Dosimetric assessment of conventional and advanced algorithms in clinical stereotactic radiotherapy

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically compare the dosimetric performance of conventional (Ray Tracing, AAA) and advanced (Monte Carlo, Acuros XB) dose calculation algorithms across homogeneous and heterogeneous tissues in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 125 SRT cases (brain: 50, lung: 20, liver: 20, spine: 35) was conducted using CyberKnife and Varian systems. Plans were originally created using Type B (Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm [AAA] and Ray Tracing) algorithms and were subsequently recalculated using Type C (Acuros XB and Monte Carlo) algorithms, while maintaining identical beam geometry and monitor units. Dosimetric parameters (D_95%, D_mean, D_max, CI, HI, GI) were evaluated. Validation included point dose measurements with Cheese Phantom and gamma index analysis using the PTW 1600 SRS Phantom.

Results: In lung cases, Type B algorithms overestimated D_95% by 14% compared to Monte Carlo, which reduced D_mean by 13.7% and CI by 25.8%. In liver, Acuros XB lowered D_mean by 21.4% with a 0.8% CI reduction. For spine, Monte Carlo reduced D_95% by 3.4%, with a 1.1% drop in D_mean and stable CI. Brain cases showed minimal differences, with Monte Carlo increasing CI by 2.5% (1.19 vs. 1.16). Gamma pass rates exceeded 98% for Monte Carlo and Acuros XB, surpassing Ray Tracing and AAA (≤96%).

Conclusion: Advanced algorithms demonstrated superior dose accuracy, homogeneity, and organs at risk (OAR) sparing in heterogeneous anatomical regions. Despite higher computational requirements, their clinical implementation is justified for SRT/SBRT planning. This study supports a site-specific approach, advocating for advanced algorithm use in anatomically complex scenarios.

Keywords

acuros XB / dose calculation algorithms / heterogeneous tissues / Monte Carlo / stereotactic radiotherapy

References

[1] Monte Carlo techniques in radiation medicine. Accessed April 19, 2025. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234749217_Monte_Carlo_techniques_in_radiation_medicine#read

[2] Wilke L, Andratschke N, Blanck O, et al. ICRU report 91 on prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams: Statement from the DEGRO/DGMP working group stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery. Strahlenther Onkol. 2019; 195(3): 193-198.

[3] Treatment Planning Algorithms. ICRU. 2014; 14(2): 65-75.

[4] Prasath SS, Babu PR. Dosimetric Comparison between Acuros XB (AXB) and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023; 24(5): 1677-1685.

[5] Fogliata A, Vanetti E, Albers D, et al. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52(5): 1363-1385.

[6] Rana S, Rogers K, Lee T, Reed D, Biggs C. Dosimetric impact of Acuros XB dose calculation algorithm in prostate cancer treatment using RapidArc. J Cancer Res Ther. 2013; 9(3): 430-435.

[7] Han T, Followill D, Mikell J, et al. Dosimetric impact of Acuros XB deterministic radiation transport algorithm for heterogeneous dose calculation in lung cancer. Med Phys. 2013; 40(5): 051710.

[8] Kan MWK, Leung LHT, Yu PKN. Dosimetric impact of using the Acuros XB algorithm for intensity modulated radiation therapy and RapidArc planning in nasopharyngeal carcinomas.IntJRadiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 85(1): e73-80.

[9] Videtic GMM, Hu C, Singh AK, et al. A Randomized Phase 2 Study Comparing 2 Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Schedules for Medically Inoperable Patients With Stage I Peripheral Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: NRG Oncology RTOG 0915 (NCCTG N0927). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015; 93(4): 757-764.

[10] Hoogeman M, Prévost JB, Nuyttens J, Pöll J, Levendag P, Heijmen B. Clinical accuracy of the respiratory tumor tracking system of the cyberknife: assessment by analysis of log files. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 74(1): 297-303.

[11] Knöös T, Wieslander E, Cozzi L, et al. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external photon beam therapy for clinical situations. Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51(22): 5785-5807.

[12] Vangvichith M, Autret D, Tiplica T, Barreau M, Dufreneix S. Comparison of five dose calculation algorithms in a heterogeneous media using design of experiment. Phys Med. 2019; 61: 103-111.

[13] Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning - Chetty - 2007 - Medical Physics - Wiley Online Library. Accessed May 20, 2025. https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1118/1.2795842

[14] Omer H, Salim E, Elhag B, Sulieman A. Monte Carlo techniques in radiation medicine. Asian Journal of Medical and Clinical Sciences. 2012; 1: 2012.

[15] Dosimetric comparison of Acuros XB, AAA, and XVMC in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer. ResearchGate. Published online January 8, 2025.

[16] Ojala J, Kapanen M. Quantification of dose differences between two versions of Acuros XB algorithm compared to Monte Carlo simulations — the effect on clinical patient treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015; 16(6): 213-225.

[17] Yuan ZY, Meng MB, Liu CL, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy using the CyberKnife(®) system for patients with liver metastases. Onco Targets Ther. 2014; 7: 915-923.

[18] Botticella A, Levy A, Auzac G, Chabert I, Berthold C, Le Pechoux C. Tumour motion management in lung cancer: a narrative review. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021; 10(4): 2011-2017.

[19] Monte Carlo and ray tracing algorithms in the cyberknife treatment planning for lung tumours- comparison and validation. ResearchGate. Published online October 22, 2024.Accessed April 3, 2025. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236348730_Monte_Carlo_and_ray_tracing_algorithms_in_the_cyberknife_treatment_planning_for_lung_tumours-_comparison_and_validation

[20] Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting. JICRU. 2014; 14(2): 101-109.

[21] Schüler E, Lo A, Chuang CF, Soltys SG, Pollom EL, Wang L. Clinical impact of the VOLO optimizer on treatment plan quality and clinical treatment efficiency for CyberKnife. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020; 21(5): 38-47.

[22] Singh PK, Tripathi D, Singh S, et al. To Study the Impact of Different Optimization Methods on Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Plans for Hip Prosthesis Patients. J Med Phys. 2022; 47(3): 262-269.

[23] ICRU Report 83, Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Intensity-Modulated Photon-Beam Therapy (IMRT) – ICRU. Accessed April 3, 2025. https://www.icru.org/report/prescribing-recording-and-reporting-intensity-modulated-photon-beam-therapy-imrticru-report-83/

[24] Singh S, Bhushan M, Singh BK, et al. Comparative Study of Fluence Distribution and Point Dose Using Arc-check and Delta4 Phantoms. J Med Phys. 2024; 49(4): 706.

[25] Singh S, Singh BK, Kumar A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Image-Based Segmentation of Brain Tumor Using the Modified Transfer Learning Method. J Med Phys. 2022; 47(4): 315.

[26] Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, Purdy JA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys. 1998; 25(5): 656-661.

[27] Li J, Zhang X, Pan Y, Zhuang H, Wang J, Yang R. Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife. Front Oncol. 2021; 11.

[28] Chen WZ, Xiao Y, Li J. Impact of dose calculation algorithm on radiation therapy. World J Radiol. 2014; 6(11): 874-880. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4241494/

[29] Vassiliev ON, Wareing TA, McGhee J, Failla G, Salehpour MR, Mourtada F. Validation of a new grid-based Boltzmann equation solver for dose calculation in radiotherapy with photon beams. Phys Med Biol. 2010; 55(3): 581-598.

[30] Huang B, Wu L, Lin P, Chen C. Dose calculation of Acuros XB and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment with flattening filter free beams and the potential role of calculation grid size. Radiat Oncol. 2015; 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0357-0

[31] Singh S, Singh BK, Kumar A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Image-Based Segmentation of Brain Tumor Using the Modified Transfer Learning Method. J Med Phys. 2022; 47(4): 315.

[32] Singh S, Singh BK, Kumar A. Multi-organ segmentation of organ-at-risk (OAR's) of head and neck site using ensemble learning technique. Radiography. 2024; 30(2): 673-680.

[33] Kumar P, Singh S, Pal S, Manav M, Tyagi A. Tumor Segmentation for Brain Tumor Using Combination of Deep Learning and Machine Learning Algorithms. JK Pract.2024; 29(4): 48-54.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Precision Radiation Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute.