Dissociation of Stimulus Representation and Response Selection in Conflict Processing of Multiple Frames of Reference

Weizhi Nan , Zhenghan Li , Yuwei Sun , Yanlong Sun , Hongbin Wang , Qi Li , Xun Liu

Psych Journal ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 749 -757.

PDF
Psych Journal ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5) : 749 -757. DOI: 10.1002/pchj.70033
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Dissociation of Stimulus Representation and Response Selection in Conflict Processing of Multiple Frames of Reference

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Humans use multiple frames of reference (FORs) to represent spatial information, for example, one egocentric FOR (anchored on the observer) and various intrinsic FORs (anchored on the objects in the environment). Previous studies have shown that the cognitive resource competition of FORs will lead to FOR-based conflicts (e.g., egocentric–intrinsic, intrinsic–intrinsic) and their interactions. However, it remains unclear whether these conflicts and their interactions occur during the cognitive process stage of stimulus-representation, response-selection, or both. In our study, on the basis of a modified two-cannon task, the spatial congruency and response congruency of two cannons (intrinsic FORs anchored) were manipulated to localize the two process stages of intrinsic–intrinsic conflict. The results revealed that intrinsic–intrinsic conflict was affected by both factors, indicating that response time (RT) in the spatially incongruent condition was longer than that in the spatially congruent condition and that RT in the response incongruent condition was longer than that in the response congruent condition. Furthermore, an interaction between egocentric–intrinsic and intrinsic–intrinsic conflicts was observed, showing that the egocentric–intrinsic conflict did not change between the spatially congruent and incongruent conditions but increased from the response congruent condition to the response incongruent condition. These findings suggest that intrinsic–intrinsic conflict occurs in both the stimulus-representation and response-selection stages, whereas egocentric–intrinsic conflict occurs only in the response-selection stage. The two conflicts share a common conflict processing mechanism in the response-selection stage.

Keywords

conflict processing / frame of reference / response selection / stimulus representation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Weizhi Nan, Zhenghan Li, Yuwei Sun, Yanlong Sun, Hongbin Wang, Qi Li, Xun Liu. Dissociation of Stimulus Representation and Response Selection in Conflict Processing of Multiple Frames of Reference. Psych Journal, 2025, 14(5): 749-757 DOI:10.1002/pchj.70033

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Blair, C., and R. P. Razza. 2007. “Relating Effortful Control, Executive Function, and False Belief Understanding to Emerging Math and Literacy Ability in Kindergarten.” Child Development 78, no. 2: 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x.

[2]

Chen, Q., R. Weidner, P. H. Weiss, J. C. Marshall, and G. R. Fink. 2012. “Neural Interaction Between Spatial Domain and Spatial Reference Frame in Parietal-Occipital Junction.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24, no. 11: 2223-2236. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00260.

[3]

Cohen Kadosh, R., K. Cohen Kadosh, A. Henik, and D. E. J. Linden. 2008. “Processing Conflicting Information: Facilitation, Interference, and Functional Connectivity.” Neuropsychologia 46, no. 12: 2872-2879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.025.

[4]

Epley, N., C. K. Morewedge, and B. Keysar. 2004. “Perspective Taking in Children and Adults: Equivalent Egocentrism but Differential Correction.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40, no. 6: 760-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.002.

[5]

Eriksen, B. A., and C. W. Eriksen. 1974. “Effects of Noise Letters Upon the Identification of a Target Letter in a Nonsearch Task.” Perception & Psychophysics 16, no. 1: 143-149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203267.

[6]

Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A. G. Lang, and A. Buchner. 2007. “G*power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences.” Behavior Research Methods 39: 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146.

[7]

Gunderson, E. A., and L. Hildebrand. 2021. “Relations Among Spatial Skills, Number Line Estimation, and Exact and Approximate Calculation in Young Children.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 212: 105251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105251.

[8]

Karbach, J., and P. Verhaeghen. 2014. “Making Working Memory Work: A Meta-Analysis of Executive-Control and Working Memory Training in Older Adults.” Psychological Science 25, no. 11: 2027-2037. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614548725.

[9]

Kim, C., C. Chung, and J. Kim. 2010. “Multiple Cognitive Control Mechanisms Associated With the Nature of Conflict.” Neuroscience Letters 476, no. 3: 156-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.04.019.

[10]

Klatzky, R. L.1998. “Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Representations: Definitions, Distinctions, and Interconnections.” In Spatial Cognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by C. Freksa, C. Habel, and K. F. Wender, vol. 1404. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_1.

[11]

Lamberts, K., G. Tavernier, and G. d'Ydewalle. 1992. “Effects of Multiple Reference Points in Spatial Stimulus-Response Compatibility.” Acta Psychologica 79, no. 2: 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(92)90028-c.

[12]

Levinson, S. C.1996. “Frames of Reference and Molyneux's Question: Crosslinguistic Evidence.” In Language and Space, edited by P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. F. Garrett, 109-210. MIT Press.

[13]

Li, Q., W. Nan, K. Wang, and X. Liu. 2014. “Independent Processing of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Conflicts.” PLoS One 9, no. 2: e89249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089249.

[14]

Li, Q., G. Yang, Z. Li, Y. Qi, M. W. Cole, and X. Liu. 2017. “Conflict Detection and Resolution Rely on a Combination of Common and Distinct Cognitive Control Networks.” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 83: 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.032.

[15]

Li, Z., F. Göschl, and G. Yang. 2020. “Dissociated Neural Mechanisms of Target and Distractor Processing Facilitated by Expectations.” Journal of Neuroscience 40, no. 10: 1997-1999. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2562-19.2020.

[16]

Liu, M., C. Cheng, Y. Xu, and L. Zeng. 2024. “The Effect of Working Memory Load on Selective Attention to Emotional Faces for Social Anxiety Individuals.” PsyCh Journal 13, no. 3: 477-485. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.736.

[17]

Liu, X., M. T. Banich, B. L. Jacobson, and J. L. Tanabe. 2004. “Common and Distinct Neural Substrates of Attentional Control in an Integrated Simon and Spatial Stroop Task as Assessed by Event-Related fMRI.” NeuroImage 22, no. 3: 1097-1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.033.

[18]

Lu, C. H., and R. W. Proctor. 1995. “The Influence of Irrelevant Location Information on Performance: A Review of the Simon and Spatial Stroop Effects.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2, no. 2: 174-207. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210959.

[19]

Mou, W., and T. P. McNamara. 2002. “Intrinsic Frames of Reference in Spatial Memory.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28, no. 1: 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.162.

[20]

Nan, W., Q. Li, Y. Sun, H. Wang, and X. Liu. 2016. “Conflict Processing Among Multiple Frames of Reference.” PsyCh Journal 5, no. 4: 256-262. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.150.

[21]

Nan, W., C. Wang, Y. Sun, H. Wang, Q. Li, and X. Liu. 2018. “Temporal and Spectral Profiles of Conflict Processing Among Multiple Frames of Reference.” Psychophysiology 56, no. 4: e13313. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13313.

[22]

Nan, W., L. Yan, G. Yang, X. Liu, and S. Fu. 2022. “Two Processing Stages of the SNARC Effect.” Psychological Research 86, no. 2: 375-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01506-5.

[23]

Polk, T. A., R. M. Drake, J. J. Jonides, M. R. Smith, and E. E. Smith. 2008. “Attention Enhances the Neural Processing of Relevant Features and Suppresses the Processing of Irrelevant Features in Humans: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Stroop Task.” Journal of Neuroscience 28, no. 51: 13786-13792. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-08.2008.

[24]

Posner, M. I., and M. K. Rothbart. 2007. “Research on Attention Networks as a Model for the Integration of Psychological Science.” Annual Review of Psychology 58: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.1158.110405.085516.

[25]

Rueda, M. R., M. K. Rothbart, B. D. McCandliss, L. Saccomanno, and M. I. Posner. 2005. “Training, Maturation, and Genetic Influences on the Development of Executive Attention.” PNAS 102, no. 41: 14931-14936. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506897102.

[26]

Scheller, M., J. Tünnermann, K. Fredriksson, H. Fang, and J. Sui. 2024. “Self-Association Enhances Early Attentional Selection Through Automatic Prioritization of Socially Salient Signals.” https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.31.605951.

[27]

Smith, J. L.2011. “To Go or Not to Go, That Is the Question: Do the N2 and P3 Reflect Stimulus- or Response-Related Conflict?” International Journal of Psychophysiology 82, no. 2: 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.07.019.

[28]

Spironelli, C., M. Tagliabue, and C. Umiltà. 2009. “Response Selection and Attention Orienting: A Computational Model of Simon Effect Asymmetries.” Experimental Psychology 56, no. 4: 274. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.274.

[29]

Sui, J., X. He, and G. W. Humphreys. 2012. “Perceptual Effects of Social Salience: Evidence From Self-Prioritization Effects on Perceptual Matching.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38, no. 5: 1105-1117. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029792.

[30]

Sui, J., and G. W. Humphreys. 2015. “The Integrative Self: How Self-Reference Integrates Perception and Memory.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19, no. 12: 719-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.015.

[31]

Sun, Y., and H. Wang. 2010. “Perception of Space by Multiple Intrinsic Frames of Reference.” PLoS One 5, no. 5: e10442. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010442.

[32]

Sun, Y., and H. Wang. 2014. “Insight Into Others' Minds: Spatio-Temporal Representations by Intrinsic Frame of Reference.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8, no. 58: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00058.

[33]

Szűcs, D., and F. Soltész. 2007. “Event-Related Potentials Dissociate Facilitation and Interference Effects in the Numerical Stroop Paradigm.” Neuropsychologia 45, no. 14: 3190-3202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.013.

[34]

Tamborello, F. P., Y. Sun, and H. Wang. 2012. “Spatial Reasoning With Multiple Intrinsic Frames of Reference.” Experimental Psychology 59, no. 1: 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000119.

[35]

Treccani, B., R. Cubelli, S. Della Sala, and C. Umiltà. 2009. “Flanker and Simon Effects Interact at the Response Selection Stage.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62, no. 9: 1784-1804. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802557751.

[36]

Wang, H., T. Johnson, and J. Zhang. 2001. “The Mind's Views of Space. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Cognitive Science, Beijing, China.”

[37]

Wang, K., Q. Li, Y. Zheng, H. Wang, and X. Liu. 2014. “Temporal and Spectral Profiles of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Conflict Processing.” NeuroImage 89: 280-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.045.

[38]

Xu, H., G. Yang, F. Göschl, et al. 2024. “Distinct and Common Mechanisms of Cross-Model Semantic Conflict and Response Conflict in an Auditory Relevant Task.” Cerebral Cortex 34, no. 3: bhae105. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhae105.

[39]

Xu, H., G. Yang, H. Wu, J. Xiao, Q. Li, and X. Liu. 2024. “Distinct Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Semantic Conflict and Response Conflict Processing.” Cerebral Cortex 34, no. 2: bhad539. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad539.

[40]

Yan, L., G. Yang, W. Nan, X. Liu, and S. Fu. 2021. “The SNARC Effect Occurs in the Response-Selection Stage.” Acta Psychologica 215: 103292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103292.

[41]

Yang, G., W. Nan, Q. Li, and X. Liu. 2015. “Behavioral and Electrophysiological Profiles Reveal Domain- Specific Conflict Processing.” Advances in Computational Psychophysiology: 33-34.

[42]

Zacks, J. M., and P. Michelon. 2005. “Transformations of Visuospatial Images.” Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 4, no. 2: 96-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582305281085.

[43]

Zhang, M., X. Z. Tan, L. Shen, A. Wang, S. Geng, and Q. Chen. 2014. “Interaction Between Allocentric and Egocentric Reference Frames in Deaf and Hearing Populations.” Neuropsychologia 54: 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.015.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

92

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/