Advances in examination methods for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of techniques for evaluating patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). It encompasses the history, clinical examinations, and diagnostic imaging methods for AIS. These methods include digital radiological examination, EOS® imaging, nuclear medicine, ultrasound, body surface topography techniques such as the Moiré pattern technique, raster stereophotography, and DIERS formetric 4D as well as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Traditionally, full-spine standing X-rays have been the standard for diagnosing AIS. High-quality clinical assessments may continue as a reference for assessing other spinal deformities. However, the new diagnostic imaging methods aim to reduce radiation exposure while maintaining image quality and practicality. Emerging technologies demonstrate strong reliability and effectiveness in diagnostic imaging of AlS. These techniques may be beneficial for diagnosing and monitoring AIS and its progression without requiring high levels of radiation exposure. The article is a search and summary of the PubMed electronic database to understand the current and future status of AIS imaging technology, which can not only help to introduce other researchers to the field but also serve as a valuable source for healthcare professionals to study existing methods, develop new ones, or select evaluation strategies.

Keywords

adolescent idiopathic scoliosis / diagnostic imaging / radiological examination / surface topography / ultrasound

References

[1] Tabard-Fougère A, Bonnefoy-Mazure A, Hanquinet S, Lascombes P, Armand S, Dayer R. Validity and reliability of spine rasterstereography in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2017; 42(2): 98-105.

[2] Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, et al. Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis US preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc. 2018; 319(2): 165-172.

[3] Bettany-Saltikov J, Weiss HR, Chockalingam N, et al. Surgical versus non-surgical interventions in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 32(4):Cd010663.

[4] Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L, et al. 2011 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis. 2012; 7(1):3.

[5] Lonstein JE. Scoliosis - surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 443: 248-259.

[6] Kotwicki T. Evaluation of scoliosis today: examination, X-rays and beyond. Disabil Rehabil. 2008; 30(10): 742-751.

[7] Lectures on the pathology and treatment of lateral and other forms of curvature of the spine: review. Br Foreign Medico-Chirurg Rev. 1865; 36(72): 367-372.

[8] Karpiel I, Ziebinski A, Kluszczynski M, Feige D. A survey of methods and technologies used for diagnosis of scoliosis. Sensors. 2021; 21(24):8410.

[9] Jin C, Wang SR, Yang GD, Li E, Liang ZZ. A review of the methods on cobb angle measurements for spinal curvature. Sensors. 2022; 22(9): 19-3258.

[10] Zhou GQ, Jiang WW, Lai KL, Zheng YP. Automatic measurement of spine curvature on 3-D ultrasound volume projection image with phase features. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2017; 36(6): 1250-1262.

[11] Nash CL Jr, Moe JH. A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. 1969; 51(2): 223-229.

[12] Stokes IA. Axial rotation component of thoracic scoliosis. J Orthop Res. 1989; 7(5): 702-708.

[13] Asher MA, Burton DC. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis. 2006; 1(1):2.

[14] Watanabe K, Aoki Y, Matsumoto M. An application of artificial intelligence to diagnostic imaging of spine disease: estimating spinal alignment from moire images. Neurospine. 2019; 16(4): 697-702.

[15] Molnar S, Mano S, Kiss L, Csernatony Z. Ex vivo and in vitro determination of the axial rotational axis of the human thoracic spine. Spine. 2006; 31(26): E984-E991.

[16] Smith RM, Pool RD, Butt WP, Dickson RA. The transverse plane deformity of structural scoliosis. Spine. 1991; 16(9): 1126-1129.

[17] Gregersen GG, Lucas DB. An in vivo study of the axial rotation of the human thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. 1967; 49(2): 247-262.

[18] Glaser DA, Doan J, Newton PO. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography. Spine. 2012; 37(16): 1391-1397.

[19] Brooks HL, Azen SP, Gerberg E, Brooks R, Chan L. Scoliosis: a prospective epidemiological study. Comparative Study. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. 1975; 57(7): 968-972.

[20] Wessberg P, Danielson BI, Willén J. Comparison of Cobb angles in idiopathic scoliosis on standing radiographs and supine axially loaded MRI. Spine. 2006; 31(26): 3039-3044.

[21] Lee MC, Solomito M, Patel A. Supine magnetic resonance imaging cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs. Spine. 2013; 38(11): E656-E661.

[22] Brink RC, Colo D, Schlosser TPC, et al. Upright, prone, and supine spinal morphology and alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017; 12(1): 6.

[23] Addai D, Zarkos J, Bowey AJ. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Child's Nerv Syst. 2020; 36(6): 1111-1119.

[24] Brink RC, Homans JF, Schloesser TPC, et al. CT-based study of vertebral and intravertebral rotation in right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2019; 28(12): 3044-3052.

[25] Nokes SR, Murtagh FR, Jones JD, et al. Childhood scoliosis: MR imaging. Radiology. 1987; 164(3): 791-797.

[26] Barnes PD, Brody JD, Jaramillo D, Akbar JU, Emans JB. Atypical idiopathic scoliosis: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology. 1993; 186(1): 247-253.

[27] Krismer M, Sterzinger W, Haid C, Frischhut B, Bauer R. Axial rotation measurement of scoliotic vertebrae by means of computed tomography scans. Spine. 1996; 21(5): 576-581.

[28] Rogers BP, Haughton VM, Arfanakis K, Meyerand ME. Application of image registration to measurement of intervertebral rotation in the lumbar spine. Magn Reson Med. 2002; 48(6): 1072-1075.

[29] Rogers B, Wiese S, Blankenbaker D, Meyerand E, Haughton V. Accuracy of an automated method to measure rotations of vertebrae from computerized tomography data. Spine. 2005; 30(6): 694-696.

[30] Carro PA. Magnetic resonance imaging in children with scoliosis. Semin Muscoskel Radiol. 1999; 3(3): 257-266.

[31] Charpak G. Prospects for the use in medicine of new detectors of ionizing radiation. Les perspectives ouvertes, pour la medecine, par les nouveaux detecteurs de rayonnements ionisants. Bull Acad Nat Med. 1996; 180(1): 161-168. discussion 168–169.

[32] Garg B, Mehta N, Bansal T, Malhotra R. EOS® imaging: concept and current applications in spinal disorders. J Clin Orthopaed Trauma. 2020; 11(5): 786-793.

[33] Suzuki S, Yamamuro T, Shikata J, Shimizu K, Iida H. Ultrasound measurement of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1989; 71(2): 252-255.

[34] Zheng Y.-P, Lee TT.-Y, Lai KK.-L, et al. A reliability and validity study for Scolioscan: a radiation-free scoliosis assessment system using 3D ultrasound imaging. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016; 11(1): 13.

[35] Brink RC, Wijdicks SPJ, Tromp IN, et al. A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J. 2018; 18(6): 979-985.

[36] Wong YS, Lai KKL, Zheng YP, et al. Is radiation-free ultrasound accurate for quantitative assessment of spinal deformity in idiopathic scoliosis (IS): a detailed analysis with EOS radiography on 952 patients. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019; 45(11): 2866-2877.

[37] Jiang W, Chen X, Yu C. A real-time freehand 3D ultrasound imaging method for scoliosis assessment. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022; 23(8).

[38] Drerup B, Hierholzer E. Automatic localization of anatomical landmarks on the back surface and construction of a body-fixed coordinate system.J Biomech. 1987; 20(10): 961-970.

[39] Frerich JM, Hertzler K, Knott P, Mardjetko S. Comparison of radiographic and surface topography measurements in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Open Orthop J. 2012; 6(1): 261-265.

[40] Hackenberg L, Hierholzer E, Pötzl W, Götze C, Liljenqvist U. Rasterstereographic back shape analysis in idiopathic scoliosis after anterior correction and fusion. Clin Biomech. 2003; 18(1): 1-8.

[41] Hackenberg L, Hierholzer E, Pötzl W, Götze C, Liljenqvist U. Rasterstereographic back shape analysis in idiopathic scoliosis after posterior correction and fusion. Clin Biomech. 2003; 18(10): 883-889.

[42] Ito Y, Doi T, Ohtomo N, et al. A novel screening method for scoliosis using a bodysuit and 3-dimensional imaging. Spine. 2023; 48(18): 1289-1294.

[43] Degenhardt B, Starks Z, Bhatia S, Franklin G.-A. Appraisal of the DIERS method for calculating postural measurements: an observational study. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017; 12(1): 28.

[44] Schulte TL, Hierholzer E, Boerke A, et al. Raster stereography versus radiography in the long-term follow-up of idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008; 21(1): 23-28.

[45] Krott NL, Wild M, Betsch M. Meta-analysis of the validity and reliability of rasterstereographic measurements of spinal posture. Eur Spine J. 2020; 29(9): 2392-2401.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Pediatric Discovery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.