Optimized fiducial marker placement using B-spline surface modeling and graph theory for Cyberknife stereotactic body radiotherapy for superficial tumors

Jing Huang , Xianlong Xiong , Cheng Chen , Yuhan Li , Ruijie Wang , Zhitao Dai

Precision Radiation Oncology ›› 2025, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 87 -95.

PDF
Precision Radiation Oncology ›› 2025, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 87 -95. DOI: 10.1002/pro6.70017
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Optimized fiducial marker placement using B-spline surface modeling and graph theory for Cyberknife stereotactic body radiotherapy for superficial tumors

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

CyberKnife, an established noninvasive stereotactic radiotherapy technology, has been extensively utilized to treat various malignancies because of its high precision and conformal dose delivery. The success of CyberKnife treatment is crucially dependent on optimal fiducial marker placement. This study introduces a novel fiducial marker placement planning algorithm tailored for superficial tumors, which are located 20–50 mm beneath the epidermis. A retrospective analysis was performed on the data collected from three patients with thymus, breast, and submandibular gland tumors. This algorithm generated potential implantation sites by constructing and optimizing a B-spline surface around the tumor. Candidate points were filtered using multi-criteria constraints: (1) a minimum of 18-mm inter-marker distance, (2) angular separation >30°, and (3) nonoverlapping visibility in 45° oblique digital reconstructed radiographs. To enhance the computational efficiency, a kd-tree spatial indexing structure was integrated with graph theory, specifically the Bron–Kerbosch algorithm for maximal clique detection. The proposed method achieved a time complexity of O(mlogm + m2 + 3n3), demonstrating a significant improvement over the brute-force O(n3) approach. The experimental results showed that our algorithm could efficiently plan fiducial marker placement, thereby simplifying the planning process and providing valuable technical support for CyberKnife treatments.

Keywords

Fiducial Marker Placement / CyberKnife / Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy / Superficial Tumor

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jing Huang, Xianlong Xiong, Cheng Chen, Yuhan Li, Ruijie Wang, Zhitao Dai. Optimized fiducial marker placement using B-spline surface modeling and graph theory for Cyberknife stereotactic body radiotherapy for superficial tumors. Precision Radiation Oncology, 2025, 9(2): 87-95 DOI:10.1002/pro6.70017

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Chang BW, Saif MW. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in pancreatic cancer: is it ready for prime time?. JOP. 2008; 9(6): 676-682.

[2]

Seo Y, Kim MS, Yoo S, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy boost in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 75(5): 1456-1461.

[3]

Adler JR, Chang SD, Murphy MJ, Doty J, Geis P, Hancock SL. The Cyberknife: a frameless robotic system for radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1997; 69(1-4 Pt 2): 124-128.

[4]

Sotiropoulou E, Stathochristopoulou I, Stathopoulos K, Verigos K, Salvaras N, Thanos L. CT-guided fiducial placement for cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery: an initial experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010; 33(3): 586-589.

[5]

, Muhammad S, Rogelio S. Eus guided cyberknife fiducial placement for pancreatic head cancer using the back-loaded technique with bone wax seal: 677. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104: S251-S252.

[6]

Chandnani M, Faisal MF, Glissen-Brown J, et al. EUS-guided fiducial placement for pancreatobiliary malignancies: safety, infection risk, and use of peri-procedural antibiotics. Endosc Int Open. 2020; 8(2): E179-E185.

[7]

Dutta D, Kataki KJ, George S, et al. Prospective evaluation of fiducial marker placement quality and toxicity in liver CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol J. 2020; 38(4): 253-261.

[8]

Jowhari F, Liu M, Vandervoort E, et al. Mo1307 How good is eus guided fiducial placement for targeted cyberknife radiotherapy? Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87(6): AB438.

[9]

Trumm CG, Häussler SM, Muacevic A, et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous fiducial marker placement for CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery: technical results and complications in 222 consecutive procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014; 25(5): 760-768.

[10]

Shinohara K, Roach M. Technique for implantation of fiducial markers in the prostate. Urology. 2008; 71(2): 196-200.

[11]

Zioueche A, Richioud, B, Malet C, Sunyach MP, Laroque C. EP-1281 How to deal with radiologist and radiotherapist constraints in fiducial placement and tracking using cyberknife?. Radiot Oncol. 2012; 103: S488.

[12]

Lei SY, Collins S, Xia F, et al. SU-E-T-67: A Simple Tool for Evaluation of Fiducial Placement for CyberKnife SRS/SBRT Treatment. Med Phys. 2011: 38(6): 3500-3501.

[13]

Casutt A, Noirez L, Bernasconi M, et al. Endobronchial coil spring fiducial markers for CyberKnife® stereotactic body radiation therapy. Respirology. 2021; 26(5): 469-476.

[14]

Pop D, Venissac N, Bondiau PY, Mouroux J. Peroperative fiducial placement for postoperative stereotactic Cyberknife radiosurgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010; 10(6): 1034-1036.

[15]

Park SJ, Ionascu D, Hacker F, Mamon H, Berbeco R. Automatic marker detection and 3D position reconstruction using cine EPID images for SBRT verification. Med Phys. 2009; 36(10): 4536-4546.

[16]

Li WZ, Liang ZW, Cao Y, et al. Estimating intrafraction tumor motion during fiducial-based liver stereotactic radiotherapy via an iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. Radiat Oncol. 2019; 14(1): 185.

[17]

Sun X, Dai Z, Xu M, Guo X, Su H, Li Y. Quantifying 6D tumor motion and calculating PTV margins during liver stereotactic radiotherapy with fiducial tracking. Front Oncol. 2022; 12: 1021119.

[18]

Goldsmith C, Green MM, Middleton B, et al. Evaluation of CyberKnife® Fiducial Tracking Limitations to Assist Targeting Accuracy: A Phantom Study with Fiducial Displacement. Cureus. 2018; 10(10): e3523.

[19]

Campbell BCV, Christensen S, Levi CR, et al. Comparison of Computed Tomography Perfusion and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Perfusion Diffusion Mismatch in Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2012; 43(10): 2648-2653.

[20]

Green RA, Adams RW, Duckett SB, Mewis RE, Williamson DC, Green GG. The theory and practice of hyperpolarization in magnetic resonance using parahydrogen. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2012; 67: 1-48.

[21]

De Boor C. A Practical Guide to Splines. 27 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer, 1978.

[22]

Bittner K, Brachtendorf HG. Fast Algorithms for Adaptive Free Knot Spline Approximation Using Nonuniform Biorthogonal Spline Wavelets. SIAM J Sci Comp. 2015; 37(2): B283-B304.

[23]

Liu XM, Huang HK, Xu WX. An Intelligent System of Space Surface Modeling. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 2004; 5: 4290-4295.

[24]

Plonka G, Tasche M. Cardinal Hermite Spline Interpolation with Shifted Nodes. Math Comp. 1994; 63(208): 645-659.

[25]

Peters J, Reif U. Analysis of Algorithms Generalizing B-Spline Subdivision. SIAM J Num Anal. 2000; 35(2) 1-26.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Precision Radiation Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

41

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/