Deep Learning-Based Blind Denoising for Distributed Acoustic Sensing Seismic Data With Self-Supervised and Transfer Learning

Tianrui Li , Zhengyong Liu , Qi Sui , Chao Lu , Jun Han , Shaoyi Chen , Zhaohui Li

Photonic Sensors ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4) : 250434

PDF
Photonic Sensors ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4) :250434 DOI: 10.1007/s13320-025-0769-x
Regular
research-article

Deep Learning-Based Blind Denoising for Distributed Acoustic Sensing Seismic Data With Self-Supervised and Transfer Learning

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

A distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) technology, extensively utilized in the seabed geological exploration, ocean current analysis, and marine seismic monitoring, faces challenges due to the presence of various noise types in sensing signals, which complicates signal recognition and analysis. This paper introduces a novel deep learning-based strategy for the blind denoising of the DAS seismic data. We propose an advanced neural network training approach that leverages self-supervised learning and transfer learning methodologies, enhanced by the integration of a physical model of seismic transmission. This innovation leads to superior signal correlation across adjacent DAS channels. Our method outperforms other denoising algorithms under identical conditions, achieving the highest windowed signal-to-noise ratio of approximately 26 dB and the fastest processing time of 0.32 seconds, establishing itself as a significant and promising technique for field applications involving DAS data.

Keywords

Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) / seismic denoising / self-supervised learning / transfer learning / deep-learning / data processing

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tianrui Li, Zhengyong Liu, Qi Sui, Chao Lu, Jun Han, Shaoyi Chen, Zhaohui Li. Deep Learning-Based Blind Denoising for Distributed Acoustic Sensing Seismic Data With Self-Supervised and Transfer Learning. Photonic Sensors, 2025, 15(4): 250434 DOI:10.1007/s13320-025-0769-x

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Li J, Kim T, Lapusta N, Biondi E, Zhan Z. The break of earthquake asperities imaged by distributed acoustic sensing. Nature, 2023, 620: 800-806

[2]

Cheng F, Chi B, Lindsey N J, Dawe T C, Ajo-Franklin J B. Utilizing distributed acoustic sensing and ocean bottom fiber optic cables for submarine structural characterization. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 5613

[3]

Jousset P, Reinsch T, Ryberg T, Blanck H, Clarke A, Aghayev R, et al.. Dynamic strain determination using fibre-optic cables allows imaging of seismological and structural features. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(12509

[4]

Li J, Zhu W, Biondi E, Zhan Z. Earthquake focal mechanisms with distributed acoustic sensing. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(14181

[5]

Sladen A, Rivet D, Ampuero J P, De Barros L, Hello Y, Calbris G, et al.. Distributed sensing of earthquakes and ocean-solid Earth interactions on seafloor telecom cables. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(15777

[6]

Williams E F, Fernandez-Ruiz M R, Magalhaes R, Vanthillo R, Zhan Z, González-Herráez M, et al.. Distributed sensing of microseisms and teleseisms with submarine dark fibers. Nature Communications, 2019, 10: 5778

[7]

Fan X, Yang G, Wang S, Liu Q, He Z. Distributed fiber-optic vibration sensing based on phase extraction from optical reflectometry. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2017, 35(163281-3288

[8]

Wang Z, Zhang L, Wang S, Xue N, Peng F, Fan M, et al.. Coherent 0-OTDR based on IQ demodulation and homodyne detection. Optics Express, 2016, 24(2853-858

[9]

Lu Y, Zhu T, Chen L, Bao X. Distributed vibration sensor based on coherent detection of phase-OTDR. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2010, 28(22): 3243-3249

[10]

Shinohara M, Yamada T, Nakahigashi K, Sakai S I, Mochizuki K, Uehira K, et al.. Aftershock observation of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake by using ocean bottom seismometer network. Earth Planets and Space, 2011, 63(1): 835-840

[11]

Rawlinsona N, Pozgaya S, Fishwick S. Seismic tomography: a window into deep earth. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2010, 178(3–4): 101-135

[12]

Chen S, Han J, Sui Q, Zhu K, Lu C, Li Z. Advanced signal processing in distributed acoustic sensors based on submarine cables for seismology applications. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2023, 41(13): 4164-4175

[13]

Ip E, Ravet F, Martins H, Huang M F, Okamoto T, Han S, et al.. Using global existing fiber networks for environmental sensing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2022, 110(11): 1853-1888

[14]

Isken M P, Vasyura-Bathke H, Dahm T, Heimann S. De-noising distributed acoustic sensing data using an adaptive frequency-wavenumber filter. Geophysical Journal International, 2022, 231(2): 944-949

[15]

Kuruguntla L, Dodda V C, Elumalai K. Study of parameters in dictionary learning method for seismic denoising. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2021, 60: 5906213

[16]

Wang X, Ma J. Adaptive dictionary learning for blind seismic data denoising. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2020, 17(7): 1273-1277

[17]

Liu L, Ma J. Structured graph dictionary learning and application on the seismic denoising. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 57(41883-1893

[18]

Hao T, Jing L, He W. An automated GPR signal denoising scheme based on mode decomposition and principal component analysis. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2023, 20: 1-5

[19]

H. Ma, J. Yu, Y. Wang, N. Wu, and Y. Li, “A global and multiscale denoising method based on generative adversarial network for DAS VSP data,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 61: 1–15.

[20]

Dong X, Li Y. Denoising the optical fiber seismic data by using convolutional adversarial network based on loss balance. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2021, 59(12): 10544-10554

[21]

Li Y, Zhang M, Zhao Y, Wu N. Distributed acoustic sensing vertical seismic profile data denoising based on multistage denoising network. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 1-17

[22]

Tian Y, Sui J, Li Y, Wu N, Shao D. A novel iterative PA-MRNet: multiple noise suppression and weak signals recovery for downhole DAS data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 1-14

[23]

Wang M, Deng L, Zhong Y, Zhang J, Peng F. Rapid response DAS denoising method based on deep learning. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2021, 39(8): 2583-2593

[24]

Wang Z, Liu J, Li G, Han H. Blind2Unblind: self-supervised image denoising with visible blind spots. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 202220272036

[25]

Huang T, Li S J, Jia X, Lu H C, Liu J Z. Neighbor2Neighbor self-supervised denoising from single noisy images. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 20211477614785

[26]

Knill A, Buchholz T O, Jug F. Noise2Void -learning denoising from single noisy images. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 201921242132

[27]

van den Ende M, Lior I, Ampuero J P, Sladen A, Ferrari A, Richard C. A self-supervised deep learning approach for blind denoising and waveform coherence enhancement in distributed acoustic sensing data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2023, 34(7): 3371-3384

[28]

Xu Z, Wu B, Yang H. Seismic data random noise attenuation using visible blind spot self-supervised learning. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 202322072210

[29]

Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2015, 2015234241

[30]

Stevenson P R. Microearthquakes at flathead lake, montana: a study using automatic earthquake processing. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1979, 66(1): 61-80

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

131

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/