Development and Experimental Validation of Force-Sensing Biopsy Needle for MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy

Rongrong Liu , Seong Young Ko

Photonic Sensors ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4)

PDF
Photonic Sensors ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4) DOI: 10.1007/s13320-025-0765-1
Regular
research-article

Development and Experimental Validation of Force-Sensing Biopsy Needle for MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

A biopsy needle is an essential surgical tool used to extract several pieces of tissue for diagnosing diseases such as prostate cancer. To facilitate cancer diagnosis, a real-time force-sensing biopsy needle comprising a stylet with an outer tubular sleeve (cannula) was developed in this study. For compatibility with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate biopsy, fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors are embedded into the stylet. The performance of the individual stylet and the entire needle was experimentally evaluated, and the resolutions for force measurement were found to be 1.40 mN and 1.60 mN, respectively, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.6 mN; these are sufficient for differentiating normal prostate tissue from cancer tissue. Since FBG sensors are affected by both strain and temperature, the effects of temperature due to the different sensor positions were analyzed to enable temperature compensation for the needle. The real-time force-sensing performance of the needle was evaluated at room temperature by inserting it into the heated chicken breast, which was used to replicate the typical human body temperature. The forces measured using the proposed needle were observed to be in close agreement with reference measurement from a force gauge; specifically, the measurement errors were found to be 0.021 2 N for the proposed biopsy needle.

Keywords

Prostate biopsy needle / force measurement / FBG sensor / MRI-compatible

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Rongrong Liu, Seong Young Ko. Development and Experimental Validation of Force-Sensing Biopsy Needle for MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy. Photonic Sensors, 2025, 15(4): DOI:10.1007/s13320-025-0765-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

SiegelR L, MillerK D, FuchsH E, JemalA. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2022, 72(1): 7-33

[2]

RawlaP. Epidemiology of prostate cancer. World Journal of Oncology, 2019, 10(2): 63-89.

[3]

XinH, ZelekJ S, CarnahanH. Laparoscopic surgery, perceptual limitations and force: a review. First Canadian Student Conference on Biomedical Computing, 20064449

[4]

ChaddaR, WismathS, HessingerM, SchäferN, SchlaeferA, KupnikM. Needle tip force sensor for medical applications. 2019 IEEE SENSORS, 201914

[5]

SuH, ZervasM, ColeG A, FurlongC, FischerG S. Real-time MRI-guided needle placement robot with integrated fiber optic force sensing. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 201115831588.

[6]

ShangW, SuH, LiG, FurlongC, FischerG S. A Fabry-Perot interferometry based MRI-compatible miniature uniaxial force sensor for percutaneous needle placement. 12th IEEE Sensors 2013 Conference, 201314

[7]

ShiC, TangZ, WangS. Design and experimental validation of a fiber Bragg grating-enabled force sensor with an ortho-planar spring-based flexure for surgical needle insertion. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 2021, 3(2): 362-371.

[8]

LoebS, VellekoopA, AhmedH U, CattoJ, EmbertonM, NamR, et al.. Systematic reviewet al.cations of prostate biopsy. European Urology, 2013, 64(6): 876-892.

[9]

CandefjordS, RamserK, LindahlO A. Technologies for localization and diagnosis of prostate cancer. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 2009, 33(8): 585-603.

[10]

WangX J, WangJ B, LiuY X, ZongH F, CheX Y, ZhengW, et al.. Alterations in meet al.roperties are associated with prostate cancer progression. Medical Oncology, 2014, 31: 1-10

[11]

ZhangQ, YaoJ, CaiY, ZhangL, WuY, XiongJ, et al.. Elevated hardnesset al.eral gland on real-time elastography is an independent marker for high-risk prostate cancers. La radiologia Medica, 2017, 122: 944-951.

[12]

WeissR E, EgorovV, AyrapetyanS, SarvazyanN, SarvazyanA. Prostate mechanical imaging: a new method for prostate assessment. Urology, 2008, 71(3): 425-429.

[13]

DasC J, RazikA, SharmaS, VermaS. Prostate biopsy: when and how to perform. Clinical Radiology, 2019, 74(11): 853-864.

[14]

HoeksC M A, SchoutenM G, BomersJ G R, HoogendoornS P, de KaaC A H, HambrockT, et al.. Three-Tesla magneet al.nce-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. European Urology, 2012, 62(5): 902-909.

[15]

UzunD, ÜlgenO, Kocatürk. Optical force sensor with enhanced resolution for MRI guided biopsy. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020, 20(16): 9202-9208.

[16]

PolygerinosP, SeneviratneL D, RazaviR, SchaeffterT, AlthoeferK. Triaxial catheter-tip force sensor for MRI-guided cardiac procedures. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2012, 18(1): 386-396.

[17]

GonencB, ChamaniA, HandaJ, GehlbachP, TaylorR H, IordachitaI. 3-DOF force-sensing motorized micro-forceps for robot-assisted vitreoretinal surgery. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2017, 17(11): 3526-3541.

[18]

SuH, IordachitaI I, TokudaJ, HataN, LiuX, SeifabadiR. Fiber-optic force sensors for MRI-guided interventions and rehabilitation: a review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2017, 17(7): 1952-1963.

[19]

LiuR, AniqueF, ChenR, OhS S, JoJ K, KoS Y. A novel MR-conditional cam-based automatic prostate biopsy device. Mechatronics, 2023, 91102966.

[20]

LiB, YuanL P. Modeling and analysis of prostate soft tissue puncture performance using puncture needle. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2022, 202216110482

[21]

LiuR R, XuB X, KoS Y. Design of MRI compatible biopsy needle capable of force measurement. 2021 21st International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), 202121612164.

[22]

LiuR, KoS Y. A novel force sensing biopsy needle for MR-compatible robotic biopsy system: performance evaluation. International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems, 2023629636

[23]

AhnB M, KimJ, IanL, RhaK H, KimH J. Mechanical property characterization of prostate cancer using a minimally motorized indenter in an ex vivo indentation experiment. Urology, 2010, 76(4): 1007-1011.

[24]

XuB, KoS Y. Novel force sensing module for a concentric tube-based vitreoretinal surgical robot. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2020, 316112395.

[25]

ShellockF G, ValencerinaS. In vitro evaluation of MR imaging issues at 3T for aneurysm clips made from MP35N: findings and information applied to 155 additional aneurysm clips. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2010, 31(4): 615-619.

[26]

MP35N-Fort Wayne Metals, “MP35N-Alloy,” [Online]. Available, https://fwmetals.com/what-we-do/materials/high-performance-alloys/mp3 5n-alloy, February 2024.

[27]

PodderT K, ShermanJ, ClarkD P, MessingE M, RubensD J, StrangJ G. Evaluation of robotic needle insertion in conjunction with in vivo manual insertion in the operating room. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 20056672

[28]

Eaton-EvansJ, Dulieu-BartonJ M, LittleE G, BrownI A. Thermoelastic studies on Nitinol stents. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 2006, 41(7): 481-495.

[29]

LuJ, ToploskyV J, GoddardR E, HanK. Low temperature physical properties of Co-35Ni-20Cr-10Mo alloy MP35N®. Cryogenics, 2017, 86: 106-111.

[30]

JiangX, WangK, LiJ, ZhanH, SongZ N, CheG H. Optical sensor of thermal gas flow based on fiber Bragg grating. Sensors, 2017, 172374.

[31]

EisakhaniA, GaoX, GorbetR, CulhamJ R. Electrical resistance and natural convection heat transfer modeling of shape memory alloy wires. Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2014V08BT10A014

[32]

YanY, PitchumaniR. Numerical study on the dopant concentration and refractive index profile evolution in an optical fiber manufacturing process. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2006, 49(13–14): 2097-2112.

[33]

TeertstraP. Thermal conductivity and contact resistance measurements for adhesives. International Electronic Packaging Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2007381388

[34]

FrishmanS, KightA, PirozziI, CoffeyM C, DanielB L, CutkoskyM R. Enabling in-bore MRI-guided biopsies with force feedback. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2020, 13(1): 159-166.

[35]

YanK, PodderT, LiL, JosephJ, RubensD R, MessingE M, et al.. A real-time prostet al. detection technique using needle insertion force and patient-specific criteria during percutaneous intervention. Medical Physics, 2009, 36(7): 3356-3362.

[36]

SchoutenM G, BomersJ G R, YakarD, HuismanH, RothgangE, BosboomD, et al.. Evaluation of a ret al.hnique for transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsies. European Radiology, 2012, 22: 476-483.

[37]

ElayaperumalS, BaeJ H, ChristensenD, CutkoskyM R, MoslehiB. MR-compatible biopsy needle with enhanced tip force sensing. 2013 World Haptics Conferenc, 2013109114.

[38]

SuB, YuS, YanH, HuY D, BuzurovicI, LiuD, et al.. Biopsy needle syset al. steerable concentric tube and online monitoring of electrical resistivity and insertion forces. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2021, 68(5): 1702-1713.

[39]

MoZ, XuW. Temperature-compensated optical fiber force sensing at the tip of a surgical needle. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2016, 16(24): 8936-8943.

[40]

LehmannT, RossaC, SlobodaR, UsmaniN, TavakoliM. Needle path control during insertion in soft tissue using a force-sensor-based deflection estimator. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, 201611741179

[41]

UlgenN O, UzunD, KocaturkO. Phantom study of a fiber optic force sensor design for biopsy needles under MRI. Biomedical Optics Express, 2019, 10(1): 242-251.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

136

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/