Background: Ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (typically defined >40 Gy/s) has shown promise for enhanced normal tissue sparing while maintaining tumor control, termed the FLASH effect when this biological response is observed. However, precise dose rate control remains a technical challenge in proton therapy systems, particularly for research applications investigating dose rate effects.
Purpose: To develop and validate a passive beam modulation technique using tungsten scatterers for controllable dose rate adjustment in a synchrotron-based proton therapy beamline without modifying accelerator parameters.
Methods: We investigated dose rate modulation using tungsten foils of varying thicknesses (0.1-3.5 mm) positioned upstream in an 87.2 MeV experimental proton beamline. Monte Carlo simulations using Geant4 were performed to model the dose rate variation as a function of the tungsten scatter's thickness. Experimental validation was conducted using an Advanced Markus ionization chamber for dose rate measurements and EBT-XD radiochromic films for lateral dose profile analysis. Five tungsten thicknesses were tested with full-spill deliveries (~1400 monitor units (MUs), and ~100 milliseconds (ms) pulse width).
Results: An inverse exponential relationship between dose rate and scatterer thickness was observed, with measured dose rates ranging from 288.9±0.7 Gy/s (0.1 mm tungsten) to 10.2±0.2 Gy/s (3.5 mm tungsten). Experimental measurements validated the accuracy of Monte Carlo predictions at the standard condition (1400 MU delivered in 100 ms) by falling within the 95% confidence intervals. Lateral beam profiles demonstrated progressive broadening with increased scatterer thickness, and the film measurements showed good agreements with Monte Carlo simulation (<2% difference at beam center).
Conclusions: Tungsten scatterer thickness modulation provides a practical, controllable method for dose rate adjustment spanning conventional to FLASH regimes. This passive approach enables precise dose rate control for preclinical radiobiological research without requiring modifications of accelerator structure and parameters.
| [1] |
Mohan R. A review of proton therapy–Current status and future directions. Prec Radiat Oncol. 2022;6:164–176.
|
| [2] |
Guan F, Bronk L, Titt U, et al. Spatial mapping of the biologic effectiveness of scanned particle beams: towards biologically optimized particle therapy. Sci Rep 2015;5:9850.
|
| [3] |
Mohan R, Peeler CR, Guan F, Bronk L, Cao W, Grosshans DR. Radiobiological issues in proton therapy. Acta Oncol (Madr). 2017;56:1367–1373.
|
| [4] |
Paganetti H, Blakely E, Carabe-Fernandez A, et al. Report of the AAPM TG-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2019;46:e53-e78.
|
| [5] |
Guan F, Bronk L, Kerr M, et al. Interpreting the biological effects of protons as a function of physical quantity: linear energy transfer or microdosimetric lineal energy spectrum? Sci Rep. 2024;14:25181.
|
| [6] |
Favaudon V, Caplier L, Monceau V, et al. Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:245ra293-245ra293.
|
| [7] |
Titt U, Yang M, Wang X, et al. Design and validation of a synchrotron proton beam line for FLASH radiotherapy preclinical research experiments. Med Phys. 2022;49:497–509.
|
| [8] |
Liu K, Titt U, Esplen N, et al. Discordance in acute gastrointestinal toxicity between synchrotron-based proton and linac-based electron ultra-high dose rate irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2025;122(2):491-501.
|
| [9] |
Yang M, Wang X, Guan F, et al. Adaptation and dosimetric commissioning of a synchrotron-based proton beamline for FLASH experiments. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67:165002.
|
| [10] |
Guan F, Jiang D, Wang X, et al. Mimicking large spot-scanning radiation fields for proton FLASH preclinical studies with a robotic motion platform, Prec Radiat Oncol. 2024;8:168–181.
|
| [11] |
Taylor PA, Moran JM, Jaffray DA, Buchsbaum JC. A roadmap to clinical trials for FLASH. Med Phys. 2022;49:4099–4108.
|
| [12] |
Agostinelli S, Allison J, Amako Ka, et al. GEANT4—a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2003;506:250–303.
|
| [13] |
Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, et al. Geant4 developments and applications. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2006;53:270–278.
|
| [14] |
Biggs S, Jennings M, Swerdloff S, et al. PyMedPhys: A community effort to develop an open, Python-based standard library for medical physics applications. J Open Source Software. 2022;7:4555.
|
| [15] |
Guan F, Wang X, Yang M, et al. Dosimetric response of Gafchromic™ EBT-XD film to therapeutic protons.Prec Radiat Oncol. 2023;7:15–26.
|
| [16] |
Bronk J, Bronk L, Singh S, et al. Enhanced radiation-sparing effects of ultra-high dose rate proton radiation (FLASH-RT) in a human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cerebral organoid model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022;114:S66.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2025 The Author(s). Precision Radiation Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute.
PDF
