Enhancement of FSO communications links under complex environment

Abstract

Free space optical communication is a line-of-sight (LOS) technology that uses lasers to provide optical bandwidth connections. Potential disturbance arising from the weather condition is one of the most effective factors that influence the bi-directional free space optics (FSO) performance. The complex weather condition in the Middle East region and Arabian Gulf has been dominated by dust storms activities. Dust storms directly affect the characteristics of FSO and consequently lead to an increase in the bit error rate (BER) and deterioration Q-factor to bad levels due to the high attenuation factor. In this research, the authors compare the differences between two bi-directional FSOs. One is the traditional link, and the other has been developed to enhance the system performance under the dust storms condition. The proposed design consists of dual FSO channels, and each one includes erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) optical amplifiers. This design has demonstrated the proficiency in addressing the attenuation that occurs due to weather stickers. The results prove there is an improvement in performance by measuring the Q-factor. In addition, BER can be significantly improved, and further communicating distance can be achieved by utilizing 1550 nm with multiple channels and EDFA.

Keywords

FSO / atmospheric attenuation / laser / dust attenuation / EDFA

References

[1] Kim I. I., McArthur B., Korevaar E. J.. Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications. SPIE, 2001, 4214(2): 26-37.

[2] Raja A., Kagalwala Q., Landolsi T., El-Tarhuni M.. Free-space optics channel characterization under UAE^weather conditions. 2007 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications, 2007 856-859.

[3] Perez J., Ghassemlooy Z., Rajbhandari S., Ijaz M., Minh H.. Ethernet FSO^communications link performance study under a controlled fog environment. IEEE Communications Letters, 2012, 16(3): 408-410.

[4] Ghassemlooy Z., Perez J., Leitgeb E.. On the performance of FSO communications links under sandstorm conditions. International Conference on Telecommunications, 2013 53-58.

[5] Karimi M., Nasiri-Kenari M.. Free space optical communications via optical amplify-and-forward relaying. Journal Lightwave Technology, 2011, 29(2): 242-248.

[6] Fadhil H. A., Amphawan A., Shamsuddin H. A. B., Abd T. H., Al-Khafaji H. M. R., Aljunid S., . Optimization of free space optics parameters: an optimum solution for bad weather conditions. Optik–International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 2013, 124(19): 3969-3973.

[7] Mohammed N. A., El-Wakeel A. S., Aly M. H.. Performance evaluation of FSO link under NRZ-RZ line codes, different weather conditions and receiver types in the presence of pointing errors. Open Electrical & Electronic Engineering Journal, 2014, 6(1): 28-35.

[8] Alnajjar S. H., Malek M. S. R. F., Ahmad M. S.. Low-altitude platform to enhance communications reliability in disaster environments. Journal of Advances in Information Technology, 2014, 5(1): 21-30.

[9] Hu Z., Chou H. F., Boors J. E., Blumenthal D. J.. 40-gb/s optical clock recovery using a compact traveling-wave electroabsorption modulator-based ring oscillator. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 2004, 16(5): 1376-1378.

[10] Wandernoth B.. 5 photon/bit low complexity 2 MBit/s PSK transmission breadboard experiment with homodyne receiver applying synchronization bits and convolutional coding. 20th European Conference on Optical Communications, 1994 59-62.