Risk factors associated with morbidity and unfavorable treatment outcome in drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: a case-control study

Changshu Li , Shufan Liang , Xue Wang , Su Lui , Chengdi Wang

Precision Clinical Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) : pbaf008

PDF (881KB)
Precision Clinical Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2) :pbaf008 DOI: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbaf008
Research Article
research-article

Risk factors associated with morbidity and unfavorable treatment outcome in drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: a case-control study

Author information +
History +
PDF (881KB)

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the risk factors in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) and clinical characteristics related to unfavorable anti-TB treatment outcomes.

Methods: A total of 961 pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients were included at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2008 to November 2023. We analyzed the differences of clinical characteristics between DR-TB and drug-sensitive tuberculosis (DS-TB), and then compared these features in DR-TB patients with different outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to quantify risk factors associated with DR-TB and adverse treatment outcomes.

Results: Among 961 pulmonary TB patients, a history of anti-TB treatment [odds ratio (OR), 3.289; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.359-4.604] and CT-scan cavities (OR, 1.512; 95% CI, 1.052-2.168) increased DR-TB risk. A total of 214 DR-TB patients were followed for a median of 24.5 months. Among them, 116/214 (54.2%) patients achieved favorable outcomes. Prior anti-TB treatment (OR, 1.927; 95% CI, 1.033-3.640), multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) (OR, 2.558; 95% CI, 1.272-5.252), positive sputum bacteriology (OR, 2.116; 95% CI, 1.100-4.134), and pleural effusion (OR, 2.097; 95% CI, 1.093-4.082) were associated with unfavorable outcomes, while isoniazid-resistant TB patients showed better outcomes (OR, 0.401; 95% CI, 0.181-0.853). The clinical model for unfavorable outcome prediction of DR-TB achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.754 (95% CI, 0.690-0.818).

Conclusions: Treatment history of anti-TB not only increases the risk of the emergence of DR-TB, but also potentially leads to treatment failure during re-treatment in DR-TB patients. Drug resistance subtypes, radiological characteristics, and the results of sputum smear or culture may affect the treatment outcome of DR-TB.

Keywords

drug-resistant tuberculosis / multidrug-resistant tuberculosis / anti-TB treatment / clinical characteristics / risk factors / treatment outcome

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Changshu Li, Shufan Liang, Xue Wang, Su Lui, Chengdi Wang. Risk factors associated with morbidity and unfavorable treatment outcome in drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: a case-control study. Precision Clinical Medicine, 2025, 8(2): pbaf008 DOI:10.1093/pcmedi/pbaf008

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 82341083), the 1.3.5 Project for Disciplines Excellence of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (grant No. ZYYC23027), the 1·3·5 projects for Artificial Intelligence of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (grant No. ZYAI24016), and the 1·3·5 Project of State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and Multimorbidity, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (grant No. RHM24208). We are grateful to the staff in our research groups involved in the study for their valuable contributions and discussions.

Author contributions

Changshu Li (Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing), Shufan Liang (Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft), Xue Wang (Data curation), Su Lui (Project administration, Writing - review & editing), and Chengdi Wang (Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision).

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at PCMEDI Journal online.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Ethics statement

This study was conducted in strict accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, ensuring ethical integrity and participant rights. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to sample collection, following standard ethical guidelines. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Approval No. 2023.2286). Informed consent, either verbal or written, was obtained as per local regulatory requirements, except in cases where waivers or exemptions were granted by the respective ethics committee.

References

[1]

Global Tuberculosis Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024. https://www.who.int/teams/global-programme-on-tuberculosis-and-lung-health/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2024.

[2]

GBD 2021 Tuberculosis Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-specific progress towards the 2020 milestones of the WHO End TB Strategy: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Infect Dis 2024;24:698-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00007-0.

[3]

Trajman A, Campbell JR, Kunor T et al. Tuberculosis. Lancet 2025;405:850-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02479-6.

[4]

Burki T. Excess tuberculosis deaths in the WHO European region. Lancet Infect Dis 2024;24:e287-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00250-0.

[5]

Gai X, Allwood B, Sun Y. Advances in the awareness of tuberculosis-associated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin Med J Pulm Crit Care Med 2024;2:250-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pccm.2024.08.008.

[6]

van der Zalm MM, Jongen VW, Swanepoel R et al. Impaired lung function in adolescents with pulmonary tuberculosis during treatment and following treatment completion. eClinicalMedicine 2024;67:102406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102406.

[7]

Zhuang L, Yang L, Li L et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: immune response, biomarkers, and therapeutic intervention. MedComm 2024;5:e419. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.419.

[8]

Furin J, Cox H, Pai M. Tuberculosis. Lancet 2019;393:1642-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30308-3.

[9]

Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 2022;399:629-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02653-2.

[10]

Farhat M, Cox H, Ghanem M et al. Drug-resistant tuberculosis: a persistent global health concern. Nat Rev Microbiol 2024;22:61735. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-024-01025-1.

[11]

Andrews JR. Recasting resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Immunol 2024;25:1316-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-024-01907-9.

[12]

Chen X, Hu TY. Strategies for advanced personalized tuberculosis diagnosis: current technologies and clinical approaches. Precis Clin Med 2021;4:35-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcmedi/pbaa041.

[13]

Li T, Zhang B, Du X et al. Recurrent pulmonary tuberculosis in China, 2005 to 2021. JAMA Netw Open 2024;7:e2427266. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.27266.

[14]

Zhao Y, Xu S, Wang L et al. National survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2161-70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1108789.

[15]

Dong Z, Wang QQ, Yu SC et al. Age-period-cohort analysis of pulmonary tuberculosis reported incidence, China, 2006-2020. Infect Dis Poverty 2022;11:85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-022-01009-4.

[16]

Dooley KE, Hendricks B, Gupte N et al. Assessing pretomanid for tuberculosis (APT), a randomized phase 2 trial of pretomanidcontaining regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis: 12-week results. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023;207:929-35. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202208-14750C.

[17]

Maier C, Chesov D, Schaub D et al. Long-term treatment outcomes in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2023;29:751-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2023.02.013.

[18]

Li B, Wang W, Zhao L et al. Photothermal therapy of tuberculosis using targeting pre-activated macrophage membrane-coated nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol 2024;19:834-45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024-01618-0.

[19]

Motta I, Boeree M, Chesov D et al. Recent advances in the treatment of tuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2024;30:1107-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2023.07.013.

[20]

Naidoo K, Perumal R. Advances in tuberculosis control during the past decade. Lancet Respir Med 2023;11:311-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00090-5.

[21]

Hoelscher M, Barros-Aguirre D, Dara M et al. Candidate antituberculosis medicines and regimens under clinical evaluation. Clin Microbiol Infect 2024;30:1131-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2024.06.016.

[22]

Dean AS, Tosas Auguet O, Glaziou P et al. 25 years of surveillance of drug-resistant tuberculosis: achievements, challenges, and way forward. Lancet Infect Dis 2022;22:e191-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00808-2.

[23]

Baya B, Achenbach CJ, Kone B et al. Clinical risk factors associated with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Mali. Int J Infect Dis 2019;81:149-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2019.02.004.

[24]

Bachir M, Guglielmetti L, Tunesi S et al. Isoniazid-monoresistant tuberculosis in France: risk factors, treatment outcomes and adverse events. Int J Infect Dis 2021;107:86-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.093.

[25]

de Dieu Longo J, Woromogo SH, Tekpa G et al. Risk factors for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the Central African Republic: a case-control study. J Infect Public Health 2023;16:1341-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2023.06.007.

[26]

Oehadian A, Bastos ML, Centis R et al. Occurrence and predictors of adverse events associated with linezolid in the treatment of patients with MDR-TB. Pulmonology 2024;30:184-7. https://10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.09.003.

[27]

Zhou G, Luo S, He J et al. Effectiveness and safety of tuberculosis preventive treatment for contacts of patients with multidrugresistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2024;30:189-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2023.09.015.

[28]

Wang G, Jiang G, Jing W et al. Prevalence and molecular characterizations of seven additional drug resistance among multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in China: a subsequent study of a national survey. J Infect 2021;82:371-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.02.004.

[29]

Zheng X, Davies Forsman L, Bao Z et al. Drug exposure and susceptibility of second-line drugs correlate with treatment response in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a multicentre prospective cohort study in China. Eur Respir J 2022;59:2101925. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01925-2021.

[30]

Liang S, Xu X, Yang Z et al. Deep learning for precise diagnosis and subtype triage of drug-resistant tuberculosis on chest computed tomography. MedComm 2024;5:e487. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.487.

[31]

Linh NN, Viney K, Gegia M et al. World Health Organization treatment outcome definitions for tuberculosis: 2021 update. Eur Respir J 2021;58:2100804. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00804-2021.

[32]

Pradipta IS, Forsman LD, Bruchfeld J et al. Risk factors of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect 2018;77:469-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2018.10.004.

[33]

Tiberi S, Utjesanovic N, Galvin J et al. Drug resistant TB- latest developments in epidemiology, diagnostics and management. Int J Infect Dis 2022;124Suppl 1:S20-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.03.026.

[34]

Conradie F, Bagdasaryan TR, Borisov S et al. Bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 2022;387:810-23. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2119430.

[35]

Pedersen OS, Butova T, Kapustnyk V et al. Treatment outcomes and risk factors for an unsuccessful outcome among patients with highly drug-resistant tuberculosis in Ukraine. Clin Microbiol Infect 2024;30:360-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2023.12.001.

[36]

Dookie N, Ngema SL, Perumal R et al. The changing paradigm of drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment: successes, pitfalls, and future perspectives. Clin Microbiol Rev 2022;35:e0018019. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00180-19.

[37]

Pedersen OS, Holmgaard FB, Mikkelsen MKD et al. Global treatment outcomes of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect 2023;87:177-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2023.06.014.

[38]

Derendinger B, Dippenaar A, de Vos M et al. Bedaquiline resistance in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in Cape Town, South Africa: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Microbe 2023;4:e972-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00172-6.

[39]

Gegia M, Winters N, Benedetti A et al. Treatment of isoniazidresistant tuberculosis with first-line drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2017;17:223-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30407-8.

[40]

Wang M, Guo X, Yang X et al. Mycobacterial dynamin-like protein IniA mediates membrane fission. Nat Commun 2019;10:3906. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11860-z.

[41]

Khan SR, Manialawy Y, Siraki AG et al. Isoniazid and host immune system interactions: a proposal for a novel comprehensive mode of action. Br J Pharmacol 2019;176:4599-608. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14867.

[42]

Dheda K, Limberis JD, Pietersen E et al. Outcomes, infectiousness, and transmission dynamics of patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis and home-discharged patients with programmatically incurable tuberculosis: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2017;5:269-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30433-7.

[43]

Ahmad N, Ahuja SD, Akkerman OW et al. Treatment correlates of successful outcomes in pulmonary multidrugresistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet 2018;392:821-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31644-1.

[44]

Günther G, Guglielmetti L, Leu C et al. Availability and costs of medicines for the treatment of tuberculosis in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 2023;29:77-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.026.

[45]

Wulandari DA, Hartati YW, Ibrahim AU et al. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Clin Chim Acta 2024;559:119701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2024.119701.

[46]

Rivière E, Whitfield MG, Nelen J et al. Identifying isoniazid resistance markers to guide inclusion of high-dose isoniazid in tuberculosis treatment regimens. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020;26:1332-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.004.

[47]

Van Deun A, Decroo T, Aung KJM et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis borderline rpoB mutations: emerging from the unknown. Eur Respir J 2021;58:2100783. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00783-2021.

[48]

Laws M, Jin P, Rahman KM et al. Efflux pumps in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their inhibition to tackle antimicrobial resistance. Trends Microbiol 2022;30:57-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2021.05.001.

[49]

Earp JC, Garaeva AA, Meikle V et al. Structural basis of siderophore export and drug efflux by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Commun 2025;16:1934. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56888-6.

[50]

Tam HK, Foong WE, Oswald C et al. Allosteric drug transport mechanism of multidrug transporter AcrB. Nat Commun 2021;12:3889. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24151-3.

[51]

Wang S, Wang K, Song K et al. Structures of the mycobacterium tuberculosis efflux pump EfpA reveal the mechanisms of transport and inhibition. Nat Commun 2024;15:7710. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51948-9.

[52]

Sakatos A, Babunovic GH, Chase MR et al. Posttranslational modification of a histone-like protein regulates phenotypic resistance to isoniazid in mycobacteria. Sci Adv 2018;4:eaao1478. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao1478.

[53]

Zhao D, Qiang L, Lei Z et al. TRIM27 elicits protective immunity against tuberculosis by activating TFEB-mediated autophagy flux. Autophagy 2024;7:1483-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2024.2321831.

[54]

Cheng N, Wu S, Luo X et al. A comparative study of chest computed tomography findings: 1030 cases of drug-sensitive tuberculosis versus 516 cases of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Infect Drug Resist 2021;14:1115-28. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S300754.

[55]

Li Y, Wang B, Wen L et al. Machine learning and radiomics for the prediction of multidrug resistance in cavitary pulmonary tuberculosis: a multicentre study. Eur Radiol 2023;33:391-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08997-9.

[56]

Khan RMN, Ahn YM, Marriner GA et al. Distributable, metabolic PET reporting of tuberculosis. Nat Commun 2024;15:5239. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48691-6.

[57]

Zhang S, Qiu L, Wu D et al. Predictors for treatment outcomes in patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis- China, 20182020. China CDC Wkly 2022;4:907-11. https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2022.187.

[58]

Viney K, Linh NN, Gegia M et al. New definitions of preextensively and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: update from the World Health Organization. Eur Respir J 2021;57:2100361. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00361-2021.

[59]

Meehan CJ, Goig GA, Kohl TA et al. Whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: current standards and open issues. Nat Rev Microbiol 2019;17:533-45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0214-5.

[60]

Schwab TC, Perrig L, Göller PC et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing to diagnose drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2024;24:1162-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00263-9.

[61]

Pei S, Song Z, Yang W et al. The catalogue of Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutations associated with drug resistance to 12 drugs in China from a nationwide survey: a genomic analysis. Lancet Microbe 2024;5:100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00131-9.

[62]

Liu D, Huang F, Zhang G et al. Whole-genome sequencing for surveillance of tuberculosis drug resistance and determination of resistance level in China. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022;28:731.e915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.014.

[63]

Shen MT, Liu X, Gao Y et al. Radiomics-based quantitative contrast-enhanced CT analysis of abdominal lymphadenopathy to differentiate tuberculosis from lymphoma. Precis Clin Med 2024;7:pbae002. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcmedi/pbae002.

[64]

Shao J, Ma J, Yu Y et al. A multimodal integration pipeline for accurate diagnosis, pathogen identification, and prognosis prediction of pulmonary infections. Innovation 2024;5:100648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100648.

[65]

Kamran F, Tang S, Otles E, et al. Early identification of patients admitted to hospital for COVID-19 at risk of clinical deterioration: model development and multisite external validation study. BMJ 2022;376:e068576. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068576.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (881KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/