A highly sensitive in-situ turbidity sensor with low power consumption

Abstract

A highly sensitive in-situ turbidity sensor with the low power consumption was proposed and evaluated in this study. To meet the practical requirements of the in-situ detection, we have designed the light scattering path, watertight mechanical structure, and ultra-weak scattering light detecting method. Experiments showed that the sensor had a sensitivity of 0.0076 FTU with the concentration range of 0–25 FTU and the R-square of 0.9999. The sensor could withstand the water pressure in depth of 1000 m and had the low power consumption in the active mode 10.4 mA, sleep mode 65 μA with a supply voltage of 8.4 V. Southern China Sea buoy experiments indicated that the sensor could work well in the actual in-situ environment. In comparison with sensors of other companies, our sensor had relatively more comprehensive performance.

Keywords

In-situ turbidity sensor / high sensitivity / low power consumption / water tight mechanical structure

References

[1] Reiter M, Heffner J T, Beech S, Turner T, Bilby R E. Temporal and spatial turbidity patterns over 30 years in a managed forest of western washington. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2009, 45(3): 793-808.

[2] Chen Z Q, Hu C M, Muller-Karger F. Monitoring turbidity in Tampa Bay using MODIS/Aqua 250-m imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 109(2): 207-220.

[3] Shi W, Wang M H. Characterization of global ocean turbidity from moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer ocean color observations. Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 2010, 115(C17): C11022.

[4] Davies-Colley R J, Smith D G. Turbidity, suspended sediment, and water clarity: a review. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2001, 37(5): 1085-1101.

[5] Gohin F. Annual cycles of chlorophyll-a, non-algal suspended particulate matter, and turbidity observed from space and in-situ in coastal waters. Ocean Science, 2011, 7(5): 705-732.

[6] Loperfido J V, Just C L, Papanicolaou A N, Schnoor J L. In situ sensing to understand diel turbidity cycles, suspended solids, and nutrient transport in clear creek, Iowa. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46(6): W06525.

[7] Lawler D M, Petts G E, Foster I D L, Harper S. Turbidity dynamics during spring storm events in an urban headwater river system: the upper tame, west midlands, UK. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 360(1–3): 109-126.

[8] Lawler D M, Brown R M. A simple and inexpensive turbidity meter for the estimation of suspended sediment concentrations. Hydrological Processes, 1992, 6(2): 159-168.

[9] Erickson T, Division M S, Honeywell I, Freeport I L. Turbidity sensing as a building block for smart appliances. IEEE Industry Application Magazine, 1997, 3(3): 31-36.

[10] Mylvaganam S, Jakobsen T. Turbidity sensor for underwater applications — sensor design and system performance with calibration results. Ocean’98 — Conference Proceedings, 1998, 1–3, 158-161.

[11] Orwin J F, Smart C C. An inexpensive turbidimeter for monitoring suspended sediment. Geomorphology, 2005, 68(1-2): 3-15.

[12] Dasgupta P K, Eom I Y, Morris K J, Li J Z. Light emitting diode-based detectors absorbance, fluorescence and spectroelectrochemical measurements in a planar flow-through cell. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2003, 500(1-2): 337-364.

[13] Hong Z, Bao C F, Qiu W F, Lu Z K. On-line turbidity measurement using light surface scattering. Automated Optical Inspection for Industry: Theory, Technology, and Applications Ii, 1998, 3558, 28-30.

[14] Ebie K, Yamaguchi D, Hoshikawa H, Shirozu T. New measurement principle and basic performance of high-sensitivity turbidimeter with two optical systems in series. Water Research, 2006, 40(4): 683-691.

[15] Ren K F, Xu F, Cai X S, Dorey J M. Development of a precise and in situ turbidity measurement system. Chemical Engineering Communications, 2009, 197(2): 250-259.