A new formula for calculating normal tissue complication probability

Tingting Cao , Qingqing Yuan , Zhitao Dai

Precision Radiation Oncology ›› 2024, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3) : 126 -131.

PDF
Precision Radiation Oncology ›› 2024, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3) : 126 -131. DOI: 10.1002/pro6.1240
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A new formula for calculating normal tissue complication probability

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Purpose: To facilitate the use of quantitative modeling of biological effects in treatment planning by introducing a simpler function equivalent to the Lyman formula for calculating normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

Methods: We first provide an approximation of the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) formula using three parameters (n, m, TD50) as a function of equivalent uniform dose (EUD). The parameters for the new formula are defined in terms of the Lyman model’s m and TD50. Conversely, m and TD50 are expressed in terms of the parameters of the new equation. The role of the Lyman volume-effect parameter n remains unchanged from its role in the Lyman model.

Results: The new formula, which exhibits a sigmoidal shape, demonstrates symmetry about TD50, akin to the LKB model. The difference in NTCP between the two formulas is less than 0.1%. The parameters (n, m, TD50) are preserved through rigorous mathematical deduction and have been recalibrated to the tolerance data of Emani et al. using the proposed formula. This new model provides a better fit to these data than the model by Burman et al., which was fitted “by eye” rather than using statisticalmethods.

Conclusion: We have developed a formula that represents NTCP as a function of EUD, which proves to be potentially useful. The parameters derived in this study are mathematically robust and offer a superior fit to the data compared to previous efforts. Additionally, the new model fits brain data as well as, if not better than, the LKB model.

Keywords

Normal tissue complications / LKB model / Equivalent uniform dose

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tingting Cao, Qingqing Yuan, Zhitao Dai. A new formula for calculating normal tissue complication probability. Precision Radiation Oncology, 2024, 8(3): 126-131 DOI:10.1002/pro6.1240

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

DenRB, DickerAP. IMRT, IGRT, SBRT: Advances in Treatment Planning and Delivery of Radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(1):e3-e3.

[2]

WolbarstAB, ChinLM, SvenssonGK. Optimization of radiation therapy: integral-response of a model biological system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1982;8(10):1761-1769.

[3]

LymanJT. Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms. Radiat Res Suppl. 1985;8:S13-S19.

[4]

KutcherGJ, BurmanC. Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;16(6):1623-1630.

[5]

EmamiB, LymanJ, BrownA, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21(1):109-122.

[6]

SchultheissTE, OrtonCG, PeckRA. Models in radiotherapy: volume effects. Med Phys. 1983;10(4):410-415.

[7]

KällmanP, AgrenA, BrahmeA. Tumour and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery. Int J Radiat Biol. 1992;62(2):249-262.

[8]

KhanAJ, KirkMC, MehtaPS, et al. A dosimetric comparison of threedimensional conformal, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and MammoSite partial-breast irradiation. Brachytherapy. 2006;5(3):183-188.

[9]

UematsuM, ShiodaA, TaharaK, et al. Focal, high dose, and fractionated modified stereotactic radiation therapy for lung carcinoma patients: a preliminary experience. Cancer. 1998;82(6):1062-1070.

[10]

HernandoML, MarksLB, BentelGC, et al. Radiation-induced pulmonary toxicity: a dose-volume histogram analysis in 201 patients with lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51(3):650-659.

[11]

LeeTF, TingHM, ChaoPJ, et al. Model Parameters Estimating on Lyman-Kutcher-Burman Normal Tissue Complication Probability for Xerostomia on Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Med Heal Biomed Bioeng Pharm Eng. 2012;6:319-322.

[12]

KehwarTS. Analytical approach to estimate normal tissue complication probability using best fit of normal tissue tolerance doses into the NTCP equation of the linear quadratic model. J Cancer Res Ther. 2005;1(3):168-179.

[13]

NiemierkoA. Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose. Med Phys. 1997;24(1):103-110.

[14]

NiemierkoA, Goitein M. Modeling of normal tissue response to radiation: the critical volume model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;25(1):135-145.

[15]

GayHA, Niemierko A. A free programfor calculating EUD-basedNTCP and TCP in external beam radiotherapy. Phys Med. 2007;23(3-4):115-125.

[16]

BurmanC, Kutcher GJ, EmamiB, GoiteinM. Fitting of normal tissue tolerance data to an analytic function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:123–135.

[17]

LymanJT. Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms. Radiat Res Suppl. 1985;8:S13-S19.

[18]

ParkC, PapiezL, ZhangS, Story M, TimmermanRD. Universal survival curve and single fraction equivalent dose: useful tools in understanding potency of ablative radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70(3):847-852.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Precision Radiation Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

152

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/