Photonic Chip Breath Analyzer

Elieser E. Gallego Martínez , Ignacio R. Matías , Carlos Ruiz Zamarreño

Photonic Sensors ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 250317

PDF
Photonic Sensors ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3) : 250317 DOI: 10.1007/s13320-025-0771-3
Regular

Photonic Chip Breath Analyzer

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

This work introduces a novel single-package optical sensing device for multiple gas sensing, which is suitable for breath analysis applications. It is fabricated on a coverslip substrate via a sputtering technique and uses a planar waveguide configuration with lateral incidence of light. It features three sequentially ordered strips of different materials, which serve to increase the multivariate nature of the response of the device to different gases. For the proof-of-concept, the selected materials are indium tin oxide (ITO), tin oxide (SnO2), and chromium oxide III (Cr2O3), while the selected gases are nitric oxide (NO), acetylene (C2H2), and ammonia (NH3). The sensing mechanism is based on the hyperbolic mode resonance (HMR) effect, with the first-order resonance obtained for each strip located in the near infrared region. The multivariate response of the resonances and the correlation with the concentration of each gas allow training a machine learning (ML) model based on a nonlinear autoregressive neural network, enabling the accurate prediction of the concentration of each gas. The obtained limit of detection for all the gases was in the order of a few parts per billion. This innovative approach coined as the multivariate optical resonances spectroscopy demonstrates the potential of HMR-based optical sensors in combination with ML techniques for ultra-sensitive multi-gas detection applications using a single device.

Keywords

Gas sensor / hyperbolic mode resonance / multivariate optical resonances spectroscopy / Engineering / Materials Engineering / Information and Computing Sciences / Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing / Physical Sciences / Optical Physics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Elieser E. Gallego Martínez, Ignacio R. Matías, Carlos Ruiz Zamarreño. Photonic Chip Breath Analyzer. Photonic Sensors, 2025, 15(3): 250317 DOI:10.1007/s13320-025-0771-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

HitesR ASettleF A. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Handbook of instrumental techniques for analytical chemistry, 1997Upper Saddle RiverPrentice Hall PTR609-625

[2]

YuanB, KossA R, WarnekeC, CoggonM, SekimotoK, de GouwJ A. Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry: applications in atmospheric sciences. Chemical Reviews, 2017, 1172113187-13229.

[3]

SmithD, ŠpanělP. Selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) for online trace gas analysis. Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 2005, 245661-700.

[4]

BedukT, DurmusC, HanogluS B, BedukD, SalamaK N, GokselT, et al. . Breath as the mirror of our body is the answer really blowing in the wind? Recent technologies in exhaled breath analysis systems as non-invasive sensing platforms. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2021, 143: 116329.

[5]

GlasstoneSAn Introduction to Electrochemistry, 2011RedditchRead Books Ltd.

[6]

TamA C. Applications of photoacoustic sensing techniques. Reviews of Modern Physics, 1986, 582381.

[7]

KooW T, JangJ S, KimI D. Metal-organic frameworks for chemiresistive sensors. Chem, 2019, 581938-1963.

[8]

HodgkinsonJ, TatamR P. Optical gas sensing: a review. Measurement Science and Technology, 2012, 241012004.

[9]

LeeD J, KangN W, ChoiJ H, KimJ, WhitakerJ F. Recent advances in the design of electro-optic sensors for minimally destructive microwave field probing. Sensors, 2011, 111806-824.

[10]

VelumaniM, PrasanthA, NarasimmanS, ChandrasekharA, SampsonA, MeherS R, et al. . Nanomaterial-based sensors for exhaled breath analysis: a review. Coatings, 2022, 12121989.

[11]

ZouM, SunL, WangX. Multigas sensing based on wavelength modulation spectroscopy using frequency division multiplexing combined with time division multiplexing. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2022, 221312930-12938.

[12]

HuangQ, WeiY, LiJ. Simultaneous detection of multiple gases using multi-resonance photoacoustic spectroscopy. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2022, 369: 132234.

[13]

LongF, GaoG, ZhangM, JiangY, CaiT. Multi-laser sensor for simultaneous multi-gas measurements using off-axis cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy with an opposite two-way configuration. Optics Letters, 2022, 4761339-1342.

[14]

LiuH, ShiY, WangT. Design of a six-gas NDIR gas sensor using an integrated optical gas chamber. Optics Express, 2020, 28811451-11462.

[15]

DongM, ZhengC, MiaoS, ZhangY, DuQ, WangY, TittelF K. Development and measurements of a mid-infrared multi-gas sensor system for CO, CO2 and CH4 detection. Sensors, 2017, 17102221.

[16]

DillonW C, HamplV, ShultzP J, RubinsJ B, ArcherS L. Origins of breath nitric oxide in humans. Chest, 1996, 1104930-938.

[17]

ZavorskyG S, HsiaC C, HughesJ M B, BorlandC D, GuénardH, LeeI V D, et al. . Standardisation and application of the single-breath determination of nitric oxide uptake in the lung. European Respiratory Journal, 2017, 4921600962.

[18]

BarkerR C, HopkinsS R, KelloggN, OlfertI M, BrutsaertT D, GavinT P, et al. . Measurement of cardiac output during exercise by open-circuit acetylene uptake. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1999, 8741506-1512.

[19]

BellC, MonahanK D, DonatoA J, HuntB E, SealsD R, BeckK C. Use of acetylene breathing to determine cardiac output in young and older adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2003, 35158-64.

[20]

HibbardT, KillardA J. Breath ammonia analysis: clinical application and measurement. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 2011, 41121-35.

[21]

RobbinsR A, GrishamM B. Nitric oxide. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 1997, 296857-860.

[22]

ZapolW M, RimarS, GillisN, MarlettaM, BoskenC H. Nitric oxide and the lung. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1994, 14951375-1380.

[23]

KharitonovS A, YatesD, RobbinsR A, BarnesP J, Logan-SinclairR, ShinebourneE A. Increased nitric oxide in exhaled air of asthmatic patients. The Lancet, 1994, 3438890133-135.

[24]

PässlerP, HefnerW, BucklK, MeinassH, MeiswinkelA, WernickeH, et al. . Acetylene. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 20111st ed.New YorkWiley-VCH Ed.Wiley

[25]

ElkayamU, WilsonA, F, MorrisonJ, MeltzerP, DavisJ, KlostermanP, et al. . Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by a single breath constant expiratory technique. Thorax, 1984, 392107-113.

[26]

VaittinenO, SchmidtF M, MetsalaM, HalonenL. Exhaled breath biomonitoring using laser spectroscopy. Current Analytical Chemistry, 2013, 93463-475.

[27]

NarasimhanL R, GoodmanW, PatelC K N. Correlation of breath ammonia with blood urea nitrogen and creatinine during hemodialysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001, 9884617-4621.

[28]

PetrovaM, DiamondJ, SchusterB, DaltonP. Evaluation of trigeminal sensitivity to ammonia in asthmatics and healthy human volunteers. Inhalation Toxicology, 2008, 20121085-1092.

[29]

DuBoisS, EngS, BhattacharyaR, RulyakS, HubbardT, PutnamD, KearneyD J. Breath ammonia testing for diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2005, 50: 1780-1784.

[30]

KearneyD J, HubbardT, PutnamD. Breath ammonia measurement in Helicobacter pylori infection. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2002, 47: 2523-2530.

[31]

AmanoA, YoshidaY, OhoT, KogaT. Monitoring ammonia to assess halitosis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 2002, 946692-696.

[32]

PhillipsM, CataneoR N, CumminA R, GagliardiA J, GleesonK, GreenbergJ, et al. . Detection of lung cancer with volatile markers in the breath. Chest, 2003, 12362115-2123.

[33]

UlanowskaA, KowalkowskiT, TrawinskaE, BuszewskiB. The application of statistical methods using VOCs to identify patients with lung cancer. Journal of Breath Research, 2011, 54046008.

[34]

FuX A, LiM, KnippR J, NantzM H, BousamraM. Noninvasive detection of lung cancer using exhaled breath. Cancer Medicine, 2014, 31174-181.

[35]

LiM, YangD, BrockG, KnippR J, BousamraM, NantzM H, FuX A. Breath carbonyl compounds as biomarkers of lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 2015, 90192-97.

[36]

MiekischW, SchubertJ K, Noeldge-SchomburgG F. Diagnostic potential of breath analysis–focus on volatile organic compounds. Clinica Chimica Acta, 2004, 3471–225-39.

[37]

BuszewskiB, KesyM, LigorT, AmannA. Human exhaled air analytics: biomarkers of diseases. Biomedical chromatography, 2007, 216553-566.

[38]

DacresH, NarayanaswamyR. A new optical sensing reaction for nitric oxide. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2003, 901–3222-229.

[39]

LimN, KimK H, ByunY T. Preparation of defected SWCNTs decorated with en-APTAS for application in high-performance nitric oxide gas detection. Nanoscale, 2021, 13136538-6544.

[40]

LiW, GengX, GuoY, RongJ, GongY, WuL, et al. . Reduced graphene oxide electrically contacted graphene sensor for highly sensitive nitric oxide detection. ACS Nano, 2011, 596955-6961.

[41]

ChenG, ParonyanT M, HarutyunyanA R. Sub-ppt gas detection with pristine graphene. Applied Physics Letters, 2012, 1015053119.

[42]

ZhengK, ZhengC, HeQ, YaoD, HuL, ZhangY, et al. . Near-infrared acetylene sensor system using off-axis integrated-cavity output spectroscopy and two measurement schemes. Optics Express, 2018, 262026205-26216.

[43]

JordanL R, HauserP C. Electrochemical sensor for acetylene. Analytical Chemistry, 1997, 69142669-2672.

[44]

MaY, QiaoS, HeY, LiY, ZhangZ, YuX, TittelF K. Highly sensitive acetylene detection based on multi-pass retro-reflection-cavity-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy and a fiber amplified diode laser. Optics Express, 2019, 271014163-14172.

[45]

ZhangC, HeY, QiaoS, LiuY, MaY. High-sensitivity trace gas detection based on differential Helmholtz photoacoustic cell with dense spot pattern. Photoacoustics, 2024, 38: 100634.

[46]

ShrivastavA M, SharmaG, RathoreA S, JhaR. Hypersensitive and selective interferometric nose for ultratrace ammonia detection with fast response utilizing PANI@SnO2 nanocomposite. ACS Photonics, 2018, 5114402-4412.

[47]

ArmasD, ZubiateP, ZamarrenoC R, MatiasI R. Ammonia gas optical sensor based on lossy mode resonances. IEEE Sensors Letters, 2023, 782001204.

[48]

ChenQ, WangS, BaiS, ShenL, PengJ, ZhangY, et al. . Sub-ppt NH3 detection by MoS2@sulfur nanosheets. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2024, 985: 174070.

[49]

MillerD J, SunK, TaoL, KhanM A, ZondloM A. Open-path, quantum cascade-laser-based sensor for high-resolution atmospheric ammonia measurements. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2014, 7181-93.

[50]

KorentA, Žagar SoderžnikK, ŠturmS, Žužek RožmanK, RedonN, WojkiewiczJ L, et al. . Facile fabrication of an ammonia-gas sensor using electrochemically synthesised polyaniline on commercial screen-printed three-electrode systems. Sensors, 2020, 211169.

[51]

QiaoS, HeY, SunH, PatimiscoP, SampaoloA, SpagnoloV, et al. . Ultra-highly sensitive dual gases detection based on photoacoustic spectroscopy by exploiting a long-wave, high-power, wide-tunable, single-longitudinal-mode solid-state laser. Light: Science and Applications, 2024, 131100.

[52]

SunH, QiaoS, HeY, LiuY, MaY. Highly sensitive CH4, C2H2 and CO simultaneous measurement LITES sensor based on multi-pass cell with overlapped spots pattern and QTFs with low resonant frequency. Optics Express, 2024, 321628183-28194.

[53]

XuM, PengB, ZhuX, GuoY. Multi-gas detection system based on non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) spectral technology. Sensors, 2022, 223836.

[54]

TianL, XiaJ, KolomenskiiA A, SchuesslerH A, ZhuF, LiY, et al. . Gas phase multicomponent detection and analysis combining broadband dual-frequency comb absorption spectroscopy and deep learning. Communications Engineering, 2023, 2154.

[55]

GuiX, TongY, WangH, YuH, LiZ. Research on multi-component gas optical detection system based on conjugated interferometer. Photonic Sensors, 2017, 73261-269.

[56]

MatiasI R, VillarI D, CorresJ M. Lossy mode resonance based sensors in planar configuration: a review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2023, 2376397-6405.

[57]

FuentesO, CorresJ M, MatiasI R, VillarI D. Generation of lossy mode resonances in planar waveguides toward development of humidity sensors. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2019, 37102300-2306.

[58]

MartínezE E G, OtamendiM H, ZamarreñoC R, MatíasI R. LMR-based optical sensor for ethylene detection at visible and mid-infrared regions. IEEE Sensors Letters, 2023, 785000404.

[59]

VillarI D, ArreguiF J, ZamarreñoC R, CorresJ M, BariainC, GoicoecheaJ, et al. . Optical sensors based on lossy-mode resonances. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2017, 240: 174-185.

[60]

Gonzalez-SalgueiroL, VillarI D, CorresJ M, GoioecheaJ, MatiasI R. Metallic-dielectric layer based hyperbolic mode resonances in planar waveguides. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2024, 42134626-4635.

[61]

MartínezE E G, ZamarreñoC R, MeursJ, CristescuS M, MatíasI R. Hyperbolic mode resonance-based acetone optical sensors powered by ensemble learning. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2024, 418: 136342.

[62]

RodríguezI D, Del VillarI, LorenzoO F, SanzJ M C, MaestroI M. Interdigital concept in photonic sensors based on an array of lossy mode resonances. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 13228.

[63]

DominguezI, VillarI D, FuentesO, CorresJ M, MatiasI R. Dually nanocoated planar waveguides towards multi-parameter sensing. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 3669.

[64]

ImasJ J, ZamarreñoC R, ZubiateP, VillarI D, Pérez-EscuderoJ M, MatíasI R. Twin lossy mode resonance on a single D-shaped optical fiber. Optics Letters, 2021, 46133284-3287.

[65]

SchroederV, EvansE D, WuY C M, VollC C A, McDonaldB R, SavagatrupS, et al. . Chemiresistive sensor array and machine learning classification of food. ACS Sensors, 2019, 482101-2108.

[66]

YangJ, LuS, ChenB, HuF, LiC, GuoC. Machine learning-assisted optical nano-sensor arrays in microorganism analysis. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2023, 159: 116945.

[67]

NelsonM P, AustJ F, DobrowolskiJ A, VerlyP G, MyrickM L. Multivariate optical computation for predictive spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry, 1998, 70173-82.

[68]

JonesC M, DaiB, PriceJ, LiJ, PearlM, SoltmannB, MyrickM L. A new multivariate optical computing microelement and miniature sensor for spectroscopic chemical sensing in harsh environments: design, fabrication, and testing. Sensors, 2019, 193701.

[69]

DavisB M, HemphillA J, Cebeci MaltaşD, ZipperM A, WangP, Ben-AmotzD. Multivariate hyperspectral Raman imaging using compressive detection. Analytical Chemistry, 2011, 83135086-5092.

[70]

MartínezE G, ZamarreñoC R, MatíasI R. Photoisomerization-induced LMR shift for UV radiation detection. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2024, 366: 114970.

[71]

MartínezE G, MatiasI R, Melendi-EspinaS, HernaezM, ZamarreñoC R. Lossy mode resonance based 1-butanol sensor in the mid-infrared region. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2023, 388: 133845.

[72]

HernaezM, ZamarreñoC R, VillarI D, MatiasI R, ArreguiF J. Lossy mode resonances supported by TiO2-coated optical fibers. Procedia Engineering, 2010, 5: 1099-1102.

[73]

VitoriaI, GallegoE E, Melendi-EspinaS, HernaezM, Ruiz ZamarreñoC, MatíasI R. Gas sensor based on lossy mode resonances by means of thin graphene oxide films fabricated onto planar coverslips. Sensors, 2023, 2331459.

[74]

OzcarizA, MartinezI, ZamarreñoC R, ArreguiF J. Development of copper oxide thin film for lossy mode resonance-based optical fiber sensor. the Eurosensors 2018 Conference, 2018893. Graz

[75]

VillarI D, BohorquezD L, CaputoD, BuzzinA, ChiavaioliF, BaldiniF, et al. . Lossy mode resonance sensors based on tungsten oxide thin films. 2020 IEEE Sensors, 20201-4Rotterdam

[76]

McKenneyD J, WangS W, DruryC F. Reaction of nitric oxide with acetylene and oxygen: implications for denitrification assays. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1997, 6151370-1375.

[77]

GarinF. Mechanism of NOx decomposition. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2001, 2221–2183-219.

[78]

OnoY, NgC Y. A study of the unimolecular decomposition of the (C2H2)3+ complex. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1982, 104184752-4758.

[79]

WatsonH E, RamaswamyK L. The refractive index dispersion and polarization of gases. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series A–Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1936, 156887144-157

[80]

PuzkoR S, MerzlikinA M. Analytical properties of the effective refractive index. Optics Communications, 2017, 383: 323-329.

[81]

ShrivastavaA, GuptaV B. Methods for the determination of limit of detection and limit of quantitation of the analytical methods. Chronicles of Young Scientists, 2011, 2121-25.

[82]

FormisanoE, De MartinoF, ValenteG. Multivariate analysis of fMRI time series: classification and regression of brain responses using machine learning. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2008, 267921-934.

[83]

YinC, DaiQ. A deep multivariate time series multistep forecasting network. Applied Intelligence, 2022, 5288956-8974.

[84]

HecklerC E. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Technometrics, 2005, 474517.

[85]

MöllerM F. A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Networks, 1993, 64525-533.

[86]

YangW, WangK, ZuoW. Fast neighborhood component analysis. Neurocomputing, 2012, 83: 31-37.

[87]

GoldbergerJ, HintonG E, RoweisS, SalakhutdinovR R. Neighbourhood components analysis. the 18th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2004513-520Vancouver

[88]

TappertF D. The parabolic approximation method. Wave Propagation and Underwater Acoustics, 2005224-287

[89]

GordonI E, RothmanL S, HillC, KochanovR V, TanY, BernathP F, et al. . The HITRAN2016 molecular spectroscopic database. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2017, 203: 3-69.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

204

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/