. Sato, 15–32. Routledge.

[7]	Enel, E., and J. Yao. 2021. “How Does That Make You Feel: Students' Affective Engagement With Feedback.” Language Teaching Research Quarterly 25: 66–83. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.25.04.

[8]	Fu, M., and S. Li. 2022. “The Effects of Immediate and Delayed Corrective Feedback on L2 Development.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44, no. 1: 2–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000388.

[9]	Gillies, R. M. 2008. “The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Junior High School Students' Behaviours, Discourse and Learning During a Science-Based Learning Activity.” School Psychology International 29, no. 3: 328–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034308093673.

[10]	Gillies, R. M. 2016. “Cooperative Learning: Review of Research and Practice.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 41, no. 3: 3–16. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3.

[11]	Goo, J., and A. Mackey. 2013. “The Case Against the Case Against Recasts.” Studies in second language acquisition 35, no. 1: 127–165.

[12]	Guilloteaux, M. J. 2016. “Student Engagement During EFL High School Lessons in Korea.” Foreign Language Education 23, no. 1: 21–46. https://doi.org/10.15334/FLE.2016.23.1.21.

[13]	Han, Y. 2017. “Mediating and Being Mediated: Learner Beliefs and Learner Engagement With Written Corrective Feedback.” System 69: 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.07.003.

[14]	Han, Y. 2019. “Written Corrective Feedback From an Ecological Perspective: The Interaction Between the Context and Individual Learners.” System 80: 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.12.009.

[15]	Han, Y., and F. Hyland. 2015. “Exploring Learner Engagement With Written Corrective Feedback in a Chinese Tertiary EFL Classroom.” Journal of second language writing 30: 31–44.

[16]	Hanley, K. J. 2023. “Group Allocation Based on Peer Feedback.” European Journal of Engineering Education 48, no. 2: 284–299.

[17]	Harasim, L. 2012. Learning Theory and Online Technology: How New Technologies Are Transforming Learning Opportunities. Routledge.

[18]	Henderson, M., D. Boud, E. Molloy, et al. 2018. Feedback for Learning. Closing the Assessment Loop. Framework for Effective Learning. Australian Government, Department for Education and Training.

[19]	Hiver, P., S. Mercer, and A. H. Al-Hoorie. 2020. Student Engagement in the Language Classroom. Multilingual Matters.

[20]	Johnson, D. W., R. T. Johnson, C. J. Roseth, and T.-S. Shin. 2014. “The Relationship Between Motivation and Achievement in Interdependent Situations.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 44, no. 10: 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12280.

[21]	Li, S. 2018. “Corrective Feedback in L2 Speech Production.” In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, edited by J. Liontas, P. Brain, and R. Compton. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0247.

[22]	Lyster, R., and L. Ranta. 2013. “Counterpoint Piece: The Case for Variety in Corrective Feedback Research.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35, no. 1: 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311200071X.

[23]	Manhood, O. 2017. “I Feel Disappointed: EFL University Students' Emotional Responses Towards Teacher-Written Feedback.” Assessing Writing 31: 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001.

[24]	Moser, A. 2020. Written Corrective Feedback: The Role of Learner Engagement. Springer.

[25]	Nassaji, H. 2009. “Effects of Recasts and Elicitations in Dyadic Interaction and the Role of Feedback Explicitness.” Language Learning 59, no. 2: 411–452.

[26]	OECD. 2017. “PISA 2015 Collaborative Problem-Solving Framework.”http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf.

[27]	Pellegrino, J. W. and Hilton, M. L. eds. 2012. Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. National Academies Press.

[28]	Price, M., K. Handley, and J. Millar. 2011. “Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36, no. 8: 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513.

[29]	Robinson, J. L. ed. 2024. Providing Writing Feedback in Online Teaching and Learning: The PAUSE Framework: The PAUSE Framework. IGI Global.

[30]	Sato, M., and K. McDonough. 2019. “Practice Is Important, but How About Its Quality? Contextualized Practice in the Classroom.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41, no. 1: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000159.

[31]	Shen, R., and S. W. Chong. 2023. “Learner Engagement With Written Corrective Feedback in ESL and EFL Contexts: A Qualitative Research Synthesis Using a Perception-Based Framework.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48, no. 3: 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2072468.

[32]	Shonfeld, M., D. Passey, L. Appleby, et al. 2017. “Digital Agency to Empower Education. Discussion pPper EdusummIT 2017.”http://unesco.unibit.bg/sites/default/files/EDUsummIT2017%20TWG4%20DP%20MS%20discussion%20paper%20final.pdf.

[33]	Vattøy, K., and K. Smith. 2019. “Students' Perceptions of Teachers' Feedback Practices in Teaching English as a Foreign Language.” Teaching and Teacher Education 85: 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.024.

[34]	Weinberger, Y., and M. Shonfeld. 2020. “Students' Willingness to Practice Collaborative Learning.” Teaching Education 31, no. 2: 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1508280.

[35]	Wiliam, D. 2011. Embedded Formative Assessment. Solution Tree Press.

[36]	Winston, N., and D. Carless. 2020. Designing Effective Feedback Processes in Higher Education: A Learning-Focused Approach. Routledge.

[37]	Zhang, Z. 2021. “Promoting Student Engagement With Feedback: Insights From Collaborative Pedagogy and Teacher Feedback.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 47, no. 4: 540–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1933900.

[38]	Zhang, Z. V., and K. Hyland. 2018. “Student Engagement With Teacher and Automated Feedback on L2 Writing.” Assessing Writing 36: 90–102.

[39]	Zheng, Y., and S. Yu. 2018. “Student Engagement With Teacher-Written Corrective Feedback in EFL Writing: A Case Study of Chinese Lower-Proficiency Students.” Assessing Writing 37: 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001.