Actual Sensing Sensitivity and SNR Measurement of Optical Tweezers Based on Coulomb Force Input

Abstract

Sensing sensitivity is the key performance of optical tweezers. By adjusting the frequency and magnitude of an applied Coulomb force as an input of optical tweezers, we directly measured the sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of a system and indirectly calculated the actual noise magnitude. Combined with an output filter, the relationship between the SNR and bandwidths was studied. We established the simulation model of a system using Simulink and simulated the relationship between the SNR and magnitude of the input forces and filter bandwidths. In addition, we built an experimental system to determine the relationship between the SNR and the magnitude of the input forces and filter bandwidths. The actual minimum detectable force was measured as 1.8275×10⁻¹⁷ N at a 1 Hz bandwidth. The experimental results were correlated with the simulation and theoretical results, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed method and demonstrating the high sensitivity of vacuum optical tweezers as mechanical sensors. We proposed a novel method of calibration and measurement of system sensing parameters by applying an actual force that was more direct and precise than the theoretical calculation method that requires accurate fitting parameters, such as the particle radius and density. This method can be employed to analyze the system noise and phase characteristics to confirm and improve the real performance of the system.

Keywords

Optical tweezers / sensitivity / Coulomb force / SNR / Simulink / system noise characteristic

References

[1] Newman R D, Bantel M K. On determining Gusing a cryogenic torsion pendulum. Measurement Science and Technology, 1999, 10(6): 445.

[2] Chaturvedi N A, Lee T, Leok M, McClamroch N H. Nonlinear dynamics of the 3D pendulum. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 2011, 21, 3-32.

[3] Walker G B, Lahoz D G. Experimental observation of Abraham force in a dielectric. Nature, 1975, 253(5490): 339-340.

[4] Klimchitskaya G L, Mostepanenko V M. Experiment and theory in the Casimir effect. Contemporary Physics, 2006, 47(3): 131-144.

[5] Polzin K A, Markusic T E, Stanojev B J, Dehoyos A, Spaun B. Thrust stand for electric propulsion performance evaluation. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2006, 77(10): 105108.

[6] Ranjit G, Cunningham M, Casey K, Geract A A. Zeptonewton force sensing with nanospheres in an optical lattice. Physical Review A, 2016, 93(5): 053801.

[7] Aist J R, Liang H, Berns M W. Astral and spindle forces in PtK2 cells during anaphase B: a laser microbeam study. Journal of Cell Science, 1993, 104, 1207-1216.

[8] Burns M M, Fournier J M, Golovchenko J A. Optical matter: crystallization and binding in intense optical fields. Science, 1990, 249(4970): 749-754.

[9] Steubing R W, Cheng S, Wright W H, Numajiri Y, Berns M W. Laser induced cell fusion in combination with optical tweezers: the laser cell fusion trap. Cytometry, 2010, 12(6): 505-510.

[10] Block S M. Kinesin motor mechanics: binding, stepping, tracking, gating, and limping. Biophysical Journal, 2007, 92(9): 2986-2995.

[11] Okada Y, Hirokawa N. A processive single-headed motor: kinesin superfamily protein KIF1A. Science, 1999, 283(5405): 1152-1157.

[12] Berns M W, Wright W H, Tromberg B J, Walter R J. Use of a laser-induced optical force trap to study chromosome movement on the mitotic spindle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1989, 86(12): 4539-4543.

[13] Nicklas R B. Measurements of the force produced by the mitotic spindle in anaphase. The Journal of Cell Biology, 1983, 97(2): 542-548.

[14] Feng L, Jiao H, Yao B. Sensitivity analysis of light force accelerometer based on optical trapping Mie microsphere. Optoelectronics Letters, 2014, 10(1): 77-80.

[15] Dufresne E R, Grier D G. Optical tweezer arrays and optical substrates created with diffractive optics. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1998, 69(5): 1974-1977.

[16] Burnham D R, Mcgloin D. Holographic optical trapping of aerosol droplets. Optics Express, 2006, 14(9): 4176-4182.

[17] B. Sun, Y. Roichman, and D. G. Grier, “Theory of holographic optical trapping,” Optics Express, 2008(16): 15765–15776.

[18] Wu J G, Ren Y X, Wang Z Q, Zhou C, Li Y M. Time-sharing multiple optical traps using rotating glass plate. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2009, 36(10): 2751-2756.

[19] Yuan L, Liu Z H, Yang J, Guan C Y. Twin-core fiber optical tweezers. Optics Express, 2008, 16(7): 4559-4559.

[20] Ribeiro R R, Soppera O, Oliva A G, Guerreiro A, Jorge P S. New trends on optical fiber tweezers. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2015, 33(16): 3394-3405.

[21] Huisstede J, Rooijen B, Werf K, Bennink M, Subramaniam V. Dependence of silicon position-detector bandwidth on wavelength, power, and bias. Optics Letters, 2006, 31(5): 610-612.

[22] Farré A, Marsà F, Montes-Usategui M. Optimized back-focal-plane interferometry directly measures forces of optically trapped particles. Optics Express, 2012, 20(11): 12270.

[23] Kuehn S, Hickman S A, Marohn J A. Advances in mechanical detection of magnetic resonance. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2008, 128, 052208.

[24] Frimmer M, Luszcz K, Ferreiro S, Jain V, Hebestreit E, Novotny L. Controlling the net charge on a nanoparticle optically levitated in vacuum. Physical Review A, 2017, 95(6): 061801.